Morganelefay
11493
563
15
Every day they keep proving my theory that MAGA hats suck the brain cells out of your head. Won't be too long before they starve.
Oct 7, 2025 10:18 AM
Morganelefay
11493
563
15
Every day they keep proving my theory that MAGA hats suck the brain cells out of your head. Won't be too long before they starve.
Skuggen
I wonder if he's as big a supporter of everything else in the constitution.
SomeDetroitGuy
He 100% is not.
GrumpyMe
To photograph ICE faceless, numberless, nameless operators
IgnisInvictus
Oh that's hilarious.
usernametakenisthestoryofmylife
Killing them softly with pictures...Killing them softly...
JackieDaytonaRealHumanBartender
To be fair, James Woods hasn't seen a camera in a while.
onecowboytoo
2017.
Omicron416
Underrated comment here!
blessedarethecheesemakers
https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTY1YjkxZmJldWhnbWJnZ2t5ZDc3YnAwbGN3N29ocnF1emZsZnByanNvb2tyM2ZhdSZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/DpbECBuWKrNRC1Hcda/200w.mp4
FlintNorth44
historycat
But see, we need assault rifles so we can prevent a tyrannical government from snatching kids from their beds in the middle of the night!
Photeus
Meanwhile....
kiski
But it's better to need and have a gun and not use it than to need and not have a gun and not use it!
Default87
KommanderKayriel
NRA were also Russian agents, oddly enough.
DukePhelan
I used to think my shotgun and pistol were enough for anything I might need, or the bolt action .308 for longer range work. But now I am starting to see the need for a 30 round semi automatic, what with ICE rolling around in their terroristic goblin packs.
ToSisPoS
No no… you see we define “tyrannical” as “tan suit.” The stuff going on right now is just “law & order.”
TNSCLuotaMEa4fVN
Or our neighbors from our streets
OmegaZen
It's not even that we need to ban them, it's just nuts how anyone with a basic permit and no psych test can buy them, under 21yo in most states. Very low hanging fruit...
FlintNorth44
They should have been banned along with orange boy.
DukePhelan
I am in VA. I can get an AR faster than I can get an appointment with my PCP. This nation is so fundamentally broken.
lightfoot2
I do like that.
leroy666
Drug addled!
hyptosis
"Idiot Liberals" as drool drips from his chin, to be fair though I didn't notice it at first either, I was reading the text. Pretty good one, it looks like a cool video game gun upon inspection :P
lonelyrangerofthedreams
“Wonderful”…
*goes back cleaning kids brain and blood from the school walls*
Skawomplious
Ok, it fooled me too though, and I actually have one.
Osiricus
James Woods is actually as shitty as the roles he plays. Someone should take James Woods out into James Woods woods and James Woods him.
deechill
ICE is a good enough reason
FlintNorth44
The AR-15 was made to be an assault rifle. They took of the select fire to sell to civilians. THE GUN NUT ARGUMENT IS NULL AND VOID.
MyBigMouth
James Woods, what a Kevin Sorbo
NappaTheFriendlyGhost
Worse really. Sorbo is a washed up nobody that tries to stay relevant by parroting what he thinks will get him attention. Woods has a long history of extremely creepy and sexist behavior that many women have been coming out about. Sorbo's doing it for attention while Woods is doing it to shield himself.
Omicron416
As I understand it, Sorbo has some similar history himself.
Morganelefay
The only difference being that Woods actually has talent, regrettably.
michiyl
yalczero
Let's all be honest though. We'd all be a little sad if this gif didn't exist.
doctorId
James Woods is the Tim Allen of Kevin Sorbos
MrNardtastic
A total Dean Cain
KillerTofu69
It doesn't stand for "Armalite Rifle" its just ARmalite. The AR tag is used for more than just the rifle platform
KommanderKayriel
Careful, Tofu, that might be too much for a Republican to comprehend all at once!
mytruepersonality
People like to be obtuse about normaculture. AR might stand for something in the technical term but in society it now also stands for assault rifle. Just how GOP once stood for the republican party and now they are protect pedophiles party.
doctorId
DrNicholasRivierA
Took me two seconds when I saw three rifle barrels.
whisker99
I'm unclear, is this an ar rifle or an assault camera? Can somebody clarify me as if I were unpastaurized butter? I also can't tell this apart from my a$$whole
Someshithead241
Even if AR doesn't stand for Assualt rifle, its still actually an assault rifle is it not?
copperdomebodhi
"That's not marinara, it's bolognese sauce! You need to sit down and shut up about what's for dinner."
swedeonamoose
I thought the general term was ammosexual ?
Goblinpunker
Agreed
Morganelefay
Oh, maybe that's the American term. I'm European, you see.
SomeDetroitGuy
"Assault Weapon" was a legal term to refer to military styled semi-autimatic rifles with a pistol grip, detachable high capacity magazine, and removable stock, among other features. An AR-15 and its clones absolutely counts under that legal definition. But the issue of being overly precise about specific technical definitions is a bad-faith attempt to derail legitimate attempts to discuss reasonable firearm regulations that the VAST majority support.
KommanderKayriel
2A Dem here. Reasonable regulations, please. At this point, taking them away from all Trump supporters sounds reasonable. They're 9/10 of every mass shooter situation to begin with, and usually the school shooters.
IDontKnowWhatToDoAnymoreAndImTired
Talking about things in accurate terms is important. Because the term "assault weapon" was deliberately coined to create confusion in the public between military-grade fully automatic weapons, and things like ARs which fire one round at a time the same as any other rifle. You cannot simply buy an automatic weapon in the US. If you want to talk about "good faith," facts are a good place to start.
SleepyHollowAppleTree
james woods is a tool.
stoots24
You know, he could have stopped 9/11… ;)
VaclavUrbanek
Wasn't that Mark Whalberg?
stoots24
James was on their dry-run flight pre-9/11?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rShhooZT1qE
ImHereToExplainTheJoke
Which is exactly why he's not nearly as prolific an actor as he should've been. He's a good actor, but an absolute dickbag and impossible to work wiht.
DrProfessorRocketSurgeon
He's a cocaine disposal system... Coke goes in and insane dribblings come out.
ontarioOT
No, tools are useful.
Skywatcher16
he is useful. presuming disney intends to do a proper live action herculese. if thats not in the works though, then yeah. useless.
Morganelefay
Thing is, if there is a live action Hercules and it stars James Woods, as good as he was as Hades? I'd not want to spend a single penny on a product that he now would benefit from.
Skywatcher16
true, lets be real: how much longer is he gonna be around to have those benefits? that said, as long as they got danny devito into it, i could live with an immitation james woods as hades
Morganelefay
The good die young, that fucker is gonna be 100.
KiddR78
He used to regularly guest star on Family Guy, they even named the High School after him. Which used to be funny until MAGA happened to America. In 2016, they killed him off in season 9, retconned him in season 10 so they could ultimately have Peter ruin his career, and then changed the name of the school in another episode. 1/2
KiddR78
Seth McFarlane was actually friends with many republicans, like Rush Limbaugh, who guest starred on the show. But Woods became someone Seth didn’t want to be associated with anymore. Beyond just differing opinions. 2/2
shitheadtookmyname
James woods is particularly odious bc he went to MIT and wants everyone to know he's a genius.
Bardcrest
yeah, I am kind of surprised
VaclavUrbanek
A great example that high IQ doesn't mean shit.
Wolfshead009
There is a reason most role playing systems have separate stats for Intelligence and Wisdom.
Lethous
He's a villain. A manifestation of Hades himself.
januarylover
James Woods is a piece of shit.
LabsAreGoobers
I never understood the “AR doesn’t stand for Assault Rifle” argument. Ok, it doesn’t stand for that, but it is a semi automatic assault rifle that is easy to use and modify.
Morganelefay
The idea is that it discredits the "gun opposition" argument because they don't even know what they're talking about, so rather than engage with the actual argument they can just say "Oh but you believe AR stands for Assault Rifle so you're an idiot checkmate libcuck" and go about shitting their bullshit elsewhere.
SomeDetroitGuy
Technically, if it is semi-autimatic then it isn't an assault rifle. An assault rifle is select fire. But that is irrelevant because they are being pedantic to avoid discussing the actual issue - any American over age 18 can easily get a weapon capable of firing 30 highly powered rounds accurate at 600 meters inside of a couple seconds for a couple hundred bucks. They might need to drive a bit to obtain it, but it is available easily.
StillNotYouTube
What the "AR" in AR-15 stands for is an irrelevant distraction. What matters is how it functions.
Illinifan88
Don't fall into the bullshit "AR doesn't stand for assault rifle" argument.
All magazine fed, semi-automatic weapons need to be banned. You don't need those for hunting. You don't need them for self-defense.
Whether it's pistols or rifles, these are the weapons that are responsible for mass shootings. Lots of bullets in a short time with a fast reload.
BythepowerofPlank
you want clip-fed hunting rifles? that do sound kinda neat
SomeDetroitGuy
100% agree. I have no issues with a bolt action rifle or pump action shotgun for hunting or a revolver or a shotgun for defense. There is no need for people to have a weapon capable of firing a 5.56mm round 30 times in a few seconds without reloading. There is no need for a concealable weapon firing a .45 inch bullet a dozen times in a couple seconds without reloading.
KommanderKayriel
Well... I mean there is NOW, there wasn't before.
Chagrinnish
As a hunter I'll emphasize that it's goddamn scary when a nearby hunter is popping off shots like that.
Metalsmith21
Even if they were "Built for women" who's buying them now?
It's like saying Opium is a pain reliever so we shouldn't restrict their purchase and use.
lightfoot2
They're (the gun) built for spraying a lot of bullets in a hurry. Want to do real stuff get a Mauser bolt action. One shot is all you need.
Madara1389
Except the automatic variant has been banned from civilian usage for decades... The civilian-available version of the AR-15 *is* semi-automatic only (meaning only one shot per trigger pull).
DukePhelan
Even allowing for adjustment between shots you can pretty easily reach 45 rounds a minute fire rate with a semi automatic rifle.
Madara1389
Bolt actions & shotguns aren't that far behind that in terms of potential rate of fire, and handguns & shotguns can go over that. The British in WWI pushed their bolt-action Lee Enfield rifles to a RoF of 38 rounds per minute which is comparable to the RoF of the most common shotgun in the US (which fires far more projectiles per shot and are lethal out to 100 yard), and the average 9mm handgun can reach 600 rpm.
DukePhelan
Yes, but none of those weapons have the capacity for those rates of fire, at least maybe the Enfield with a trained rifleman behind it, but the reloading would likely lower that rate, and definitely would for the others.
An AR you drop the mag, slame a new one home, and keep the party rocking.
lightfoot2
Ok, I can launch 8 bullets from my .22 semi automatic rifle in the time it takes me to shoot then re-chamber two rounds from the bolt action loader. A semi auto can fire quite rapidly and is good for putting bullets all over the target. A bolt will fire slowly but I can make funny patterns on the target it at 50 years. Whatever works for ya.
Madara1389
Have you ever heard of the concept of the "Mad Minute?" In WWI, when the primary firearm was a bolt-action rifle, the British adopted a rapid-fire training drill where they'd practice scoring as many hits on a target at 300 yards within 60 seconds as possible. The minimum expected performance was 15 shots; but a practiced soldier could land as many as 38-40. Mind you, they managed this with rifles that could only hold 10 rounds at a time. [1/2]
Madara1389
But if we're being 100% honest with each other, most mass shootings throughout American history were carried out with handguns & shotguns, which have far higher rates of fire than a bolt action rifle, and banning "assault weapons" wouldn't ban those two categories of firearms. [2/2]
Higure
Maybe the constitution says that James Woods doesn't need a reason to have a weapon like the one the camera equipment is arranged to look like. It is still entirely valid to ask why the constitution lets him get one no questions asked.
NickRivieraMD
I mean, it don't.
glovelyday
Depends what state. Mine asks questions. Always has, even since before the Revolution they had "well regulated militias". Safest state in the nation with a city of 250,00 or more.
Skawomplious
Honest answer? Because the purported purpose of the 2A is to be ungovernable in the face of tyranny. To that end, allowing the government to place any restrictions at all on gun ownership defeats the purpose. I believe the founders meant it when they said "shall not be infringed", and I think it still applies.
And I before I get my shit jumped - I am well aware that 2A proponents haven't yet stood up and started being ungovernable in the face of tyranny. I know it. It bothers me too.
Skywatcher16
every state asks questions. thats why you need licenses. and why every one of those guns has serial numbers that get tracked. and why they
Skywatcher16
wont let you try to buy an RPG, a tank, and f-16, or an ICBM. "shall not be infringed" as people like you interpret it has always been BS
Skywatcher16
and with DAMN good reason.
Higure
"People like me", you say. Methinks you're reading meaning into my words that isn't actually there.
Skywatcher16
"people like you" meaning people who believe 'the second amendment means i can have guns no questions asked, and restrictions/conditions on that are unconsitutional'. so unless your words are defending a point you dont actually believe in for some reason, no, im not reading meanings that are not there.
Higure
I never claimed I believed it. So my words do not defend anything of the sort. I was playing along with #1's argument for the sake of it.