waffleresidence

83292 pts · June 4, 2015


How is he unqualified?

14 hours ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I don’t think the post is literally talking about the world. It’s clearly talking about the US and using that language to be bigger than it is but it’s not literally the world.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is your fault you don’t communicate well actually.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You should express your opinions clearly and just say you are glad this person is dead. It’s what everyone is thinking you want to say but you don’t seem to be saying it outright which can either be indicative of you wanting to troll or you just don’t know how to say it clearly. So what is it? Just not brave enough to say it clearly or what?

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don’t think so. I think you either know you’re doing it on purpose or you just have a regular denial response to regular responses from others telling you that you don’t communicate well. Either way you should work on that.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You clearly spoke to my hope personally and this whole conversation you have spoken to me personally and my thoughts as an individual. You can’t say you say “hope” as a communal thing and expect me to understand you didn’t mean me personally when you hadn’t spoken communally with me at any point and have only referred to me as an individual this entire time. The only time you actually said “hope” towards anyone but me was apparently to yourself when you said hopefully he dies soon.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya and how does that affect my “hope” exactly? What am I hoping for?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’m not hoping. I’m stating it will be illegal or it will become legal if it’s changed. It’s a logical explanation to two different possibilities, why are you adding “hope” into the situation?

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I never said he wouldn’t do it, I said it would be illegal or it would need to be legalized which I doubt it will

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also all of the characters would be portrayed by men.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If they vote for Trump in 2028 they doing one of a few potential things: 1) throwing away their vote since it won’t count and they would need to fill it in and he isn’t eligible to run. 2) trump is illegally running for president and again it’s a throwaway vote. 3) Trump somehow got the constitution amended to let him and any other person be president for more than 2 terms

3 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Thank you for clarifying it’s an opinion and not your claim at facts. That was really anyone needed.

4 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s the same people. Logically you should be ok with it since it is research based and their opinions are based on research so again, this is a you problem, not a DSM problem. You can cling onto the old stuff but you are wrong in the fullest literal sense of the word.

4 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds like you don’t want to believe the criteria was updated with good faith and want to stick with the old stuff. Convenient. Regardless, you are now functionally incorrect in your assumptions and knowledge if you willingly refuse to acknowledge progress in research. Your opinion is worse than wrong. It’s unscientific.

4 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

DSM 4 is outdated. You reference outdated material?

4 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You are talking to a troll bot account

4 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hey just a heads up, you are talking to a recurring new account troll. Don’t engage.

4 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

New mars account

4 days ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Ya this is definitely the new mars account

4 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is this the new mars account?

4 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Vote

6 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s a post/call to action that as a whole white supremacy is an issue that should be more addressed by white people suggesting that white people are doing more “empathizing” than direct action to solve the problem.

6 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks!

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“Bladder testing run time” oof that is a great point to make on a rating of a film. Ok, wait for streaming it is!!

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude! Seriously! I don’t know if I want to spend premium dollars to see this film and when I asked someone why they don’t like this film on this site they just ghosted me. Is it actually bad or is it just blind hate that people have.

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok so I got rid of my singular downvote so you can see it changed again and what are you talking about? I just wanted your legitimate criticism. I want to watch, you don’t like it and I want to know why someone wouldn’t like it to help me decide to go watch it or wait for it to stream. It’s not that deep.

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn’t and to prove it I will also downvote (just long enough for you to reply) to prove I am not the singular downvote. But why wasn’t it good to you? I want to see it but I’m curious about why people wouldn’t like it.

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m confused, do you not like the movie?

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m guessing it’s people thinking “what does this have to do with anything?” or “hey look a distraction attempt.” It’s not many downvotes either to be fair.

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. It’s basically pirating if you take another platforms content and view it on a different platform. So long as you don’t give the original platform traffic, you essentially got to partake in their content without giving them anything.

1 week ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2