This guy walks free while people are still doing time for simple possession of marijuana

Nov 19, 2022 11:32 AM

baals

Views

127238

Likes

3723

Dislikes

177

I'd say he's too stupid for politics but Republicans also laud Boebert and Greene...and Trump.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

If it is grey, why haven't the families of those killed filed wrongful death suits? Bar is lower in civil court.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 7

Yea... wasn't the basis he got off because despite ALL the other laws he broke... at the exact moment he shot someone it was self defence?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

So Gaige Grosskreutz and Joshua Ziminski were also terrorist insurgents?

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 8

Also, thankfully in regards to civilian crimes we do not operate under military law here in the US.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 6

Be nice if we at least operated per our constitution and charge some criminals, other than the ones who can't afford to avoid jail anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I thought you needed to act for a political purpose/goal to be a terrorist?

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

He was. That's why he's a domestic terrorist.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

Kyle should face self defense from people everywhere he goes. He should never feel safe from self defense

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 35

The MAGA GOP need 18-25 year old voters, this is the start of their PR campaign for 2024.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The ‘medic’ Rittenhouse shot was holding a pistol for self defense and could have shot Rittenhouse FIRST because HE feared for his life.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

/s Guns make everything better, dont they... dont they!

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

Alpha Male Kyle Rittenhouse ?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As a vet I agree completely, fuck that kid

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 15

He’s a murderer and got away with it then was congratulated by right wing nutjobs

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 11

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

acquitted on all counts

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I actually watched a doc on this going in with an open mind. He shouldn't have had a weapon in the first place. That being said his actions

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Definitely seemed to be out of self defense. I don't think this was in any way murder.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

the problem is none of this is accurate and this guy is not a lawyer. stop letting your bias distort the facts. thats what republicans do.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 16

Republicans: *looking up from counting their money* hm? oh, just some bullet fodder talking *goes back to counting bribe money*

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 14

I mean, y’all forget the dude on the stand that was a felon with a weapon that said IN COURT he planned on killing him and got shot and ++

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 18

Here's a hot take; both were in the wronmg and deserve jail.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

++served ZERO time and had NO trial? Like, you can’t pick and choose what you want to be mad at. The law is the law. Get over it.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 16

What? You say that like laws are always just and are unchanging. What do you mean get over it? People are dead.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

I mean, that's definitely one take, but by that measure every person prepared for self-defense is an insurgent terrorist.

3 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 17

lol sry wrote a whole thing and deleted , this whole topic is too complicated for character limits.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But he put himself in a riot, armed, and spoke about being prepared to shoot people...

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

This will be downvoted, but he was found innocent by a jury. You want change, go fucking vote.

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 20

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

How is voting going to change the minds of a jury?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Too bad about the gerrymandering . . .

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Ah Kyle Murderer Rittenhouse. The little white turd who got away with it.

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 36

Thats a little racist, dontcha think?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

No. Calling a white person white isn't racist in the slightest.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

a white turd tho?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Little turd who happens to be white.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I mean... I feel like if I called a black guy that I didn't care for a black turd, there would be objections.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Apparently he thinks he'll be in the House as rep when he turns 25. ?

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Anyone who votes for him deserves him. He'd probably do something else that potentially gets him killed within a year of winning.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, the MAGA folks put MTG in congress, them putting another piece of shit in congress is very likely.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah and sickeningly she won overwhelmingly again ?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The GOP considers him a hero. He is a murderer. That tells you all you need to know about today's GOP.

3 years ago | Likes 766 Dislikes 47

And the state of the society Americans have cultivated for themselves. You guys need to unfuck yourselves ASAP.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Pull yourself up by your bootstraps!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They love him cause he got to kill people they don't agree with any get away with it, which is their ultimate fantasy.

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Fuck the GOP.

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 5

Sadly, it also tells you all you need to know about the parts of America that keep voting GOP as well.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

It doesn’t tell all which is even sadder…

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately that only tells you some of what you need to know…Their evils run deep…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They held a raffle for the rifle he used to kill people.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Same model I assume, not the same object. Similar to what the NRA did just after Uvalde with the Daniel Defense DDM4 V7

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not as bad as the people who find terrorists, school shooters, and serial killers attractive.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's the most blatant of the blatant parallels with everybody's favorite assholes to annihilate in video games, Adolf's Knockoff Fascists.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

uninformed, emotionally driven arguments like this, make you sound like you are also a GOP member.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 34

Explain.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And trying to pretend like the GOP isn't evil in almost every single way makes you sound like one. Spot the fascist, yall!

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

If Kyle had been Black and his victims white this would have ended very differently.

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 24

For damn sure

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 13

Victims were white btw

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Yes, I know. Just saying. ?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

typical white on white crime.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But they were defending blm so you can see how that doesn't matter to other domestic terrorists.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 15

Legally carries a weapon. Gets chased. Gets backed against a car. Defends self. “Terrorist!”

3 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 46

he was never cornered you disingenuous idiot.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

A lot of people never watched the trial, and it shows. The prosecution's own witnesses demonstrated it was self defense.

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 13

most biased trial i've ever seen.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

At 17 wasn't he explicitly not legally carrying a weapon? Across state lines no less.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

If you watched the trial you'd know both of your sentences and what they imply are wrong. Google Wisconsin gun laws.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

Made a video saying he wants to kill blm. Took a rifle to blm protest. Started shit then started shooting. That's not self defense.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 18

He's a domestic terrorist.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 14

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:25 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I agree with this post.

3 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 29

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

He brought a loaded rifle to an area he had no place being and had explicitly stated that he wanted to shoot people with his AR beforehand.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The fact that he put himself in a situation he had no fucking business being in. It was not HIS property to defend. He should've stayed home

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

A protest is violent. If it's not, it isn't worth noting, but apparently you forgot protests come well after negotiations have failed.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:21 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

protests should be peaceful. That way, they don't have to pay them one bit of mind. Peace doesn't pen history.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:21 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

WTF do you think a protest is? A nice little come together where everyone can talk and work things out? The actual propaganda is that all 1/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And if you travel anywhere with a gun with an intent to do something with that gun, it's violent. Fuck the gun gonna do? Issue a citation?

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Untrained, underage teens have no business roaming the streets with a rifle.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Are you stupid? Why would he bring a loaded rifle to a place of unrest with no intent to use it?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You wouldn't know self-defense if you got shot while breaking into someone's house. Shut the fuck up.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you referring to Kyle Rittenhouse, the terrorist insurgent?

3 years ago | Likes 1649 Dislikes 61

They are indeed speaking about Kyle Rittenhouse, the murderous, terrorist, insurgent.

3 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 10

Waitammint. Kyle Rittenhouse is a terrorist insurgent? I THOUGHT SO!

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 11

Didn't he make a post or something that said he's going to run for president?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe his proper name is Kyle "the civilian murdering, terrorist, insurgent" Rittenhouse

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Who should be Kyle "the incarcerated, murdering, terrorist insurgent" Rittenhouse.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You forgot crybaby bitch boi

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It was funny when I tried to point this out and people defended him with almost tears in their eyes.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Yes, I do believe they are talking about Kyle Rittenhouse, the terrorist insurgent.

3 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 13

Oh yes, definitely referring referring to Kyle “the terrorist insurgent” Rittenhouse.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Domestic* terrorist insurgent

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

The one who got away with murder?

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Kuzco’s poison

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You forgot murderer

3 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 10

yeah make sure you say murder first so ppl dont think he murders insurgents

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

What's this about Kyle Rittenhouse, the murderous terrorist insurgent?

3 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 2

Can we please make this a thing in the same way we constantly remind people about the rapist Brock Turner.

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 3

Do you mean Brock Turner the rapist?

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Brock Turner: Rapist

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The rapist, Brock Turner?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Much like Chris belter, Brock Turner is indeed a rapist

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Yet I was downvoted before the trial for pointing that if you go counter-protesting with an assault rifle, you own the result.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

That's because there was a surge of alt-right here after some of their insular subreddits got shut down.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The problem was the prosecution. They got greedy with his charges. 1st degree homicide is hard to prove without doubt

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Aye, nothing to do with the far-right judge who denied inconvenient facts to be shown, or the sparkling white jury.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I think that sounds too tough for what he really is, a scared little bitch who needs an assault rifle to protect himself from skateboards.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 13

he had already killed before the skateboard was a threat, he murdered over a thrown plastic bag.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

One guy had a gun btw

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 18

kyle had already killed someone before that person became involved. so shut up.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

this 'murica, son, we don't take kindly to facts around here. we just let the media tell us how to feel about things.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Facts like kyle was an active shooter who had killed at least one unarmed person, BEFORE that person with a gun was involved?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wut? It was Ziminski firing in Kyle’s direction among “kill you chants” that made him stop and shoot.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What does active shooter even mean? And Rosenbaum was behaving aggressively all night, chased him, cornered him and tried to grab his rifle.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but he only brought it out after he saw Kyle kill an unarmed man, it was either that or do nothing cause the cops weren't gonna help.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

He killed an unarmed man, who tried to grabbed a gun. I guess you should wait until he gets your gun to shoot him? Oh wait...

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 15

Yes he saw a man bring an assault rifle to a protest in the US, mass shooting capitol of the world, and tried to take it, can't imagine why.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

The person that kept even more children from being raped by a psychopath ?

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 92

Kyle doesn't get to make that decision, even if it's true. But, you go on justifying extrajudicial killings.

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

Would you mind elaborating just a tiny bit? I think the rest of missed that episode of

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Joseph Rosenbaum the first person ritenhose killed that night was a serial child rapist

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 30

Dude, SOURCE? Also, even if this was true, how would Rittenhouse have known that?

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Also, if he did know that and still killed him, that's not how justice works. That's fucking premeditated murder.

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Hey, did you know that cops are also not supposed to murder guilty people? Did you know that judges aren't either? Or prison guards?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

There’s a second insurgent terrorist?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Now don't tell them that. You'll only make the mob even madder

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 44

Every red hat always says that exact phrase. So programmed.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's like talking to a poorly-programmed chatbot.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Go back to reddit bro.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Mum should've swallowed tbh

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

At least I have a mom

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 21

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Kyle didn't know he was previously convicted of that. Understand?

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

But he did know they were the type of people to pull a gun on him and violently attack him

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 25

facepalm.... he had killed someone BEFORE anyone pulled a gun on him you idiot.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Did...did you read the post? Specifically the second part? There's also 0% chance Kyle had any idea who he was killing or their background

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 6

3 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 7

This is what he’s referring to:

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 31

You know what would be even worse than all that? Murdering 2 people and nearly killing a 3rd before your 18th birthday.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Good thing it was a clear cut case of self defense and not murder then.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 20

Past crimes do not make being killed by a terrorist okay.

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

I agree, is assaulting a minor and being killed by the victim for it while in commission of the act alright?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

Then why does holding a gun justify being attacked?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

14 downvotes within an hour. We've got some MAGA nuts here.

3 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 57

Yep

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I think they're magagas now. Giant babies who support another giant baby

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Have some respect. They’re called MAGAts

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 14

I'm also fond of Trumpanzees

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ha! That’s great!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually I vote democrat across the board. I disagree with this issue based on the facts of the case.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 12

Same. He was a colossal fucking dumbass for being there, and has only gotten worse since, but, laws as written? The verdict was correct.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

My thoughts exactly. He's a gullible tool being propped up by the GoP to enrage democrats

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You don't want to to see the comments section now. A lot of people defending the domestic terrorist.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

nuts and bots

3 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 12

I feel like there is a joke about an artificial insemination robot in there somewhere.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

seed-3P0

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nice

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

82 now..... a part of me really hopes some are bots.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 11

Da, Komrade, best bots only from Mudder Rushah.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

As a non bot I'd be willing to run down this case with anyone over voice chat.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

As in you agree with what he did?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No not really. I just think most people that are mad about the case don't really understand it. I agree with the verdict in comparison 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To the charges but I don't agree with pervious statements and some conduct during. Just hard to have an interesting convo over 140 char 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dislike Trump with a passion but rittenhouse isn't a murderer. None of this holds up under the mildest scrutiny.

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 69

He intentionally went there to kill people that disagreed with him. He made a video saying he was going to do it. He's a murderer.

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 9

Are you talking about the super store video? Shoot me a link.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 22

lol your comments say you are a trump supporter you lying piece of shit..

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Would you mind explaining that? or is that just your cop out for being a moron?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

really...you are the one with the shitty reading comprehension..

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hope on voice then bud. But we both know it's cope

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

So when a citizen confronts an active shooter and is killed by that shooter, it’s self defense. Got it.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 36

Point of info: I should have used the sarcasm tag on this post

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Literally being downvoted by people too dense to see the sarcasm *and* by people pissed at the criticism of their defense of Rittenhouse.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not in any case and certainly not remotely close to the rittenhouse scenario. Feel free to hop on a vc with me if you want.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 21

That's not what happened. He made a video saying he wanted to kill blm. Then took a rifle to a blm protest, started shit, & started shooting

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

I should have used the sarcasm tag

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

So if everyone agreed and upvoted, you're claiming you would've respond to all of them with "no, see, I was joking, get it?" [X]Doubt

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's an outright lie. I'll PayPal you $100 if you have a video of him saying he wanted to kill BLM.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

He is literally a domestic terrorist.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

I agree

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

This is a reality free zone.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 35

I agree

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 30

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Yup. I’m very left, but most lefties forsake the facts for feelings and hardcore bandwagon. Makes us look bad unfortunately.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 30

Would be nice at least to have some critical engagement. Like the top comment right now, it's a completely unrelated video, just frustrating

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 19

You're not critically engaging, you're making stock strawman talking points and then lamenting that nObOdY WaNtS tO DiScUsS ?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Sorry if you saw that last comment, was meant for other guy >.<

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mute this sealioning douche. They all think everyone owes them an argument. This creep actually wants you to confront them on voice chat.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Yea crazy to think after you call the guy a Nazi on repeat that he gets pushed to the right. Who woulda thought.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 43

It's almost like humans have personal agency and can deliberately distance themselves from violent hate groups instead of leaning into it.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I mean we have clear evidence of him supporting the protests before any of this happened.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 17

Why are you defending a domestic terrorist? Do you also support violence against Americans that disagree with your politics?

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Wanna vc? Personally that seems like projection

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 17

this was two fucking days later you twit.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pushed to the right of what? This chud got away with murder and GLOATS about it you fucking simpleton.

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Well before he was there he's literally on video supporting BLM sooo

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 19

People who sympathize with the alt-right blame everyone else for "making" them Nazis instead of coddling them.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

i could have accepted manslaughter. if you go to confront your neighbour armed with a gun and fire upon him when he hits you,not selfdefense

3 years ago | Likes 297 Dislikes 38

You’re completely wrong. Educate yourself. https://pudge.substack.com/p/jury-read-the-instructions

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 33

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A vigilante charge would have been the safest bet

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

I could have accepted this if it was because his parents should be held responsible for the murder part, given he was 17.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Not sure I agree with your last bit. If I conceal carry, and I confront my neighbor, and they assault me, firearm use would be self-defense.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I get a firearm specifically to confront my neighbor...that's a dif argument.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thats just insane, and i'd say 9/10 that defense wouldnt work, you cant just pick a fight and murder when ppl attack w fists

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They probably would have gotten him on manslaughter but sometimes people can't help themselves and aim for the moon.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Escalation resulting in death should be penalized

3 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 9

This is what stand your ground laws are based on, but it's sick. You can go pick a fight with someone and kill them when you start to lose!

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

stand your ground defense is applied wildly differently. almost only applies to white ppl killing vlack people, se last week tonight on this

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cops be like ?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

LegalEagle did a good job explaining the trial. I still agree with you guys, but he breaks down why it happened

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

he didnt cover the part where if kyle had been black killing trump supporters he'd be either dead or in for life. the law COULD be applied

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is why i call him a killer, not a murderer. He killed people, for no good reason. But murder is a crime he was acquitted of. Don't...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Make it right. It's his fault they're dead, and he's happy about it. A right fucken trashbag.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

2) the way it was no doubt but its suspect AF that it was in this case

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It actually is self defense, look it up lol

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 79

His own lawyer stated he was there to guard property. Guarding property is not self defense, and to non assholes who don't value 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 property over human lives, illegally playing security guard with an illegal gun that ends in human death is in fact several crimes.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whether or not he was there to protect property. When the self defense happened, he was protecting his own life not the property...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:16 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

This. The jury got it right based on the applicable laws and charges. DA shouldn't have gone so big. Vigilantism, reckless endangerment.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

The best measure for self defense is avoiding the situation. He walked the streets waiting for someone to challenge him.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

“The best defence is NO BE THERE” --Mr Miyagi

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:15 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2022 5:57 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Some things, especially intentions, can be obvious, but not provable beyond any doubt in court

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Was he stupid to go there? Yes. Everyone who was there that night was equally guilty of that though so not a good reason to convict

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

He was illegally playing security guard with an illegal firearm and killed people defending property cause he valued property over life.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you think it is OK for untrained, underage teens to walk the streets with a military style machine made to kill, why don't we post a few

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Exactly, there's a reason there was no violence until he showed up with the biggest gun he could find to "defend himself" from nothing.

3 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 11

No no no, he showed up to defend a total stranger's insured auto parts store. Totally worth killing people for. /s

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Agreed, I was talking about why he said he went, not what he did when he got there. 140 characters and all.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:20 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Why? He isn't an officer of the law or a trained medic. That's vigilantism and that is still illegal

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 6

"Violence" lol. He was there to defend the protestors from the cops? They were the ones using violence. Property damage is not violence.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:09 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Violence is against people. Property damage is against insurance companies. It's easy.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So what was his goal then? To put out trash can fires? He needed an assault rifle to do that?

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Feb 28, 2023 1:15 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

So he went there specifically because he wanted an excuse to shoot at people, got it. Thanks for being honest about that!

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Who fucking asked him to show up, armed and inexperienced, to “guard more properties”? Fucking nobody, that’s who.

3 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 6

If you have a gun for self defense, you keep it concealed. He showed up waving it around and made people think he was a mass shooter.

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

If only there was a whole profession of people, trained and empowered to do that. Oh well, guess it has to be done by vigilante children.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Things can be replaced you don't need to murder to "protect" them

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

it should be noted that if he was arrested participating in the protest instead of murdering someone it would have been a federal crime

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

However also should be noted no one was actually charged

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what do you mean when you say no one was charged?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

crossing state lines to protest makes it a federal charge

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

This take is honestly the goofiest. A) You think protesting is illegal B) You seem to think anyone cares if they live on a states border.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Any charges that actually went through? I googled 'violent rioting crime' and didnt have any hits; Your link from 2020, would expect some.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... what? Protesting is not illegal and crossing state lines to do it is not illegal. If the protest goes bad there might be local charges.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

if you are arrested at a protest day for violating a dispersal order and cross state lines that will result in federal charges

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"It is a federal crime to cross state lines... to incite or participate in violent rioting" bill barr

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0