4011 pts ยท March 29, 2025
#4 Well of of those is an improvement in my book.
I realize this can be hard to grasp for some people (that don't want to get it) but: No, not all jews. All zionists.Concentrating on all jews would not only injustly hurt all the jews that don't support zionism but would also injustly exclude all the twats that aren't jews and support zionism.Fuck zionists.
Well everyone knows that if you're disabled you can't be going around on your own. So if you're really disabled the person taking care of you can go upstairs to notify people that they will bring you in. /s
Someone else posted this link that includes a video of him saying it: https://x.com/atrupar/status/2053865854136099245
Aren't right wing people the only ones that tried to kill him so far?
Excuse me if I add a question since each form of christianity (I assume it is if no I apologize) has it's own take on these things. So in your version what happens if you reject god's offer to take away your free will? Is it hell or do you actually solve that with some not cruel method?
This is a surprisingly honest take on heaven. Never heard it before.
Is there free will in heaven? If yes then evil doesn't need to exist.
I disagree. While it's true a computer can't be held accountable by allowing a computer to make decisions the person that allowed it takes all of the responsibility for those decisions on themselves.Or in different words: The person that allows a computer to make decisions should be held accountable for all the decisions the computer made.
A thing few people know about email is that it's actually an unreliable protocol. It is possible for an email you send to not reach the destination even if the address you're sending to exists. It's extremely unlikely to happen in our current days because all connections are so good but the possibility is there.
No no, just let them do it. If the problem wants to solve itself we shouldn't be stopping it.
Doing god's work!
But!
So which one is this?
As a former catholic you have various groups of catholics. Traditional catholics are insane.
Look, I can eat shit but is it not true? Do you get to escape the debt they incurred against your will? If you weren't responsible for their actions in any sense you could, right?Thing is: Are you responsible in the sense of "you went and caused this"? No.But like it or not, in a democracy the people that are elected legally represent all the population (including those that don't like them) and do stuff in our names.Unless we fix what they did it remains done in our names.
I can understand that. I can also udnerstand why they would do it when they see no other options to help their people against a military and poltiical superpower who controlls the narrative.You can also look at it through something like the national debt: You didn't vote for the party that raised it beyond the GDP (cough gop cough). You didn't personally increase it. But as a citizen you now carry the burden of repaying it. Just or not. It's how things are.
Our culture puts emphasis on the idea that what you do individually matters but on a global socio political scale that just isn't true. Like it or not the actions of a society reflect on it's members. When people have nothing left to loose can hope that killing a few of us (even if not directly responsible) might move something. It did in the case of 9/11 the Taliban now rule down there. 2/2
Do they hate you personally? They don't even know who you are. They hate who you are part of. (and certainly hate me too)I'm gonna try to put it like this: If a terrorist blows me up tomorrow I wont blame them. I didn't personally do anything to them and would prefer to live but the society I am part of has been murdering, exploiting, stealing, couping and ultimately profiteering from their misery for longer than any of us are alive. 1/2
2/2 (sorry my bad i have nothing to add)
I think the problem people have is that they view stuff like that as an attack on them individually. You are personally nobody's foe. As I am personally nobody's foe even though I live in "the west" too.Was each german in nazi germany personally responsible for what the leadership did? Of course not. Did they all ultimately suffer the consequences? Yes.I think it's important to acknowledge than if we fail to stop this as a society we will be blamed for it as a society. 1/2
If it were happening to you and your children would you find that enough?And no the solution is not individual no matter how they conditioned us to think so. You don't need to burn yourself. We should collectively do things. And many of the things we should do would be very uncomfortable to us. But it would stop their blood from being spilled (possibly in exchange for ours being spilled).
Also the solution would not be to individually kill some politicians but to collectively overthrow the government. 2/2
In full honesty if your children were being killed by a foreign state and their citizens would treat it as "I'm against it but what can I do, the elections are in 6 months let's hope for the best." Would you genuinely think that is sensible? You'd probably want them to stop the war at any cost. But deaths on the other side of the world are not as personal as the potential for death and unrest where we live. It's why "western" countries have been doing this for ages. 1/2
Imagine a foreign country killing your children and their citizens being "Well I'm against it but what can I do? Maybe I can change something at the next election." Would you find that to eb a sensible reply to the situation?To us it's political. To them it's life and death in a war that is being allowed by us.And they can see that what we seem to care most about is not stopping the slaughter at any cost but not being personally painted as the bad guys as we're against it on some level.
There's many views on how to approach communism. Some believe you need strong leadership to rule with an iron fist. Others want direct democracy. Anarchist forms of communism (that value democracy) have existed in the past (and been hated both by capitalists and authoritarian communists). If you ask people why authoritarian forms are so present now they'll often say that otherwise capitalists would just sabotage them (while I really dislike their takes) I personally find that hard to argue with.
Of course it was mayo. That's why it's called "sinko de mayo", but people keep mispronouncing it. :D
What doesn't fit to me is how if you observe the white things (ice?, foam?) on the water when they are near the bottom right side of the screen (1:12). They should be leaving the camera at the same speed they did before + the speed of the car. Yet when the car starts (or a moment before that) they seem to freeze. Eh, I would have to view it frame by frame, likely it all makes sense. The car could be moving very slowly and the river could be further away than it seems.
Someone explain if I'm wrong but this looks fake. The water is moving right. When they start moving left even a little bit (which should make the water appear to move faster to the right) the water appears to stop. If they moved in the same direction as the water it could make sense. But not this way. Idk.
Artists: I'll draw pretty people.My brain that still remembers some of the manuals and lore I read: "I know the work of chaos when I sees it," I say coughing blood and scratching the weird growth on my forehead, "nobody in the old world has perfect skin and perfect hair without the help of the ruinous powers."
#4 Well of of those is an improvement in my book.
I realize this can be hard to grasp for some people (that don't want to get it) but: No, not all jews. All zionists.
Concentrating on all jews would not only injustly hurt all the jews that don't support zionism but would also injustly exclude all the twats that aren't jews and support zionism.
Fuck zionists.
Well everyone knows that if you're disabled you can't be going around on your own. So if you're really disabled the person taking care of you can go upstairs to notify people that they will bring you in. /s
Someone else posted this link that includes a video of him saying it: https://x.com/atrupar/status/2053865854136099245
Aren't right wing people the only ones that tried to kill him so far?
Excuse me if I add a question since each form of christianity (I assume it is if no I apologize) has it's own take on these things. So in your version what happens if you reject god's offer to take away your free will? Is it hell or do you actually solve that with some not cruel method?
This is a surprisingly honest take on heaven. Never heard it before.
Is there free will in heaven? If yes then evil doesn't need to exist.
I disagree. While it's true a computer can't be held accountable by allowing a computer to make decisions the person that allowed it takes all of the responsibility for those decisions on themselves.
Or in different words: The person that allows a computer to make decisions should be held accountable for all the decisions the computer made.
A thing few people know about email is that it's actually an unreliable protocol. It is possible for an email you send to not reach the destination even if the address you're sending to exists. It's extremely unlikely to happen in our current days because all connections are so good but the possibility is there.
No no, just let them do it. If the problem wants to solve itself we shouldn't be stopping it.
Doing god's work!
But!
So which one is this?
As a former catholic you have various groups of catholics. Traditional catholics are insane.
Look, I can eat shit but is it not true? Do you get to escape the debt they incurred against your will? If you weren't responsible for their actions in any sense you could, right?
Thing is: Are you responsible in the sense of "you went and caused this"? No.
But like it or not, in a democracy the people that are elected legally represent all the population (including those that don't like them) and do stuff in our names.
Unless we fix what they did it remains done in our names.
I can understand that. I can also udnerstand why they would do it when they see no other options to help their people against a military and poltiical superpower who controlls the narrative.
You can also look at it through something like the national debt: You didn't vote for the party that raised it beyond the GDP (cough gop cough). You didn't personally increase it. But as a citizen you now carry the burden of repaying it. Just or not. It's how things are.
Our culture puts emphasis on the idea that what you do individually matters but on a global socio political scale that just isn't true. Like it or not the actions of a society reflect on it's members. When people have nothing left to loose can hope that killing a few of us (even if not directly responsible) might move something. It did in the case of 9/11 the Taliban now rule down there. 2/2
Do they hate you personally? They don't even know who you are. They hate who you are part of. (and certainly hate me too)
I'm gonna try to put it like this: If a terrorist blows me up tomorrow I wont blame them. I didn't personally do anything to them and would prefer to live but the society I am part of has been murdering, exploiting, stealing, couping and ultimately profiteering from their misery for longer than any of us are alive. 1/2
2/2 (sorry my bad i have nothing to add)
I think the problem people have is that they view stuff like that as an attack on them individually. You are personally nobody's foe. As I am personally nobody's foe even though I live in "the west" too.
Was each german in nazi germany personally responsible for what the leadership did? Of course not. Did they all ultimately suffer the consequences? Yes.
I think it's important to acknowledge than if we fail to stop this as a society we will be blamed for it as a society. 1/2
If it were happening to you and your children would you find that enough?
And no the solution is not individual no matter how they conditioned us to think so. You don't need to burn yourself. We should collectively do things. And many of the things we should do would be very uncomfortable to us. But it would stop their blood from being spilled (possibly in exchange for ours being spilled).
Also the solution would not be to individually kill some politicians but to collectively overthrow the government. 2/2
In full honesty if your children were being killed by a foreign state and their citizens would treat it as "I'm against it but what can I do, the elections are in 6 months let's hope for the best." Would you genuinely think that is sensible? You'd probably want them to stop the war at any cost. But deaths on the other side of the world are not as personal as the potential for death and unrest where we live. It's why "western" countries have been doing this for ages. 1/2
Imagine a foreign country killing your children and their citizens being "Well I'm against it but what can I do? Maybe I can change something at the next election." Would you find that to eb a sensible reply to the situation?
To us it's political. To them it's life and death in a war that is being allowed by us.
And they can see that what we seem to care most about is not stopping the slaughter at any cost but not being personally painted as the bad guys as we're against it on some level.
There's many views on how to approach communism. Some believe you need strong leadership to rule with an iron fist. Others want direct democracy. Anarchist forms of communism (that value democracy) have existed in the past (and been hated both by capitalists and authoritarian communists). If you ask people why authoritarian forms are so present now they'll often say that otherwise capitalists would just sabotage them (while I really dislike their takes) I personally find that hard to argue with.
Of course it was mayo. That's why it's called "sinko de mayo", but people keep mispronouncing it. :D
What doesn't fit to me is how if you observe the white things (ice?, foam?) on the water when they are near the bottom right side of the screen (1:12). They should be leaving the camera at the same speed they did before + the speed of the car. Yet when the car starts (or a moment before that) they seem to freeze. Eh, I would have to view it frame by frame, likely it all makes sense. The car could be moving very slowly and the river could be further away than it seems.
Someone explain if I'm wrong but this looks fake. The water is moving right. When they start moving left even a little bit (which should make the water appear to move faster to the right) the water appears to stop. If they moved in the same direction as the water it could make sense. But not this way. Idk.
Artists: I'll draw pretty people.
My brain that still remembers some of the manuals and lore I read: "I know the work of chaos when I sees it," I say coughing blood and scratching the weird growth on my forehead, "nobody in the old world has perfect skin and perfect hair without the help of the ruinous powers."