Funkypeeg
9746
434
8
Convicted sex trafficker finds one of her main clients did nothing wrong by abusing her victims.
link edit as it only worked on mobile:
https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-administration-considers-releasing-transcripts-doj-interview-ghislaine/story?id=124383957
zerneus
She proved he was around her though which places him at the scene lol
ragazzino
"Sometimes we'd sit in the same pew if we saw each other at church"
MrsHowVeryDareYou
“because we'd like to release everything, but we don't want people to get hurt that shouldn't be hurt. And I would assume that was why he was there. I want to release everything. I just don't want people to get hurt."
This could not be any clearer. JFC.
casualgenderquestion2718
Well yeah, the reason you’re in jail is that NONE of it was particularly concerning to you.
weave
She had zero credibility and would like to anyone and everyone of it died her needs. She's going to get a pardon in exchange and as one hand washes the other there is nothing anyone will be able to do about it.
Kenbamazingbutprobablywontbe
Lol doj? You mean trumps personal lawyer.
zanaria
No testimony from her can be considered Truthful as long as Trump is in office because he and the doj can just promise her whatever she wants, or threaten to make her suicide if she doesn't say Trump did nothing...
NoItsATideUsername
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that she and I have very different meanings of the word concerning.
Zetor
If this was a TV show, I would have given up because of the ridiculous writing.
PaperinoVB
Noooo... really? I can't fucking believe she said so O_O It's impossible! I'm shocked!
Rijtjeshuis
... and here comes her presidential parson
themobileappisbroken
"he didn't do anything that stood out differently to what everyone else was doing, if he had I would have noticed"
4etherling
Link isn't working
Funkypeeg
Fixed it sorry. it only worked on mobile somehow
manwithsevenlivers
DutchBoeremeisie
Oh, there's a big surprise. I think I’m gonna have a heart attack and die from that surprise.
BavarianGuy
So she didn't piss of the single one guy that could release her from prison? Shocker...
mikeymikec
https://imgur.com/WmSUerL
JinxRocks
"I wasn't in the room with him while he was raping them..." doesn't mean he didn't rape them,
SecretAgentSuperBooger
Considering she's a convicted madame of children for a cabal of pedos, what WOULD she find concerning?
KoalaOnTheJuice
If he had showed any moral fortitude whatsoever. That would have been deeply concerning for them I imagine.
mastikator
Trump Epsteining her in jail might concern her.
Che07
"He always waited until I was out of the room after I told him it was too disgusting to watch, like I normally did."
khora
Great. Now release the Epstein files.
Scahrossar
Remember, besides all the other bullshit, she also perjured herself before.
petonious
Quality job there corporate lapdog. ABC has fallen completely. Mail ABC headquarters boxes of dog poop. Use USPS to drive the point.
Samja192
Can we stop saying the DOJ interviewed her? It was trumps personal lawyer
orp0piru
Witness tampering. Conflict of interest. Corruption.
necroticon
That is the law firms motto, yes.
karlfrack
It says "DOJ interviewed her" everywhere across all media. Totally bizarre. We are living in a propaganda-altered info highway. Ttumps personal attorney interviewed her. To a person above a 3rd grade-level of critical thinking skills never mind basic intelligence, that is clearly a farce.
NotSoFatTony84
It was but isn't he part of the doj now?
lolspeak
Yes, but he was Trump's personal lawyer and Trump fired the prosecutor who convicted Maxwell (meaning they would've also handled the very recent appeal that Maxwell recently filed).
Handing this case to your personal lawyer and firing the career federal prosecutor who would've gotten it makes this look a lot less like an action from "the DOJ" and more like direct meddling by the President.
NotSoFatTony84
Ok yeah gotcha. All of that makes sense , just the original comment made me think he wasn't part of the doj but definitely understand how it's more meddling and personal vs official doj stuff.
deadlyJumper
Doesn't matter, the framing is intentionally done to leave out this very critical information. The media is doing everything it can to frame it as a legitimate thing that definitely has no conflict of interest at all.
Illinifan88
For real. He put his personal lawyer into the DOJ for this precise reason.
He's abusing the federal government for his own personal wealth and protection.
Funkypeeg
Everything becomes blurry very quickly in a fascist regime's apparatus.
YeastInfectedWhiskerBiscuit
In a normally functioning society, where the rule of law is actually practiced and followed as it was designed, there would be so many high-profile people in prison right now. And quite a few executed for treason. We know Trump works for Putin. We know he gave him lists of our undercover agents. We know he gave him classified secrets. We know he committed an insurrection. We know the entire GOP and the Supreme Court enable him. We know we have people with zero qualifications running departments.
YeastInfectedWhiskerBiscuit
We know hundreds of thousands of people are dead as a direct result of Trump's actions and inactions. We know he is intentionally manipulating the market for his and his followers' financial benefit. We know he rigged the election through multiple means, from machine hacks to government policies. We know Elon and his goons stole billions worth of information and likely planted backdoors into every agency. We know Trump and the entire GOP lie thousands of times a day. We know they're Nazi's.
YeastInfectedWhiskerBiscuit
We know that since Trump and a number of GOP members stole the elections and are thus illegitimate members of government, that their orders and polices are null and void. That the orders, organizations, and actions of agencies like ICE are illegal and void. As such, any person they attempt to detain can fight back with deadly force because the actions of ICE are, in fact, kidnapping and assault, and have nothing to do with any lawful action. We know the entire GOP and cabinet are corrupt.
YeastInfectedWhiskerBiscuit
We know Trump is a pedophile. We know Trump has spent a lifetime destroying the lives of anyone he encounters. We know he's a predator. We know he's raped and assaulted more women, female children, and young boys (yes, he's assaulted boys too). We know Trump is an absolute fucking moron. And the scariest thing is that there are a lot of things we don't actually know. More evil and terrifying things that may never be known.
pres465
Cool. Then release the files.
Wuz314159
"Concerning" to her. . . She is a child trafficker after all. Trump was just a "good customer".
hyperchondriac
He always returned their property alive, probably good enough for them.
KillingTlme
She was interviewed by Trump's personal lawyer while hoping for a pardon. What was she going to say?
fartharder
"Nothing concerning, just business as usual"
sevenfingerman
“Around her” are the key words here.
ArchMagos
She has also perjured herself before. Her word is worth less than the electricity used to load that news article on your phone.
aloharamada
Well, if it's information relied to a witness by a third party but something they didn't witness firsthand, it's considered hearsay, and no court really counts that as evidence, right? So the wording isn't all that weird. Also, there's no way in hell she's being honest about any of this, obviously, but she's got expensive lawyers who know how to write a statement "properly".
cattlegrazer82
Good. She doesn't have to "commit suicide" now.
deadlyJumper
Yes, she does. She's still a loose end. One that if she gets away and feels like being petty could still drop names he doesn't want, including his.
gayvillian
Car crash or some other "accident." Epstein and her with dying by suicide is too coincidental.
SereneCyan
I'm pretty sure Trump isn't the only powerful one invested in her assisted suicide...
mastikator
Remind me again, who was president when Epstein committed suicide?
KawaiiInari
Seriously, is anyone really expecting her to tell the truth?
popeyeNL
Any transcript is suspect unless some independent witness can certify its accuracy
torokunai
three words: quid pro quo
DestinyPrevails
Eh... I don't actually doubt that Maxwell said so. She has a very strong incentive to do it, after all: She's already been moved to a nicer prison and has far less risk of accidentally committing suicide. Rather, her value as a witness is less than zero when she's being courted and instructed by the Nazi goons to blame everyone else and exculpate the Nazi Pedophile-In-Chief. She'll tell them whatever they told her to tell them and in return she'll get a pardon by the Gang of Pedophiles (GOP).
HowlingRollercoaster2
I wonder if the big box of documents she took back to jail with her after that meeting was that "transcript" so she could memorize it for upcoming appearances? Probably why she was moved to lower security too, more freedom to have possessions and less oversight.
gayvillian
I would have to see video that is proved to be unedited by metadata, and even then, theres a 99% chance she's lying to get pardoned.
azgrak1
Cheetohs personal attorney needs to interview some victims. Katie Johnson perhaps. I’ve read the transcripts of previous testimony where she describes being raped by cheetoh and Epstein.
autofire
She's already going to do and say whatever trump wants her to
StarmineRendezvous
And then probably go back to trafficking children straight to Trump.
autofire
Undoubtedly. And I can guarantee it'll only be democratic names that she releases
TheGhostofElizabethShue
If there’s a transcript there’s audio, but for some reason they’re not talking about releasing that…
LogicalLimes
Would the transcripts cover non-verbal things? Like winking?
TheGhostofElizabethShue
Who knows, and I should have said "at least audio" if you're going to go to the trouble of recording it at all it's probably video.