40910 pts ยท February 2, 2022
something I would think the UN would propose
I would bet money that if its successful in the red sea, it will expand it mission to the strait of hormuz
theres is a possibilty this turns into WWIII. I dont mean nuclear war. I mean in the sense of several great powers fighting on multipe continents. If Ukraine joins the war against Iran, it will be the beginning of one. Linking the Ukrainian and Iranian war. To the people that think Ukraine never would, Iran has been idrectily aiding Russian with drone fabrication. They also have leverage to make a lot of money from gulf states and the US by helping
No, the US Air Force and Navy are doing the bulk of the *fighting*. Meaning there are no troops on the ground for Iran to attack aside from the bases. Which leads to a much lower killed to wounded ratio as the those bases are expected to be hit and can prepare.
True
all of this is stikes on US Bases. Nothing else as been attacked
Having a successful third party is not possible in the US. If you want change you have to start a grass root movement and slowly affect one of the two main parties over time and build up support. that is the only way. That also means vote in *all* elections local and primaries.
that an extreme low death to wounded ratio. 1:34 But the entire conflict has been fought by the Air Force and Navy so not terribily surpising.
well better buy it $7.85 then at $12.00
well do want o fill your car up now when $4.00 a gallon or wait a week and its over $5.00? 4 being the current national average
ME1 planet side traveling in the Mako really did suck
for most of the world, nail biting. For the US a mix of both. Europe and africa will face the worst of it
morality and ethics get thrown out the window when it comes to geopoltics. What other countries choices will be what ever benefits them the most. There is lot of hatred toward Iran and dont want them to control the strait
if happens 1/3 of global oil trade will be locked up and 1/5 of all maritime trade. That will force other countries to do something. this an apocalyptic economic situation
It should be permanent standard time not DST
read your source that 500k *deaths* Causalities are deaths + wounded is 1.4 million https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-blood-and-treasure-ballooning-costs-putins-war
thats 450k deaths. Causualities with wounded are over 1.4 million right now.
what are you going on about?
current rate of russian casualties per year is about 400k (prior 2026 which there are on track to have over 500k casualties this year) Russian cant throw every fresh 18 year old to die in ukraine. that would destroy the country. Even 400k now will massive generational outcomes
everyone under the age of 46 so its several generations. however it is not that simple that they are "expendable" because older age population is becoming an increasingly large percentage of thier population, they need younger generation of works to pay for the increase strain on social services as the older population ages out of working
because it take time for generations to grow about 30-40 years. Chinas population as already started contracting. Which every death from the younger generation would only increase the demographic collapse. As well as cause instabilities back home as families with a single child, having them get killed in a war would start unrest. They cant afford millions of deaths like they could in the past
also casualty doesnt mean death. It means removed from active duty
and? thier population is currently contracting as well as an older population. With fewer younger generation, wasting them in a war would only speed up chinas demographic collapse. which they are expected be under a billlion population again by 2070
did the policy not push the public for to have fewer kids? going from average 6 births per woman prior to policy and now to less than 2 by the start of the 90s?
https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-blood-and-treasure-ballooning-costs-putins-war 5th paragraph
really cant say that anymore for china, because decades of the one child policy, the younger generation is too precious of them to lose
I see people saying Russia has unlimited troops to meat grinder thier way through the war to win. Thats so incredibly wrong. The current ratio causality ratio between Ukraine and Russia is 1:8. For every 1 Ukrainian causality, Russia has 8. Thats not sustainable and the number has been growing. The start of the war it was 1:2 -1:3
oh I though you reposted it because it was negitive
something I would think the UN would propose
I would bet money that if its successful in the red sea, it will expand it mission to the strait of hormuz
theres is a possibilty this turns into WWIII. I dont mean nuclear war. I mean in the sense of several great powers fighting on multipe continents. If Ukraine joins the war against Iran, it will be the beginning of one. Linking the Ukrainian and Iranian war. To the people that think Ukraine never would, Iran has been idrectily aiding Russian with drone fabrication. They also have leverage to make a lot of money from gulf states and the US by helping
No, the US Air Force and Navy are doing the bulk of the *fighting*. Meaning there are no troops on the ground for Iran to attack aside from the bases. Which leads to a much lower killed to wounded ratio as the those bases are expected to be hit and can prepare.
True
all of this is stikes on US Bases. Nothing else as been attacked
Having a successful third party is not possible in the US. If you want change you have to start a grass root movement and slowly affect one of the two main parties over time and build up support. that is the only way. That also means vote in *all* elections local and primaries.
that an extreme low death to wounded ratio. 1:34 But the entire conflict has been fought by the Air Force and Navy so not terribily surpising.
well better buy it $7.85 then at $12.00
well do want o fill your car up now when $4.00 a gallon or wait a week and its over $5.00? 4 being the current national average
ME1 planet side traveling in the Mako really did suck
for most of the world, nail biting. For the US a mix of both. Europe and africa will face the worst of it
morality and ethics get thrown out the window when it comes to geopoltics. What other countries choices will be what ever benefits them the most. There is lot of hatred toward Iran and dont want them to control the strait
if happens 1/3 of global oil trade will be locked up and 1/5 of all maritime trade. That will force other countries to do something. this an apocalyptic economic situation
It should be permanent standard time not DST
read your source that 500k *deaths* Causalities are deaths + wounded is 1.4 million https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-blood-and-treasure-ballooning-costs-putins-war
thats 450k deaths. Causualities with wounded are over 1.4 million right now.
what are you going on about?
current rate of russian casualties per year is about 400k (prior 2026 which there are on track to have over 500k casualties this year) Russian cant throw every fresh 18 year old to die in ukraine. that would destroy the country. Even 400k now will massive generational outcomes
everyone under the age of 46 so its several generations. however it is not that simple that they are "expendable" because older age population is becoming an increasingly large percentage of thier population, they need younger generation of works to pay for the increase strain on social services as the older population ages out of working
because it take time for generations to grow about 30-40 years. Chinas population as already started contracting. Which every death from the younger generation would only increase the demographic collapse. As well as cause instabilities back home as families with a single child, having them get killed in a war would start unrest. They cant afford millions of deaths like they could in the past
also casualty doesnt mean death. It means removed from active duty
and? thier population is currently contracting as well as an older population. With fewer younger generation, wasting them in a war would only speed up chinas demographic collapse. which they are expected be under a billlion population again by 2070
did the policy not push the public for to have fewer kids? going from average 6 births per woman prior to policy and now to less than 2 by the start of the 90s?
https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-blood-and-treasure-ballooning-costs-putins-war 5th paragraph
really cant say that anymore for china, because decades of the one child policy, the younger generation is too precious of them to lose
I see people saying Russia has unlimited troops to meat grinder thier way through the war to win. Thats so incredibly wrong. The current ratio causality ratio between Ukraine and Russia is 1:8. For every 1 Ukrainian causality, Russia has 8. Thats not sustainable and the number has been growing. The start of the war it was 1:2 -1:3
oh I though you reposted it because it was negitive