Ron Paul suddenly has an issue with libertarian policy.

Jan 13, 2021 12:07 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

92955

Likes

1569

Dislikes

87

Yo in all reality this isn’t a good thing. Donald deserved a ban for obvious reasons but what did Ron do? It’s their right but damn man

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

On one hand I agree. Facebook should have been warning pages. But that would require their mod team to do it's job. On the other hand theyre

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A private entity and can ban and lock out who ever they want without warning as outlined in their ToS and EULA

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Libertarians still want companies to follow their own rules

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

To be fair; he simply voiced a thing happened and it was done poorly. He did not suggest govment change it. THIS isn't directly hypocritical

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Ponder this: He is offended by not being given evidence of the claim being made that resulted in the actions against him.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not saying they were wrong by any means. Just.. turntables.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now they can now how feels to be fired in a "right to work" state.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There’s an actual “LEARN MORE” button in the image he attached.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You wanted to repeal Section 230 to make Facebook responsible for your speech, & now you’re bitching about getting removed for your speech?

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

"Not my speech, just liberal speech." - Ron Paul

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Shit, I’m not alone! Got hammered by a 24-hour suspension for a post about the penalties for impeachment conviction. Someone ratted me out.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Crap, that was aimed at Ru Paul. Sorry, Ron!

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Shashay away!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

water off a ducks back

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I must be failing to see where he's demanding government oversight.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

He’s just pointing out that he doesn’t believe he violited their terms of service. He doesn’t take issue with the existence of those terms

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 21

Believe it or not you can both acknowledge that someone has the right to make a decision and also argue that it is the wrong one

5 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 3

Imgur hates libertarians because most only think of the philosophy in extremes.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Yes, most Imgurians mods do think in only extremes

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whatd he say to make this happen?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

“The senator from Kentucky is now working for Vladmir Putin” - John McCain

5 years ago | Likes 748 Dislikes 23

Ron Paul has never been a senator in Kentucky

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

“Yippee-Ki-Yay, motherfucker!” -John McClane

5 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

"Stoke me a clipper, I'll be back for Christmas" -Rimmer

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mr. Falcon*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wrong person. Ron Paul is a retired US representative. Rand Paul is a Senator. Also, read up on WHY he objected to McCains bill.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Could I get a TL;DR version; my brain tends to zone out when reading political policy.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

McCain was pushing a bill to support adding Montenegro to NATO. Since NATO is a military alliance where members come to each other's aid...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

... in times of war, adding them to the alliance would do virtually nothing to strengthen the alliance, and served only as a mechanism to...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

... pull the US into more foreign wars, for which it gains no benefit. Rand is a staunch opponent of foreign interventionism and voted no.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Is that libertarian policy? I honestly thought that meant no rules or restrictions of expression.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A true libertarian will abolish public schools and the fire department.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Free market, right Ronald? ?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Suck it up buttercup

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I think he defends their right to exclude him from their service while wondering why they did it - I think that's logically-consistent.

5 years ago | Likes 101 Dislikes 8

Ron's crazy, but consistent. Like Bernie, but on the opposite side.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Yeah, there's nothing in this post, at least, suggesting they shouldn't be able to do it. Just that it sucks that they did.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Isn't Dr. No a libertarian? I thought he was in favor of corporatation?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No regulations Ron. Let the invisible hand guide the markets. If that same invisible hand bitch slaps you, that's your fault

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm OK with any platform wanting to keep extremist people who post terroristic threats and violence off their servers. That's reasonable. /1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Problem is social media is bullshit trash and has nothing to do with offering a place for discussion.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, that's just totally absurd. Imgur is social media. I have tens of thousands of comments on here with most of them being discussions.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But this is crossing a line. It looks like we really are starting to see them stamp out ANY expression or thought that doesn't lean hard /2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

enough left. That isn't something to be cheered on. As Americans it is HEALTHY to be able to engage in debate of different ideas on /3

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

these platforms. Otherwise Facebook will just become a hard left version of Parler. That's stupidly divisive. Blocking a retired /4

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

politician who has threatened nobody and done nothing more than say things Facebook's internal people don't agree with is not OK. /5

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What do you suppose his violations were about?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Apparently it was a "mistake" according to FB.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I didn't think the leopards would eat MY face!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two first name rule.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought Ron Paul was chill and it’s just his idiot son who is a total prick?

5 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 9

Other way around. Rand Paul is chill, Fairtax dude. His idiot son is a loony.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Ron is the dad

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, shit, you're right. Been too long since they were in the public eye and I've gone and flipped them in my head.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was just that Ron Paul is more sincere in his crazy libertarianism while his son is more on the self-serving douchebag side.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I respect Ron Paul, I don't agree with him on much but he has integrity and sincerity. He doesn't vote based on his own interests

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Both.jpg

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

Just because Ron Paul was a meme 4 years ago doesn't make him chill

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

8 years ago. He ran in 2012, and was pretty successful with center-right millennials which is why he became a meme.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

You're correct.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well... they are well read; and sometimes this makes them seem smart... but every few months they tip their hands.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Fuck no.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

Both of them have exercised a great deal of integrity. Just because they don't share your political opinions don't make them villains.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Their integrity is inconsistent is the overriding point.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

integrity is in short supply these days

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Libertarians are a joke. Not a very good joke, but a joke nonetheless.

5 years ago | Likes 526 Dislikes 97

We just want individuals to be left alone. I guess for some people that is a very controversial position.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Don't worry, it's a funny joke, you just have to make yourself laugh.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"The market can apply pressure to control government action!" "Why is the market applying pressure to me? Unfair!"

5 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 2

If you think Ron Paul is a libertarian I think you're a joke.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

He ran as one before and his official party is the Libertarian Party. Are you stupid?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's sentiment like this, that is allowing the 2 party system to ruin our country. Libertarianism is very idealistic, but so is democracy

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We have all see how democracy can fail. Libertarians want smaller government, not no government. And like all parties there are extremists

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or in the case of Ron Swanson, actually a good joke

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you go back 120 years or so, libertarians actually made some good points, just like Marxists. Now they're just morons though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, none of these people are actually libertarians.

5 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If you want a great laugh, read The Probability Broach. A libertarian haven where dolphins could talk all along, but didn't like our beliefs

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most libertarians I know will accept science as fact and are accepting of minorities. Its a low bar but they're better to work w/than R.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Libertarians, to me, are simple neo-anarchists, they want literal anarchy but are too afraid to call it that.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

If they wanted actual anarchy, how would all their money let them Lord over people? They just don't want democratic laws.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actual anarchists believe in community though, and libertarians are *terrified* about caring for anyone beyond themselves

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That when it's philosophy is enacted would be literal anarchy. Literal. Fucking. Anarchy. Taxation is theft? How the fuck to run a (1)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

lol I listed a fact, you've flown off your rocker. The other stuff is idiots identifying with libertarians wrong. I'm progressive,Bull moose

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) Government without taxation? They claim the free market will solve everything, but complain about everything the free market produces.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(3) They make their living using everything they say is wrong with the government, they are fucking moronic neo-anarchists.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Settle down if you don't want to approach things as a student

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone who believes libertarianism is a legitimate political ideology is functionally illiterate.

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 28

Libertarianism has roots in decent philosophy, but over the past 100 years or so it's become laughably stupid.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It’s a derangement based in a misunderstanding of what it is to be in a society while being ignorant of deregulation’s affects historically.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

? This again, you learned from a rebulican posing as a libertarian. It's simply just that human liberty be of core value. Nothing more.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I’m familiar with the “unregulated capitalism fixes everything” party, yes.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Liberty is what helps a society lol you're insane.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure as a published author and person who's smarter than you, I'm not illiterate. But what the fuck do I know.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You would have to be ignorant of economics, psychology, and history in order to consider libertarianism legitimate.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Don’t forget contortionist, you’d have to be to try that hard to suck your own dick.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

can someone explain to me exactly what libertarianism is?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Basically anarchy that benefits the rich. Think the "small government" Republicans taken to an extreme, but they tend to lean more liberal

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

when it comes to social issues like gay marriage and weed legality.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Embarrassed Republicans

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one knows. Every libertarian says they aren't like other libertarians. It does seem to trend toward ignoring history though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nutshell: maximum individual and private autonomy with as little government as possible. The character Ron Swanson from Parks & Recs is one.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So is Oliver Queen, the Green Arrow, from DC comics. Functionally though libertarianism just hands all control to the wealthy as it thinks-

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the free market will regulate society and government action; but the wealthy have the capital to control the said markets but they don't-

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

believe in government regulations to prevent such forces from colluding into trusts and all-consuming megacorps and conglomerates.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In US it's a term that was appropriated to describe a political movement/ideology that has large emphasis on very limited government and

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heavily favors individual and property rights.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle. Everyone else in this thread is an idiot.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

That doesn't explain anything.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rebulican idiots identifying as one hurts the party a lot. I'm seeing that in this post greatly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Liberty is to be able to do as one please so long as it doesn't hurt others. That's the true libertarian stance. Nothing more

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A libertarian is just a Republican that smokes weed and has a gay friend.

5 years ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 25

Why did the Libertarian cross the road. Because they’re a joke

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Not all of us libertarians want the dissolution of Gov't. Some just want the freedom of weed and guns and prison reform.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 16

Any stop pointless wars.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

You know i actually want the same thing, as a Democrat.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like saying you're a Christian except for the whole jesus part

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

... isn´t there a Christian religion that does not have Jesus.. or was that Jehova?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you don't believe in Jesus, you might be a Jew or Muslim. But isn't believin in Christ kinda important for Christians? It's in the name.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ummm... then by most libertarians' definition you are not a libertarian. You just have your own specific set of political stances.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 4

It's a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

In a philosophical sense, maybe. But in practice, every Libertarian I've met is about no taxes and "free market" to solve everything.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Imagine being so fucking stupid you actually think Libertarians = Anarchy. Libertarian is an entire quadrant of the political spectrum.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I assume you are aiming that at Libertarians. Every self-labeled libertarian I've met IRL precisely describes Anarchy.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or just hates age of consent laws

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 15

Why did the libertarian go to prison? Pedophilia. "Um, technically, its hebophilla.."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And aggressively failed history.

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 7

And dropped economics after four classes thinking they already knew everything

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You must not know about the wonders of trickle down economics. Aware yoself.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And math, based on their tax policies.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Still waiting for one to explain the difference between Libertarianism and Anarchy...

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Originally the definitions were pretty similar, these days libertarians believe the state shouldn't have any power over us, but /1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-that corporations should (think outer worlds), anarchists think leaders shouldn't exist, the state shouldn't have more power than people/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-(or shouldn't exist) but neither should anything else, no corporations, no bosses, no kings, etc. How this should work is hotly debated./3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Libertarian: No rules lol, and fuck poor people. Anarchy: No rules lol, somehow this helps poor people.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The other guy did it well, but here's another. It's that purge episode of Rick and Morty. Libertarianism is WE LONG FOR FEUDALISM

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

But most aren't rich enough to own people so it's more like "WE LONG FOR THE BOOT MILORD!"

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Please tread on me more

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

NO STEPPY WEPPY

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As far actual definitions go, Libertarianism is a more general term, and can describe any ideology that pursues liberty as a core goal (1/?)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Whether it's anarchist or something more Hobbesian, As far as the American Libertarian party goes, I don't think a single one of them(2/3 )

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

intellectual capacity to understand that distinction. (3/3)

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's a political philosophy and movement that upholds liberty as a core principle.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's what they say. In reality they support neo--feudalism.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which one

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just literally the main thing a libertarian wants, if you're doubting if someone is a libertarian just ask them their core values

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was more pointing out the question was "what's the difference between libertarianism and anarchy" and you just defined one thing

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then you'll know if you should listen to them at all.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Anarchy, State and Utopia" by Nozick is a good place to start if you're serious about wanting to learn. Proposes a rough framework for

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

moving from anarchy to a libertarian state. I found it sloppy and unconvincing, but it's leagues ahead of Ayn Rand et al.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Libertarianism is anarchy for rich people

5 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 9

Yup. Darn AnCaps.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That...okay, that's damn fine explanation, there. Updoot to you!

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

Aka conservative ideology.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Libertarians are ultra right fiscally and ultra left on social issues.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

They're not ultra left on social issues because they generally oppose discrimination laws.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They're a private entity. Who the fuck are you to tell them what to do, Ron? What's next? Traffic signals?

5 years ago | Likes 826 Dislikes 45

I mean, traffic signals are totally in the public sector and state / city purview though

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*blows up the post office*

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Under the legal protections they have, they aren't supposed to pick sides or have political opinion. That's the issue.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"What do you mean I can get kicked out of Starbucks by screaming and throwing my own filth around?!"

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's not like he asked them to bake a gay cake or anything.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Light houses!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's not. He's saying he's never received prior warnings of violations, and is now banned for repeated violations.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sounds about normal for any of the larger sites, makes it next to imposible to follow TOS/EULA just creating a account is usally a violation

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in and on itself, that then corp can use as ground for termination if the user gets annoying.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure. But just pointing out that he's not DEMANDING ACTION like OP seems to think.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Clearly missing the point.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pay .05 to use the sidewalk, or subscribe to the Mountain Dew daily taste the taste of freedom pass™

5 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 6

Considering the reality of socialism doesn’t change the cost benefit analysis, it just changes it from market-driven to politically-driven.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You've tried the best, now try the rest! - let's get some Outerworlds here cause that's literally libertarian space

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta drink your Verification Can to continue playing your game

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, please. It would be $20 to use the sidewalk and paid security to eject you into the street for not paying.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It is called job creation and you will like it.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And then if you don't pay for street use?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You get collected by the police and sent to work in lithium mines.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean he seems to just be asking for an explanation? Is that unreasonable?

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

He is asking that, but it's with a snide "they're discriminating against me for being a nazi" subtext

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Freedom is 1. Facebook being allowed to block 2. Him being allowed to complain and 3. Imgurians criticizing everyone. System seems to work.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well, it doesn't really seem to be working based on what we're seeing

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

First I want to acknowledge what you have said as having merit and truth. My thoughts are that a calculator will still calculate even if

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The room is on fire (system working as designed). But again I think you are correct in your comment.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering his stances on similar issues, yes

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 10

Yea no you're wrong and you don't know what you're talking about. Rand Paul, yes. His dad? No.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Could you briefly explain his stance on similar situations?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not in 140 characters and on my break at work.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I'm ignorant, educate me?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ron Paul is far, far right libertarian which means he believes businesses should be allowed to do whatever they want without gov regulation

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

So it's a bit ironic that a business is doing exactly what it wants without gov regulation and the result is that he gets banned lol.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty sure he's pro businesses doing whatever they want with no restrictions. Someone who believes they don't have to follow rules

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

"I'm pretty sure" is a good indication you aren't actually educated on his viewpoints

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

I guess my interpretation wasn't so much that he was saying they didn't have the right to do it, as much as just being like what did I do?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2