How fast are you willing to go?

Mar 6, 2015 7:01 PM

AnAverageJho

Views

480615

Likes

11723

Dislikes

191

Would you want to go as fast as a Formula 1 car?

~300km/h. Pretty fast.

Would you break the speed of sound?

~1220km/h for Mach 1. Pretty fucking fast.

Would you go to ludicrous speeds?

Okay, maybe not that fast...

How about going at the speed of light?

~1'000'000'000km/h or 300'000'000m/s

"Yeah right," I hear you say, "we would've heard about something allowing us to get to the speed of light. How could you get us up to those kinds of speed?"

The answer is simple, my friends: if you can't get to the speed of light, make the speed of light come to you.

This is where this simulation comes in

"A slower speed of light" is a game based on the open source, unity-based engine called OpenRelativity. Most, if not all, of the game was developed by MIT.

The game does literally what you think it does. The game takes special relativity and lowers the constant 'c' as you play along, so the counter-intuitive effects start happening at walking speeds.

What you get is a trippy game that allows people to experience special relativity. All the while remaining simple and without requiring too much computing power.

Effects include, but are not limited to:

Time dilation
Length contraction
Thomas rotation
Headlight effect
Relativistic doppler effect
Relativistic abberation

Download the game: http://gamelab.mit.edu/games/a-slower-speed-of-light/

Available for PC, Mac and Linux.

I got so sick just watching that one gif ...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry but that F-18 is doing like 300 kts. Not even close to Mach 1

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've done ~160mph on a sport bike. So sure Id go to 180

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Light speed too slow

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Damn, that's a 10 year old F1 gif

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ludicrous speed is far faster than light though.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the fast choo choo http://imgur.com/rfw7jrU

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

dang thing crashes on my computer right after it shows the controls. :(

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know i just gotta go fast

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

SANIC

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I Must accelerate at great velocity

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I got pulled over going ~110 MPH the other day so I'm almost already at the first one :D

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good thing no one knows you’re browsing 4 year old posts.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It really do be like that sometimes

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: the speed of sound is not static. It is dependent on the density of the air, which is affected by temperature and altitude.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i'm gonna play it on acid tommorow

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Yeeee acid games!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, how'd it go?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i didn't get to do it cause i didn't have enough time it lasts 12 hours so you gotta be free all day and i was busy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ill do it soon though and ill update you

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I worked at the UMR Rock Mechanics Explosives Research Lab for a while in college. We'd photograph explosions with a high-speed camera. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sanic

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

gotta go fast

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I Must accelerate at great velocity

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kurtjmac did a let's play of this.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Commenting because I'm on mobile can't download till on laptop omg

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've gone to plaid...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

omg, i want this and oculus vr!!

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Having tried occulus, it would be awful for myself. I was getting queasy with it already, mind you still going the speed of light.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My god.... they've gone into plaid!

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Incidentally, I downloaded that game yesterday.. finished it in little over 4 mins..

11 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

You must have been going pretty fast because it looked like you took 35 years.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

But if you control the speed of light then time is relative to your speed.

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

So you're saying that for your mom, it seems like I last a long time?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Only because of her massive gravitational field.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You beautifully confused manbian....

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What about the speed of time?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Time travels at the speed of light, actually.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I travel at the speed of time, approximately 60 seconds per minute!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#4 is that real? Are there actually cameras with such a high fps of recording? that is so cool

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No. Not even close. It would require relativistic shutter speeds, making the shutter too massive for the mechanism to cycle.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heres the TED talk it was presented in http://youtu.be/Y_9vd4HWlVA

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

oh my fuck that is amazing

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Strap me onto a scram jet and I'll be happy.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I know of this game. I can't remember is SO played it or the YouTubers he watches played it... Imma check.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, imma say that SO played it but never made a video of it. Or he showed me a video of it with not him playing it. My money's on the first.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry for keeping you guys in suspense. I know how much you guys care about the mundane details of my life.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 gigs of ram required, DAMN

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I only have 4 and it worked like a charm. It doesn't say required, it says it was tested on a machine with 8

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ah, ok, thanks. maybe I have a chance then.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

U da real MVP

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's exactly what I thought, relative time dilation in an amazingly compressed space. Kryten, you're a mindreader.

11 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 0

It's cold outside, there's no kind of atmosphere. I'm all alone, more or less.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

let me fly, far away from here, fun, fun, funnnnnn in the sun, sun, sunnnnnnnnnnn..

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*do do do do do*

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did... did you just make a Red Dwarf reference?

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Yea verily, just watched that episode (White Hole) last week. Still classic.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

So what is it?

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Only joking.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shut up Rimmer.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Downloaded. Played. Almost vomited due to motion sickness within 2 minutes. 10/10 would puke for science.

11 years ago | Likes 1290 Dislikes 5

Reminds me of the first time I played Portal. I laughed so hard at you because I know the feels. <3 +1

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Same. It was awesome but my brother had to stop watching me play it half way through and it hit me after I finished. Still queezy.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I actually had this game as homework in one of my undergrad physics courses.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't usually get motion sick, but I'm definitely nauseous now.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He's not joking.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now put that into an oculus rift :)

11 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 0

ded

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

........his puke?

11 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 2

No you put the puke in a morpheus headset

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You monster

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I love my DK2 but for 5 days after getting it I was unbelievably nauseous.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well if you don't want it...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thing is, this was very obviously made in Unity, so it would be really easy to make it Rift compatible.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True.. It would be fun. For seconds :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd be cool with it! I don't get VR sick.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do. Id still love it :)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you change the FOV?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. It's like a variable FOV which is what is so motion-sickness inducing.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The field of view changes as you speed up. It's one of the effects of going at speeds near the speed of light.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm sooo gonna puke for this science. Here we go...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can someboday explain to me how it is possible to capture the speed of light, with a camera? Doesn't that imply the cam is that fast?

11 years ago | Likes 206 Dislikes 7

It's actually a composite of trillions of individual "1D" pictures of repeated pulses at minutely different delays and angles.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Well now it makes sense.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the camera captures several pictures of a diferent ace of light at different intervals,then bringing them together into a seamles "one shot"

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So it's not actually capturing the light traveling?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not in one take, no. that's impossible. none the less, it is a cornerstone.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Similar to how you can get a laser dot to "move" across the surface of the moon faster than the speed of light.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow that's a mind boggling thought to be honest. Never thought about it this way. Doesn't that mean faster than light travel is possible?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, it just means that things can take place in intervals faster than the speed of light would usually allow. Keep in mind, the dot 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

isn't actually moving, it's just being perceived in different places. The photons that create the dot are still moving at C.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not that compicated. You get on camera how you point with a flash light at a bottle of coke. Like the guy in the gif above.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that shows you the beam of light, actually traveling through the bottle? I doubt that. Very much.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're passing the light through a different medium to make it go slower. But yeah, still crazy fast.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's a composite shot. If it was one shot, the shutter would have to have moved at relativistic speeds.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is my point exactly. So you are saying it's basically a lot of photos and takes added together?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Each shot taken at a later stage of the burst's passage.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Mar 8, 2015 3:38 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You're saying we can't actually measure it, just time it when it starts and stops?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, this is really taken by a camera. It's called femto-photography and it involves taking thousands of extremely short exposure shots.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

went googling a bit, and yep i was wrong. thank you for correcting me op.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

it's useful to know that "light" in this case is a wavepacket of photons. The wavepacket itself is moving slower than c

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well that's disappointing.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's what she said?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, she never saw it, in fact she doesn't exist. Unless you're referring to my hand, but that hasn't mastered speech yet.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

here's a nice tutorial on how to teach your hand to talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLwX7CFDdo8

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the source of the image, and it does involve one of the fastest cameras in the world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9vd4HWlVA

11 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 1

thanks a lot for this video. just amazing

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was the best 11 minutes I have spent in a long time. Thanks for the sauce.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I worked at the UMR Rock Mechanics Explosives Research Lab for a while in college. We'd photograph explosions with a high-speed camera. (1)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

While obviously the time-scale is still nowhere near lightspeed, explosion flamefronts are scary fast. These cameras don't HAVE shutters-(2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(3) the cameras we used burned about 100,000 frames/sec and you run the reel of film at high speed through an open shutter. Expensive shots!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The speed of sound is a lot faster than the speed of your ears right now, something something Jaden Smithism

11 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 3

Alrighty then. +1

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If The Speed Of Light Is So Fast, How Comes I Can See It Move When I Turn On The Light? Think About It.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

If The Sound Of Speed Is So Fast Then How Come I Can Rap So Slowly?

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Genetics. Soz brah

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh god you did the CaPiTaLiZaTiOn...

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dr Karl explains this in a podcast if you search for it on triple j's website in lamen terms. If keen I'll grab the cast and link it.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I'll find it, thanks

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I recall, there was a pretty good TED talk about it up on their site as well for those interested.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Please do, Im curious.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dr Karl, if you don't know, is like Australia's Bill Nye. Only more awesome.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*laymen's terms. As in, terms for the lay [uneducated] man.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

so, ironically, me.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Really fast camera capture rate + editing to slow it down + possibly making the light pass through water to make it slower.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Does that really slow it down that much, just because it's water?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not sure about numbers but from what i know it does slow it down a "fair bit".

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. They used neither of those methods.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Scientists are now capable of slowing light down enough that we can study it a bit better.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

So it's not actually the speed of light?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Mar 7, 2015 7:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well alright then, what I mean is it's not actually THE speed of light we usually speak of.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess not? Physics has never been thing.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The speed of light is 300,000,000 m/s not m/h.

11 years ago | Likes 1338 Dislikes 10

And I have no idea how they made the conversion from km/h to m/h, disregarding this mistake.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Online converters? derp

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

299792458 m/s

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Don't be a turd

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

nah, chill bro. it just looks like an 'h', because the light has gotten here yet.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I fixed it. I made this pretty late at night and I dun goof's.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Everyone knows that a billion kilometres per hour equals three hundred million kilometres per hour. DUH

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No, just everyone knows how to use an online converter lol

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*meters per second. Sorry, many of imgur don't know mph vs m/h. 186,282 miles per second, if that helps put it into perspective for anyone

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And not to get all technical, but that's like pretty damn fast!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is that more or less than 30 speed?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the above doesn't make sense to you: m stands for meters not miles.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's 299792458 m/s (exactly).

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but I need to upgrade my video card to get up to that.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

s/m/h

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't you read? The game slowed it down!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Glad this is top comment, that was really bothering me

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn it, OP

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what the government wants you to think.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

n00bs

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Crucify him over it, it's just a video game promotion thing anyways.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do imgurians do that..this dude worked so hard to mage the post and one error is nitpicked to death. I know he was wrong but I didn't

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, 299 792 458 m / s

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*299792458m/s, in vacuum. Less in atmosphere and less through water. Counterintuitive to soundwaves, that move faster in denser mediums.

11 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 15

And always too fast for the human body un aided to withstand.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yup.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are mixing the concepts 'speed of light' and 'the speed at which light moves'. The speed of light is constant.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Thanks for the correction. The technical terms may be confused as English isn't my first language.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not really, the photons are still moving the same speed, but take more bends and turns through water, making it seem like it's slower

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

As nakerium so eloquently put it, I am now aware of my grave error. Please accept my upvote to you as humble apology.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

\o/ *Gives cookie*

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

COOKIES! ... waaaait... there's no raisins in these, are there?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're getting downvoted. Here's an upvote, since the "in vacuum" is a very important factor!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks :D Precision is key no matter what, can't ignore details like that.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, they redefined the length of a meter (slightly) to make the speed of light an integer number. Less floating point operations (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

for simulations. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I see.. seems weird to redefine a meter, though, and by how much are we talking? A millionth, a billionth? Less, more?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's cool because that's an exact value.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, don't ask me why I remember that, but I read it in Guinness Book of Records in '97... stuck with me ever since.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

300,000,000 m/s to 3 significant figures. I think 3sf. is good enough for imgur.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

It's still nice to know the exact value. (Yes, exact; the definition of meter has been adapted so that c = 299792458 m/s exactly)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For short, school level calculations, that's probably an okay number, but for actual scientific calculations, precision is important.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

but im still in school so i use 3x10^8 and 9.81 in physics 9.8 ini mechancs

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, exactly, school. Where the points don't matter and the rules are made up.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Are we making a scientific calculation, or are we posting on imgur? Because this sure looks a lot like imgur to me.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

LET'S CLARIFY, THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS ALWAYS C. IT'S JUST APPEARS SLOWER BECAUSE IT INTERACTS IN VARIOUS WAYS WITH THE ATOMS IN A MEDIUM.

11 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Ha no it doesn't

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

ALRIGHT, LET'S START A CLUB.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

WHY ARE WE YELLING?!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

BECAUSE USERNAME

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

sorry to be that guy, but: it is 300,000,000 km/s. light goes from the earth to the moon in just a little more than a second.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

You ARE that guy but not the way you think. You really think the speed of light is 300 MILLION k per second? It's 300 THOUSAND k per second.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

idc. hate me

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Check again.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

its 300,000 km/s or 300,000,000 m/s. The moon is not 300 million km away though you are correct that it takes a little over a second.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

m is meters not miles

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

c is dependend on µ_0 = 4*pi*10^(-7) H/m and ɛ_0 = 8.85419*10^(-12) F/m. c = 1/(sqrt(µ_0*ɛ_0)) = 2.9979*10^8 m/s ≈ 300.000.000 m/s

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you're gonna be the "UMM, ACTUALLY GUISE..." guy, at least research.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1. it was not my intention to be that guy. ok well maybe it was. 2. i was too lazy to research. and 3. i uh um.... DANGIT. uh... reason? hm

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

dayum son! where did u find this? :D

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0