32903 pts ยท January 16, 2017
Imgur hates my favorites.
Usually the people who did something upsetting a long time ago. Often it wasn't even that long ago, and equally as often they're still doing it.
At the start of the video, there's a blonde girl wearing a white bikini visible in the crowd. The resolution is bad enough that the whole group just kind of blends together but you can see her right at the start (third person from the left), she slowly shimmies her way to the right, and then at the... moment where you probably stop paying attention to the background you can see her again as she turns her back to the camera.That said, abysmal ratio.
Sycophants often think that their loyalty will be met in kind, but loyalty without expertise is easy to replace. It's why Trump's inner circle seems to have a revolving door that can cycle through new people in a matter of days. If your only contribution is towing the line, you will be replaced and forgotten the moment you leave the room.
Yea I feel for his struggle and think there should be room for people to live this sort of lifestyle if that is what they want, but the vibe is definitely off in this video. Comes across as very self-righteous, like the sort of person who would start quoting the Constitution after he's been informed that he's trespassing on private property.
Facing outward still works as a power move. Just ask your opponent if he wants to kiss his wife.
Yea there's not a single legitimate result on google that corroborates that this is purely a sex act for cats or that is equal in severity to rape to do it, I do not know why you would think that there would be a source with this opinion. The most you get is that their response to it is similar to sexual stimulation. I also said that I don't do this act with cats at the start of the conversation and I'd appreciate it if you didn't try to resort to ad personam just because you're incorrect.
It's not a matter of consent, it's a matter of what defines an act as a sex act. This stimulates a nerve-dense area that results in a hormonal release, it's no more a sex act than a mother breastfeeding her child. Babies can't consent, and the mother experiences pleasure very similar to an orgasm when she breastfeeds, does that make the act of breastfeeding rape?Cats don't even experience sexual pleasure the same way humans do, trying to say this is a sex act for them is anthropomorphizing.
I find this behavior a little odd to engage in but calling it rape is a bit ridiculous. Equating it to rape just minimizes how serious rape is.
The "Explain X" manner of speaking is extremely Mars-coded, but everything else this person has said isn't even Mars-adjacent. You have to misread their first message pretty radically in order to interpret it as being pro-fascist. They even put the little /s at the end.
Naturally. But a bullet that could penetrate the glass AND his protective layer of fat and leathery hide? I'm not made of money.
The nationwide protests against Trump were some of largest protests in American history.He gives speeches from behind bulletproof glass.
I think for a lot of people it's about exposure at a certain age, and if it just didn't happen to you at that age you'll never really have it click. I can understand it even if I don't personally "get" it, like the xenomorph design is very intentionally evocative of sexuality with the head shape being phallic and the face-huggers being an obvious allegory for rape and unwanted pregnancy. It's not shocking to hear people are into these things, though I do wish I didn't see it as often as I have.
Controlled opposition opinion.
The goal is predictable, the justification/reasoning is a little more batshit insane than anticipated. Almost nothing comes as an actual surprise anymore.
And again, the allegations against Lindsey Graham are relatively credible. Talking about him specifically being a closeted homosexual is not painting every single homophobic conservative as a secret homosexual.
/ succinctly that they do not intend to insult homosexuality at all. Interpreting their statement in an antagonistic way is akin to interpreting your statements here as being in defense of Nazis. It's just not an honest way to engage with the topic.
I am, literally, in your shoes for the record. Questions that are asked in good faith are not the same thing as emotional detachment; I genuinely asked because I wanted to understand your reasoning. I can respect your perspective, though I think projecting your frustrations regarding the overall persecution of lgbt people onto the people who are not wanting to insult us at all is... kind of a misfire. I think anyone perceived to conflate homosexuality and homophobia usually clarifies, pretty /
Again, I'm asking what the harm is and what the relevance is to this particular instance, not whether or not it happens. I can see the argument, potentially, that conflating homophobia with closeted homosexuality runs the risk of casting homosexuality in the same light as homophobia. That's me making an argument for you and it is, in my opinion, not a very great argument so I don't want to just assume that's what your argument is.
I tend to enjoy it when the slander is truthful, but I'm not really seeing the issue with this particular problem. Why should we defend the Nazis from being inaccurately accused of being gay? Furthermore what bearing does that have concerning a politician who in all likelihood, according to multiple allegations, genuinely was a closeted homosexual?
Kind of an odd, self-answering question to ask, no? If all secrets should be outed what purpose does a question like this serve besides an attempt to shut down the conversation? Pointing out Lindsey's obvious closetedness and the hypocrisy it casts on his legacy as an anti-lgbt legislator does not make any of the publicly known, obvious dirt on him any less disgraceful.
Donald Trump went from being a political rival in the Republican primaries to being someone you needed to suckle on the teat of in order to remain in office as a Republican. Republicans are profoundly efficient at falling in line.
Yea an innate part of this scenario is that the customer is never going to know if the delay is caused by a genuine issue or a pilot that is just crying wolf. The onus of good business practice does not fall on the customer though, they paid for a flight at a specific time and delays are delays regardless of the reason. If the business is shitty, and learns shitty lessons from giving compensation, that isn't the customer's responsibility. It's not complicated, stop being so condescending.
Yea the issue is that there was an error and it caused a delay, only being caught via the pilot's intuition. The airline needs to work on both it's maintenance and it's ability to find maintenance issues. Losing money due to their sloppy maintenance protocols is a positive.
A shitty corporation doesn't really need incentive to avoid spending money.These delays are caused by concerns over safety, yes, but those concerns are caused by sloppy maintenance. A proper business would recognize that the compensation they now have to give is due to the poor maintenance, not the concerns.
Everyone in The Office is kind of terrible for one reason or another.
Trump released ~6% of the Epstein files at present. Which is not only less than he is "legally able to" it's less than he's legally *required* to and less than he promised when he ran for office (shocker), and we know definitively that he's retracted his own name and pictures with him in them for no justifiable reason. I'm not answering this because a troll asked a bad-faith question. I'm answering it in case anyone read the bad-faith question and wondered to what extent the answer is "no."
https://wchstv.com/news/local/police-navigate-wild-traffic-stop The person they arrested was 55, but it's not the woman in this clip just to be clear. I was curious just because that would be a profoundly tragic 55, even with meth involved.
You seem to be misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm calling him a pedophile.
Usually the people who did something upsetting a long time ago.
Often it wasn't even that long ago, and equally as often they're still doing it.
At the start of the video, there's a blonde girl wearing a white bikini visible in the crowd. The resolution is bad enough that the whole group just kind of blends together but you can see her right at the start (third person from the left), she slowly shimmies her way to the right, and then at the... moment where you probably stop paying attention to the background you can see her again as she turns her back to the camera.
That said, abysmal ratio.
Sycophants often think that their loyalty will be met in kind, but loyalty without expertise is easy to replace. It's why Trump's inner circle seems to have a revolving door that can cycle through new people in a matter of days.
If your only contribution is towing the line, you will be replaced and forgotten the moment you leave the room.
Yea I feel for his struggle and think there should be room for people to live this sort of lifestyle if that is what they want, but the vibe is definitely off in this video.
Comes across as very self-righteous, like the sort of person who would start quoting the Constitution after he's been informed that he's trespassing on private property.
Facing outward still works as a power move. Just ask your opponent if he wants to kiss his wife.
Yea there's not a single legitimate result on google that corroborates that this is purely a sex act for cats or that is equal in severity to rape to do it, I do not know why you would think that there would be a source with this opinion. The most you get is that their response to it is similar to sexual stimulation. I also said that I don't do this act with cats at the start of the conversation and I'd appreciate it if you didn't try to resort to ad personam just because you're incorrect.
It's not a matter of consent, it's a matter of what defines an act as a sex act. This stimulates a nerve-dense area that results in a hormonal release, it's no more a sex act than a mother breastfeeding her child. Babies can't consent, and the mother experiences pleasure very similar to an orgasm when she breastfeeds, does that make the act of breastfeeding rape?
Cats don't even experience sexual pleasure the same way humans do, trying to say this is a sex act for them is anthropomorphizing.
I find this behavior a little odd to engage in but calling it rape is a bit ridiculous. Equating it to rape just minimizes how serious rape is.
The "Explain X" manner of speaking is extremely Mars-coded, but everything else this person has said isn't even Mars-adjacent. You have to misread their first message pretty radically in order to interpret it as being pro-fascist. They even put the little /s at the end.
Naturally. But a bullet that could penetrate the glass AND his protective layer of fat and leathery hide? I'm not made of money.
The nationwide protests against Trump were some of largest protests in American history.
He gives speeches from behind bulletproof glass.
I think for a lot of people it's about exposure at a certain age, and if it just didn't happen to you at that age you'll never really have it click. I can understand it even if I don't personally "get" it, like the xenomorph design is very intentionally evocative of sexuality with the head shape being phallic and the face-huggers being an obvious allegory for rape and unwanted pregnancy. It's not shocking to hear people are into these things, though I do wish I didn't see it as often as I have.
Controlled opposition opinion.
The goal is predictable, the justification/reasoning is a little more batshit insane than anticipated. Almost nothing comes as an actual surprise anymore.
And again, the allegations against Lindsey Graham are relatively credible. Talking about him specifically being a closeted homosexual is not painting every single homophobic conservative as a secret homosexual.
/ succinctly that they do not intend to insult homosexuality at all. Interpreting their statement in an antagonistic way is akin to interpreting your statements here as being in defense of Nazis. It's just not an honest way to engage with the topic.
I am, literally, in your shoes for the record. Questions that are asked in good faith are not the same thing as emotional detachment; I genuinely asked because I wanted to understand your reasoning. I can respect your perspective, though I think projecting your frustrations regarding the overall persecution of lgbt people onto the people who are not wanting to insult us at all is... kind of a misfire. I think anyone perceived to conflate homosexuality and homophobia usually clarifies, pretty /
Again, I'm asking what the harm is and what the relevance is to this particular instance, not whether or not it happens.
I can see the argument, potentially, that conflating homophobia with closeted homosexuality runs the risk of casting homosexuality in the same light as homophobia. That's me making an argument for you and it is, in my opinion, not a very great argument so I don't want to just assume that's what your argument is.
I tend to enjoy it when the slander is truthful, but I'm not really seeing the issue with this particular problem. Why should we defend the Nazis from being inaccurately accused of being gay? Furthermore what bearing does that have concerning a politician who in all likelihood, according to multiple allegations, genuinely was a closeted homosexual?
Kind of an odd, self-answering question to ask, no? If all secrets should be outed what purpose does a question like this serve besides an attempt to shut down the conversation? Pointing out Lindsey's obvious closetedness and the hypocrisy it casts on his legacy as an anti-lgbt legislator does not make any of the publicly known, obvious dirt on him any less disgraceful.
Donald Trump went from being a political rival in the Republican primaries to being someone you needed to suckle on the teat of in order to remain in office as a Republican. Republicans are profoundly efficient at falling in line.
Yea an innate part of this scenario is that the customer is never going to know if the delay is caused by a genuine issue or a pilot that is just crying wolf. The onus of good business practice does not fall on the customer though, they paid for a flight at a specific time and delays are delays regardless of the reason. If the business is shitty, and learns shitty lessons from giving compensation, that isn't the customer's responsibility. It's not complicated, stop being so condescending.
Yea the issue is that there was an error and it caused a delay, only being caught via the pilot's intuition. The airline needs to work on both it's maintenance and it's ability to find maintenance issues. Losing money due to their sloppy maintenance protocols is a positive.
A shitty corporation doesn't really need incentive to avoid spending money.
These delays are caused by concerns over safety, yes, but those concerns are caused by sloppy maintenance. A proper business would recognize that the compensation they now have to give is due to the poor maintenance, not the concerns.
Everyone in The Office is kind of terrible for one reason or another.
Trump released ~6% of the Epstein files at present. Which is not only less than he is "legally able to" it's less than he's legally *required* to and less than he promised when he ran for office (shocker), and we know definitively that he's retracted his own name and pictures with him in them for no justifiable reason.
I'm not answering this because a troll asked a bad-faith question. I'm answering it in case anyone read the bad-faith question and wondered to what extent the answer is "no."
https://wchstv.com/news/local/police-navigate-wild-traffic-stop
The person they arrested was 55, but it's not the woman in this clip just to be clear. I was curious just because that would be a profoundly tragic 55, even with meth involved.
You seem to be misunderstanding what I'm saying. I'm calling him a pedophile.