89380 pts ยท November 6, 2016
If i ask you whether you want to do a thing, you have to consider the answer. But if I just do it, you don't. Decades ago, Coors changed the way they paid employees. The employee went to a wimdow and got their full pay in cash. Then they went to the next window and paid the teller their FICA. Then the next window, their social security. The workers got really upset because the payment was real instead of just a line item on a paycheck. Of course, the government made Coors stop doing it that way.
Absolutely true, but it's not as if they had a choice one way or the other
Nothing will happen to the money, because it's already happened. That money was used to pay those who were on Social Security when you were paid.
Flock hate is legit, but this is not an Flock story -- it is a story of bad police work. Witnesses said a Durango caused the accident, so cops used Flock to identify a nearby Durango and then assumed it was the accident vehicle. Flock was right - the vehicle was a Durango - but the cops took that info and misused it.
While I get the point, it doesn't look like the Flock camera made any decisions -- it was just bad police work. Witnesses said a Durango caused the accident, so cops used Flock to identify a nearby Durango and then just assumed it was the accident vehicle.
Yeah, this is a story about bad police work, not Flock cameras
Fast food is just the example here. Every loyalty program and online store is doing this too.
AI
I went through help wanted ads in my field for months and applied for every job I found in person. I had over a dozen interviews before I was offered an unpaid internship. After 4 months, a client liked my work so much they offered me an entry-level position. This was 35 years ago.
But that woild require effort
Or a period's
Not half as much as they're laughing at these comments.
And likely last...
Yeah. That's a well thought out and supported argument. Guess we'll see.
No it doesn't. The stalking charge requires proof that the defendant traveled across state lines with the intent to kill, injure, or harass, and engaged in a course of conduct that caused or was reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress or death. The murder charge does not require travel across state lines and it does require a completed intentional taking of a human life.
It also won't work because double jeopardy in New York requires that the crimes have the same elements which is not the case with stalking and murder. More likely, they're attempting to take advantage of mitigation. If you're found guilty of a crime after trial, it adds additional points which increases the sentence. By taking responsibility you avoid that. That's one of the reasons plea bargains are so common at the federal level.
Only in New York. Their laws are more protective than general constitutional double jeopardy. That said, it's not necessarily a winning argument. There's an exception to the New York law and that it only applies when the crimes have the same elements, which is not the case with stalking and murder.
Yeah, when I make high pitched singing noises my cat freaks out too
It has nothing to do with security, but everything to do with the location. When the government takes land for a public sidewalk, it, not the neighboring property owner, becomes responsible for what happens on that land. If the fight started in the casino, and security moved them to the sidewalk, that might change the analysis, but that did not happen here.
What kills that analysis is that it was on a public sidewalk. When the government gets an easement for a public sidewalk, the owner gives up it's right to control. The casino, or any neighboring business, can't control who uses the sidewalk outside their building or what they do. For that reason, they are not responsible for what happens on a public sidewalk, generally.
It's a bit of a cliche, but one of the purposes of law school is to teach students to "think like lawyers." To get a problem, research authority, analyze the issue, and come up with an answer. It's also to give you access to the breadth of the law -- contracts, torts constitutional, employment, tax, criminal, etc. In my experience, most young practitioners see only a very narrow slice of the law.
It was valets, not security. https://www.casino.org/news/texas-man-avoids-prison-after-brutal-hate-crime-outside-mgm-grand-detroit/
Never believe anything that a lawyer writes in a complaint. There's other new sources out there that say that it wasn't security that saw them get attacked, it was the valets. One source I read said they were attacked at 1:13 a.m., the valet's immediately called security and the police, security showed up a minute later and administered medical assistance, and the police showed up shortly thereafter.
Yeah, that's why I was saying it was another pair. The point being that some are made in the USA and those that aren't don't claim to be. This video seems to be misinformation.
I'm looking at another pair, and they don't mention USA in the title and are clearly marked as "imported"
Next year, some idiots will be buying pagers
Judging from his tag on you, he's not only a proud to be ignorant he's aggressively proud. It takes a man to admit when he's wrong - don't know what that makes OP.
I am willfully and intentionally antisocial. This looks draining and expensive over time.
It's a figure of speech. Hyperbole.
If i ask you whether you want to do a thing, you have to consider the answer. But if I just do it, you don't. Decades ago, Coors changed the way they paid employees. The employee went to a wimdow and got their full pay in cash. Then they went to the next window and paid the teller their FICA. Then the next window, their social security. The workers got really upset because the payment was real instead of just a line item on a paycheck. Of course, the government made Coors stop doing it that way.
Absolutely true, but it's not as if they had a choice one way or the other
Nothing will happen to the money, because it's already happened. That money was used to pay those who were on Social Security when you were paid.
Flock hate is legit, but this is not an Flock story -- it is a story of bad police work. Witnesses said a Durango caused the accident, so cops used Flock to identify a nearby Durango and then assumed it was the accident vehicle. Flock was right - the vehicle was a Durango - but the cops took that info and misused it.
While I get the point, it doesn't look like the Flock camera made any decisions -- it was just bad police work. Witnesses said a Durango caused the accident, so cops used Flock to identify a nearby Durango and then just assumed it was the accident vehicle.
Yeah, this is a story about bad police work, not Flock cameras
Fast food is just the example here. Every loyalty program and online store is doing this too.
AI
I went through help wanted ads in my field for months and applied for every job I found in person. I had over a dozen interviews before I was offered an unpaid internship. After 4 months, a client liked my work so much they offered me an entry-level position. This was 35 years ago.
But that woild require effort
Or a period's
Not half as much as they're laughing at these comments.
And likely last...
Yeah. That's a well thought out and supported argument. Guess we'll see.
No it doesn't. The stalking charge requires proof that the defendant traveled across state lines with the intent to kill, injure, or harass, and engaged in a course of conduct that caused or was reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional distress or death. The murder charge does not require travel across state lines and it does require a completed intentional taking of a human life.
It also won't work because double jeopardy in New York requires that the crimes have the same elements which is not the case with stalking and murder. More likely, they're attempting to take advantage of mitigation. If you're found guilty of a crime after trial, it adds additional points which increases the sentence. By taking responsibility you avoid that. That's one of the reasons plea bargains are so common at the federal level.
Only in New York. Their laws are more protective than general constitutional double jeopardy. That said, it's not necessarily a winning argument. There's an exception to the New York law and that it only applies when the crimes have the same elements, which is not the case with stalking and murder.
Yeah, when I make high pitched singing noises my cat freaks out too
It has nothing to do with security, but everything to do with the location. When the government takes land for a public sidewalk, it, not the neighboring property owner, becomes responsible for what happens on that land. If the fight started in the casino, and security moved them to the sidewalk, that might change the analysis, but that did not happen here.
What kills that analysis is that it was on a public sidewalk. When the government gets an easement for a public sidewalk, the owner gives up it's right to control. The casino, or any neighboring business, can't control who uses the sidewalk outside their building or what they do. For that reason, they are not responsible for what happens on a public sidewalk, generally.
It's a bit of a cliche, but one of the purposes of law school is to teach students to "think like lawyers." To get a problem, research authority, analyze the issue, and come up with an answer. It's also to give you access to the breadth of the law -- contracts, torts constitutional, employment, tax, criminal, etc. In my experience, most young practitioners see only a very narrow slice of the law.
It was valets, not security. https://www.casino.org/news/texas-man-avoids-prison-after-brutal-hate-crime-outside-mgm-grand-detroit/
Never believe anything that a lawyer writes in a complaint. There's other new sources out there that say that it wasn't security that saw them get attacked, it was the valets. One source I read said they were attacked at 1:13 a.m., the valet's immediately called security and the police, security showed up a minute later and administered medical assistance, and the police showed up shortly thereafter.
Yeah, that's why I was saying it was another pair. The point being that some are made in the USA and those that aren't don't claim to be. This video seems to be misinformation.
I'm looking at another pair, and they don't mention USA in the title and are clearly marked as "imported"
Next year, some idiots will be buying pagers
Judging from his tag on you, he's not only a proud to be ignorant he's aggressively proud. It takes a man to admit when he's wrong - don't know what that makes OP.
I am willfully and intentionally antisocial. This looks draining and expensive over time.
It's a figure of speech. Hyperbole.