263 pts ยท November 22, 2014
x=1 satisfies the equation. The method by which the answer is attained is false but the answer itself is correct.
without complex functions, abstract algebra, quantum mechanics and its foundations, Maxwell's equations, Gauss, vector calculus, etc etc 2/2
Our complete modern world only functions through abstract mathematics, though. The very machine you type this on wouldn't function 1/2
access to a new way of thinking or increases your intelligence should have priority. But that's mostly subjective.
Haha, that's true. While it's important to make distinctions in how important something is to learn, I'd say anything that truly gives 1/2
something you base on direct applicability. If you only focus on what you can directly apply in the moment, you'll get nowhere. 2/2
Because even if something doesn't teach you a directly applicable skill, it could still teach you a way of thinking. Knowledge isn't 1/2
Damn, you win...
433.9999*
#5 Does anybody have the template for this?
as the bending (inwards or outwards) of the vertices of those squares. 2/2
You know how notebooks have squares in them? Try visualising space as that, except 3D, and the disturbances you see in this video 1/2
It's meant as an analogy though, not as a proof.
Tbh it's not entirely accurate, as a lot of scientists don't even back a consistent absolute morality themselves.
pseudo-scientific speculation, unrooted in facts. 2/2
I'm terribly sorry but I've never seen the consequences of a Minkovski-diagram explained this badly. It began good but quickly became 1/2
I disagree that it is specific to women, but it is very weird that every time somebody is accused of something we seem to grab pitchforks.
Manage our society. I unfortunately can't stop these things from happening, and I won't "put up" just because I can't stop something myself.
Read my first reply. She's a bitch for doing something like this and I'm not supporting her, but mob outrage is NOT the way we should 1/2
Wait, are you saying I should either accept mob outrage or shut up of I don't want mob outrage? Because that just doesn't make sense
And does that excuse mob rage outbursts? If she's in prison on felonies concerning this, isn't she already taken care of by our system?
Although what she did is absolute bullshit, why are you all so keen on mob justice? Is that how this site works now?
Here's a fun one! If it takes a satellite orbiting a planet 1.8 hours to make full orbit, what is the density of the planet?
As a chemistry student, I would kill for this
''secrets''
the fundamental laws of nature work (and to check whether our current theories are right -> hypothesis testing) 2/2
To smash them into eachother at enormous speeds in order to figure out what the most fundamental particles are, how they work and how 1/2
Anybody else read this in David Attenborough's voice?
But... but... the fourth dimension is spacelike time... we already live in a 4D world...
x=1 satisfies the equation. The method by which the answer is attained is false but the answer itself is correct.
without complex functions, abstract algebra, quantum mechanics and its foundations, Maxwell's equations, Gauss, vector calculus, etc etc 2/2
Our complete modern world only functions through abstract mathematics, though. The very machine you type this on wouldn't function 1/2
access to a new way of thinking or increases your intelligence should have priority. But that's mostly subjective.
Haha, that's true. While it's important to make distinctions in how important something is to learn, I'd say anything that truly gives 1/2
something you base on direct applicability. If you only focus on what you can directly apply in the moment, you'll get nowhere. 2/2
Because even if something doesn't teach you a directly applicable skill, it could still teach you a way of thinking. Knowledge isn't 1/2
Damn, you win...
433.9999*
#5 Does anybody have the template for this?
as the bending (inwards or outwards) of the vertices of those squares. 2/2
You know how notebooks have squares in them? Try visualising space as that, except 3D, and the disturbances you see in this video 1/2
It's meant as an analogy though, not as a proof.
Tbh it's not entirely accurate, as a lot of scientists don't even back a consistent absolute morality themselves.
pseudo-scientific speculation, unrooted in facts. 2/2
I'm terribly sorry but I've never seen the consequences of a Minkovski-diagram explained this badly. It began good but quickly became 1/2
I disagree that it is specific to women, but it is very weird that every time somebody is accused of something we seem to grab pitchforks.
Manage our society. I unfortunately can't stop these things from happening, and I won't "put up" just because I can't stop something myself.
Read my first reply. She's a bitch for doing something like this and I'm not supporting her, but mob outrage is NOT the way we should 1/2
Wait, are you saying I should either accept mob outrage or shut up of I don't want mob outrage? Because that just doesn't make sense
And does that excuse mob rage outbursts? If she's in prison on felonies concerning this, isn't she already taken care of by our system?
Although what she did is absolute bullshit, why are you all so keen on mob justice? Is that how this site works now?
Here's a fun one! If it takes a satellite orbiting a planet 1.8 hours to make full orbit, what is the density of the planet?
As a chemistry student, I would kill for this
''secrets''
the fundamental laws of nature work (and to check whether our current theories are right -> hypothesis testing) 2/2
To smash them into eachother at enormous speeds in order to figure out what the most fundamental particles are, how they work and how 1/2
Anybody else read this in David Attenborough's voice?
But... but... the fourth dimension is spacelike time... we already live in a 4D world...