Uafish

17805 pts · March 12, 2012


Because of the first line at the start when the dad tells the kid to “tuck in your shirt”

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I assumed boy because girls don’t normally tuck in their shirts?

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

But TB isn’t part of the usual vaccine schedule, so isn’t really affected by the antivax movement?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No I don’t think so, it’s referring to the botched assassination where they failed several times only to succeed at the very end

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one else here seems to remember THE safe... Pepperidge farm remembers

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea but he was saying he usually loved it, and it was only when it did taste disgusting because of the drugs he knew he needed to stop

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DNA is a double helix, has thymine and uses deoxyribonucleic acid while RNA is a single helix, has uracil (not T) and uses ribonucleic acid

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean sure but that’s still way better than actual ads

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

3 % of cancers missed by skipping to 5 instead of 2 years, as they generally take >5y to develop, and it’s going to save so much money.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 to develop any changes, in most cases more so screening every 2 years is just a waste of money. There is only going to be a very small

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 Okay so I did actually mean “the new screening program is just as effective”, my apologies. Studies have shown that it takes at least 5y

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha well Vs are like vacuums unless air/water is introduced so the membranes generally stay together unless you do splits or something

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

3 https://www.cancer.org.au/news/blog/prevention/australia’s-new-cervical-cancer-screening-program-your-faqs-answered.html

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 anyway. So literally picking up the same cancers with more precision.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 It is going to be more effective. The only type of cancer that isn’t HPV linked is very very rare, and isn’t picked up in the old Pap test

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And in Aus that number is even higher, I think greater than 99% of cervical cancer is HPV related

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Over 99% of cervical cancer is caused by HPV, the new screening program is just as effective. Gardasil is updating to cover more strains too

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you done any research? Cervical cancer is linked to HPV 99.7% of the time - the new vaccine is just as effective. Don’t spread lies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I liked Big Mouth

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Legit questions, cos this seems like such a good idea, but how do you make the bed with 2?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hope so, my soul has gotta be out there somewhere

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In fairness, the title really adds to the post so OP still gets some credit

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Well that's why it is stupid, because the whole "73c to the dollar" thing doesn't take occupation into account

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

You alright there fam?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hmm Boxing Day is more a recovery from all the wine on Christmas haha. Kangaroo Boxing Day is a nationally sanctioned drinking event.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thankyou!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's more an excuse to get drunk, but yes vaguely

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's one of my friend's arm, she was also wearing black :)

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

I agree, but I am very lazy. Costume was so easy, cargo pants were $3 from an op shop!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1