Oh no, hypocrisy from Republicans, who would have expected that

Jul 8, 2026 5:38 PM

robotfencer

Views

26366

Likes

962

Dislikes

15

https://www.texastribune.org/2026/07/07/ken-paxton-voting-election-law/

"may have" lol. Just like Trump "may have" shit his pants while president.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The hypocrisy just makes it so much worse

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Republican voters are fine with blatant hypocrisy. It's the second principle of conservatism. The first is that there is no other god but lucre, the filthier the better.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do as I say not as I do

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The rationalization is that they need to win at any cost necessary, which means it's not even really illegal to them. If you also claim the other side is cheating, you're only playing fair if you yourself cheated, which you didn't because it was necessary to win against cheaters.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its fine, the Texas AG will take care of it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think he meant double down. Damn autocorrect. "That's probably why my dealer gave me extra this month."

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You MEAN "Convicted Felon Ken Paxton".

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The story in a nutshell: "State Sen. Angela Paxton said in a 2025 divorce filing that Paxton, whom she accused of adultery, moved out of their Collin County home a year earlier. But Paxton continues to list the home’s address in the northern Dallas suburb on his voter registration."

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Of course he did. "Rules for thee and never for me".

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/gallery/34ZvfBn

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The TLDR; he steals the Christmas cake given to his office.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rules for thee, not for me.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LOCK HIM UP! LOCK HIM UP!

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is the same twat who threw a paroled woman back in prison for voting after an election official told her she was good to go.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Every accusation is an admision you say?

3 weeks ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The only good thing Ken Paxton will ever do is die. Hope he does some good real soon

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

or any republican for that matter.

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rules for thee but not for me

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And nothing will happen

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Of course he did. But it's ok, he's a Republican.

3 weeks ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

I'm sure the AG of Texas is gonna take care of it.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Rules for thee not for me

3 weeks ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 0

Ah yes. I always forget about the 11th commandment. 🤔

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

gov. abbott R-TX worked to limit lawsuits for the same type of injury for which he has been receiving payments for over 40 years. A tree fell on abbott, so he sued and receives monthly payments and occassional lump sum payments, totalling in the $$$-Millions.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"may have" is a term here meaning "definitely did but we can't 100% prove it and don't want to get sued"

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

More like, "Definitely did & we already proved it or we wouldn't have run the story, but we have to phrase it in uncertain terms because they have access to much more expensive lawyers."

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"we know he did it, we have proof but the judge might still rule he didn't broke the law so he can then sue us for defamation because pedophiles run together like chlamydia and gonorrhea"

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Stop with the "softened" legal wording. Speak the truth. It's not "may have" it's "has/had." It's not "appears to have used" it's just "used." Call them out. It's not libel or slander when you are stating facts.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This x 10,000... enough with this shit of using misleading ambiguous headlines that imply a crime that absolutely DID happen may or may not have happened when referring to actual republican crimes and using the same kind of misleading headlines when referencing baseless republican accusations against their opponents which imply a crime was committed when there was NONE.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Stop with the "hardened" social media wording when bitching about journalists doing journalism. They have to confirm facts before they report them as such.

3 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

They should ONLY report on facts. Reporting on rumors and unfounded speculation isn't journalism.

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What did I say

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This bullshit about covering opinions and feelings as if they were news and not a reaction to news came from the birth of CNN and the 24-hour news cycle. They had no way to fill up all that air, so they'd cover the facts, and then get everyone's feelings about the facts, and take polls about the feelings about the facts, until eventually dumb people got brainwashed into thinking feelings are as valid as facts.

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everything's okay if you're a rich/powerful white christian republican man with a bad haircut!

3 weeks ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

What if I'm just a poor atheist white Democrat man with a bad haircut, do I get any bonus prizes? I mean 50% ain't bad

3 weeks ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Priority boarding on the highway to hell?
Save me a seat!

3 weeks ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same thing Tubbs did over in Alabama. Currently running for governor, but voted in Florida in 2018. You have to be an Alabama resident for 7 consecutive years prior to the election to be governor. His evidence for Alabama residency is a homestead exception filed in 2017, so he either committed voter fraud by voting in a state where he did not live or tax fraud by filing a homestead exemption for a house that isn't his primary residence; he can't have it both ways.

3 weeks ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

Oh but he'll get away with it cuz he was a gud foosball coach (no he was not)!

3 weeks ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They can absolutely have it both ways. The laws only protect them and bind their enemy.

3 weeks ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

It's ok if you're doing it because you have multiple houses and simply lost track lol

3 weeks ago | Likes 248 Dislikes 1

"It's okay because I'm rich and white. Not some poor ethnic." - GOP

3 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fascists believe morality is an innate quality unrelated to behavior. They are good; you are bad regardless of actual actions.

3 weeks ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

People are saying he has shacked up with his new girl (after being divorced on biblical reasons - cheating) in Denton Texas. I'll keep both eyes out for his lazy eye whenever I'm out and about in Denton.

3 weeks ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the affluenza defense. it always works.

3 weeks ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

Ethan Couch would agree

3 weeks ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I remember the Judge that gave his light sentence was railed and retired the same year. Year later he fled to Mexico with his mom and the manhunt for him. I did have to check to see it was Texas and not one of the other shit states down there, like Florida, Arizona, or such.

And thanks to Wikipedia see that Abbot stated he was looking to appeal it when he was AG during the gov race for Texas in 2014. Texas trash fire all at the top.

3 weeks ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0