3348 pts ยท June 26, 2017
It's a thing now, linguistics happened. POV no longer means literally "point of view". it's more of a preposition now
It's been done: https://youtu.be/wft1q5OgynI
These viral ads for millennials are getting out of hand
No, you still need flat (spectrum) speakers as a baseline, or else the mix will be colored (wrong balance of frequency bands). But they should also listen on different systems to make sure it degrades gracefully.
You should check out What Makes This Song Stink on youtube. Actual musician trashes on Kid Rock (and others, it's a series). It's more hilarious than it sounds in a comment.
Godwin: "no it's totally correct to compare them to Nazis"
He screams for he does not know.
No, it's to prevent the usage of binary liquid explosives, namely REDACTED and REDACTED
This also why we need NPVIC and STAR voting / RCV / I don't really care as long as it's not first past the post winner-take-all
Porque no los dos?
Look up "eeby deeby" on know your meme
It actually is the same amphetamine you get on the street (albeit more pure). the does make the poison. Most speed users take way more than pharmacological amounts.
Ish. Many drugs alter brain chemistry (see SSRIs), doesn't make em addictive. Addictive drugs directly or indirectly stimulate the goal-seeking, reward, pain blocking, and/or memory formation parts of the brain. If you are getting cravings on withdrawal, that's still messing with your pleasure/pain balance. But yes it's not as simple as "feeling high", you can have addiction without euphoria.
SAIL!
It's called just owning chickens and trying to do anything around them. Constant pecking. You just shoo them away. Now, fighting a rooster every day, I might just take the chimp
#11
Better than Not Sure
Congrgats on the cooch. Coochgradulations.
Holy fucking jesus carl's jr christ
That's not Real Gay (tm) though, that's just "experimenting with your friend". (this has a term btw, it's a form of bisexual erasure)
Dividing in the geometric sense is not the same as dividing rational or real numbers. Both use the word "divide" but one means "split" and the other means "the thing which inverts multiplication". it just so happens for integers and fractions (rationals) they mostly behave the same. But zero breaks that analogy, and you have to use the stricter definition of division. E.g. how do you divide something by 2+2I? Imaginary cuts? You can't with rationals, but that's fine with complex numbers.
Short answer: mathematicians use more formal number groups such as the Reals and Complex numbers, not apples, and division by the absorbing element is undefined there. Medium answer: division is defined as the inverse of multiplication. If 1/0 =1, then 0*1 = 1 when you rearrange, which is totally wrong, you get a contradiction.
Has nothing to do with modern tech. Real numbers can't divide zero, but other exotic number systems can. Nothing stops modern tech from implementing the surreal numbers for example
LOUISAAAAAAAAAA mmJENKINSSSSS!!!
That's one of those bullshit pop sci factoids with a poorly done paper's results stretched way beyond any reasonable interpretation.
Beat it beat it OOOH!
"Weird Allison"
It's a thing now, linguistics happened. POV no longer means literally "point of view". it's more of a preposition now
It's been done: https://youtu.be/wft1q5OgynI
These viral ads for millennials are getting out of hand
No, you still need flat (spectrum) speakers as a baseline, or else the mix will be colored (wrong balance of frequency bands). But they should also listen on different systems to make sure it degrades gracefully.
You should check out What Makes This Song Stink on youtube. Actual musician trashes on Kid Rock (and others, it's a series). It's more hilarious than it sounds in a comment.
Godwin: "no it's totally correct to compare them to Nazis"
He screams for he does not know.
No, it's to prevent the usage of binary liquid explosives, namely REDACTED and REDACTED
This also why we need NPVIC and STAR voting / RCV / I don't really care as long as it's not first past the post winner-take-all
Porque no los dos?
Look up "eeby deeby" on know your meme
It actually is the same amphetamine you get on the street (albeit more pure). the does make the poison. Most speed users take way more than pharmacological amounts.
Ish. Many drugs alter brain chemistry (see SSRIs), doesn't make em addictive. Addictive drugs directly or indirectly stimulate the goal-seeking, reward, pain blocking, and/or memory formation parts of the brain. If you are getting cravings on withdrawal, that's still messing with your pleasure/pain balance. But yes it's not as simple as "feeling high", you can have addiction without euphoria.
SAIL!
It's called just owning chickens and trying to do anything around them. Constant pecking. You just shoo them away. Now, fighting a rooster every day, I might just take the chimp
#11
Better than Not Sure
Congrgats on the cooch. Coochgradulations.
Holy fucking jesus carl's jr christ
That's not Real Gay (tm) though, that's just "experimenting with your friend". (this has a term btw, it's a form of bisexual erasure)
Dividing in the geometric sense is not the same as dividing rational or real numbers. Both use the word "divide" but one means "split" and the other means "the thing which inverts multiplication". it just so happens for integers and fractions (rationals) they mostly behave the same. But zero breaks that analogy, and you have to use the stricter definition of division. E.g. how do you divide something by 2+2I? Imaginary cuts? You can't with rationals, but that's fine with complex numbers.
Short answer: mathematicians use more formal number groups such as the Reals and Complex numbers, not apples, and division by the absorbing element is undefined there. Medium answer: division is defined as the inverse of multiplication. If 1/0 =1, then 0*1 = 1 when you rearrange, which is totally wrong, you get a contradiction.
Has nothing to do with modern tech. Real numbers can't divide zero, but other exotic number systems can. Nothing stops modern tech from implementing the surreal numbers for example
LOUISAAAAAAAAAA mmJENKINSSSSS!!!
That's one of those bullshit pop sci factoids with a poorly done paper's results stretched way beyond any reasonable interpretation.
Beat it beat it OOOH!
"Weird Allison"