390630 pts ยท December 6, 2015
https://www.fastcompany.com/91307181/elon-musk-privately-pressured-reddit-ceo-steve-huffman-on-content-moderation-report I wonder if anyone affiliated with Imgur was also contacted...
good lord ๐คข
Yeah this is a bot that reposts comments containing Youtube links, but replaces those links with this spam/scam site. The bot also blasts the original comment with a bunch of downvotes.
I don't know, he might be on a redemption arc. It's been more than two weeks since he's said any grotesque warhawk stuff.
Style of the previous owner of my house: "This'll cost $1000 to fix properly, but I bet I can do it for $10. Or $5 if I swipe some hardware from work."
I wonder if upper management or the owner also have a pay cap? ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
Even then, he didn't find a whole one: "Almost an insult." Almost.
"While Brave AI attempts to pull from as many legitimate sites as it has access to, it has access to less legitimate sites as well. What all AI models do not have access to, is content that is still under an active copyright, like active educational textbooks."that username....
I think the rule for an airport saying "international" in the name is that it has to at least offer a connecting flight to an airport that does fly international.
And at least once, he attempted a joke that fell flat, and then complained at everyone.
A digital ration card to let you buy a limited amount of gasoline per week in Russia-occupied Crimea.
meh, sometimes a touch of silly stuff can be nice. Whatever.
@ButterIdentifierBot Is this true?
Medialab: "Good news, we've fired everyone who could have made the site better!"
OP does this every time: A real image or video first, then AI-generated slop, then AI-generated text. And then sometimes they'll get all pissy when it's pointed out."Hey, you post a real image, then AI-generated image, then LLM-generated text.""OMG YOU SUCK SHUT UP.""I literally just pointed at your post and described what it actually is. Wow."
convenient direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUWaJG-jPW8
No questioning of information, there will only be, "Let me check with to learn Truth."
And then eventually make their LLM things THE source of "truth." A libertarian dipshit where I work is getting there. This person is hesitant to believe things people say until... "Ok I checked with Chat and it agrees."
https://youtu.be/nC8hnkUs3fM Minus the tracker tag Youtube adds to shared links. ๐
non-Twitter link: https://bsky.app/profile/mayor.nyc.gov/post/3mr722e77z22z
And for some of them (there are a few like this where I work): "Hahaaa! I love it! I'd be doing exactly the same stuff if I was president! I love him! Trump 2028!!!"
context for anyone reading this: "(/jk)" definitely means "jerking" and not "just kidding"
there was an attempt
Hello, person of zero-chill. Good lord. 1) I made one simple statement of fact. 2) Fusion isn't the most dangerous energy source we know, as we have no viable reactors. 3) We can do renewables with batteries AND also research fusion. 4) I've come to not care much for fission power myself. It's no longer needed. Renewables+storage is way easier&safer. 5) Fusion could still be useful, it's interesting physics research, and it doesn't bring with it many of the problems of fission.
How I figure it would go down: He announces he's officially running again, the Republican Party approves it and makes him the nominee, his name goes on the ballots, lawsuits keep flying, and the Supreme Court effectively declares that the 22nd Amendment somehow does not apply to Dear Leader, and also declares that states aren't allowed to keep his name off ballots.
Definitely check the hell out of its output though. Someone at a forum I'm on did a somewhat disorganized poll for some product preferences, then they took the results of the questions and had an LLM sort the results into several categories by subject. The LLM's sorted output included several extra poll questions and votes that it had conjured out of nowhere.
very versatile, too
This is talking about fusion, way different than fission.
good lord ๐คข
Yeah this is a bot that reposts comments containing Youtube links, but replaces those links with this spam/scam site. The bot also blasts the original comment with a bunch of downvotes.
I don't know, he might be on a redemption arc. It's been more than two weeks since he's said any grotesque warhawk stuff.
Style of the previous owner of my house: "This'll cost $1000 to fix properly, but I bet I can do it for $10. Or $5 if I swipe some hardware from work."
I wonder if upper management or the owner also have a pay cap? ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค
Even then, he didn't find a whole one: "Almost an insult."
Almost.
"While Brave AI attempts to pull from as many legitimate sites as it has access to, it has access to less legitimate sites as well. What all AI models do not have access to, is content that is still under an active copyright, like active educational textbooks."
that username....
I think the rule for an airport saying "international" in the name is that it has to at least offer a connecting flight to an airport that does fly international.
And at least once, he attempted a joke that fell flat, and then complained at everyone.
A digital ration card to let you buy a limited amount of gasoline per week in Russia-occupied Crimea.
meh, sometimes a touch of silly stuff can be nice. Whatever.
@ButterIdentifierBot Is this true?
Medialab: "Good news, we've fired everyone who could have made the site better!"
OP does this every time: A real image or video first, then AI-generated slop, then AI-generated text. And then sometimes they'll get all pissy when it's pointed out.
"Hey, you post a real image, then AI-generated image, then LLM-generated text."
"OMG YOU SUCK SHUT UP."
"I literally just pointed at your post and described what it actually is. Wow."
convenient direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUWaJG-jPW8
No questioning of information, there will only be, "Let me check with to learn Truth."
And then eventually make their LLM things THE source of "truth." A libertarian dipshit where I work is getting there. This person is hesitant to believe things people say until... "Ok I checked with Chat and it agrees."
https://youtu.be/nC8hnkUs3fM Minus the tracker tag Youtube adds to shared links. ๐
non-Twitter link: https://bsky.app/profile/mayor.nyc.gov/post/3mr722e77z22z
And for some of them (there are a few like this where I work): "Hahaaa! I love it! I'd be doing exactly the same stuff if I was president! I love him! Trump 2028!!!"
context for anyone reading this: "(/jk)" definitely means "jerking" and not "just kidding"
there was an attempt
Hello, person of zero-chill. Good lord. 1) I made one simple statement of fact. 2) Fusion isn't the most dangerous energy source we know, as we have no viable reactors. 3) We can do renewables with batteries AND also research fusion. 4) I've come to not care much for fission power myself. It's no longer needed. Renewables+storage is way easier&safer. 5) Fusion could still be useful, it's interesting physics research, and it doesn't bring with it many of the problems of fission.
How I figure it would go down: He announces he's officially running again, the Republican Party approves it and makes him the nominee, his name goes on the ballots, lawsuits keep flying, and the Supreme Court effectively declares that the 22nd Amendment somehow does not apply to Dear Leader, and also declares that states aren't allowed to keep his name off ballots.
Definitely check the hell out of its output though. Someone at a forum I'm on did a somewhat disorganized poll for some product preferences, then they took the results of the questions and had an LLM sort the results into several categories by subject. The LLM's sorted output included several extra poll questions and votes that it had conjured out of nowhere.
very versatile, too
This is talking about fusion, way different than fission.