Bloomberg: "for about two years, employees at Evraz North America Inc., a Russian-owned steel plant operator in the US, falsified quality control test results on some armored plating for the vehicle’s manufacturer, according to an internal report"

Mar 11, 2025 4:52 PM

vladrichdemaclant

Views

58970

Likes

1548

Dislikes

32

"The incidents took place at an Evraz facility in Oregon from 2017 to 2019, according to Evraz’s probe and company officials, who said employees at the Portland plant skipped mandatory hardness tests and inputted fake results on an estimated 12,800 armor plates of various types. Those plates were labeled as tested and approved, though some later showed signs of cracking."

"A primary customer for the armor plates was Oshkosh Defense LLC, a maker of a wide range of military vehicles, including the JLTV"

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-11/armor-plates-for-us-army-s-jltv-didn-t-pass-quality-control-tests

You want to eliminate waste and fraud, start here.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also building the new USPS trucks coming out.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If this seems amazing to anyone, remember this Russian purchase was in 2006-7, when most of the US felt Russia had been defanged. Even up to the 2012 election, when Romney & Obama debated, and the concept of Russia returning as a threat was laugh worthy to many. Of course, two years later, they spilled into Chechnya and began a war that has run hot & warm since.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"I had a guaranteed military sale with ED 209 - renovation program, spare parts for twenty-five years... Who cares if it worked or not?"
-Dick Jones senior executive at OCP

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Well, it is in Putin's and Trump's best interest that they don't work.

1 year ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 5

Only if we sold them to our allies. If we kept them, then Putin would want high quality for us, since he now owns the US military through his subsidiary Trump and Co.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

he owns it like a venture capitalist owns it, he wants to run it into the ground, make any profit, make it unusable for anyone else, then move on to the next thing

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds like fraud, waste, and abuse.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

So... the military in general?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I too think it's smart to have a Russian-owned steel plant supply armor for our military vehicles

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Every soldier knows their gear was made by the lowest bidder.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know who was president then…

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, the US military does abominable things to their soldiers so this is nothing new. Remember the Edgewood Arsenal experiments or the more-recent Camp Lejeune contaminated water lawsuit? The government and military don’t care. Billions of dollars go to the military every year and yet, they pay a pittance in settlements when caught actively harming soldiers.

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I was reading recently that essentially every post/base's water is contaminated with PFAS. As an Army brat who joined later in life, I'm waiting for my third arm or malignant tumor whichever comes first.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, you didnt buy the extended warranty against hyper-oligarchy, so say it with me: "Its not service related!"

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like there's a CHEETO involved

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who used to build military equipment, I wish this were even news.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That is negligence by the US people responsible for testing the product. As a public sector purchaser, I never allow the suppliers to mark their own homework. I sample-test and if it fails, the contract is toast. They know this in advance, no problem.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I was head of QA for a children's products wholesaler. We never trusted supplier's own test results...and as a result, never had a recall.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like the FAA allowed Boeing to test and certify its own planes?

You may not allow this but a wild guess tells me you're not too high in the food chain to be noticed by lobbyists with their full suitcases of special vacations, fancy restaurant visits and paid top colleges for your kids.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

that's how NASA does business, but apparently DoD gets to be special

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've seen multiple members of the senior brass devolve from caring about their Joes and switch into "fuck em all for the sake of profits" mode as they eye the exit door into their cushy contractor job. PMCs are a bane on our planet.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a veteran and a former inspector:

The Russian angle is probably not the reason they did this.

Every. Corporation. And. Military. Manufacturer. Does. This.

They bypass tests, metrics, and deadlines like they were tiny, insignificant bubbles in champagne. And they do it with a smile on their face until the auditor or inspector shows up, then they suddenly "start an investigation".

Oh look, "Evratz investigation"...

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

True, but Russia has been intentionally sabotaging things in several countries for decades, and some of the most recent ones were Russian workers in some - either it was guns, drones or ammo - manufacturing plants sabotaging them because they were headed for Ukraine, so they were shit quality but at least they got caught pretty quickly. Tried to find the article but there's so many about different European countries where they've struck. It seems like US is not prepared for the same.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I get that, but this is Imgur, where assuming based on race, country of origin, gender, etc. is usually frowned upon. I get that Russia does this and I even agree that this assumption is consistent with our current fascist situation, but extraordinary claims usually require extraordinary evidence here... so it's weird to me how readily "Russian owners equals Russian spies and saboteurs" was the agreed upon answer rather than waiting for the evidence.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wrongful death lawsuits for service member families go!

1 year ago | Likes 356 Dislikes 2

Yeah, good luck with that. I lost hearing in the military while working in the training section and setting up rifle range training, the government sued 3M later for selling faulty earplugs to the military, settled to the tune of 6 billion, and my hearing loss claim was denied so I'm never seeing a dime of that lawsuit. You have to prove everything and it's so stupidly hard and probably only worse with recent cuts.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy shit, that's insane luck. You might be the first vet I've heard of being denied hearing loss. I was under the impression that it was an automatic 10% rating

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funny enough, you can't do this.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

the VA has determined your condition (dead) was not service related

1 year ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Family lawyer: Hi, I need detailed records on where my client's MRAP was manufactured and whether its armor plating passed quality control
DoD:

1 year ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

Recovered MRAPs are disassemble for good parts and sent for scrap as per military protocol. The ones not recovered sit on an active battlefield if it's not already burnt to crisp and tampered with, goodluck towing that back for your lawsuit *laughs in evil lawyer*

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

"Этот Джокер просит у нас документы.... I mean, sure, we will send them in the mail"

"Деметри, заставь Deepseek собрать некоторые старые результаты тестов. Стат"

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

It should go without saying that military hardware should not rely on components from non-US companies.

1 year ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

You'd think so, would you not?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*laughs in Canadian* or you can use use Chinese steel and aluminum *laughs harder in Canadian*

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How do they even get a contract to supply the military when owned by an enemy? There's your waste and corruption. Not in erroneously listing social security birthdays wrong.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh good, we are going the way of the empire. They were space nazis and lost but damn did they look good.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't even have to look to know it took place under Trump's first administration. Trump is a fucking Russian asset. Why the fuck are Republicans going along with this?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not quite forged in fire.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

more like forged in ink.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"forged in lighter flames" sponsored by Bic.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why is a Russian owned steel plant providing armor for U.S. Infantry?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because that was when Trump was president and he is a literal traitor to the country

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Why in the everloving fuck would you let Russia be in charge of making armor plates for ANYTHING?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um fucking excuse me, just a quick question, um, yes, hi, WHY DO WE HAVE RUSSIANS MAKING ARMOR FOR OUR WAR MATERIEL

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Cause they're our bet friends now. Haven't you heard?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually it was Americans making the armor and lying on forms. The reality is that the Russians aren't even needed, because there will always be a capitalist willing to do the sabotage to increase their cut of the profits.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember ED 209? Buggy as hell, piece of crap product. But "we're going to make $billions$, who cares if it doesn't work?"

1 year ago | Likes 132 Dislikes 0

The Sgt York Anti-Aircraft tank almost pulled an ED209 on several members of Congress in the 1980s during a test run.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe we can set up a demo of ED209 for Congress soon?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Every republican is a poorly written OCP character (evil corporation from the movie) that didn't make it to the movie because they were too poorly written or unbelievably greedy, bad and stupid.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

If I remember right, he was given five bullet points about why he was fired at the end of the director's meeting that week.

1 year ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I see what you did there!

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To be fair it's feet and center of gravity were not designed for human sized stairs.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And yet it is clearly programmed to know how to walk down stairs. Just one more corporate oversight. Like installing a screen door on a submarine. 😆

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of my favourite parts of that movie is after it's proved to be a colossal failure and kills an executive at its showcase, is that it's still pressed in to service later in the movie it's seen guarding the building (and in later movies they're still in use).

1 year ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

And in the Robocop game one of them malfunctions again, and Murphy is forced to kill it after it guns down one of his fellow officers.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There are many RoboCop games.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ah, I was talking about Rogue City.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

With the money they spent on R&D, no way they'd let it go to waste. Who cares if it sometimes kills people for no reason?

1 year ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

yes, that's exactly the lampooning of the absolutely psychotic business decision's they're playing out

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hey, Guyz! What's happening in this thread?

1 year ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 3

what does the most effective anti-armor platform of the late cold war have to do with this?

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

the bradley fighting vehicle movie?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fairness the Bradley has proven to be an excellent vehicle. Colonel Burton was a jackass, member of the Fighter Mafia, who totally misunderstood the reasons for tests being performed in the way they were and why the Bradley wasn't just an M113. The Bradley should be seen as a response to the BMP AFVs, not to M113, it's made for an entirely different doctrine and performs well in it. I thought we dispelled the myths perpetuated by the Pentagon Wars with Ukraine War tbh.

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

The "Pentagon Wars" myths were dispelled by the stellar performance of the Bradley during Desert Storm already.

It boggles my mind how people still buy into the bullshit that reactionary forces such as the fighter mafia spouted decades ago. If things went their way, combat vehicles would still be on the technological level of the Korea war ffs.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everything would be on technological level of Korean war, since their whole ideology is based on the idea that F-4 Phantom was too complicated and unable to dogfight.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After that footage of a Bradley bullying a T-90 tank the proof is really in the pudding.

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

How TF our govt let Russia, one of our adversaries, own a fucking steel plant making armor plates for our soldiers....

1 year ago | Likes 1009 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 year ago (deleted Mar 11, 2025 5:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The steel planet was in Oregon. I think that's in America. The plant was owned by a Russian company

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because that adversarie shit is bullshit, they do bussiness when they find them profitable, saying they are 'the enemy' is just a con to justify military spending and to use when convenient. See how the EU is parroting at every second how bad is russia and how evil is putin while buying from them as much gas as they can to this day.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

It happens. A lot of titanium that went in to the SR-71 blackbirds was purchased from Russia through shell companies.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That was different. It wasn't Russia allegedly covertly owning US Titanium suppliers, it was because the only major producer of Titanium at the time was the Soviet Union. It was cheaper to buy it covertly in the limited quantity needed than to build up our own supply line.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well they have a president and an entire political party, so there is that

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't take the bait! Epstein! Give us the list! Stfu about everyyyything else... list... no... i don't wanna see the alien ship you just found.... gimme the list!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That mill was acquired in 2006. https://www.aist.org/evraz-to-acquire-oregon-steel-mills-for-us$2-3-billion

1 year ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Russia wasn't a whole lot different. Ask Chechnya, Georgia, Ossetia, etc.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

No Russia hasn't changed. Every US administration has thought they could change that and tried to do a Russian reset. Even Obama foolishly tried and Obama enabled alot of Putin's aggressiveness. Russia is an enemy of freedom, democracy and human rights and they always have been and probably always will be.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Money

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NATO claims Russia is not its enemy.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

NATO does not maintain an official list of adversaries, as it is a mutual defense organization and therefore does not have "enemies" when there is no conflict involving a NATO member. HOWEVER, NATO does consider Russia a potential threat.
https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/01/04/not-if-but-when-nato-prepares-for-russian-attack-on-finland-baltics-and-norway/
Nice try.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

We've been an oligarchy for a while my dude. Citizens united made it so neither party had to actually make concessions to its base and they could bury any calls to hold them accountable in bullshit. Gow do you think we got in this mess? Even our leftist party refused to even bother lying about Medicare for all, college tuition, or any of its usual promises in this last election. The oligarch class wins no matter who we elect and they didn't even need to hide it this time.

1 year ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 3

Yup

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who benefits from Ukraine receiving defective equipment?
Russia.

Who benefits from making that happen?
Russian assets.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Oligarchs launder money by investing in legit companies.

1 year ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Thats how they make America Great Again

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

capitalism

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Look at who was president then. Hmmmm…. The shit gibbon!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We transitioned from an industrial / trade economy to a bloated service economy that sells suffering and white collar crimes and left all the industries that actually produced things to rot, which allowed China, India and Russia to buy them all up for peanuts.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

From Google: EvrazNA is a US based subsidiary of a UK incorporated company, that has a significant portion, at least 28%, of its shares owned by Russian oligarchs. That's the facts. Whether or not that translates to "Russia owns a steel mill that is sabotaging armor plates for Oshkosh" is up for debate. But they are under "scrutiny".

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That's some weak sleuthing.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Additionally, looking at the (reported) demographics of EvrazNA. None of them speak Russian, and around 50% of the employees are white males, with the majority being self-proclaimed Democratic voters. So it's probably top down corruption/laziness, with little to no intention, of the grunt employees, to be supporters of a Russian agenda.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Would you like to ban foreign ownership of businesses and facilities in the US?

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 28

How about banning military and other sensitive contracts to companies owned by entities of countries designated as "foreign adversaries" (as defined by 15 CFR 791.4)

YES. ABSOLUTELY FUCKING YES.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes. Start by kicking the Middle East companies out of Arizona and their wholesale water table/colorado river watershed theft for their damn Alfalfa going overseas. Think we’d be able to do the same over there?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Maybe for businesses directly tied to our overinflated deficit increasing military budget, yeah.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So, the thing you are talking about that doesn't involve widespread bans on companies, is supply chain vulnerability management. Most if not all DoD entities are supposed to be doing this or passing the responsibility on as part of issuing contracts. This is a failure on Oshkosh Defenses' side, not "the government" or "the DoD"

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah almost like they should have sourced their material from an ally like canada or Mexico and tested it properly before letting countless soldiers die from their negligence.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and spend .000001 of a cent more per unit? that sounds an awful lot like communism...or socialism...whichever, americans don't know the difference, they just know that it isn't capitalism

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

YES, we should ban foreign ADVERSARIES from making our MILITARY assets. YES. YES.

1 year ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

But we buy a bunch of equipment and goods from foreign countries, you know?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 22

Most critical defense manufacturing is banned from.overaeas manufacturing for this reason. A 3P vendor to a DoD manufacturing company is a degree out and not subject to same.rulws

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

My guy, you gotta proofread your comments.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

In this case, I think it would be just as useful to punish Oshkosh for not evaluating their vendor appropriately since they're the prime contractor.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who was president in 2017-2019?

1 year ago | Likes 256 Dislikes 9

Is it ....ORANGE????

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

It's not, actually

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Must of been Obama /s

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

*have

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

*Must've

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah, that's perfectly fine, too.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sorry. *have of been Obama /s

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Well who was President in 2007?

1 year ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

Dick Cheney?

1 year ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

Would the real Dick Cheney please stand up, please stand up

My earworm is now yours

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huh, that is technically true. He was acting president for a couple hours in July while Bush was undergoing a medical procedure.

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Dubya

1 year ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 0

To be fair to Bush, Russia was seen as non-adversarial at the time.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

To be fair ... Dubai was the first "reset" attempt to be friends with Putin. Then, Obama made a second attempt as he was determined to just continue Bush policies because he was the first black president and needed that cover, except, of course, domestic stuff like healthcare. And, they both got duped into thinking Putin and company were part of the human race. They are not.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup. He was buddies with Putin too. Even called him Pootie Poot.

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

"I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy”

“I was able to get a sense of his soul.”

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0