Just a little dose of what they go through...

Dec 2, 2015 6:52 PM

fonfonroo11

Views

414379

Likes

21559

Dislikes

811

She made a good point. I have not once used Planned Parenthood to actually have an abortion. I got STD testing and was prescribed bcontrol.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

I got UTI help and birth control when I had no insurance! Lovely people.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"I am pro life but you are not so you must die"

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 17

Seriously. Live and let live I say

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Once Linda is done with ISIS, we should get her to take care of these bundles of sticks.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Every one killed at the latest attack were parents.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Victoria, Australia just made it illegal to protest within 150 meters of a health clinic. This shit wouldnt fly here.

10 years ago | Likes 455 Dislikes 12

The US has a similar law. The OPs comments about protestors were probably before that law took effect.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The law for the buffer zone is new, making it illegal for anti-abortion protesters to harass/film women going in/coming out of clinics 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

In 2001, an anti-abortion douche killed a clinic security guard. The asshat wanted to kill everyone inside and burn the clinic in Melb 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

France, no one publicly protest about that , and you can have one in a public hospital.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

wait victoria did that? thank fucking god

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Right on dude. I'm getting grilled down here with my comment wtf..... Pp saved me man. Y are they taking lives!!??

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish they would only be allowed to protest on a busy highway. I'm sure they'd stop protesting if they are too busy dodging cars all day.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm really REALLY pro choice!! BUT I'm also really for my right to protest peacefully. PP needs protection w/out restricting our voices.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

To clarify: I'd NEVER protest a PP! I want to make it rich just to donate money to the org. I just dont want to infringe on our other rights

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

they haven't restricted their opinions they just made them move over,making sure they don't harass women and get in their face. that's it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, I agree. And I'll go further and say theyre a bunch of jerks. I used to work in a grocery store, with those solicitors outside 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

asking for donations. And customers were so irate. Make them go away! And, I'm like, Lady, freedom of speech, don't ask for your rights 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Protesting at government buildings targets the ministers,who make decisions. Protesting at a clinic targets the clients,with fear as its aim

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's the "peacefully" part that a lot of them fail. Screaming epithets, holding up signs of dead bodies, etc, isn't "peaceful".

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is said very well +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live in Queensland where sadly it still illegal unless recommended by a doctor. It is a backwards state still, unfortunately.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

When i needed a termination in QLD, i had to have 2 doctors say i would be an unfit parent to allow it. Really fucking sucked.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's terrible :-(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dumb american here: I know you guys have national healthcare, so can you just go to a different state to obtain an abortion if they're 1/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Queensland is a rather large state, some people may be 1200+miles from another state. You are right however, they could travel for it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

illegal in your state? Will your healthcare cover it, or does it even cover it in the first place?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Most of our states allow abortion with a Drs request. Depending on type of abortion & gestation, from $40 - $800, with a small rebate.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

There is no medicare rebate here as far as i know, its an out of pocket procedure

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about protests against malpractice?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Protests against malpractice are called lawsuits sweety

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Come on now, many people have been ripped off or unfairly compensated through lawsuits...I am one. I am not ignorant on this topic at all.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In most civilised countries you have a formal complaint process. You don't need to stand outside anywhere, yelling, to be heard.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Peaceful protests? Do governments of "civilized countries" actually listen and take action in support of complaints? Genuinely curious.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, after all, we control the government, not the other way around!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... Keep telling yourself that. Follow the money, and you'll find who's in charge.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was at PP for a pregnancy test back in Feb & when I left I passed a small group of protestors & one of them gave me a rose. I was confused

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

See, the majority of protesters are not maniacs. Only the latter make the news, though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

I was spit on and called a whore by a group of them outside my Planned Parenthood in 08. I was going there for an annual exam.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I am very sorry this happened to you. There is no excuse for what these people did.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*Quickly scrolls to banned comments*

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Terrorism are done by people who don't know how to talk about stuff :c

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've never needed PP personally, but I donate a chunk to them every year because this matters. We can't let the terrorists win.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

When I was 16, I had an abortion by Dr. Tiller. It made me turn my life around, in a good way. I cried when he was killed.

10 years ago | Likes 2101 Dislikes 77

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 20, 2016 8:51 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why dude why? Go troll somewhere else

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Just because you don't like what you read doesn't mean it's trolling

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 46

But this was just rude and hateful.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Pointing out that her parents didn't do to their child what she did to hers is rude and hateful?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 32

Thank you for sharing this.

10 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 2

I had one when I was 15, picketers were outside, those assholes made me change my outlook on others. I'm 21, happy, and in college now.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Just so everyone understands, I was pro-life until this happened, and now I hate the idea that it's categorized as pro-life or pro-choice.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Also thanks for all the words of support. It drowns out the negative ones :-)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

remeber him and selebrate his life at his clinic every year for me if you can.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Tiller was a super nice man, my dad use to body guard for his wife when she went grocery shopping. He trained their dog Axel too :)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I... I don't know how to respond to this but give you my condolences.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If there was a person who achieved true martyrdom for their cause in modern society, it's definitely Dr. Tiller.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your parents lives couldve been turned around if they made the same decision you did.I guess they LET YOU LIVE.I wish the baby has- oh wait.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 85

Just a quick note: often times, those who get abortions tend to turn their lives around, especially in the area of sex. More protection, etc

10 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 3

My friends got an abortion when she was a full grown adult because she didn't want a family YET.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Awesome, she sounds like a really responsible person. Having a baby should always be on your own terms :)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It changed my sex life but it mostly made me a better person. I entered the field of social work because of it.

10 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 1

I'm glad you had a positive change through this experience. Many people don't recognize that tends to happen after events like this :)

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Changed my life in a positive way. Knew a child wasn't in my wheelhouse Ave still isn't. No regrets. Would go back and do the same thing

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Agreed. And many times a woman could be doing everything right in life and dont need to turn their lives around. There shouldnt be a stigma.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The stigma is more for the life that was ended, not the one that got to continue.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

This strawman pro-life people foist up of women getting abortions as birth control must just think women are all psychopaths.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 3

2. The easier method is if you are deliberately withholding these methods from people or not giving it to them as an option.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I've had this discussion before. Ita just not logical when you compare how easy it is to take contraception. The only time it would become

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Very brave for sharing. My heart goes out to you for your loss.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 6

Thanks for the compassion :-)

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Which loss, the murdering doctor or the kid she killed? Sadly, she mourns the doctor who killed her child, but not the actual child. SMH

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 42

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2017 5:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's ironic, isn't it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You don't know she doesn't mourn that child.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

You don't know that. Abortion is not any easy choice, I'm sure she still thinks about it enough without dicks on the internet shaming her.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuck off

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

O wish I could upvote this more

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 25

Yep, truth always stings.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is why you need security guards such as myself, but that costs money and places like this have little to spare.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

What I don't understand is that a large majority of those hostile "pro-lifers" don't care about the baby anymore once it's born.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Pro-lifers killing people, what an oxymoron....

10 years ago | Likes 2526 Dislikes 67

I don't mean to be that guy, but that's irony, not an onxymoron :P Have an upvote nonetheless.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Too late: you're that guy. But that's kind of awesome.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Conservative logic: Life begins at conception and ends when you become a Syrian refugee.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

Compassion is only for coffee cups

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Bill Hicks had something to say about this. It hasn't changed in 20+ years.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So, cut off their oxygen supply and you're left with a dead moron?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I should point out I'm in no way advocating murder, murder is bad. Word play on the other hand is fun.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I compare pro-lifers to collectors. They only care about the product while it's still in the wrapper.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Talk about a literary divide. For sure

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not defending it, but they see themselves as "protecting life that can't protect itself." after birth though, fuck it, you're on your own.

10 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 6

I presume they execute any woman that has a miscarriage?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I refer to them as pro-birthers not pro-lifers

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 6

That's all they are. They couldn't be bothered to give half a shit about anyone once they pass through the vagina.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 6

Or anyone WITH a vagina

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

...but a leech is not life, it cannot live on its own outside the body (just stating a fact)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

"protecting fetuses that can't protect themselves" once it's a baby, the parents better be able to pay for that food/medical expenses!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same argument was used during abolition. "If we free the slaves, are YOU going to take care of them? No? Then leave them be."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Giving the death sentence to a murderer. Makes sense to me as long as they see abortion as murder

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 13

It's subjective

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That abortion is murder? Agreed.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So we are agreeing that it's opinion-based whether it's murder or not?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It appears that way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

no, that's irony. Billy Mays is an oxymoron

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

oxy left them a few terrorism acts ago...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's already insane that they call being anti-abortion and anti-freedom that way.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would technically be irony and not an oxymoron, but still, point received.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great album

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is horrible wot this prolifenazis do but still tough i cant ignore: there is something wrong about the "her body her rules" to abortion

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Wut

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell us what you believe is wrong with it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My question is why the media doesn't cover this incidents as Christian Terrorist or Christian extremist.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 9

Yeah like they arent covering the recent PP shooter at all.../s. It helps if you watch the news to begin with. And Imgur doesnt count.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well of course because terrorism only comes in form of muslims doing terroristic acts. Sad world.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

So all pro-lifers are Christian? Interesting....

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 26, 2017 4:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

you know the answer to that as much as i do

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Giving the death sentence to a murderer. Makes sense to me as long as they see abortion as murder

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 21

I think most disagree with the death penalty to begin with

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You wouldn't want to shoot a mass murderer that you knew wouldn't be jailed for his actions?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a different argument. I'm talking about capital punishment itself.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well it's a pretty closely related argument haha. And Kansas currently does have the death penalty as far as I know.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like people got the wrong message in your comment. Here, have an upvote.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Haha looks like it. I am not saying they are murderers, just trying to introduce some empathy.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Im just wondering but if im a guy can I go into a PP for an STD test?

10 years ago | Likes 586 Dislikes 7

is it free? what if I just want a prostate massage?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Tell the pro-life protesters outside that you're there for an abortion and see what they do!

10 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

YES

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Absolutely!

10 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

Can my sister get a mammogram?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes. They do breast exams.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For a lot of people, men and women, PP is their only primary care. They do amazing stuff there for anybody.

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

And men can use birth control and STD protection as well. They give men plenty of condoms if requested.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

They will provide excellent medical care and a 100% judgement-free treatment. PP is the best.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

of course you can! It's planned parenthood for everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

STDs aren't strictly related to parenthood (I wouldn't have guessed from their name that it'd be possible).

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. PP offers medical care, knowledge and supplies to anyone regardless of gender, sexuality, color or creed.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

+1 upvote for awareness

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I have! And when I was super broke and young. PP came through for me.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

great question... time to get my PP tested

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yep. I did that after my wife said she wanted a divorce and I figured out that she had been cheating on me.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure when a guy goes into a PP it's called docking.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They will also give you a nice verity pack of condoms. Great way to find the brand that fits you best.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was there yesterday to get some bc and it was like 75% boys and 25% women

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and that's not all, you can go there for a wide range of reproductive health needs. And they really care.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um, not sure. According to the Grand Ole Retard Party you can only go there to murder babies. Very metal.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

100%. Tell your friends. Spread the word. PP is not just for women and unfortunately, alot of people still do not know this.

10 years ago | Likes 288 Dislikes 1

Lol. Pp.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Hah! You said pp

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thank you

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

definitely! any gender can go there! they treat UTIs and cancer too!

10 years ago | Likes 279 Dislikes 4

Gender is the wrong word when you're talking about sex organ differentiation... yes any gender, but more importantly, either/any sex.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You go yet?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cancer? They do?

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

They can perform out patient procedures for precancerous cells as well as screening

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think they screen for cancer and help people find resources to treat it for minimal cost. I don't think they can treat it themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Interesting, thanks mate!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most importantly it's usually inexpensive and confidential

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

For what it's worth I'm a male who is trying to encourage others to be proactive about their sexual health :)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only usually confidential. Other times they post your face on FB, along with a picture of the horrible rash you had.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

I'm both upset and curious about this story... Tell me more!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cool. We're making up more fake stories about Planned Parenthood? Planned Parenthood stole my bike.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Woah, it was a joke on his unfortunate placement of 'usually'. I thought I was exaggerating enough to make that obvious. Sheesh.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great I'm glad 16 year Olds can have abortions without ever letting their parents know! Amazing!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

When that's life or death for you you'll be glad it's there.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That can never happen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

When you're in an abusive situation it absolutely can feel like life or death

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When the 16 year old's dad raped her, I'm very glad the parents don't have to know. Confidential medical care is important.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

So your one hypothetical situation supercedes everything? A rapist dad would be put in prison, and would not have parental rights anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

A rapist dad usually won't be put in prison and even rapists have parental rights in most states. And that means rights over the baby 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Side note - most people don't need legal protections most of the time. ALL of our legal protections are there because we can't predict 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

that came from the incestual rape. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The fact that so called "adults" pull this kind of shit is just fucking sad.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 7

It's okay that people kill babies but not okay that people are so sickened, so very disgusted by it that it drives them mad.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 11

No kidding. It's a temper tantrum, except they have access to weapons.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

adults are the people who commit atrocity for the most part. I wouldn't go about saying they are acting like children.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aren't you allowed to shoot them if they attempt to set the place on fire? Seems fair.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 5

As someone who lives in Kansas I am quite sure the law is that if it is out of self-protection, you can. Which in this case it would be...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Often, people who dedicate their lives to helping and improving others' lives don't like to take life, even if they're threatened.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Depends on the state, i'd imagine... And if you could reasonably argue that the fire endangers the shooter.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I truly can't understand how some people make it their daily lives to harass and terrorize other people. They get up and plan these things??

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Yeah, they harass people that get up every day to kill babies. What is wrong with these people?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 26

Fetus*...until you are capable of tak8ng your own breath on your own unassisted you are not a baby.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Agreed. A week or two in, you're smaller than a freckle. Like getting a mole removed.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's un-American and un-Christian to harass and assault those people because you don't agree with them. It's bullying. Nothing more.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

One of my best friends was staunchly pro-life, until she scheduled her abortion. Super convenient.

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 9

Same with my friend. She apparently didn't want to use condoms or have a half black baby. Very moral, huh?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Few plans survive contact with the enemy

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How very sad.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Like, how is this NOT treated as terrorism by the law??? What do they need to do for that, wear a turban?!

10 years ago | Likes 1645 Dislikes 67

It in fact is treated as terrorism by the law. And law enforcement takes cases like this seriously. But its hard to find perpetrators.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I would say the picketers are preaching hate speech and sometimes practicing terrorism.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Picketing itself isn't terrorism. It's aim might be similar, but the means are very much different (i.e. non-violent/criminal).

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No but it could be perceived as hate speech, and their shooting, bombing, breaking private property could be perceived as terrorism.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they commit crimes as well, it should be considered terrorism, obviously. Hate speech is a thin line I don't want to bother myself with.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

7-11 was a part time job

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

its been going on since LONG before 9/11, which is the date when religious fanaticism became terrorism... back then they were just nutjobs

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Because it's only terrorism when *non*white people do it.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Except for the whole Oklahoma City thing.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is? The gov treats it as such.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

I may be wrong but I do believe that they treat it as an act of domestic terrorism, but not the same as international terrorism.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

It... is....

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Because the terrorists in these cases are mostly white and Christian. That's why.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Maybe because the war on terrorism is more about getting politicians re-elected than actually making people safe? Nah, couldn't be that...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The government treats this as terrorism though. By law, terrorism is any violent crime politically motivated so yeah this qualifies

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is, when it actually, you know, happens.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 16

Yea these things are crimes and clinic reports them.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Canada's intelligence Agency actually defines anti-abortion violence as "single-issue terrorism". But we all know America is fucked up so..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It technically is. All of those things are against the law. Enforcement is the problem.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amen

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It appears your country treats it as terrorism only if the mass murderers do it in the name of religion. Waiiit a minute.....

10 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 10

Glad someone said that

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No no no only if they aren't white

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

It is terrorism. But if you're going to let dictionary definition decide it just imagine what the gov have to face for, say, training 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

They just have to rename "terrorists". I know it's not the dictionary definition but I always took it to mean an organized group.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

guerillas/soldiers abroad, so on.. A whole clusterfuck of walnutty proportions.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Christians cannot commit terrorism. God must kill people who don't kill people they way he wants people killed & sometimes he needs help.Duh

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I'm pretty sure God can kill as he pleases without the need for Cletus doing it in his stead.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree with you, now let's convince Cletus.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Man, ain't that the rub?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ROFL

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What has a turban got to do with this. It's ignorance like yours that allow people like this. If they had a turban they would be Sikhs

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's my point exactly. You're labeled you a terrorist if you're a sikh, or just brown-skinned,but not if you blow up a health clinic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a good job that Bin Laden never wore a turban then! People might have confused him with a Sikh! Muslims wear turbans too, dude.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That 'turban' you talk of is worn by Pashtun people who are not arabs but are Muslims.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's my point exactly. You're labeled you a terrorist if you're a sikh, or just brown-skinned,but not if you blow up a health clinic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In America, you're also labeled a terrorist if you have a turban, even if it has nothing to do with anything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck. Your comment was actually really well thought of. I'm really sorry for assuming. I need to stop doing that. It really doesn't help.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

eh no worries mate

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're christian and white.

10 years ago | Likes 760 Dislikes 45

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Apr 26, 2017 4:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Note that even at his most righteously angry, all Jesus did was flip some tables.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

But if blacks do it they are praised.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

If a bunch of black people went and shot up a clinic with patients there really wouldn't be a lot of praise going on

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Ding ding ding!

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Jaysus, your comment breaths truth

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Correct.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

"Christian"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Just... pointing out. There was no mentions of Christians anywhere in the post :/

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

A large number of pro life people get their sentiment from religious teachings or upbringing. Not all of them, but a large number

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Regardless - there was no mention of Christians, and I just find it rude to assume/stereotype. Perhaps I'm being oversensitive but...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

or because they aren't organized groups targeting the PP clinics, but yea, which ever works best for your agenda.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 21

By this logic, the Oklahoma City bombing wasn't terrorism.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually lone wolf acts of terrorism like these are still considered terrorism. By law it's any violent crime politically motivated

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Who isn't calling the attackers terrorists?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They are as Christian as ISIS is Muslim

10 years ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 27

There really is no reason not to respond to radical Christianity with the same extreme prejudice we have for radical Muslims.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, yeah, but because that's their "classification" I suppose. Fucking Daeshbags need to stop killing people.

10 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 1

Dude. Daeshbags. Nice.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

So, really Christian. Just because they make you look bad...

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 7

And they claim Christianity like ISIS claims Islam. And Christians are positions of power like Muslims are in Saudi Arabia/Syria/Pakistan.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yes, cause christians totally havent ever killed people who didnt follow their beliefs at all.

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

And the crusade ultimately failed anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Not entierly true. Their goal was to halt muslim expansion into Europe. Which they succeeded in Iberia for instance.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're talking about the crusaders, that was almost exclusively the Roman Catholic church with approval from the "Holy Roman Emperor".

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

So only all of western europe's christians then?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like, sikhs wear turbans not Muslims. And this is labeled terrorism by definition.

10 years ago | Likes 151 Dislikes 7

2/2 involving an airplane until 9/11 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_182 *Edit for whatever reason this didn't post

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/2 There are Sikh terrorists and they were in involved in the largest act of terror

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

Yeah. No. Call me a crackpot but everyone cannot deny the strange inconsistencies of 9/11.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Instructions unclear - persecuted entire population

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

This really shouldn't have downvotes.. search for "Khalistan separatists."

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I think the comment above yours said it better than I could've.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Exactly. People WILL label you a terrorist if you're a sikh, but not if you blow up a health clinic.

10 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 6

Muslims on the other hand are a different story

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

And how are they a different story?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I assume it's because they are labelled as terrorists.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sikhs aren't labeled terrorists. At least not where I'm from. We have police officers with government designed turbans.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Oh in the US they are (by regular citizens). And people who blow up health clinics are labeled as "heroes"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nobody is labeling the planned parent shooter a hero except trolls on Twitter.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Anyone in America who looks Muslim or Middle Easter, or who have brown skin are believed to be terrorists. which is fucking stupid

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

I can only speak for the north but that shit don't fly up here.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

At least one Sikh was killed in the US shortly after 9-11 because people are dumb.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Dude, the head of our military has a turban. He's got a red one, a camo one...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those people are no better than ISIS.

10 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 22

Daesh at least admits they're terrorists.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

Well, I hate them, but ISIS is honestly worse. Doesn't mean they're not hateful creatures who should go to jail for their crimes, mind you.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Don't kid yourself The only thing stopping them from acting like ISIS is a more stable government that wouldn't allow that to spread

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

There's plenty of stable Christian governments that don't indiscriminately kill folks who disagree with them. *anymore, anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

I was talking more of the extremist Christians in the US who would jump at the chance to force their religion on people with a gun.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There is absolutely no thing as "Christian government" - because all western democratic countries are secular and separated from religion.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the people setting fire to clinics and cherry bombing them would surely be doing far more if they knew they could get away with it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine what these people could accomplish if they channeled that time and energy into helping already born children

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

They do. Most of the major charitable NGOs in this country have religious origins.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, if they would stop aborting babies they could spend time caring for babies.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

How many kids have you adopted? Also, do you personally donate to food bank &, non profit low income medical centers?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have two step kids, 5 children total, we donate to homeless frequently, and make other donations often. We also serve at various centers.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

As do I. If you are truly pro life, you should adopt children who have no homes, that you claimed were important enough to not abort.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We plan to do so, thank you for your encouragement.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should spend time adopting babies instead of making them. So many pro birthers out there breed like no other but don't adopt.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We plan to do so, thank you for your encouragement.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"I'm undecided on abortion: On one hand I support it because it kills babies but on the other hand it gives women a choice which isn't good"

10 years ago | Likes 401 Dislikes 64

Basically the thought behind most of it

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 25

Isn't this joke on anthony jeselnik sp? Comedy special on Netflix? Now I'm wondering if he ripped it off.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is definitely Jeselnik XD

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Beat me to it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Twitter was like the worst tool to say something that long

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Yeah 140 chars is way too short to discuss issues like this. *turns and stares at imgur*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imgur is not made for that either you know

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know, and yet here we are, trying. And I'm worse than most, IIRC I've gone into double digits replying to someone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imgur is just a picture sharing website we made it social but it hasn't been made that way

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am aware.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Twitter is the worst tool for pretty much everything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Twitter is for microblogging. It's pretty fine to share real-time events

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't believe abortion is still so controversial in a country so advanced. Theses stories sound like they come from the Middle Ages.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 12

Pretty sure pro-lifers consider abortion to be a "barbaric Middle Age" practice, especially so for an "advanced country."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't exaggerate. In the middle ages we had wars, death penalty, torture and our leaders were expected to give an oath on a religious book.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Due to bronze age beliefs unfortunately.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

I'll probably get down voted for saying this but... It's because of religion. I've never met a 'pro-lifer' who wasn't a zealot.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 15

Ive never met an atheist who wasnt a cynical asshole. I hope y'all believe me like you believe babbzilla

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Ooh, I've touched a nerve with this one.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes I guess the point of using logical fallacies is just to demean others. You must be a kind and happy person.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I am a happy person, thank you. But I also have opinions that make people twitch like they're getting a root canal without being numbed.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm going to go with, mostly yes. But more it's our culture to believe that we have every right to mind other peoples' business and 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 try to enforce our morals on to them.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hi, my name is Craig, nice to meet you. Now you have met one.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Nice to meet you. Never thought I'd see the day to be honest

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not all religious extremists are Muslim. They can be from any demographic. The only characteristic they share is that they're bat shit crazy

10 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 12

I fail to see the distinction between religion and politics. People seem highly tolerant of dogmatic atrocities in the latter.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Let's try Communism again. This time it'll work!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Research it a bit - the majority of domestic terrorism is not done by muslims. White supremacists/racism and eco-terrorists are the worst.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All walks of life have crazies. Politics, religion (including anti-religion groups) - anything people feel passionate about

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Nope. I can tell you that no true Scotsman would ever do such a thing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fanaticism exists within any religion, philisophy or political idea. People stop to question and start blindly following.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's amazing what's okay, when you rationalize it as God saying you're right.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

As a Catholic I can tell ya God would call violence like this a sin.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But your catholic leaders like to rape little boys so

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Ok...As a Catholic I fervently believe there is a special place in hell for those guys, and I hope they rot in jail first as bonus.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair enough. Carry on.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pro-Life... Until they're born.

10 years ago | Likes 527 Dislikes 79

Err, most of the biggest charitable NGOs in the U.S. have religious origins. In the top 5, it looks like only the Red Cross wasn't.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro-birth.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 7

Until they're baptised*

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

Before that they are heathen spawn bound for Satan's army.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So yes, pro-life people are also running pre- and post-natal care, orphanages, etc.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"That's not the real issue here" No, that's the part of the issue you ignore because you're too much of a coward to care about other people.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 8

Churches are the main benefactors to living people down on their luck. And they are notoriously pro-life. What do you do to help?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It's a catchy line but you do yourself a disservice by misrepresenting the argument of the other side.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 87

Hush. It's so easy to lump everyone that disagrees with you into one homogeneous group of d-bags. Don't spoil it.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 30

22% of children live in poverty in the US and I don't exactly see much activity among the pro-life crowd to change that.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

But our poverty is wealth compared to most of the world.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's really, really hard not to disagree when hypocrisy like this is abundant.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

I don't find it misrepresented at all. The people who are typically so adamantly pro-life also tend to be against programs like welfare, >>

10 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 7

... I'm pro life, pro welfare, pro sex ed, pro condoms/bcp, pro adoption, and i think we need every program you've mentioned. >.>

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

You are the exception to the rule.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

>> public healthcare solutions, public assistance, and other programs that would greatly benefit quality of life.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

quality of life has nothing to do with pro-life. being alive has to do with it. I am sure most of them would be for homeless shelters >>

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

soup kitchens, and food stamps. But those keep people from dying. Healthcare I imagine would be more hot button though

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not that I disagree, but is that anecdotal, or do you have a report or study to support your claim?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Historical Republican vs Democrat positions on social programs and tax policy

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I really hate fucktards who do this shit. Planned parenthood is 90% help for NOT having kids.

10 years ago | Likes 215 Dislikes 29

I'm getting absolutely grilled for my comment of support.... This is not OK. Pp saved my health....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And congress is helping in creating more hate in this program, United States is becoming scary!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It really is and it's a depressing fact.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*97%

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I went to a Catholic college that wouldn't provide birth control through the health clinic and almost everyone went to PP.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Isn't the Catholic stance that BC is immoral cuz you shouldn't be frickin unless it's to make babies?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's basically it, but more specifically that a couple having sex must be open to having a child as a result, and not exclude procreation.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Right. Like, using protection removes God's will from the equation or whatever.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mhm, but most people think that's all a grand conspiracy. I've had people tell me they're fudging their financials and are hiding (1)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Not true. They self-publish their financials, the best people can do is attempt to reverse-engineer it: http://goo.gl/xPHiwN

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact, they're officially opposed to transparency since it can be used to "monitor [legal] compliance": http://goo.gl/Dn8xxE

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the sheer amount of abortions they perform that way. Ignoring the fact that they're independently audited almost every year and any (2)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

attempts to hide such things would be caught in no time by the people who want them shut down. (3)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

97% of services rendered have nothing to do with abortion. I got treated for a UTI there when I had no insurance at 18.

10 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 7

97+% of the things the PP shooter did in his life wasn't shooting people in PP, does that excuse his actions?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 36

Haha!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

An absolutely untrue statistic.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 66

If you took the time to google it, you'd see it is a true statistic

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually there are links in this very thread which show it to be plainly false. Why don't YOU google it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your face is an absolutely untrue statistic.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

One of the more intelligent responses, actually.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

100% true statistic. Only 3% of services rendered from PP are abortion related.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 6

And abortion related services are privately funded, not paid for by taxpayers.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Incidentally, that's not an opinion. That claim has been thoroughly debunked.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 29

Just curious: Source?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Absofuckinglutely false. How can you even for one moment believe such a thing?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 34

Well for starters, remember that time that people where all like "planned parenthood sells dead baby parts"? Well the fuckers...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because we're not insane?

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

I don't support abortion, but responding with terrorism and more killing is disgusting and anti-Christian.

10 years ago | Likes 237 Dislikes 20

I agree with you.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Thank you. The people who respond to abortion with violence and killing are in no way pro life.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

It's harder to lead by example than it is to be angry and smash things you don't like.

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Ok, but the people who support the killings are insane. They aren't just normal people with crazy views, they're delusional morons.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're not gonna draw attention to yourself by not killing people, I guess...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

That kind of thinking is the first steps toward the Dark Side.. tread carefully young padawan.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't support abortion either, but I am all for sex ed, birth control, WIC, and anything that will help mothers to keep them healthy. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 4

2/2 I am also a Christian. I don't understand why we hurt others to try to make a point. PP does so much more than just abortions.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

It's a mix of many things, including a bad education system.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same here. Interestingly, the founder of PP was against abortions, and supported preventing pregnancies instead.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I don't understand why some Christians are against birth control. It just makes sense to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first plac

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*place.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that's more a Catholic thing, or specific to certain denominations where they're not allowed to use birth control at all. 1-

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I kind of get that some of them are in a gray area due to how they work. And that some Christians are afraid of making birth control and 2-

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Idk if anyone is "pro-abortion" lol but I am pro choice. And these acts are truly disgusting

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

While I support women's rights, I feel that abortion is an unethical practice. If there were a way to end a pregnancy without killing 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

a baby I'd be all for it, unfortunately that's not medically possible yet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

It will never be possible the whole point is to get rid of it for whatever reason

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I am pro-abortion in the same sense I am pro-knee surgery and pro-root canals. It is a needed medical procedure.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

Eh, I don't think that's quite the same in comparison.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

Pregnancy is a health condition like both of those. It has a relatively high mortality rate in the US compared to our allies. 14/100,000

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 3, 2015 1:09 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

"not a necessity" ???? The fuck? You know there are cases where happily pregnant women who want to have the baby HAVE to get an 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

It is most often not a necessity. Less than one percent of cases are "get an abortion or die." http://www.abortionfacts.com/facts/8

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

abortion, right? Or else they would fucking die due to complications? I'd call "get an abortion or die" a fucking necessity you loon. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I agree with abortion when it's due to complications. I'm talking about woman who choose to have an abortion due to just not wanting a baby.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They definitely can be necessary. Good friend of mine had a stroke during her last pregnancy and absolutely cannot carry another to term.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Less than 1% of woman have abortions for medical reasons http://www.abortionfacts.com/facts/8

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I completely agree that that they can be and I support those, but do you have any idea how rare that is? Less than 1%.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They're not pro-life, they're pro-birth. After that, they don't give a damn what happens to those kids.

10 years ago | Likes 259 Dislikes 57

True Story!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Thats actually not pro birth. They could care less about birth. It's actually about punishing and controlling women at a deeply seated level

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

anti-choice

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Pro-baptism*, same reason why some sent missionaries to the third world with bibles instead of bread. The soul wont go to heaven otherwise.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

How do you know?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 22

B/c by opposing PP, they also oppose women's/mothers' health. ie "you must give birth but don't spend *my* tax dollars helping the kid"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True Story!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

I would love to know how many "pro-lifers" have adopted children or foster children or do any volunteer/donations to help kids.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 7

Every church I've been to advertises charitable assistance for families and mothers, pre- and post-natal. It's part of the social structure.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

when i was in foster care, my foster parents were pro-life and christian. they support me using birth control and they're fostering a girl.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Glad to hear it! I'd like to think that the majority of them do this too :)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

A lot of us.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Really? In my area the church is one of the biggest contributors to disadvantaged families. Want to back your statement up with facts, or?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 18

People are people outside of "the church". Sin every day but Sunday and do evil hateful crap in the name of religion. Facts: Those same 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

people are usually conservatives who want to cut social services for those children. Cutting those services puts those very children in 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

the position where they need that charity from "the church" members so they can feel good about themselves for helping some local needy. 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Those same people also want to cut ed funding because it isn't supportive enough of their magic sky daddy fantasies causing generational 4/5

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Aug 19, 2019 10:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm also willing to bet the absolute staggering majority of church goers aren't shooting up clinics, of any kind.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Probably not but I'd be willing to bet that 95% of those protesters are church goers.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My wife didnt kill me so that means no wives have ever killed their husbands, thats the same argument you're making, with a different x & y

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

No, I'm saying it's a minuscule problem, I'm not denying it exists.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Representational bias. You can't speak for all churches. In the average area the government pays more in food stamps than the church.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

(1) Religious NGOs are a huge fraction of charitable work in this country and in the world.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) Comparing charitable work/donations to monetary payments that come out of backed-by-force govt-mandated taxes is a bit insulting, no?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't doubt you are doing something but every stained glass window is a month of food for a family of four.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Solid logic, lets apply it to everyone. ''Don't buy a car or an Xbox, give your money to the poor''

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That logic is what the bible says. If they want to practice selective hypocrisy I'd prefer the focus on the living.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Those stained glass windows are typically donated, not taken from charitable accounts. They often have a dedication at the bottom.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not, I said in my area, and asked them to back up their statement instead of making sweeping generalizations about masses of people

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I believe he was talking about the group of people terrorizing the clinics from the tweets above

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a sad day when merely asking for verification is met with resistance. I don't care what someone believes, sources should be provided

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, in the average area the Church contributes to disadvantaged people. Little or big, they help. I'm an atheist, but this is fact.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Atheist non-profits and secular charities help too. Churches are given an unfair advantage though by the gov, & proselytize

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea. But it's the how. Is it done anonymously? What are the stipulations? I could have gone to college for free if I became a Mormon.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

No stipulations. In fact, the Little Sisters of the Poor case is going before SCOTUS because LSP *refuses* to discriminate. (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they did only serve Catholics, they'd be reclassified and not be in legal trouble. Irony. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

why would you kill someone to prove you're "pro-life"?

10 years ago | Likes 9513 Dislikes 86

Same reason you shoot a mass murder. So they stop murdering people...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 22

Fuuuuuuck, this took a very very dark turn too fast. So much for DAESH fundamentalists being the only nut-jobs around.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Not that I agree with what was done at all, but taking life to protect other lives is a commonly understood principal, such as in war.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Except that young pregnant women didn't sign up to fight a war.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't agree with this logic, but I believe the idea is babies are innocent but the PP people are evil, and if you're poor it's your fault

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not that I agree with it, but the idea is you kill a serial killer to stop him from killing more.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

The term "pro-life" as it is used in America, is a misnomer. But it doesn't matter. The ideals are what need discussed not the nomenclature.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because Jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simple - Steople are Pupid. It looks dumb written, but say it outloud, and try not to smile...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

why would you kill terrorist to save lives? im not agreeing with it but its the state of mind these loonies have.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bc radical republicans are out ther focking minds mate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sacrifice of mine to save many... Possibly the thought process

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why do we kill terrorists in the name of saving lives?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

one doctor vs many babies

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

this is the biggest argument right now. It makes no fucking sense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"to prevent more lives from being taken" is the response I've heard most often.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

short term answer is the shooter was a cunt convinced this crusade would be the difference between them being a good person vs a bad person.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're not Pro Life They're at best 'Pro Embryo' and mostly 'Anti Choice'. They don't give a shit about actual Life.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I guess they see it as killing one to save lots, or they see unborn babies as innocent and the person working there, as guilty?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They aren't pro-life. It is just a word they used to make their cause seem just.They are anti-abortion. That's all. Don't call them pro-life

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Devil's advocate here. I think it's more like pro new-life. Obviously they don't care about life that made different choices than theirs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because people are disgustingly stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well, that is because people tend to be hypocritical cunts.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They generally see it as math, the doctor is seen as a mas murderer, killing him or her saves many in the future.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not agreeing with it, but you kill one to stop the death of many. Example: How many would kill Hitler as a child, if they could?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Not me, soviet overlords and all that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's the thing. They really aren't pro-life.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Simple, these "Pro life" jerk offs stick with the mentality that it works when you "Kill one to save many". Sadly, they don't read up on 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

What the people they attack and murder ACTUALLY do. They think planned parent organizations are abortion clinics. SMH.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

" I know we are pro life, but can we also kill some people?" "...Alright, everyone open your pro life pamphlet to page one again."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pro-lifers arent really pro-life, they are just anti-abortion. they also tend to be religious zealots who are taught it isn't murder if -

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the other person disagrees with you and your religion

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As Family Guy put it, "Once they're out of the womb they can go fuck themselves."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The answer is most obviously and simply: they are not pro-life. They use that veil of aesthetic morality to justify their beliefs.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I'm asking the same question! This doesn't make sense.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

To "save" hundreds, I presume -_-

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because a bundle of cells is the most important form of life!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's permissible to kill during jihad.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Can't believe what I have to do to show that I'm pro-homosexual equality

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because America or some bull crap. I'm waiting on my work visa for Japan... Done with the place.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because religion.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're only pro-life before the fetus is born. After that, kid's on their own no matter how shitty their life is.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Applying logic to something illogical. Their movement is based around a magic sky man, why would they care about logic!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Christopher Hitchens was pro life because he knew about biology. Famous atheist. Very anti-magic-sky-man.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you convince yourself someone is evil it becomes possible to justify doing evil against them.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

psychopathy?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because jesus.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Especially in church

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hope they didn't claim to be "doing the work of god" because I'm pretty sure killing someone in a church isn't something God approves of.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because Jesus told him to.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

And in a church

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because "pro-life" ends at birth

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Duh. Christians kill masses to teach savages that they shouldn't kill.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the Logic of a Crazy Christian.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

With and emphasis on crazy. Don't you dare align all Christians with those psychos.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because god tells you too. I point out fucked up commandments in the Koran, so I'm dam sure gonna do so when it's in the OT.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

Why do people riot and loot stores to prove that #blacklivesmatter?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 29

Because they have no brain cells

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

They only care about you as long as you are Still completely inside another person, after that it's a free for all

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

because they see children as innocents and those who give abortions as sinners and devil worshipers

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Killing someone to show you're "Pro-Life" is like fucking to show support of abstinence.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Or like going to war to enforce peace.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because "pro life" is a buzzword and abortion is an actual thing. A thing people need as an option in their lives, as well.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's the Radical-Right Paradox

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Because they are usually autistic retards (in the casual sense) and have no concept of what's actually happening. They just want publicity.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 17

Excuse me for asking but might i ask for the definition of "autistic in the casual sense"? im unfamilliar with the phrase

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Basically they aren't actually those things but you want to say something other than stupid because they're stupid-er than stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

I know u cant comprehend their actions, they r stupid, however giving em the excuse of bein born without social skills isnt gunna help

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 3, 2015 8:21 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Easy. They justify it with their religious beliefs.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Well it worked well for America in WW2 against the nazis

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Because stupid. I don't say that the be dismissive. Actual stupidity. The inability to apply logic and learn.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

i think the best explanation i heard is that these people aren't pro life, they're pro birth

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because someone told you to and it's easier to follow than think.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Seems a bit backwards if you ask me

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because these people are idiotic with a fucked up perception of morality

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is some childish logic on the murderer's behalf

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Exactly! This is terrorism!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I created an account just so I could upvote this.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you ever seen a debate in the US? It's entirely made of fallacies.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The funny thing about humanity is, you can justify anything to yourself, as long as you believe what you're doing is right.1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is precisely the type of thinking terrorists use. To then, anything is justifiable, as long as their goals are met.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Christopher Titus did a bit on this on his album "Neververlution" It's pretty funny

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

was just about to say that. so retarded...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they rationalize a difference between "innocent" life and everyone else. Unborn babies are innocent, their world is simple black and white

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Babies aren't innocent though. Not until they've been baptized in Christ's name is the stigma of the original sin removed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Point is, they're reaching for justification. It makes sense to them.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cos you are so pro life you did a full 360. Or 180. Shit, whatever.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because they are pro-birth, not pro-life

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't attempt to find logic in their actions. Terrorist are terrorists.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably because they are morally twisted lunatics who are the problem with religion in this country.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

because use of logic has been aborted by them

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because dumbfucks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would you kill someone who has killed another person? It's not my viewpoint, but it's on par with murder for them. Doesn't justify it.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Religious fanatics. ..

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because of the 'us' vs 'them' mentality. These sorts of aptly described terrorists are no different than any other sort of terrorist. (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They've been so corrupted by hate that they see their enemies as murderous monsters. In this case anyone who associates themselve's in (2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

any way with abortion is complicit in the murder of thousands of babies. If you have that drilled into you regularly enough, you believe it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same way sending your army to kill everyone proves the other are bad for killing everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Logic and critical thinking tend to stay far away from the minds of the simpletons who argue vehemently for pro-life.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

logic is never the murderers strong suit in these cases.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a false premise. They kill because they want abortions, what they perceive as mass killing, to stop. It's not to prove themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because a small yet scarily active percentage of Americans are FUCKING crazy.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because terrorism is often an excuse to wreak havoc with a fake cause

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Makes for a great newspaper headline. "pro-Lifer Shoots and Kills a Man."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fucking idiocy. As someone who's not exactly comfortable with the idea of baby killing myself, I still think they're fucking idiots.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... that having been said, I'm not to sure about this list of incidents OP posts, without police reports to back it up.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's an American thing

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because assholes like that aren't pro life, they are pro birth. They don't care what happens to a child after birth, let alone an adult man.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for the same reason you'd vote for Trump, because Thinking isn't one of your skills

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So here's my take (and I'm in the middle). Imagine that there was a law about to be passed that said that children aren't legally humans x/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

until they're 1 year old. Now imagine there were doctors that were performing operations on these non-humans that killed them. You would be

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

justifiably horrified and potentially feel fully justified in killing the doctor to prevent the deaths they were inflicting on children that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you (and I obviously) consider human. In fact, it would probably become your single biggest driving consideration come election time. To get

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

people into positions of power that could reverse this tragedy. Thats how many pro-life people see the issue. They literally see murder here

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Religion.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You see, Christians have had it drilled into them that they are not allowed to think for themselves. (Coming from strong Christian family)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

So people still say this after all the left-wing, anti-intellectual, anti-speech, anti-press college sit-ins.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's because they see people who perform abortions as murderers. In their eyes, they think they are bringing justice by killing murderers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Kill few to save many" is what they're thinking, I imagine.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because some people are retarded (pardon my rude use of words)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they aren't "pro-life" they are "pro-birth"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They aren't pro life, they are pro birth. They don't care what happens once the child is born. He could be a literal slave, wouldn't matter.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Irony, it runs in that persons blood.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Logic escapes them. Don't even expect a coherent answer.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You could ask the same question about why America goes to war to enforce peace you know. Conflicting beliefs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We're Pro-Life and we'll KILL your ass!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because they're delusional

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because logic is lost on most of humanity

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

PRO-LIFERS MURDERING DOCTORS AHAHAHA! IT'S IRONY, ON A BASIC LEVEL, BUT IT'S A HOOT, YOU CAN GET A HOOT. - Bill Hicks

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As somebody who is a bit of both, those shooters are just misguided terrorists. I really regret that the pro life movement has created this.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because they're irrational people who are blinded in their stupidity

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because it's religious logic. Which means not logical at all- you know. Massively hypocritical.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because according to illogical people, justice for murder is delivered by more murder.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would be interesting to ask them

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Religion is the death of us all.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Tips fedora*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They think the ends justifies the means.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"I THINK BABIES SHOULD LIVE BUT I DON'T THINK YOU SHOULD LIVE FOR DOING YOUR JOB!"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're different than you. Plain and simple.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because your mother didn't "love you enough" as a kid and you take that out on other people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least one pro-life organization keeps track of abortion clinics and doctors, with their mission being to close them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

because they think they are killing babies, and they also think it is justifiable to kill those who kill babies. I dont agree with them btw.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

because analcunts thats why

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not that I agree with this at all. But if you believe someone is killing a lot of other people maybe the solution is to kill them.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

"let's bomb a clinic full of potentially pregnant women! FOR THE BABIES!"

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

They would each still have an eye. And the initial eye taker would not take the other's last eye because they would lose their's. Punishment

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

in the land of the blind the one eyed man is king

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are you against the extermination of ISIS?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is the prime example I had in mind when I wrote my original comment.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They only care about you as long as you are Still completely inside another person, after that it's a free for all

10 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 9

Not sure where this imgur meme comes from, but that's categorically untrue. Charity just doesn't make the news.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except women go into a clinic considering abortion and they blow up them and their unborn child-they've just committed the abortion-LOGIC

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

LOL! Seriously! I don't understand anti-abortionists.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

How so?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a Pro-Choicer, it's clear you've never actually meet any of these people because they tend to adopt a lot, donate a lot to charity, and

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

donate a lot of time to help the unfortunate.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I concede your point but those people aren't the ones causing damage to these clinics. Unfortunately because the bad is so bad I 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are good and bad people everywhere, just don't generalise. Have an upvote :Ü™

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Islam is a religion of peace! [1]

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

And because imgur is dumb I must explain: I know Muslims aren't committing these crimes. The Christians are. [2]

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

But if you think ISIS doesn't represent Islam you also must consider that abortion clinic terrorists don't represent the pro-lifers. [3]

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Millions of Americans are anti-abortion. Few terrorize clinics. Billions of Muslims in the world, and only thousands kill people. [4]

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Millions of Americans are anti-abortion. Few terrorize clinics. Billions of Muslims in the world, and only thousands kill people. [4]

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm pro-choice and anti-Islam and just making fun of imgur's mental gymnastics over radical fringes that make groups look bad. [5]

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because they're not "pro-life" they're "anti-choice". They couldn't give two fucks about life, it's about controlling women

10 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 48

This. This is precisely what it is.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Pro choice here, this bullshit isn't helping anyone. Inflammatory strawman-ing, if anything all you have done is prove both sides need work.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 12

If you think this, you're fucking over the pro-choice movement. They legitimately believe that babies are being murdered.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I wouldnt use the word legitimately, since no medical science says that fetus=baby. How bout truly believe?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm 100% pro choice... But that's just not true. Pretty much all pro-lifers don't give two shits about control they just think it's murder

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Agree, also they are actually pro-birth.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Your comment is ignorant and disgusting. You're no better than the "pro-lifers" you chastise.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

I'm definitely pro-choice but saying that someone who is pro-life is automatically repressing women is some tumblr style bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, its because they believe that the baby is still a human

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro-life movement is estimated to be 63% women (sauce: wiki). That suggests something about the demographics of the pro-choice movement, no?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, fuck you and your strawman bullshit. You give no credence to pro-choice be completely ignoring what "pro-life" people believe.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 19

Then tell us "wise one" what pro-life believes

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

They believe that fetuses are already living humans on at least some level and that abortion is /literally/ murder.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But they don't have cognitive thought aswell as a working cardiovascular system

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

what

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That person is building up pro-lifers as something they aren't, as having weaker or worse motivations than they actually do, just in 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

order to make them look even worse than they are. Being pro-life is about what they believe to be murder, not about some hidden hate 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

You have said it well my friend.....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

For some, it's less about controlling women and more about not killing babies (paraphrasing things I've heard people say).

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 15

foetus does not equal baby

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Accomplished by forcing slavery on women, so I would argue against that.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

Which is still a bullshit argument unless these people are also actively fighting against world poverty, starvation, and sickness.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Many of them are.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Yes, but those people are off somewhere actually doing good, rather than trying to fight something that's a symptom of a bigger problem.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

kill the murdering whores!!!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 36

Yea I guess I should've watched the news yesterday before making that comment jokingly. I accept the downvotes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because nothing says you value human life like shooting up an abortion clinic!

10 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 12

If i thought someone was killing babies i would feel the desire to stop them

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Made me laugh out loud hahaha

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I'm very Pro-Choice but if I believed that abortionists were killing children, I'm not sure I could be as restrained as most pro lifers are.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

it's not even an abortion clinic, which makes it way worse.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

They see the workers as killers of many. Then it's a math problem. A very violent math problem.

10 years ago | Likes 341 Dislikes 10

I'm pro-choice, but I don't understand why people don't get this. It's a stupid question.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Who ever killed Batman's parents (and created the Batman) has saved all the lives of those saved by Batman minus 2.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Dude, Chill

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Incorrect. Since he couldn't possibly have foreseen the consequences of his actions, the Wayne killer can't be credited for the lives saved/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

any more than the Joker, Two Face or so on could be for putting them in the position where they needed to be saved./

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This would be the same logic as crediting Hitler for the Theory of Relativity, if you'll excuse the breach of Godwin's Law.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For those that didn't get my reference: http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20120528.gif

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is as saying that whoever raped a child for years, and that child later becomes a famous author, brought more happiness than pain.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I already explained the reference in this nested bunch of comments

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then again, Batman could have prevented hundreds of deaths by killing the Joker rather than allowing him to constantly escape...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lucy stole 18 apples and shot the shopkeeper. Lucy ate half an apple for every police she killed while making her escape. (1/?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She killed 3 policemen and one K9. Jake bashed Lucy's head in for eating some of the apples she was supposed to bring him. (2/?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Police gunned Jake down in an alley and fucked the bulletholes with their batons. The remaining apples were evenly planted on (3/?)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the graves of the people who died at this chain of events. All the apples contained 5 seeds each. 3 out of ten seeds grew into trees. (4/5)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is why ethics>morals

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 16

Yeah, that really depends on how you define those words.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

ethics = a set of moral principles

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Ethics is the principles set out by society, morals are the principles each individual believes in.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

❸ because so many people couldn't be wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

❶ While this is correct, I'd just like to point out, using, salem witch hunts, the holocaust, and segregation as examples of why it's

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

❷ dangerous to have the mindset from @FloodingWaters's comment, that whatever is common practice in society must be right,

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

The inconsistency is that people claiming to believe it's killing don't take violent action. Very odd state of mind.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

Not really - would you be willing to kill someone murdering thousands of children a year? That's what pro-lifers feel is happening here.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Idk, is it a pro-lifers legal right or responsibility to murder someone?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro Choice > Pro Life. I draw the line when the brain develops and begins functioning. Before that it's a bundle of cells.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We have too many humans for the planet anyway. We are killing ourselves no matter how you look at it.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Yah I'm pro life by far but there's a better way to go about this then murder and terrorism. I think its murder but they are 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

making themselves just as guilty as the people they are trying to stop

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I don't know why people have such a hard time understanding this. There is a system of logic behind most of what they do, and you can (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

acknowledge it without agreeing with it. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a Pro-Choice person, if people are murdering children, several a day every day, I could see people willing to kill to stop it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 24

That doesn't make it okay though

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How can it be a murder when its not a person yet, just a few cells? When I get a haircut, did I commit a genocide?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

No, you removed dead cells that contained your own DNA.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Okay, so I drink a lot of alcohol which will kill some brain and liver cells. What now?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That is your body and completely your choice. A fetus has its own unique set of HUMAN DNA

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Implying they actually murder. Is it really murder to remove a bundle of cells.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Ending a life with its own unique DNA but hey we can over simplify anything. Is it really murder to just put poison in a cup?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

So you would be also against killing insects or microogranisms?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What kind of logic is that? That bundle of cells is HUMAN DNA.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

I AM pro-life, but abortion is such a small portion of PP that I still support them. Most clinics (like this one) don't even provide it.

10 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 11

Based on the stats of who they serve, for what, and how small they actually are, I've found the "necessary for public health" argument weak.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm pro-life too, but I still think it's the woman who needs to decide what to do with her own body, regardless of what I think about it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What I don't understand is why does anyone (pro-life or otherwise) have to try and enforce their beliefs onto the others.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

If anyone believes a terrible wrong is being committed, do they ever sit quietly? Would we want to live around people who did?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While I completely disagree, it's their belief that their views are ethically correct thus they want everyone to follow their ethics

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It honestly makes me sick how the right media has convinced so many people that planned parenthood is state funded abortion clinics.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm glad you're sensible, but I still can't support someone who believes forced birth is ethical.

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 13

And "pro-lifers" can't support someone they believe supports murder. You won't understand them unless you seriously consider their views.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Otherwise, it's inconsistent and doesn't follow through. No ethics worth his salt is pro-life because of that reason. It's un-provable.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have seriously considered tier views. I wrote several papers. The problem is they all crumble once you really look at them.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The only way for pro-life to make sense is to be pro-life in all cases. Rape, incest, pedophilia, the whole nine yards.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are they not pro-life in all cases? I don't know many pro-lifers and i cannot speak for them.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And 'pro-lifers' won't understand pro-choice until they take an ethics class.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe they have and it reinforced their beliefs.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hitchens was an atheist, anti-religious, but he also understood biology. He was pro-life. Will an ethics class affect the biology?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I respect your opinion. You see, not all republicans are stupid assholes.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

I still think you're an asshole. Your opinion is callous and has caused much suffering in the world.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

Nothing personal, though.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Kids cost a lot and can get you arrested. They'll make you poor if you can't afford them.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

So... why isn't infanticide legal in that case?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Costs are kids>abortion>condoms. If a condom fails, an abortion works too. It actually contributes to science and medical research.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That is a fantastic question. Also why are the same people that are "pro-life" so often against any form of welfare or govt healthcare?

10 years ago | Likes 2155 Dislikes 44

Because government assistance can breed dependency and abuse. It used to be looked down upon to accept such hand outs as failing at life.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 17

So cut off all welfare to everyone just because some people abused it?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And always so eager to bomb other countries "back to the Stone Age" regardless of how many civilians get caught in the crossfire.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

They aren't pro life. They're pro birth. It's allows them to sleep well at night because they feel compassionate.

10 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 12

that's the point of religion. FEEL like you are some kind of saint while simultaneously being an asshole

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

Because their "Pro-Life" is actually "Pro-God" and they behave similarly to Medieval Nobles: Badly, but for God.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

Hi, I'm a Taoist and I'm pro-life. Nice to meet you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

So?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't have a god telling me anything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Are they?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

Usually, yes.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Source?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Well, there's no source for that. It's just my observation.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Because as we know the great heyzues said that people should never help anyone else because they should get a job or something.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pro-Birth is the way you make the most money: on a large, uneducated, depressed populace living paycheck to paycheck.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They also tend to be pro-death penality

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pro-life =/= Pro-quality life

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

R-selection vs K-selection. I know it's an outdated model, but it explains so much.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And by forcing stuff like waiting periods, they make riskier surgical abortions necessary rather than the quick and easy medical ones.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I personally don't see how the two are related. Most pro-lifers believe it's a child, so asking for permission to kill it is outrageous.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

It's related b/c actually being pro-life would mean after the birth they focus on also caring about the resulting life/child. They don't.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm pro-life, a counselor in a school, and I work closely with Social Services to make sure they're all healthy and safe. I'm not (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

anti-helping people, but believe the welfare system needs to be revamped. It's easy to take advantage of it. You can't group us all together

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because they live in America, where welfare and healthcare is socialism, and socialism is communism?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Nothing about those in "the good book", therefore they dont exist

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If you read the bible, God is very pro-abortion. The great flood, for instance. A special drink for Jews that would abort adulterous babies.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

YES THIS

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Same goes for gun control

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cause they don't trust the government to be able to competently run such things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's true, it's a lot cheaper to kill a child no one wants than care for an adult no one wants.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

because they can't see what they really are: fascists.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And so often pro-war.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is belief in limited govt a sign of moral deficiency now?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm pro-choice but this is unfair 2argue.It's poss to have diff opinions across political spectrums. Ex: pro-choice but against euthanasia.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

It's not a money issue, it's a trust issue.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

We mostly don't trust our government with money, power, or control.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because they disagree with the government's use of force. Stealing for charity is different than voluntary charity. Cons. do more of that.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

would love to see some statistics on this. I don't consider giving to a church as charitable as giving to the red cross.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can you tell me why when an (actual) terrorist kills people in the name of Islam,everyone is real quick to point out that they're not "true"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

>Muslims, or when a feminists threatens people with death "not true feminism", but when these crazy people start threatening PP, it's not>

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

> questioned at all whether they are pro-lifers but people go on and make even more ridiculous generalizations instead?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

This is a very good question. I, and a lot of other people, don't subscribe tot he "no true scotsman".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let me start off by stating my opinion on abortion in no uncertain terms: I think it should be safe, legal, and rare. 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Modern contraception is very effective when used properly, cheap, and (should be) abundant. It's simply more sensible to avoid pregnancy 2/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what I can see, it's a matter of efficient returns on an "investment". 9 months vs ~18 years is a huge financial difference. 3/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pro-lifers want to feel like they've saved lives: for the greater good. However, resources (money) are limited. To get the best return 4/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same people that are against abortion are usually against sex education and contraceptives for teenagers. Yeah, it don't make sense.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Probably cuz they didn't attend a good school so they don't know anything

10 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 18

Well a lot of the ones in control have gone to prestigious institutions. I think some believe they did it all on their own without any help.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well they are against funding education too...

10 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 9

I'm pro-life, for universal healthcare, and against the death penalty. Fight me.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Me too! I'm very much in the middle of conservative and liberal. Pro-life, pro-marriage equality, pro-gun rights, for social health care....

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being pro-life: You're doing it right.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok, I'll bite. Are you against all forms of abortion, even in cases of rape or where birth threatens the life of the mother?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

With rape, I think it's still a shame that they won't get a chance to live. However, if the mother's life is at serious risk, it's her call.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whoo hoo, another pro-life liberal...there are others out there!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you guys like to shoot people huh?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If you start with a libertarian philosophy it seems perfectly reasonable that all of these positions would pretty naturally follow

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Sounds like someone doesn't know what a libertarian actually is...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Agreed. Not all libertarians are pro-life. I am pro-choice and I believe that our freedoms shouldn't be impeded. Even with that hard choice.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I will only point out that I said nothing remotely like "all libertarians are pro-life"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, I really hate tiny message sizes cause I got lots to say about this... but I'll stop here.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does that fit with pro-life?

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Libertarian foundation + life begins at conception would get you that blend of positions

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

So the christian right wing. Sounds like a blend of tea party and libertarianism.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Most libertarians I know are pro-choice.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

I would hypothesize that your observation is more a matter of social selection than a statistically useful sampling of libertarians :)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not murder for pro-life. Libertarian would abhor the taking of the ultimate freedom that a person has, life.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Agree completely - meant as a reason to advocate in defense of the unborn child.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

But they would mean taking the liberty away from an adult. Which is why most libertarians I know are pro-choice.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Adults have the liberty to not have sex or use protection/birth control.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Because they are Pro-Birth, not Pro-Life. "WE WANT YOU TO GIVE BIRTH. But after that we don't give a shit about your baby."

10 years ago | Likes 1376 Dislikes 41

Or they don't think that it's the government's to be involved in that. Most churches are involved with pregnancy refuges and other programs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Yet the government would be involved in the woman's healthcare, the babies healthcare, the delivery, the aftercare, etc etc. Faulty logic.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Why can't I upvote this more than once?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone make this so.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The same argument was used to oppose abolition. "If the slaves are free, are YOU going to take care of them? No? Then leave them as slaves."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is literally my argument against "pro-lifers" every time.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

This.

10 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 7

They only care about the baby when it turns 18 so it can join the military and vote.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So much yes to this.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These are the same "Christians" who don't give a shit or do anything about current homeless or orphaned children already alive

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I call them anti-abortionists

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

That is some terrible shit. Stuff like this makes me realize why trying to live alone feels right.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Forced-birthers want to punish women for daring to have sex without the sole purpose of makin' babies. That's all it comes down to.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Was that a George Carlin reference?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If that's the person who said it, I forgot where I heard it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

brilliant

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

@AlwaysSeriousAboutHentai for president!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fucking THANK YOU!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I wish I could favorite comments or users I'd favorite you

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At least give credit to Carlin when you use his genius for internet points

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Honestly, I had forgotten where I had heard it, thanks.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bingo!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly this. This is literally what it boils down to.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They consider life sacred until you are born

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Exactly. All they care about birth. And then especially if your kid is disabled, they don't give a shit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Give birth as PUNISHMENT for what a SLUT you are.

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 6, 2017 2:37 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

SUFFER, WHORE

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

This is definitely the sentiment I hear from the pro life people I know. Fucking despicable

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

I have also heard this, in basically the exact same words.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Lol! Masterful troll or woefully uninformed?? YOU DECIDE!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

*you or your

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

What are you correcting?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The statement was that they don't care about "your baby." They don't care about "you," either. I wasn't correcting so much as adding.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah, don't make them the favor to call them pro-life. Call them anti-choice.

10 years ago | Likes 345 Dislikes 13

You people seriously don't see how biased you are about this topic? It's like people calling you "pro-death/pro-murder", fucking ridiculous.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Calling it pro-death instead of pro-choice would be factually wrong though, while anti-choice instead of pro-life is not. If anything, 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I use the term "pro-life" with heavily sarcastic quotation marks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

And anti choice, is anti America!!!

10 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 7

We should fight fire with fire and terror the terrorists! I DEMAND CIVIL WAR!!!!! HAIL SATAN! Jk..

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Straight up! +1

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

That's some pretty sweet marketing they've got going there isn't it? If you aren't "pro-life" you're obviously "pro-death".

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

Why not anti-life? I hear there's even an equation for it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Both sides are kind of guilty of that charge. Really it's a discussion of the legality and morality of terminating unwanted fetuses.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

He didn't say it was pro-death

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Can't speak for everyone, but is this the same government that still consistently fucks up VA healthcare? And you want MORE of that?

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 21

Hm, counterpoint: or you can die from an easily treatable illness.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah I was about to mention this. You can get super reduced cost healthcare, but wait months. Or pay a higher fee and get seen right away

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

... the problem is that when the government is involved, the taxpayer pays premium rates, and you get super reduced cost service.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In the U.S. yes, but when the gvt uses their size as a bargaining chip to reduce rates and improve care everyone wins but greedy companies

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'd rather have slow and unorganized care than no care

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 10

At least you'll die full of hope that you'll get treated someday.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I havent had a solid shit since August. they'll see me in January, assuming it doesn't try to kill me first. Ever had diarrhea for 6 months?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Forgive me for thinking that maybe someone who has a sick kid deserves better response time than that. And thanks for the downvotes.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

When have Christians ever cared about hypocrisy? The bible preaches forgiveness and love, somehow translates to hate gays and women

10 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 26

You just typecasted all Christians. That makes you a bigot.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah watch the generalisations here. It's not all Christians, it's assholes. That thinking is why the world is so fucked up.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*bad Christians.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

If that type of Christians are bad Christians, then most Christians I've met were bad Christians.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

When did this become about Christians?....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Remember when god killed a million Ethiopians? Yeah a lot of hypocrisy..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Funniest thing is that abortion was practiced a lot in biblical times! The reason the bible doesn't mention is it because IT'S OK WITH IT.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

But it does mention it in numbers 5, with a priest testing an unfaithful wife that appears to cause a miscarriage.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention greed and xenophobia

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As stated by wise men before me " I like your Christ, just not your Christians"

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Gandhi. Of India. The adopted home of Mother Teresa. Where she started an army of women who care for the poorest of the poor to this day.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

God wants spiritual fruits. Not religious nuts.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The full quote is "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the Bible doesn't say nice things about gays or women

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Name a religious text that does!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The bible says whatever anybody wants it to say to prove their points.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It barely mentions either.. one passage in Leviticus and two female characters. Mostly it says "don't be greedy" and "love thy neighbour"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of the key and peele skit where god told a group of people "donate your belongings and spend your life helping others"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, Paul calls homosexuality an abomination a couple of times, and a lot of Christians believe his word has authority

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

He also says to never drink, so if you have ever had a drink then you're a hypocrite

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The group ended up pretending they thought it was a ghost and ran away instead of proving they're "loyal" to him.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because most pro-lifers are morons...

10 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 47

They may be morons... but it's more that they aren't consistent in their message.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

You are helping nobody with these bullshit inflammatory mass generalizations.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 9

How about just worry about if you want to keep your baby and let others make up their own mind.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 13

Can't believe this comment is at -3 points. Sorry bro. I'll do my part.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

People want to tell others what they can and can't do like they know better. Just live your life and let others live theirs. Simple stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

bit of a broad brush, there

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 16

you realize that pro-life people think we're morons too right? That kind of reasoning helps no one.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 13

One view is rooted in bodily autonomy, the other is rooted in projecting your idiotic view onto others and isn't worth hearing out.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

Cause that's how you win people over: by ignoring them and telling them they're stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

There is no gray area here. Either you believe in a woman's ability to make legal health decisions for herself, or you are wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I love how a clearly ad-hominem attack is upvoted. Imgur ftw.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That and they believe so highly in their 'morals' that they think the entire human race should be indoctrinated into obeying them.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

have you ever heard of democracy? that's how it works. you are "indoctrinated into obeying" the rules of the many.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The democracy said "pro-choice" so pro-lifers should really just accept that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there is a difference between acceptance and following the law. "pro-lifers" have to follow the law but it is important to voice opinion.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol, and you don't? Can you actually tell me you don't want everyone to believe what you believe? Else why would you even be here arguing?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I believe in the right for a woman to choose. Which is the right thing to believe. Nobody can accurately judge another's circumstances.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"the right thing to believe" is inflammatory. and the entire judicial system is based on judging other people's circumstances.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1/2 I'm going to get dv to oblivion. But I would say ALL "pro-lifers" are morons. Via the facts, there is no reason to be against abortion.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 35

A- We are vastly over populated B- Unless an emergency, abortions are performed early term before developed C- An unwanted child= miserable

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 17

"Vastly overpopulated"? Even the UN believes the world population is stabilizing. Many countries are paying people to reproduce.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There are a few very valid reasons to be against abortion. I'm pro-choice mainly for the fact that abortion is necessary sometimes.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

There is no reason to be against it, its not your body and you have no say. Who gives a fuck what you have to say when its not your baby.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Well why should a mother be allowed to abort then? The child's body is not hers and she should have no say. Your logic is bad.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

do you think that abortions should be permitted up until the time the baby is born?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

...because kids are the worst thing ever...

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Well I think risking a woman's life with a complicated childbirth is wholly unnecessary and medically irresponsible.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

after spending 18 years being one of the worst things ever, kids evolve into something even worse.. adults.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6