289 pts · September 9, 2017
No blackout that announces its end before it begins has a chance of working.
There is but I can think of a grand total of one person who does so. 99.999% of AI 'creators' use it as a replacement instead of a tool.
Sadly, I think that either he or his handlers know *exactly* what that was and this is to prime their base for the inevitable claims of voter fraud if he loses Arizona.
I think Germany after WW2 is a better comparison, given that actually worked.
They can use all the AI they want, it's not gonna capture the magic. Gene Wilder's voice isn't why he nailed the role and Netflix doesn't have the balls to try.
That and educating to *educate* rather than educating to get good scores on tests.
...*why?*
I actually haven't. I am, however, wondering why anyone would give a fuck what colour the clouds are.
How well has that worked for you so far?
Is the chair noticeable smaller or does it just look noticeably smaller because of the noticeably bigger occupant?
But it's not just prompts. They've shown their process - It's outlining the image, it's manually touching up what the AI gives them, it is someone that before AI was making images making full, realistic looking, TV episode length videos on the same topic, something they couldn't do before not because of a lack of *creativity* but because of a lack of tools. 99.9999% of people use it as a replacement, and that's very bad, but used as a tool it can be good.
AI can be used with creativity, it's a tool like any other. But I only know of one person who does that.
I'm pretty sure the idea is that it's accurate information just delivered in a dishonest way.
All corporations, not just AI ones.
Anyone who calls themself in alpha is correct, but not in the way they think they are.
TIL.
I wouldn't say *all* excuses are pathetic - It's a tool like any other. But 99.9999999999999999% of people who use it - if not *more* - Do not use it like a tool, they use it like a replacement. I can only think of one person who doesn't - Before AI came out they drew pictures, now they can make a good looking >20 minute video. And they've shown their process, which shows there's still a lot of individual talent and work put in.
Anything can be a UFO if you're bad enough at identifying things.
#45 It doesn't help that they seem to have broke something in CoD's updates that causes the size to balloon when you update it.
While I agree, I think Buzzfeed in particular was the reverse - They went broke, then went AI as a last ditch cost cutting measure.
And that is why using AI for anything that *needs* to be trusted is stupid at best and dangerous at the far more common worst.
I don't think it's just about performance. Bit anecdotal but Call of Duty Ghosts had some of the biggest maps in COD history, easily big enough for shotguns to have a bit more realism - It's also one of the most disliked COD games and while the maps weren't the *only* reason, they were a big one.
Which I also didn't buy, but not because of pirating.
#31 Honestly the £60 remasters aren't even my main reason for emulating, it's the fact that the only option for old pokémon games is paying £200+ on Ebay unless it's Firered and Leafgreen since like... the start of the month.
And that's why using AI for anything that involves an opinion is stupid at best, and downright *dangerous* at worst. Same goes for anything that needs to be reliable tbh.
#24 The first one actually looks kind of cute. The second looks ike something from a fucking creepypasta though.
He is completely incapable of realizing that not everyone thinks the way he does.
Good. While screens do have a place in the classroom - If nothing else there's some things that can only be learned with a screen, and even without that computers are important enough in the modern world that learning how to use one should probably be a necessary part of schooling - A lot of places went *way* too far on it.
That's what happens when people don't understand what it is. ChatGPT and the like do one thing - Give something that sounds like a response to the input they are given. It was asked should you walk somewhere 300 metres away so it gave something that sounded like a reaponse to that, as despite being called AI it is not intelligent and therefore doesn't understand that this wouldn't work.
No blackout that announces its end before it begins has a chance of working.
There is but I can think of a grand total of one person who does so. 99.999% of AI 'creators' use it as a replacement instead of a tool.
Sadly, I think that either he or his handlers know *exactly* what that was and this is to prime their base for the inevitable claims of voter fraud if he loses Arizona.
I think Germany after WW2 is a better comparison, given that actually worked.
They can use all the AI they want, it's not gonna capture the magic. Gene Wilder's voice isn't why he nailed the role and Netflix doesn't have the balls to try.
That and educating to *educate* rather than educating to get good scores on tests.
...*why?*
I actually haven't. I am, however, wondering why anyone would give a fuck what colour the clouds are.
How well has that worked for you so far?
Is the chair noticeable smaller or does it just look noticeably smaller because of the noticeably bigger occupant?
But it's not just prompts. They've shown their process - It's outlining the image, it's manually touching up what the AI gives them, it is someone that before AI was making images making full, realistic looking, TV episode length videos on the same topic, something they couldn't do before not because of a lack of *creativity* but because of a lack of tools. 99.9999% of people use it as a replacement, and that's very bad, but used as a tool it can be good.
AI can be used with creativity, it's a tool like any other. But I only know of one person who does that.
I'm pretty sure the idea is that it's accurate information just delivered in a dishonest way.
All corporations, not just AI ones.
Anyone who calls themself in alpha is correct, but not in the way they think they are.
TIL.
I wouldn't say *all* excuses are pathetic - It's a tool like any other. But 99.9999999999999999% of people who use it - if not *more* - Do not use it like a tool, they use it like a replacement. I can only think of one person who doesn't - Before AI came out they drew pictures, now they can make a good looking >20 minute video. And they've shown their process, which shows there's still a lot of individual talent and work put in.
Anything can be a UFO if you're bad enough at identifying things.
#45 It doesn't help that they seem to have broke something in CoD's updates that causes the size to balloon when you update it.
While I agree, I think Buzzfeed in particular was the reverse - They went broke, then went AI as a last ditch cost cutting measure.
And that is why using AI for anything that *needs* to be trusted is stupid at best and dangerous at the far more common worst.
I don't think it's just about performance. Bit anecdotal but Call of Duty Ghosts had some of the biggest maps in COD history, easily big enough for shotguns to have a bit more realism - It's also one of the most disliked COD games and while the maps weren't the *only* reason, they were a big one.
Which I also didn't buy, but not because of pirating.
#31 Honestly the £60 remasters aren't even my main reason for emulating, it's the fact that the only option for old pokémon games is paying £200+ on Ebay unless it's Firered and Leafgreen since like... the start of the month.
And that's why using AI for anything that involves an opinion is stupid at best, and downright *dangerous* at worst. Same goes for anything that needs to be reliable tbh.
#24 The first one actually looks kind of cute. The second looks ike something from a fucking creepypasta though.
He is completely incapable of realizing that not everyone thinks the way he does.
Good. While screens do have a place in the classroom - If nothing else there's some things that can only be learned with a screen, and even without that computers are important enough in the modern world that learning how to use one should probably be a necessary part of schooling - A lot of places went *way* too far on it.
Anything can be a UFO if you're bad enough at identifying things.
That's what happens when people don't understand what it is. ChatGPT and the like do one thing - Give something that sounds like a response to the input they are given. It was asked should you walk somewhere 300 metres away so it gave something that sounded like a reaponse to that, as despite being called AI it is not intelligent and therefore doesn't understand that this wouldn't work.