There is a difference you know

Jun 29, 2018 12:36 AM

brokenshutter

Views

184249

Likes

5373

Dislikes

265

Not convicted? Equality at it's finest, if the case we're reversed the guy would be in prison and his life would be ruined.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh good. There haven't been enough of these today

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 9

Well what do you expect, losersub to do even a fraction of the job it circlejerks about doing & filter for the FP? Madness, I say. MADNESS!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Not to be pedantic, but isn't that kinda describing what rape is anyway?

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

Rape culture at its finest.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even the same front page of this NZ news source has two different definitions /a/qEQF7wP

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure the Imgur community already got it the first time. Now you're just being a point whore.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

"imgur community" lol If this was a "community" it could be best compared to Mogadishu or perhaps the Gaza Strip.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm using it very loosely. Thanks for your input

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Verbal red circles.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I rarely see outage with rape stories on imgur. Considering how often men rape women, one might think there'd be more.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

What a wonderful world we live in

8 years ago | Likes 357 Dislikes 9

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wanna go live to Mars

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Can i come too? I'll bring my sweet snes and some yahoos

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'll bring a few buckets of air.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No way, Jose.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

haaaaaaa

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok, that was funny

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Shut up

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Woman uses machete to ex-boyfriend rape. A woman used a machete to force her ex-boyfriend to strip naked and rape him

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

***Allegedly.*** Innocent until proven guilty.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WE KNOW YOU FUCKING BANDWAGONING CUNT.

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 17

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You do realize how it can be confusing to say she "used the machete to rape him"?

8 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 8

Could've happened tho. Like Soviet women soldiers did to prisoners (well, maybe not machete). Gnarly stuff, that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"She raped him while threatening him with a machete"/"she used a machete to threaten him during the rape" or something along those lines.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Probably not 100 % right, grammar is not my strongest suit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

raped him at knifepoint

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The english language is malleable. They could re-word it just fine... this would not have been a difficult thing to do. Jesus Christ...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jesus Christ, we fucking get it. Does this have to make FP 10 times every goddamn day?

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 13

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Jun 29, 2018 7:52 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I guess it’s lucky for women that Brock Turner is the only rapist in human history. Can you imagine if there *multiple* rapists out there?

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

v

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 23

I never see these pictures when the story is the other way around, instead I see a bunch of virtue signalling white knights.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Woman here. Anyone that denies such a thing is rape is a terrible person. I promise we're not all insane and truly want to fight any assault

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

Man here. i believe she would make a great adult film actress.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

I hate that some people here are saying this has just become a circle jerk like, it's people like them that's making this issue hard for vic

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good for you, I appreciate the sanity.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I feel like the peeps downvoting us are in fact the insane to be honest.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Now heres the part where i point out, yknow, ALL of feminism.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Pssst, come closer and I'll tell you a secret. We all know it was rape you can stop shitposting the circlejerk porn now.

8 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 22

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I mean, do we? Read some of the comments.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 10

Reposting this picture isn't going to change those peoples minds. This has turned into a circle jerk.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

The 2 things to make instant frontpage: saying that men can be raped, and exposing women with false rape accusations.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

Man Bites Dog.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because both are uncommon.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Or, y'know, rampant misogyny.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

If this is your idea of misogyny then you're a misandrist.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

By far, most rapists are men, and most victims women. If you only read imgur, you'd think the opposite.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Only becuase the definition of "rape" and things like this.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not on this site. Not compared to (posted) cases with female victims.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Uncommon irl. Obviously. Not everything is about the fucking internet. Go outside.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/rape Only if it's butt stuff or her vagina in his mouth.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

It's different from state to state. Some have defined rape as forceful penetration with a penis.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's even worse... :/ What she did was clearly rape.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Oh it was definitely some manner of forceful non-consensual intercourse. It just may not have been legally considered rape.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's not legally considered rape, but in every other way it IS rape. Forcing someone to have sex against their will is rape. The legal >

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

-system just hasn't caught up with the times yet.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To all the people saying she "wasnt charged" with rape. Brock turner was not convicted of rape but journalists and society call him a rapist

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

She was charged with assault.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The issue is “society at large” doesn’t treat the two rapes equally, Brock was about conviction, this is about acknowledgement.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Case and point.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'll probably get massive hatred for this, but I think crimes differ in severity. Brock fingered a girl. If people sweep this under a (1)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

single, arching category that also includes fucking someone, then how do they get more time/punishment to someone who uses their penis (2)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

on someone who's unconscious? The latter is worse, causing pregnancy or diseases. It's also a larger foreign object. I would consider (3)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this a worse crime the same way I'd consider assault with a deadly weapon to be worse than just assault.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Double standard at its finest

8 years ago | Likes 772 Dislikes 68

I don't think it's a double standard at all. Similar language is used in the other instance. This is a bigger issue

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you look at other publications female writers are calling it rape & questioning why she isn't facing rape charges.

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

i dont see how the news often uses softer terms when describing rape even when he genders are swapped

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I think its absolutley absurd people can defend saying its not rape. Be honest with yourself forced sex is rape end of story.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Errr.... let's be honest. If they actually said rape, everyone would be thinking she used a machete in his anus. Stop being so offended.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 16

“Stop being so offended” is hilarious to read on a site like imgur, where pride is found in being “rational” when faced with controversy

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think unless charged and convicted they can't say rape. It would have to be "allegedly"

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

So it's *rape* once its *proven* in the court of law for women? Yet a woman can cry wolf and its *rape* headlines with his picture attached.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

If he were to have filed charges of rape then the news source could have said raped. It has nothing to do with being a man or woman.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much. What's equality?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The vast majority of rapists don't get convicted.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Most women screw themselves by wanting to get clean after. :( No kit, no evidence, hard case. Hell, most women don't even go to cops :(

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Men have even harder time coming forward. Makes them feel immasculated. :/ "U had to want it. U got hard"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wasn't talking about cases where women don't go to the cops. But you're right, if we count the estimated unreported rape, it's even worse.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How? No one is saying what she did was okay.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 7

A lot of peoples comments on Facebook and other sites are though, and it's disgusting.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Don’t read through Facebook comments. They just bring down your mood. It’s all trolls and stupid people feeding trolls.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because if the genders were reversed, there would be a much larger outcry. This wasn't even labelled as "rape".

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

If the genders were reversed, this post wouldn't be on the FP. If the genders were reversed, folks here would be calling the victim a liar-

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Lol yea, fleeing the scene and all the actual evidence people would say liar... It's not a 23 year old accusation, little different

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Who is trying to ruin some innocent guy's life with false accusations. Cause some folks here on imgur, are deadset on trying to turn rape-

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Hard to convey sarcasm thru text.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I understand where you are coming from, I was trying to point out that rape is rape regardless of syntax. It's horrible.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Into some grand 'feminazi conspiracy against men. For some reason. Rape is horrible for both genders, so fuckin' stop trying to make it-

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I see imgur has gotten its hands on another "exception to prove the rule" story...

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 11

Don't post any statistics oe facts here, you will be crucified by the circlejerk.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

you mean like the NISVS, which recorded several years in a row that a near equal number of men are "forced to penetrate" as women are raped?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

you mean like the NISVS, which recorded several years in a row that a near equal number of men are "forced to penetrate" as women are raped?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I love when people try to defend feminism as "helping men too" and helping all rape victims then filth like you shows up.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You're the one that mentioned feminism, mate, not me...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It's more than one publication that did this, and she wasn't charged with rape from what people found but that might be a maybe D:

8 years ago | Likes 2154 Dislikes 17

Really all I can think of is:

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Ooh baby

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SHE WASNT CHARGED RIGHT AWAY - SHE IS GOING TO BE CHARGED WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITHOUT CONSENT - SOURCE: I LIVE HERE

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

If the police don’t say rape the news won’t say rape generally speaking for liability issues

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Nearly every rape case with a woman rapist is reported this way in the medias. Also, women have way lighter sentences than men in general.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Then what are we to call forced intercourse under pretext of knife to the throat?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From what I understand some state laws don't allow for a man to charge a woman with rape.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some places law state that rape is forced penetration of the victim so technically women cant rape a man (unless its butt stuff i guess)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

^

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This right here. According to the law in most places this isn't rape cause he wasn't penetrated... Kinda shitty...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Someone else commented that the victim didn't testify which is a part of why. Idk.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 1st time I saw this, I looked @ MT criminal code. It doesn’t have “rape”, only “forced sexual intercourse” and it is gender neutral.

8 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

But is this publication in Montana? Are the other publications that covered this in the same way in Montana? D:

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

This one was not, but other publications in MT did cover it in the same way.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

KRTV, local news on MT, even said on Facebook they avoid using rape in any of their reports (even men) because the legal term is different.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Correction- it’s “sexual intercourse without consent.” 45-5-503. Who penetrates whom isn’t relevant in the way the law is written.

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Well that's at least nice on the law side, the media could at least call it what it is.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Thanks for doing that research.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The government needs to redefine rape. Technically, only men are capable of rape since women can't penetrate. They need to use Webster.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

You realize than an erection is involuntary, no? Since it is, penetration can certainly be forced.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What? A woman cannot penetrate a man with his own penis.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If the man does not consent, and the female forces herself onto it, it sure as hell can. In that case, there is still penetration.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're confused between a penetrator and a penetratee.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

penetration is not limited to a penis, can also be with fingers, a foreign object, so women are definitely capable of rape

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In most cases of female rape, the woman isn't sticking fingers or an object up his butthole. Use common sense.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

2 so yea it is certainly reasonable that female perps can and would use penetration. Also you were complaining that by the legal definition

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

3 "couldn't rape" which is just some made up bull shit.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

1 first of all - how do you know? do you have statistics on the details of female perpetrated assault? assault/rape is about power not sex

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So all assault/rape is about power? How do you YOU know that? And I am certain that most cases of female sexual assault does not involve //

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most state statutes have Sexual Assault on the books, but don't define "rape."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Rape and Sexual Assault do not carry the same social meaning. One is clearly more negative than the other.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Maybe, but we're talking about legal terms.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She wasn't even charged for sexual assault btw.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish Imgur had as much sympathy for female rape victims as it does for male rape victims

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

Of course they do. This is 'just' saying bad things happen to men too. Or do you think men should remain silent?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Imgur treats every female #metoo accusation as false yet won't get their head out of Terry Crew's arse

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

this is true. But don't you find it pretentious that it's almost always male victims on imgur fp?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Pretty sure it does, what is upsetting is the fact that a obvious rape case is being defended as not rape.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

If only society had as much sympathy for male rape victims as it has for female rape victims.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 11

if that were true, how could bill cosby be so vilified over unsubstantiated allegations that were decades old? or #metoo become a big deal?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

Terry Crews ha received more supper than any female #MeToo celebrity. They’re ridiculed almost daily

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Wow, it’s like 50 cent doesn’t exist...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Rape is on the books as a crime of penetration. But they could have used sexually assaulted him instead of forced to have sex

8 years ago | Likes 365 Dislikes 30

Oh that rascal, he actually raped her

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not in Montana. Montana code annotated 45-5-503.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"Forced to Penetrate" - Mary Koss, PhD

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. Besides the fact that the rape definition needs a bit of an update.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which books? It depends on what laws apply where you live. Most people aren't from where you are.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only at common law. Montana defines sexual assault as "[subjecting] another person to any sexual contact without consent."

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 3

@TanaMaMonster

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most states have replaced "rape" with "sexual assault" in their penal codes (including Montana), but rape remains the colloquial term.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Montana uses "sexual intercourse without consent".

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Time to change those fucking books then.

8 years ago | Likes 272 Dislikes 7

good fucking luck with that.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

I feel like whoever downvotes your comment is a rapist

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Also whoever downvotes my comment is a rapist

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's about time!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

then you'd have feminists forced to accept that half of rapes are committed by women every year. Can't have that AND "rape culture"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The argument I've heard is they don't want to change it because men don't want to admit they were raped and they want men to report

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 21

That excuse is more convenient than same day shipping.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

That's stupid

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

To be clear. There is still a charge for when it happens to men. It's the same punishment. It's just not called rape

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Agreed. But sexual assault carries the same punishment.

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 8

Doesn't carry the same weight in a social context.

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

Which is why the news won’t call it rape (she’s not charged with that) and risk litigation. It’s the public perception is that rape is >>

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Worse than sexual assault, even though they are often the same.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. But at least the punishment is just as valid.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

That's not the fault of the definition. It's people who think rape is worse than sexual assault. You need to define them different

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

aaaand didnt penetration happen?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes but that would've meant charging him with rape. Stupid laws are stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

With a machete

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She did force him to penetrate her

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted May 11, 2019 3:01 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What do you mean how do you lack basic understanding of the English language? Penetration did indeed happen by force he just wasn't the

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

One who forced it and it's life or death so yeah imma get a hard on

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sure, and if a woman gets wet or even orgasms she can't have been raped either, right?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It should be pointed out that FBI, Websters, and the state they lived in all have a different definition of rape

8 years ago | Likes 758 Dislikes 10

If a man and woman get drunk and have consensual sex and that still be considered rape, how the f is this not?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Because technically that's non-consensual, even if they both say "yes".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Drunken sex is rape, but this isn't. You missed the point by a mile.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You have to use proper legal terminology when reporting. Just like alleged.

8 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 0

True. In some states, rape is very narrowly defined.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Eyy somebody watched Philly D today

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The fuck other defination is there for telling someone fuck me or die?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Theyre probably like Britain, our law defines rape as penetrative with a penis.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dictionaries are written based on how words are used by society.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is part of the reason why Sweden's rape rate is so high compared to other countries. The definition of rape in Sweden covers a lot -->

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

--> that would be a lesser charge in other countries.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

if you have to have sex with someone at gunpoint that should be rated as rape for both genders. but, apparently, (1)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

as long as you get a boner, "it can't be that bad". It's disgusting. (2)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Ya Phil DeFranco I know it's you.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But if you google all three relevant definitions... it's still rape. Or, per Mont. "Sexual contact without consent"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The FBI definition is prejudicial, it basically precludes the idea of female rapists.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

You sure bro?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If a woman rapes a man, she doesn't typically penetrate him, she penetrates herself With him. Therefore, this allows female rapists an out.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because it precludes the prospect of typical rape scenarios involving a female perpetrator, it is prejudicial.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It was the same in the UK lots of different classifications for things but no female rape at that point. Might have changed since

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. Still hasn't. I'm sure feminists will be RIGHT on that.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How? Rape is forcing someone to perform sex with you against that persons will. Definitions aside, she raped him

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I completely agree. But apparently law has nothing to do with common sense or anything. It seems to be all about technicalities.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Definition by law is not equal to definition by language

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

...and people wonder why more and more people are getting fed up with being told we live in a patriarchy.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

The narrow definition of rape was written, passed into law, and enforced by men, unless state senates were full of women a century ago.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that's just proving my point, given the way the word "patriarchy" is used by the people I'm talking about.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Patriarchy and terrible things happening to men are not mutually exclusive

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I'm going to absolutely disagree, based on the way it is used by the people who say we are living in one. bait and switch won't work.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the was SJWs define it , it totally is, They say we are in charge, so NOTHING bad can happen to us, because reasons

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why not choose a simple Def like sexual intercourse without consent. Sexual intercourse meaning penetration of the mouth, Anus or vagina

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

By the penis to the least degree?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because of sexism.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because that's not how they happened to define it originally and no one's bothered to update the legal definition.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Would you categorize penetration with, say, a broomhandle as rape? Is it sexual intercourse?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yes. Forcing someone to do something sexual they aren't consenting to should be rape.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The problem is that there are different views of what is sexual. If I have a foot fetish and forcibly lick your toes, is that rape?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I think that would be assault because it isn't sex forced upon me? I would be terrified, don't get me wrong, but it isn't sexual for me(vic)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you pop a boner while doing it and I feel SUPER creeped out about it? Fuck yes! You are doing something sexual to me, without consent

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Have sex with me or I kill you" seems like rape 100% of the time to me.

8 years ago | Likes 411 Dislikes 6

You'd think but i've been arguing with an SJW here on imgur for a week+ that it's rape when it happens to men and they just REFUSE to get it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Agreed, but there are many places including the UK, unfortunately, where the legal definition of rape involves penetration with a penis 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which means those without a penis can't legally be charged with rape. Not right by any stretch but it is the law (which needs to change) 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly many states word it as "penetration."

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Some states define "rape" as "penis-in-vagina after the woman says no or is unconscious." It's pretty archaic, to say the least.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Anal doesn't count?!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not everywhere, for some reason. It's still a crime, it just isn't categorized the same. For some reason.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

********(between the fine print) "women cant rape (or some shit.********

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That sounds like attempt to murder to me..

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Blame law enforcement/government/legal code. You can't really say the news is bad for not wanting to be sued over this.

8 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 1

Why blame law enforcement? We don't make the laws or the definitions of said laws.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I meant more the FBI for the current definition of rape, not the local police departments, though not even the former is to blame really.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who would sue them?

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

The accused ( If miraculously found not guilty), her family, etc. Honestly, I don't know who would, only that it is a potential legal issue.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

This is bullshit. You shouldn't have to bend the truth just to avoid legal retaliation.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 19

That’s why I’m all for the Uniform Code of Military Justice definition.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Shut up you dirtbag airman get back to green dot. Don't look at anyone thats sexual harassment.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

But also don't not look at them because that's also sexual harassment by body shaming.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Sometimes rape is defined by "Penetrating" someone forcefully, so women literally cant rape (without extra tools that is)

8 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

A woman could rape you with your penis.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

thats some horrible wording in laws for you.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

Are you not familiar with the legal system?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If there is universal legal system i havent heard of, then no.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So you're saying if she stabbed him with the machete, it would be considered rape?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only if it’s in the ass

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

No, that would then be sodomy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if she stabbed the penis

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Really? Who gives a sh!t what you call it? Forced to have sex against you will under threat of injury is the same thing as rape.

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 11

Nope. Words have meaning. "Pedophile" and "lolicon" mean vastly different things. "Raped" and "forced to have sex" are not the same.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those words have definitions, Forced to have sex against your will is a definition of rape it’s exactly the same thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nothing more than circle jerking going on here.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Depends on how the law is written. If the DA charges rape, and his lawyer reads the law in court, it gets thrown out and she's free 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if the law says the rapist has to penetrate the victim for it to be rape.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds like a sexist law then.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Without a doubt, it is. But one doesn't prosecute what actually happened. One prosecutes what you can prove.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not calling it rape is downplaying what she actually did. It's like saying a robber re-assigned possession of my belongings.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Except it’s the state they live in that defines it as “sex without consent”, not anyone here.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"Montana Code section 45-5-503: Sexual Intercourse Without Consent (Rape)" Montana acknowledges the word rape and does not prohibit it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The word rape is preferred due to its ability to evoke strong emotions

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

imgur is just trying really really hard to pretend there is like a feminist conspiracy against men

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 23

Nobody said anything about feminism, just a problem of double standards....

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

http://imgur.com/jfd3RQG.gif

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 5

are you saying i'm doing that or agreeing with that that is what OP is doing?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

It's a counterpoint to the Feminist Fry meme that keeps getting posted on this ceaseless circle jerk.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

So, in other words, I'm agreeing with you.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1