970 pts ยท August 2, 2017
If you bother to examine the link you posted, you'll find it agrees with me. The only place where 2nd and 3rd person POV is used is in literature where it refers specifically to the narrator's relationship to the story where you would share their 1st person perspective as an outside observer. It doesn't exist outside of narrative storytelling.
Your "fact" is not correct and your holier-than-thou attitude is both shitty and unearned, but perhaps I should clarify. An entitie's POV is always 1st person.
It is definitionally 1st person as I said and your point is both wrong and pointless. YOU are the one carrying on the argument.
While I agree with your sentiment, POV or Point Of View is definitionally 1st person. The argument itself boils down to "who cares, POV being used this way is here to stay so get over it."
It's not actually hindsight in this case. These are the exact arguments that were made at that time. Everything that has happened regarding the courts since Trump took office the first time was predicted during the 2014 midterms.
Also of note, if you take their "involved students" and divide by the number of chapters, you get an average membership of more than 200. My suspicion is that they're counting email subscribers amd calling those "involved students" regardless of whether they're active or not. I'd doubt that they even bothered to make sure those are all unique people.
They don't just get to charge federally, they still have to have jurisdiction. And that also doesn't get them around the fact that getting rid of jury trials would require a constitutional amendment.
Not saying you're wrong, they will try. But fortunately, jury trials are in the Bill of Rights, so getting rid of them and making it stick will be tricky. Plus, there are many many states where they wouldn't be able to get rid of it either.
You should have gone for the millions; fuck 'em.
Yeah, that got posted after I'd commented. Plus, the link posted earlier said exactly what I did.
So claimed by People and TMZ. The police have not said that.
Oh, 100%. I just always feel obliged to point out that the money savings come from other products because so many people point to those as an argument, but it is literally the same price as Walmart per minimum usable quantity. And there are many other things that can pay for your membership in a single trip at equal or higher quality. Coffee is (or at least used to be) another good example of savings and better quality at Costco.
If you've got menstruating women in your household, or take daily vitamins, you can save enough money to pay for your membership in a single trip. The bulk paper goods aren't actually a better or worse deal than Walmart, but the packs are bigger. They also have much higher quality meat, pet food, and frozen goods along with things you just don't find in other box stores.Plus, it's a really cheap place to have a pretty solid lunch.
Nevermind! The shark is Swedish Chef.
But is the shark a custom shark Muppet, or is it Beaker?
I believe that "transsexual" is an outdated term, but I'd guess it was used innocently here.
I believe a point was being made...and 99% of paintings are insipid.
I tend to agree. Him not getting removed feels like a red flag. It's pretty standard to initially detain all parties in any fight, let alone one on a plane. I suppose we don-t actually know what country this was in though...
You probably shouldn't just because it might convince you that you can take your eye off him. DeSantis is a snake just like Abbott, just like Trump. I think it's best to think of them as separate, allied threats.
Honestly? The good people tend to be either washed out, pushed out, or deliberately put in a dangerous situation and abandoned. The whole law enforcement bush needs to be ripped out by the root and replaced.I know there are some cops who are truly great people otherwise, but they don't make it very high.
I think at my best I could do 3. I've never been particularly gifted with upper body strength, but I did used to be skinny.
Do it again. That's the kind of action it takes and that's why the government will always fear a united people.If we could actually get our shit together, what could Florida do? Wash it off - do it again. Start arresting people-other people do it. Arrest those people-more step in. There are more of us than there is room, and the kind people are the ones who pay the bulk of the taxes. They could not stand to a united left because in the long run the right will never unite in a way that matters.
Y'all might be right, but if that's what they're doing it's a bad call. Their base would be happy to be outraged on their dildo leader's behalf.
Boy, I hope that didn't come across as me disagreeing or defending either of those monsters, I just wanted to make one more dig at the US' embarrassment of a leader. You are exactly right.
No, you have once again missed my point. I don't give a fuck what the point of the slogans is, they do not work. They DO shut down conversation when used by themselves. They DON'T convince anyone who doesn't already agree. They don't MEAN anything without an argument. And one of them, "cruelty is the point" isn't actually true because the point is control. Cruelty is just a tool.
Right, but you've completely missed my point. That particular phrase very often has the effect of shutting down discussion. Whether that's intentional or not is also irrelevant. I see exactly the same effect when people say "hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug;" it's not useful, it adds nothing to people's understanding by itself, it often has a negative effect on conversation. Slogans are fun, but they aren't an argument, they aren't evidence, and they aren't analysis.
Thank you for saying this. Way too often I see "cruelty is the point" used to just shut down a conversation as though there's nothing more to say. But it's just wrong; the point is control, not cruelty.
Yeah, except people actually liked Jimmy Savile.
No pro-Russia here, both the asshole "leaders" there can rot. But if those soldiers had refused to unroll the carpet, they would have at best gotten dishonorably discharged losing all veterans' benefits. That usually includes the ones offered by private companies too. You would have done the same in their place.The world just isn't as simple as you'd like it to be.
If you bother to examine the link you posted, you'll find it agrees with me. The only place where 2nd and 3rd person POV is used is in literature where it refers specifically to the narrator's relationship to the story where you would share their 1st person perspective as an outside observer. It doesn't exist outside of narrative storytelling.
Your "fact" is not correct and your holier-than-thou attitude is both shitty and unearned, but perhaps I should clarify. An entitie's POV is always 1st person.
It is definitionally 1st person as I said and your point is both wrong and pointless. YOU are the one carrying on the argument.
While I agree with your sentiment, POV or Point Of View is definitionally 1st person. The argument itself boils down to "who cares, POV being used this way is here to stay so get over it."
It's not actually hindsight in this case. These are the exact arguments that were made at that time. Everything that has happened regarding the courts since Trump took office the first time was predicted during the 2014 midterms.
Also of note, if you take their "involved students" and divide by the number of chapters, you get an average membership of more than 200. My suspicion is that they're counting email subscribers amd calling those "involved students" regardless of whether they're active or not. I'd doubt that they even bothered to make sure those are all unique people.
They don't just get to charge federally, they still have to have jurisdiction. And that also doesn't get them around the fact that getting rid of jury trials would require a constitutional amendment.
Not saying you're wrong, they will try. But fortunately, jury trials are in the Bill of Rights, so getting rid of them and making it stick will be tricky. Plus, there are many many states where they wouldn't be able to get rid of it either.
You should have gone for the millions; fuck 'em.
Yeah, that got posted after I'd commented. Plus, the link posted earlier said exactly what I did.
So claimed by People and TMZ. The police have not said that.
Oh, 100%. I just always feel obliged to point out that the money savings come from other products because so many people point to those as an argument, but it is literally the same price as Walmart per minimum usable quantity. And there are many other things that can pay for your membership in a single trip at equal or higher quality. Coffee is (or at least used to be) another good example of savings and better quality at Costco.
If you've got menstruating women in your household, or take daily vitamins, you can save enough money to pay for your membership in a single trip. The bulk paper goods aren't actually a better or worse deal than Walmart, but the packs are bigger. They also have much higher quality meat, pet food, and frozen goods along with things you just don't find in other box stores.
Plus, it's a really cheap place to have a pretty solid lunch.
Nevermind! The shark is Swedish Chef.
But is the shark a custom shark Muppet, or is it Beaker?
I believe that "transsexual" is an outdated term, but I'd guess it was used innocently here.
I believe a point was being made...and 99% of paintings are insipid.
I tend to agree. Him not getting removed feels like a red flag. It's pretty standard to initially detain all parties in any fight, let alone one on a plane. I suppose we don-t actually know what country this was in though...
You probably shouldn't just because it might convince you that you can take your eye off him. DeSantis is a snake just like Abbott, just like Trump. I think it's best to think of them as separate, allied threats.
Honestly? The good people tend to be either washed out, pushed out, or deliberately put in a dangerous situation and abandoned. The whole law enforcement bush needs to be ripped out by the root and replaced.
I know there are some cops who are truly great people otherwise, but they don't make it very high.
I think at my best I could do 3. I've never been particularly gifted with upper body strength, but I did used to be skinny.
Do it again. That's the kind of action it takes and that's why the government will always fear a united people.
If we could actually get our shit together, what could Florida do? Wash it off - do it again. Start arresting people-other people do it. Arrest those people-more step in. There are more of us than there is room, and the kind people are the ones who pay the bulk of the taxes. They could not stand to a united left because in the long run the right will never unite in a way that matters.
Y'all might be right, but if that's what they're doing it's a bad call. Their base would be happy to be outraged on their dildo leader's behalf.
Boy, I hope that didn't come across as me disagreeing or defending either of those monsters, I just wanted to make one more dig at the US' embarrassment of a leader. You are exactly right.
No, you have once again missed my point. I don't give a fuck what the point of the slogans is, they do not work. They DO shut down conversation when used by themselves. They DON'T convince anyone who doesn't already agree. They don't MEAN anything without an argument. And one of them, "cruelty is the point" isn't actually true because the point is control. Cruelty is just a tool.
Right, but you've completely missed my point. That particular phrase very often has the effect of shutting down discussion. Whether that's intentional or not is also irrelevant. I see exactly the same effect when people say "hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug;" it's not useful, it adds nothing to people's understanding by itself, it often has a negative effect on conversation. Slogans are fun, but they aren't an argument, they aren't evidence, and they aren't analysis.
Thank you for saying this. Way too often I see "cruelty is the point" used to just shut down a conversation as though there's nothing more to say. But it's just wrong; the point is control, not cruelty.
Yeah, except people actually liked Jimmy Savile.
No pro-Russia here, both the asshole "leaders" there can rot. But if those soldiers had refused to unroll the carpet, they would have at best gotten dishonorably discharged losing all veterans' benefits. That usually includes the ones offered by private companies too. You would have done the same in their place.
The world just isn't as simple as you'd like it to be.