If you are here to send me a message to try to change my opinion without any hard facts save your time because I won't respond. If you are the person I am currently occupying the time of so you don't irritate other people with arrogant ignorance. HI! Hope you are good. It has been fun messing with you. I will mute you when I'm bored of your whole "thing" that you have convinced yourself of.
Once again that is NOT the moment I am talking about. 27 seconds in where he has piled loose hair on top of the dog. JFC its not just reading comprehension but media literacy in general at an all time low.
What? I am talking about the part a little over midway through where he clearly picked up all the hair and put it back on top of the dog then casually wipes if off with his hands. Not the intro clip.
Look its already impressive enough without the fake "pile all the hair on top of the dog" clip.
These assholes need a moment of silence that lasts forever
Are we not drawn onward, we few, drawn onward to new era?
The legal battle over steps is probably the worst as he wasted other people time but his gambling problems are his own and generally none of that actively harmed other people. I wouldn't want to hang out with the guy but that's about it. Plenty of divas and shit all over the entertainment industry I also don't care to meet as well. Would like to hang out with Ruffalo though.
Its not?
No she steps 2-3ft sideways right into their path. This is not up for debate that is exactly what she does and if she hadn't she would not have been in the path of the scooter. Sorry but she carries some responsibility for that crash.
Old movies are even getting called AI despite not having a slop filter of any kind. I recommend these people take advantage of tools for detection which are not LLMs or Stable Diffusion or anything like that. Much simpler neural networks to detect the others. Not new tech. Though so many companies choosing to rebrand their shit as "AI" in the market boom has not been helpful.
Negative ghost rider. Did some rough math here. Those stone look to be about 2'x1' and it takes them a pretty consistent 3 frames to move across those stones. The video is in 30fps. So 3 frames is 1/10th of a second and they move 2 ft. Meaning 20ft per second or ~13.6mph. Most of these go almost 20. Now that COULD be because there is 2 people on it which you absolutely should not do and also might contribute to not being able to maneuver around... but they are not otherwise driving dangerously.
I know that. Please reread my comment as it is stating that she did and that other things could have hit her as well.
*blinkblinkblinkblinkblinkblinkblinkblinkblink*
But what if I am jorkin it?
Yep. The person who paid the price for this didn't fail anything. Not a fun video.
Yes but also people need to stop treating public paths as filming locations too. If she had stepped in front of a bike, or a person running, etc the result would have been much the same. This is also why bike lanes need to be a thing pretty much everywhere because just like its not really safe to have bikes on roads its also unsafe for pedestrians to deal with bikes (or scooters) on sidewalks. It might be beneficial to have certifications but at the same time transportation challenges are real.
I definitely was zooming in on her lips.
So you hacked an account that has been dead nearly a year to do this? Pathetic.
RIP
Exactly. We had actually reached a pretty level plateau on energy use per person before this. We may have built more datacenters... but certainly not at this monstrous rate. There is a city in Texas that has THIRTY warehouse sized data centers under construction right now and it already had DOZENS. A lot of people truly do not understand how insanely bad it is.
Other people did... but they asked OP directly instead of asking in response to the top comment and got an answer. And considering you seem regularly mention AI (including referring to it as slop) I am inclined to believe that now you are trying to save face for some reason. And I never said it was good.
So to recap: Didn't say that, we all know what you meant, other people did ask.
"Operator!"
Zone really has been at this a long time.
Uh huh... I know what you meant. Don't play like that. You brought up sources, reverse file searching and the date. Its very clear you were referring to AI. Why are you acting coy about it?
Brother he was killed by someone who ostensibly AGREED with most of his bullshit. His rhetoric contributed to his own demise. You act like it was someone left wing who did it but it wasn't.
Was watching Fairy Tail to show my fiancee and we got to the grand magic games and the announcers come on screen and she is like "Why does he look like the shrink face guy?"
No its a gun in Warframe.
Its a movie from 1987 called 7 Tiger Man. You are not good at identifying "AI" please use tools (which are not stable diffusion or LLMs or anything. They run on neural networks which have existed for a long time and are much simpler.) to assist you in identifying it in the future.