"Be sceptical, ask questions, demand proof. Demand evidence. Don’t take anything for granted. But here’s the thing: When you get proof, you need to accept the proof. And we’re not that good at doing that." - Michael Specter
"Be sceptical, ask questions, demand proof. Demand evidence. Don’t take anything for granted. But here’s the thing: When you get proof, you need to accept the proof. And we’re not that good at doing that." - Michael Specter
FYI, US casualties during Operation Desert Storm amounted to 770: https://dcas.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/conflictCasualties/gulf/stormsum Trump and his regime still claims they don't need the approval of Congress for the war against Iran, because it's not a "real" war.
While I wouldn't call it an advertisment, my main issue is that I need to create an account to access it. Providing a source is a bit pointless in a social media context when the readers can't (easily) access the source.
The Office of the Attending Physician, a federal agency, stated in writing that he's "maintained a strenuous course of physical therapy and rehabilitation, including multiple sessions a day designed to rebuild strength and reduce the risk of future falls": https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yd8k3rgj7o So either the world's most incompetent regime somehow manages to pull an ongoing cover-up on a level only seen in Hollywood movies, or a bunch of social media nutcases are making shit up again.
They don't even have a "proof of competency" should the President order a nuclear strike, just a "proof of authenticity" to make sure that it's the President who gives the order.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutrality_in_languages_with_gendered_third-person_pronouns#Generic_he
I wanted to call the ICC about it but then remembered that the US doesn't recognize it.
To me it sounds nonsensical to have a "chief" executive/technology/financial officer if there's no one reporting to them. A single indian is an indian, not a chieftain.
They already knew all they needed to know about him. He had been send back to Germany for trying to enter Syria to join ISIS, sentenced for violent crimes and preparation of a terror attack. The German justice system had been fully aware of him. Just like they had been aware of the islamic terrorist who killed 13 people and injured 67 in Berlin in 2016. Today our politicians repeat the same thing they said 10 years ago: "We need to check if something needs to be changed." and then do nothing.
That already happened...in Berlin...10 years ago...when another vehicle was steered by an Islamic fundamentalist into a crowd of people. No AI needed, just a sufficiently well designed automatic breaking system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Berlin_truck_attack
"The family" is one guy speaking English in an interview by the BBC. Don't use an English source for a Swiss pronounciation but rather the Swiss public broadcast: https://www.srf.ch/play/tv/einstein/video/leonhard-euler?urn=urn:srf:video:cd704cf5-f16f-4f30-9f45-61c64b5e97ef (at 1:58)
My guess is that he's pronouncing it that way because he has to speak English and tries to pronounce it English for that reason. It's *definitely* not the right - original - way to pronounce it. Maybe use a Swiss (SRF) sound source instead of a British (BBC) one: https://www.srf.ch/play/tv/einstein/video/leonhard-euler?urn=urn:srf:video:cd704cf5-f16f-4f30-9f45-61c64b5e97ef (at 1:58) - and drop the insults. You're making a fool out of yourself.
It's even better. Not only did the Greece pick themselves as "most corrupt", they also picked themselves to be the "most hardworking": https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2012/05/29/european-unity-on-the-rocks/
It's BS. The correct pronounciation is "OY-luhr": https://www.oed.com/dictionary/euler_n I'm a native German speaker and never heard it proncouned any different, neither in school nor in my STEM studies at the university.
Native German speaker here. It's pronounced "OY-luhr". The Oxford English Dictionary says so, too: https://www.oed.com/dictionary/euler_n It never occured to me how someone could pronounce it "YOO-luh", but I guess if the language you try to integrate it in is far enough away from the original language of the name, it's possible. Wrong, but possible. There's a variation of the name Euler in the US that is spelled Oyler - probably because people were fed up with having their name mispronounced.
" V-1 rockets with a propeller in the back" I need you to read this slowly and think about what's the problem with it.
Cats who are fed with dry food need a source of water, that's correct. But cats in general don't need "a lot of water". Our house cats descended from wild cats that lived in deserts. Their kidneys are so effective that they are able to drink salt water and, if healthy and on a proper diet (not dry food), they can survive by drawing water from the food they eat. Nevertheless, a source of water should be made available, if just for comfort. But they aren't animals that need "a lot of water".
It could be argued that Kim Il Sung was a more successful fascist than Franco. But then a bunch of people, who don't know much about North Korea, would argue that Kim Il Sung was a communist, not a fascist.
Houthis and Saudi-Arabia have been at war with each other for 11 years and Iran has supported the Houthis just as long, as it is uses them to fight a proxy war against Saudi-Arabia. Shipping in the strait of Bab al-Mandab has been attacked several times in the past years. I'm not defending the current US policies here, but this is really just hot air blown into a balloon that has been growing and shrinking since at least 2023: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Sea_crisis
People that wear socks in bed have lost control over their life.
If you want to go down a rabbit hole read about the "oil campaign of WW2". To the complete surprise of Nazi leadership, for most of the war the allied bombers ignored Axis oil production - which is largely due to "Bomber Harris" who thought bombing Germany cities would make Germany surrender. When the allies finally gave priority to bombing Axis oil production in 1944, it was "effective immediately, and decisive within less than a year": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_campaign_of_World_War_II
Looking at their YT channel, the majority of shorts like this are titled "Audio by [creator]".
I get what you're trying to say, but this guy said he found a source after having searched "37 seconds" and it actually says nothing what is claimed that it says: /gallery/8WFPkY3/comment/2506738707
The source you linked does not inlcude *any* quote of Hillary that shows she "promised military consequences". Furthermore, the statement that a source was asked for also included the claim that "all you morons said she was evil for it". That isn't even touched by that "source". I write "source" in quotation marks because it's not actually a source for anything that is being talked about in this discussion - neither the accusation against Hillary nor against "us".