Perspective

Oct 10, 2016 10:49 PM

If 100 people lived on earth

The first one made me wanna play Risk again.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If only 100 people lived on earth everybody could have like, a million houses tho.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A third of the world is Christian? Jesus Christ.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone else think it was weird that the guy with half the money is also starving?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

It's a first world thing. Starving yourself to look skinny/fit in more pumpkin spice

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Food for thought.. if only 7 went to college, who taught them? Cause I'm pretty certain you need a college degree to teach..

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Wouldn't those teachers be in the 7?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I'm glad this is on The Internet

9 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 0

where the majority of the world can't see it :)

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Really puts my struggles in perspective. I coulda been forced to learn 6500 languages.

9 years ago | Likes 218 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is like you can't read & write, you have no home, no internet, no phone, but you need to learn 6500 languages to earn $2 per day.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

I can write, I just can't read

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You win.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an Australian, I'm sad to see that an Australian won't make it as one of the last 100 people left after the apocalypse.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anyone else sitting here going 14 Americans but only 5 english speakers?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

Pretty sure that was "the Americas", not just the USA

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I've never felt so grateful to have a degree. And now I can't think of anything to say that won't sound pretentious.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

As a high school dropout, go for it. + spare some change?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

be pretentious, you desrve it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I wonder if they define "Attended college" as including trade schools.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They need to specify if they actually mean real universities, too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They actually may, you know... the statistic only says the people *attended* college.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SOURCE?!?!?!?!?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OP is a fag. Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y43TzwrBDm0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 29, 2020 5:12 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those 14 who cannot read and write have access to the internet? If so, it's unfair.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They probably have to know English too to make good use of the Internet

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Folder[Interesting]

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything is awesome

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

70 people speak 90+ different languages each. That's pretty neat

9 years ago | Likes 224 Dislikes 3

It sounds even more impressive if you say 6,500 though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hahaha exactly what I was thinking!

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Here I am only speaking one and knowing little snippets of a few others... dang.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This is just native lang, if it meant the most commonly known Lang it'd be english, most the world knows English even if only as second lang

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

This is just native lang, if it meant the most commonly known Lang it'd be english, most the world knows English even if only as second lang

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah, this is great and everything. I love what you did with the Lego people, but umm, can I have a reference page attached to your post?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Who needs facts when you have nice soundbites? Picturebites? uhh... gif-bites?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You drive a hard bargain.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Judging by that %50 of the wealth held by one person, I'm going to bet it would be 99 people really fast

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep people love stealing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

...He's talking about murder.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Horribly he's right, someone who thinks they deserve that wealth would kill the rich person

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

98, since he's highly unlikely to be the starving one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

$ per day figures are BS. Some areas cost less to live in so you can spend less. This applies regardless of country. This should be based1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

on what they can buy with that and if they have what the need or how happy they are. Those are far better indicators. Flawed statistics.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

PPP

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chinese isn't a language.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's a collection of similar languages.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... no Australia?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

100 of them are Lego people.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I love that they were Lego people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The homeless number is too high, IMO. Maybe they are talking about refugees? Almost 25%?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It might be based on what is defined as a "home". But there are massive numbers of homeless in the 3rd world

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If 1st world countries have 1%, then 3rd world would have to make up the difference for the ave. - over 50%? It maybe the definition diff.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More than 50% of the population of Mumbai is considered homeless (ie they live in the slums), likewise the Favelas of Rio

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

With 100 people, 43 repost this, 65 complain about the repost, 1 lets the starving one die to end world hunger, and 1 speaks 6500 languages.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

You are not good at math are you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just bad at typing. 55. Shoot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So basically percentages?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's what percentage literally is. "Per centum" means "by the hundred" in Latin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For people who checked out of math classes before getting to middle school

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Heh, as a math-headed person, I can still see the usefulness of this reduction as a visual aid. You look at percentages, they're abstract.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's one thing to SAY 14% of people are illiterate. It's quite another to show you 100 people, bring fourteen of them out, point at them,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and SAY "these people cannot read or write". Looking at people, or even Lego facsimiles thereof, has more impact on most people than looking

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

at printed numerals.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm glad I'm the 44 percent with Internet so I can look at spicy memes all day.

9 years ago | Likes 1035 Dislikes 2

nah you're the 1 homeless, starving guy, coz you don't know how to fuckin' survive, coz you sit on your fat ass lookin' at memes all day

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

But who said you can read them spicy memes?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I'm glad I am part of the 75% with a smartphone so I can read porn star research and perform experiments at the same time.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But how many know what a truly spicy meme is? 20? 30? 90?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

* cat memes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I find it amazing and humbling that big tech is actively trying to solve the internet issue, but 25% still don't have phones.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if I have a phone but never use it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still counts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 147 Dislikes 3

Memeball

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Beat me to it +1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

No 9gag here

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not percent tho

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

44 out of 100 is 44 percent bruh

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had a brain fart. My apologies

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No worries :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You left out Australia.

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 7

And Judaism

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because it's less than 1% of the world's population.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Australia was likely lobbed in with Asia to round off an arm.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

yeah, prolly as Australiasia

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There are cities with a greater population than us, it's understandable

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Only 2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But still, *cities*, with a greater population than one of the largest countries in the world. And Shanghai comes pretty damn close too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Texas

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Texas was once a country, but was never a continent.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not stupid. I know that there are at least 1000 people who live on Earth.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's more than thirty percent!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only 1 is starving?!? I thought it was a bigger problem than that

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 6

Poverty, Corruption and Overpopulation is the problem. Starvation have a way of fixing itself.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When we try to fix Starvation by giving poor people the absolute minimum we create Poverty, Corruption and Overpopulation. Ironic, isn't it?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(sigh....) Yep, hell of a thing. Guess i won't then. Probably make 'em even more existentially miserable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What you should do is support education, fix corruption, give out free birth controls and fight religion and superstition.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Word.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They can only starve so long you know.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Starvation is different than malnourishment. You can eat rice 3x a day and not be anywhere near starvation but be severely malnourished.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

Thx for underlining that. People tend to get confused with those two words. It's important to know the difference.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1 in a 100. There are 318.9 million people just in America. Do the math. The number of people starving is staggering.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

The number is staggering only because so many people exist. Just saying.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

But is it the same 1 that controls 50% of the money

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 1

Who needs food if you have money

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Do dollars count for fiber in a diet?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Try living with money and no food for a month, tell me how it goes.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I'm sure I'd struggle an awful lot getting fed if I was rich. :-(

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. You chose money over food, no exchanges!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahem...buy...food...with the money.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Explain how.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It will be, at the rate we're feeding them (just long enough for them to reproduce) :/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

That's simply incorrect. People don't tend to want to be starving, giving people the ability to feed themselves helps everyone.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, not everyone, not the ones profitting of the starving people. e.g. grain delivered is made infertile and cannot be sown, just eaten

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I seriously doubt it's the problem you think it is. The military is a far bigger money sink than feeding the needy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My question is what's the line between starving and underfed. The underfed group was pretty big and that's a significant problem too

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would imagine that 'underfed' would mean "not getting enough nourishment, but eating enough that direct starvation is no threat". Such

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is not underfed. The English word for that is malnourished, and it's very eat to be overfed and malnourished.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

people would be at increased risk for many health issues, and may die if any of those go from risk to actual... but they won't just starve.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At least, that's my assumed interpretation of the distinction between "underfed" and "starving". Malnourishment leaves you open to lots of

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

diseases or even a few types of organ failure, but starvation kills you directly, because you do not take in enough food to keep the body

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0