Would you like to play a game?

Sep 27, 2017 12:51 PM

lewisnel

Views

133908

Likes

2127

Dislikes

94

Simulation of war with NK leaked (updated link)

I doubt that Kim is suicidal. A more likely scenario is that NK sells its nukes on the black market, where any terrorist could get them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shall we play a game?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

The only winning move...is not to play.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Have a nice day

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol. War games. Fuck Yeah!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Got any more of them MOABs?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I like how in the end it implies the whole world explodes no matter thr winner.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Global thermonuclear war. (How about a nice game of chess?)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Loved that in the arcade. Have to have the roller ball, even though it pinched like a mofo sometimes. And watch the series Chuck, it rocks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, but remember the only way to win?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rush, the music of the universe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHST5n068bc

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem isn't that North Korea can destroy the United States. The problem is that we don't want another WW1 domino effect again.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Even if it doesn't escalate. The loss of life and economic disruption will be substantial.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it makes very little sense for America to retaliate with nukes even if NK is successful in nuking us. Highly doubt it'll go this way.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I sure fucking hope so.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I kinda think nukes have lost there strategic value outside of deference. If we blow NK off the map we lose the respect of the UN.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It just makes more sense to use strategic drone a missile strikes and destroy their military and government infrastructure.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Absolutely. North Korea is, by all means, a hostile and abusive dictatorship, but the people don't deserve to be obliterated because of it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The problem with this is all NK has to do is get a missile above the US or an ally. If it fails at that point it's still a dirty bomb.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

an emp in the right place would fuck everything up good in 'murica.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Not really EVERYTHING, since pretty much everything has backups right now so most thing would function all the same, but it sure as fuck

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

could be worse than 9/11, depending on the type of EMP of course.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They lost me the second they claimed airplanes would fall from the sky: Airplanes, much like cars btw, have shielding from EMPs, because

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but it should be noted that as it has been pointed out a billion times already ALL of their ICBMs burn themselves when trying to go

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

further than japan, so that's mostly unlikely. The real problem however are SK and japan, BECAUSE THOSE THEY CAN HIT, and they're highly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

populated areas too. The rest are safe but fuck those two are f*cked as fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ho'kay. So Here's the Earth.

9 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 1

AHH MOTHERLAND!!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But, I am le tired.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well then take a nap... THEN FIRE ZE MISSILES

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

man, dat is a sweet earf.. hhhrrrrrouuuunddd...

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

F'ckin kangaroos

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

WTF Mate

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

ROUND

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fire ze missiles!!!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

But I'm le tired

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Fine Zen. Take a nap. ZEN FIRE ZE MISSILES!!!

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Chillin.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you for this.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bout that time eh chaps?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

...Righto

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Taking me back to 2004 here dude.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Those chinese sons of bitches are goong down

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So I wrote a song about it. https://soundcloud.com/marcco68/pplsomexsm8kemistake-1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NK are pursuing nukes because the US has not toppled any regime with them, and we have threatened. A lot. Axis of evil ring a bell?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Are you old enough to remember a country called the USSR?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Lived through it. Outspending a regime ain't the same as reducing its cities to rubble, which was my intended statement. Damn 140 chars...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The USSR was a MAD-capable nuclear power, and it got toppled. Nukes make invasion unlikely, but do not ensure survival of a regime.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's a gross oversimplification of the fall of the USSR. And the analogy frankly sucks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's a statement of fact, not an analogy, and I have 140 characters to work with. You want a book, go to the library.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gorby was a responsible leader who cared about the well-being of his people. Not so KJU.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But it does ensure, on grounds of historical evidence, that we won't go police action on them and demolish everything "accidentally."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No war w/NK. The WORLD (not just US) is trying to rejoin N&S w/out bloodshed and minimal disruption. It's tough

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Because China won't consider regime change in the North, and the west won't let the North take over the peninsula.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The WORLD isn't gonna do shit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now play the one where NKorea nukes Tokio and then bombards Seoul with chemical and biological artillery shells.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

NK gets one, no one is going to let them do both.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I know people do but it's so weird to see it spelt that way

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The reason NK can't attack first is because it's understood China only backs them if they are a defender. If they are the aggressor they 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The problem is that China backs itself if a certain nation's leadership is dumb & egomaniacal enough to drop nukes right on China's border.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Are too much trouble. Without China's protection NK falls very quickly. 2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I mean, without China they literally have no friends.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Has anyone read A Canticle for Leibowitz? Why do we do this to ourselves?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a people ever needed to be liberated...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only arcade game I ever had high score. Then I learned it had only been installed that morning.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't we just play pong?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Global thermonuclear war

9 years ago | Likes 410 Dislikes 6

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fine.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

National thermonuclear war

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Number of players: zero

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How about a nice game of chess?

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 1

Later, first Global Thermonuclear War.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

joshua? is that you?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Especially since he literally gets a reference to that movie in Winter Soldier

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Total Atomic Annihilation

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What is the difference between thermonuclear - and nuclear war?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Fusion bombs.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bigger explosions and less radiation for the thermo

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Nuclear weapons split the atom. Thermonuclear weapons split the atom as a power source to fuse isotopes of hydrogen. A much bigger bang.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Fusion/Fission reaction. Thermonuclear bombs are also known as Hydrogen bombs. But you're real dead either way

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You wear thermals for one

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Dad go home

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Physicist here: if we ever have a nuclear war, it'll be thermonuclear, so there's no difference. Thermonuclear is a type of nuke.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If your so smart, explain why my phone can't auto correct you're to the right your?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lololol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This sounds about right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never thought i'd c a Nuke dropped in anger in my lifetime, always seemed like MAD wud keep sense in people, dunno now, idiots everywhere

9 years ago | Likes 217 Dislikes 21

Are you the same 45 year old mother of four that comments on local news channel's FB posts in the same broken English?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

man, fuck Imgurs character limit sometimes. makes shit like this less serious and annoying to read.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

MAD is based on all parties having a functioning brain. I’m not so sure, at the moment...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Meaning i don't think all leaders were this crazy at once....at least one of the nuclear powers had a level headed person in control.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yeah, but it only takes one fruitloop to ruin it for everyone and we have two idiots armed to the teeth

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The theory of MAD only applies if each side is capable of projecting complete devastation on the other.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. That's what the D stand for. (hehe, the standing D! Giggity!)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MAD only applies when both sides can wipe each other out. N.Korea cannot do that to the USA.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought that was just between USA and Russia.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It is. The assured destruction in this scenario is only NK's. Nothing mutual about it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

... And South Korea... And possibly Japan...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MAD only works when sensible people are in control.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's why we freak out when tin-plated and egostical dictators try to get their grubby hands on some.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not totally sure Trump and Kim didn't arrange through back channels to put on a show of hostilities for domestic consumption.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The only reason i'm skeptical of this is i don't believe Trump is competent enough to pull it off.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm sure the leaders in charge prior to trump vs Un were as uniquely crash

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Crazy*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

and posturing is gonna start a goddam war where a lot of innocent people will die, again, over stupidity arrogance and self importance.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

gotten away with it because he throws money at shit and surrounds himself with sycophants and liars and greedy people, and hes posturing now

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

- is a manchild who;s never had 2 work at anything in his life, has a god complex and throws adult temper tantrums regularly, and has always

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Nope, Obama was one of the better ones, and even further back they were good men, made mistakes maybe but knew what they were doing, Trump-

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

YOU PUT A MORON IN CHARGE OF THE NUCLEAR ARSENAL - why did a critical mass of people not think this was a bad idea?!?!

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 14

A moron? An asshole, sure. But a moron? I doubt that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you honestly think someone capable of earning 150 million in a single year is an idiot?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What is your rationale here? "having money makes you smart"?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Obama

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Because when you call someone a moron instead of giving them a better option, of course they choose the moron. They don't have a choice.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

There was a better option, that most Americans managed to grit their teeth and choose, so no excuse. They're fucking morons still.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Actually, most Americans chose the lesser evil. The electoral college decided to go the other way. Their elections are crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

That is what my post indicates - Most Americans are not morons, you can take a look at Trump's popularity ratings for a modern update :)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

A man with a boot on his head ran. He was a better fucking option than the one they picked for their party.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Exactly my point. You don't take them seriously and don't give them a serious option, insult them, and then expect them to side with you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

How is it my fault they chose the worst possible candidate in their lineup?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I dunno, I guess people saw it "working" in NK so they decided to try it in the US.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Kill'em all let GOD sort'em out! One small missile for man, MANY LARGE MISSILES for mankind!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuclear war between NK and US in a nutshell:

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Only when china would do nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which is what would happen. You think China is going to jump on the blade over an ally they only tolerate because of geography?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Things have changed since the 50's. China now owns billions of dollars worth of American financial assets. War with America would cause 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ all that to vanish; we wouldn't repay debts to an enemy. Also, American military presence in SK is due to NK.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/ If DPRK goes away, so does our main reason for arming RoK.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not really and yes they would. The korean war is an example that china would do that ( +100k casualties from china in that war ).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So which angle are we going at here, you think they'd try a conventional or a nuclear war?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Hard to say but I think a nuclear war which could lead to WW3.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That, but it also wipes out humans and most other life on Earth

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

LOL no it doesn't. Nukes are just a form of bomb. NK's are barely any stronger than Hiroshima's. And the most severe realistic result of

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually, the problem of using nukes, in that it's making precedent. Russia can use it against they neighborhood - like Georgia and Ukraine.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Nukes are just a form of bomb" Yes, and uranium is just a kind of rock, bullets are just tiny balls of metal, and coffee is just bean water

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And you're just an impressionable idiot. The 1883 eruption of Krakatoa was 200 megatons, that's 15,000 Hiroshima-tier nukes. We're fine.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Krakatoa wasn't radioactive. And it was one blast in one spot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fallout

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

nuclear war is global societal collapse. Nukes being able to wipe out mankind is an invention of fiction.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's a retarded site and you know nothing about nukes. They don't even mention the fucking yield.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd like to remind people that North Korea has 25 million people, almost all of whom don't deserve to die for Kim and Trump's insanity

9 years ago | Likes 144 Dislikes 26

I'm happy I live on the east coast.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are babies born addicted to crack every day, Fidel Castro lived to be 90. What you deserve has very little to do with what you get.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

So dont make an effort? Thats just foolish.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And they also don't deserve to be stuck under NK's rule either

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's like the matrix. Until they aren't, they're still an agent of the state and an enemy combatant.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Thats actually a pretty good comparison, dunno why you get downvoted. Your statement doesnt mean we should just nuke em all

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, abhor nuclear weapons. I think all that shit should be launched into space pointed away from us. Intergalactic Hegemony baby.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not that we'll get to witness it acting like a bunch of primitive animals on our little bit of solar driftwood.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention Hawaii and The West Coast who's lives are now in potential danger due to childish behavior.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They aren't.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeh, but it's let them live, or get that fuzzy feeling that you won. I mean, that's more important right?

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 7

No one is going to bomb NK unless they bomb someone else first, and at that point its your innocent people dying vs their innocent people

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Relax pal, this happens every few years. Back and forth 'big man' talk that goes nowhere and nothing changes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's my point with a us north Korean conflict. It's not a military problem, it's a collateral problem

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's more of a Seoul will be reduced to rubble before SE Asia forces can mobilise problem.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Unless that SK assassination unit performs beyond all wildest expectations.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wanted to make that point but couldn't do it in 140 characters. WP my friend. Not helpful it's the most densely populated place on earth

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, potential nukes heading for Japan.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How is this Trumps insanity? This conflict is the product of 7 or 8 presidents kicking the can and NK being nuts, not Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 32

NK is always nuts. This is the only President that has decided to try and out-nut them in response. Thankfully he is an incompetent shit.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Oh, that excuses it then. We should definitely try appeasement and let them develop an ICBM that can reach D.C.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Yelling at them over Twitter does not prevent that. Name one concrete mil/dip thing that Trump has done that isn't an empty threat.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It kinda does tho. This is a propaganda war before a shooting one, rhetoric is as important as ships right now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also upped missile defenses in ROK and Japan, moved pacific BCG closer to DPRK coast, calling for sanctions at UN and getting them

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No previous president has ever escalated it the way Trump is doing, and they didn't have nukes before.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 9

While Trump's rhetoric is likely not helpful it's not the root cause here. NK has launched missiles LITERALLY over Japan. That should be war

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's grounds for war, but if the US declares war, in the first hour, 100k south korean citizens die.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In other words; Obama let NORTH KOREA obtain nukes and put thier big boy pants on, and Trump is trying to Scared Straight them.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 7

Just in case this isn't a joke post, NK left the NPT in 2003 and did their first test in 2006...

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Did you just try ann appeal to logic with a pro-Trump, anti-Obama supporter? How's that working out for ya?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Trump is responding, not escalating, and responding with strength is what we want. The nation chucking missiles is escalating.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

Everyone knows that the US has a big stick, repeatedly threatening to use it just makes it more difficult for diplomacy to prevail

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

We've never seen diplomacy succeed without violence with dictators of NK caliber. Hearts and Minds won't work with a country that shut in.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Escalated? Trump was basically ignoring Kim until they started launching missiles.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Probably bercause he keeps treating it like a schoolyard fight and calling the slightly unhinged leader of a nuclear power names on Twitter.

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 11

Incompetence /= insanity

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

They aren't exactly mutually exclusive either.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Did you really just say Small Rocket Man is unhinged?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Definitely insanity and not classic cold war brinksmanship.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

How the hell is trump using classic cold war brinksmanship? Calling kim Jong un, "little rocket man" on twitter?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

By responding with over the top rhetoric he appears willing to go further than past presidents, we did the same with the USSR at many times

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The cold war brought us within inches of nuclear destruction multiple times. Using it as the basis for your foreign policy is pretty insane.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Brinksmanship is what prevented escalation into conflict at multiple turns, you don't know what you're talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

All we gotta do is bomb the capitol and all military bases we could make North Korea a smoking crater with no nuclear at all

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You think China will just watch that and do nothing against it ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Considering China has been getting real sick of NK's shit recently they might not. If NK starts the conflict anyways.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nuclear installations are in hardened bunkers in the mountains. They would 100% manage to retaliate.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have a thing called a THADDS system it shoots misiles down before they get anywhere near us

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

THAAD and Aegis have only been tested for IRBMs. Our GBDS is rated for ICBMs but has only been tested like, 3 times. Nuclear triad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well it will definitely be able to shoot down north koreas janky ass misiles if it was successful with our advanced misiles

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again, you mean? The U.S. already bombed them into the stone age in the 50's, levelling Pyongyang. Killed around a fifth of NK population.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Really? They just don't learn do tehy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Remember: We needed TWO nukes to combat the fanaticism of the japanese leaders. Widely regarded as saving more lives than it cost.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If we had bombed all the government buildings and military bases it would have ended quicker

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldve taken much longer and much more resources

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0