The death of Sears

Apr 15, 2026 7:09 PM

ILBaztardo

Views

46660

Likes

2177

Dislikes

22

Is this strategy more or less what happened to other major businesses that are no longer alone? Placing some jackoff CEO who doesn’t know anything about business but riding ways for make more money for themselves ultimately by bleeding the company dry?

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

https://imgur.com/2dH0uf5

3 months ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

I've seen this damn comic so many times, the only follow up i want to see to justify how much i hate is it to see the people on the right grab the speaker, and start roasting him over that fire and eating him alive, while he screams about "my rights and privileges! don't you know how counterproductive this is?!"

3 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

There it is.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm glad someone said the quite part out loud because I literally came to the comments section to.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is the MAGA agenda for the entire country. Destroy everything nationalized, and privatize it just like this story. To liquidate a nation. To rule a Spirit Halloween.

3 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Sounds like what the fat ass orange pedophile POS in the oval office is doing to this cointry.

3 months ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

That’s how Mitt Romney made his fortune

3 months ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

Mitt Romney killed Jeffery the Giraffe and wore his skin as a coat. (Toys R Us reference for you Gen Z's. It was a physical toy store that was like if the toy section of Walmart was a toystore the size of a Walmart.)

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Still somehow exists in Canada. Found that out very recently.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He also said that Corporations are people.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

TIL mitt rMoney murders people.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Same story with red lobster and toysrus.

3 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

And KB Toys

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

When they talk about running the government like a business, this is what they mean

3 months ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

I've never heard someone say this who didn't also hate their management. Go figure.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is what they do, at least in the white house.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Private equity ruins everything.

3 months ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 4

Yep. I’m in IT working for one, and for the last 2 years since PE purchased it’s been run into the ground, while stacking on companies at an alarming rate (~6/yr). Whether it succeeds or fails, the guys at the top profit. The losers are the burnt out employees and the clients locked into multi-year contracts.

I have a meeting scheduled tomorrow to hopefully accept a new job

3 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

The only reason I know you are not an ex-colleague is that the company I used to work for was bought 5 years ago and I left shortly after that. Same issues, same exact situation.

Best of luck tomorrow, friend!

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Got the job

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Congrats, stranger

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

CONGRATS!!!! Nothing feels quite like escaping a psychological nightmare job like that. I got out of mine last June. I am young enough I have to get another job but I'm taking time to figure out what I might like doing better than IT before I try to go back to work.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good luck to you! I once met a farmer that used to be in IT- left the career to buy a plot with a spring and farm pumpkins and stuff.. I think about him a lot haha. IT is fun and pays well, but I think the long term play is to get out with your sanity and setup a side hustle

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I fuckin loved my local sears, I knew all 7 people in the tool section, they were always great to deal with, all my tools can't be replaced now because the craftsman name isn't what it was. I've told my son about how amazing it was, but nothing will be the same

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

All through the 60s and 70s, my dad would brag about his Craftsmen tools. "If one ever breaks? I walk into Sears, drop off the broken one and walk out with a new one." He had high praise for Kenmore appliances too. By the 1990s? He wasn't bragging anymore.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Until about 2009 I would hand over a broken tool, and be handed a new one, or rebuilt. Our kenmore fridge in 06/07 lasted a full 14 months. However my 1987 ⅜ ratchet is still perfect in almost every way. I will say harbor freight (hand tools only I haven't enough experience outside of that) are craftsman quality

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Mitt Romney did the same thing to Kay-Bee toys.

3 months ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

He also tried to do it to Staples

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Command+F, replace all "Lampert" = "Trump", "SEARS" = "USA", Return.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

The new age of the robber barons.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I haven't had a chance to use this in a long time

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

what movie is this?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Other People's Money. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_People%27s_Money I thought it was fantastic, but it's definitely a love it or hate it movie.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yep. He saw himself a revolutionary like Jack Welch (the guys that started GEs' decline) without observing that Jack pretty much set the

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

ground for GEs' destruction. Theres a few great documentaries on that, by the way.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Vulture Capitalists

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

this is why big expensive buildings get set on fire

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not dissimilar to what happened with Toys R us in the US, or Red Lobster, or I'm sure a bunch of other companies that aren't quite as famous

3 months ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

Toys R Us killed itself from it's own mismanagement, not intentional dismantlement. Stores that used to have areas to play with and engage with toys replaced those areas with narrower isles, more stock...Last few times I would go there it didn't feel like Toys R Us. Why go the box store when the box is no different than ordering from Amazon. They pivoted in the wrong direction.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

No. It was bought by venture capital, saddled with the debt they borrowed to make that purchase, then needed to service hundreds of millions in debt in addition to running a profitable business. The best of managed toy companies couldn't afford to do that. Stories of mismanagement are essentially a smokescreen for this kind of destructive acquisition. "All you can eat shrimp/crab killed red lobster" is similar.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

KKR, Bain Capital, and Vornado Realty Trust lost a significant amount of money on their investment in Toys "R" Us. Yes, the strategy of using debt to finance the buyout, combined with failure to adapt to the retail landscape, led to its downfall. Mismanagement.
Bear in mind, Toys R Us was already losing ground to competitors. The age of the specialty big box stores was ending. The ones that couldn't crack the code on e-commerce died.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

When there is no management that could make that level of debt service profitable, management isn't the problem. Without that debt, Toys R us may have been able to adapt or pivot; with it they were sunk.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Most "restaurant" businesses are now actually in real estate - the actual restaurant is incidental.

That's why so many restaurants which used to have flavorful interiors and exteriors are now generic interchangeable glop that could have been generated by an AI with the prompt "every restaurant" - if they have/want to sell the building, a less distinctive offering pulls in more potential buyers.

3 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Bright Sun Films (youtube channel) makes a lot of videos about bankrupt companies, and 90% of them are because of the shady practices of private ventures buying it up, saddling it with debt, paying themselves rent, etc etc. They buy a prize stud that's slightly beyond its prime, slaughter it and feast on its flesh. In 5 minutes, they're hungry for the next stud.

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Radio Shack, imagine if they were alive in the Maker and 3d printer age.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I had both a radio shack (somehow) and an independent electronics store within a few minutes of my engineering school 2015ish. By the time I graduated they had both closed. It's just really difficult to make money selling $2 capacitors that are ¢30 on ebay. The only place I see hobby electronics/maker stuff is micro center and that's there to complement the big ticket items.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Western Auto, A&P, CompUSA, and untold others. Too many to remember. Just.. fading away.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sears could have been Amazon if it had real management. They already had the 100 years of offline order from home experience.

3 months ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

You could buy an entire house from the Sears catalog.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

My grandma often told me how her childhood home was delivered by train from the Sears Catalog. That was 100 years ago.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Always thought blockbuster would be a competitor to Netflix. Think they even had the opportunity to buy Netflix. USPS would have made a killing had it offered email accounts back in the 90's.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You want to know something crazy? Sears OWNED an ISP! They can't claim they didn't know about the internet. They owned their own ISP! They literally could have paid a kid to build a website, put the catalog online and watch the orders come in. They already had the stock, the warehouses, the distribution, the trucks and the drivers.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

See also what killed Radio Shack (I mean killed it before the PE vultures did)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All they had to do was put the catalog online. They had the products, shipping, and distribution handled. Even if the storefronts needed to shrink or close, half of the store was warehouse anyways, they just needed a pickup area or to hire more delivery drivers.

3 months ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

I did a boat tour of the Chicago River a few years and saw an enormous (and empty) Sears warehouse. The infrastructure was there all along.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The stores could even have been leveraged. People living in apartments and condos or areas of high potential for porch piracy? Ship to your local Sears. Something they already had possible with the catalog department in every store.

3 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I postulated that with some friends who were in the retail business, back in the early 2000's. Amazon was really pumping up at that point. Why didn't Sears step into this, with a tremendous infrastructure?

The general sentiment was... building online would cut into brick & mortar profits. Plus, now with this revelation, Lampert had no interest in investing in growth... only fleecing.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The crazy thing with that though, is there were places where the only "brick and mortar" Sears had was a pickup point for whatever you had ordered from the catalog. I grew up in one of those places, didn't know they had actual stores until after the decline had already started. I've felt their mail order business was always the true driver of business growth, but their need to be in physical stores was a pride thing.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I lived in one of those locations, too, in the 70s. Going to primarily ordering online in pre-pandemic felt a lot like that since we would pick up at a mail box. Sears started as mail-order with few stores in big cities. Their primary sales for decades was via catalogue.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Failure of imagination was definitely an aspect. But guys like Lampert accelerate the decline because they're profiting from it. They're trying to extract any money they can, and they don't care if all that's left after is a desiccated husk, because they made money off of sucking it dry.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The real question is why didn't the board put a stop to it? As soon as he wanted to sell off the real estate to an entity he owned, that guy should have been booted out on his behind. Hindsight is 20/20, but the board that is supposed to oversee the CEO was also negligent (at best).

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They were in on the con. Not enough pay packages put enough emphasis on long term performance. They all want immediate stock gains. A side effect of slashing capital gains taxes

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree on all counts. Any executive bonus structure should have a portion (the majority IMHO) of the funds put into multi-year escrow with metrics that focus on 5 year gains over annual gains. Quarterly bonuses should be off the table.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Took the blueprint from Jack Welch (General Electric) and somehow made it worse.

3 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

FUCK JACK WELCH.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That fun part about selling the buildings they owned to his hedge fund then charging exorbitant rents? Look at how many have done that to hospitals. Capitalist vermin are ripping the copper out of the walls and need to be exterminated

3 months ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

Steward Health Care did it.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I LOVED Sears because, at one time they actually listened to customers. I once wrote to Sears catalogue describbing the perfect women's summer shirt: 2 breast pockets (not 1) so you could wear it braless in the heat; a colour selection that included all colour seasons (not all saturated or all pastels that don't suit everyone); princess seaming etc. etc. The next year they had it! And I felt TERRIBLE returning mine because they made them too short for tummy camouflage, which I hadn't mentioned.

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

This is also what happened to Toys R Us and several others.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not sure this in tongue in cheek (you mean Eddie killed those to?), but the list of companies that have died or struggling post-internet is pretty dang long.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No, he means the people who bought them did the exact same things. They killed it on purpose.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Isn’t this the final plan for America?

3 months ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

No. Fortunately Americans can do a political reset with their votes, after they wake up.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Gonna take more than one or two elections with a democrat sweep to even start course correcting.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'd say that plan has been implemented and is in full swing.

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Every billionaire’s wealth came from extracting the money, time and energy from regular people. (Time and energy are their lives. The billionaires are feeding off of everyone else. Parasites.)

3 months ago | Likes 553 Dislikes 3

Not “every”. I actually knew a billionaire who made his money negotiating licensing deals. He setup Lucasfilm’s licensing to Viacom so Star Wars movies could be played on cable TV. He never exploited anyone. He was just a brilliant businessman. Virtually every other billionaire can die in a fire!

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, but even then there are layers. All billionaires exploit to get wealth. Many billionaires cheat and steal wealth. But some actively destroy shit to capture a fracture of the value.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like stealing a wallet, versus breaking a car window to steal a wallet. Sure, theft is bad, but you could argue it's roughly a zero sum game. But breaking a window makes it a negative sum game.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That makes it sound like they do that themselves. But the money does it for them. They could die, shrivel up and the moneygolem with the bunkercorpse would go on

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you noticed they're now sucking everyone dry more and more? Like they know some sort of crash is coming soon.

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

‘The End of Growth’ there is a great paper and a graph and everything!

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

...even those in charge of a country...

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't be sad. Be angry. And direct that anger towards something constructive.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like this is kind of what all abusers do: exploit, take, drain, threaten, destabilize, destroy. All for the self.

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Imperialism on the human scale. Keep the lights on by turning them of somewhere else. Why empires can not grasp the fact that two together can grow. Rather conquer the other and have less in the world in the end.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And because people are so afraid of being a Luigi, they rather keeping their head down on the train going offtrack.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True it's the Parasite class

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And now it's apparently become the Epstein class. Not only do they exploit for wealth, they moved over to exploitation for pleasure as well.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A successful business is built by many different people growing together, helping each other achieve a goal.
A "successful" person is built by taking advantage of those around them, then using them as stepping stones to achieve their own goal. (Usually, sadly, cold hard cash.)

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

the same thing happened to red lobster

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except Bruce Wayne, he was just born with a silver spoon. Makes you wonder what his parents did and why they were killed, though.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Clutches pearls.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not really. I imagine the vast majority of a billionaire's wealth came from people overvaluing their assets because they said so. There's a lot of shenanigans around asset valuations and it all culminates in people being "worth" billions of dollars, which allows them in turn to hoard more wealth. But the vast majority of billionaires will not get billions of dollars from selling everything they own.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Meh, Lampert’s an asshole no doubt, but he didn’t strip Sears and run away with the loot. He lost billions on Sears. Not enough to put him in the poor house unfortunately, but it’s not like he was the big winner here.

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 42

reading comprehension....is like a god damn superpower.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So is critical thinking. Especially the ability to critique narratives that agree with your worldview just as much you do those that disagree.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

reading comprehension....is like a god damn superpower.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[citation comically much needed]

3 months ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Just a billionaire sure not a winner🙄

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

He was a much larger billionaire before he was stupid enough to buy Sears. I ain’t defending the guy, or billionaires in general, but I will always defend facts. Downvote all you want, but this post is fox news quality rage bait.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

did you read the part where it describes how the purchase comes after making millions ripping then off?

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He lent the company billions, and when it went bankrupt, he got the rest of the equity in return. That equity turned out to be worth a fraction of what he lent. His acquisition and mismanagement of Sears is taught as a case study in hubris, among other things.

It is not a case study in how to the strip a company of its assets and leave other people holding the tab, which vulture capital knows how to do all to well. If that was his goal, he failed miserably.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is a bit odd that after all this aggressive dismantling he is worth 1.1 billion only.. like, for the amount of destruction and harm to everyone involves, he is just barely a billionaire?? And he had a lot of money before that... what a waste

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That’s my point. Sears was a decade long failure for him. The post reads like he systematically stripped the place for his personal gain. He’s an asshole with a ridiculous ego, but the last years of Sears was him trying to recover what he could from something already on its deathbed. And it would have closed years earlier had he not been foolish enough to dump money into it.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He botched the transition into something amazon like

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is numerically impossible for a person to *earn* a billion dollars (much less several billion). No single person can contribute that kind of value in a single lifetime. It would take thousands of lifetimes. So earning it is simply not possible.

It is, however, possible for a person to *steal* a billion dollars. Or to inherit it from someone who stole it. One of those two paths is how every billionaire got their billions.

3 months ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

well yes, that's why a lot of that "wealth" is merely on paper. They "get" it by convincing people what they own is worth far more than they actually are. It doesn't actually matter how much money they "have", only that people think they have a lot of it, because that's what gives them power. In reality, they can only access a fraction of that net worth as actual wealth

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only exception that is odd is media. Rowling sold over 600 million Harry Potter books. If she earned $2 per book (seems reasonable), that is over $1B with no stealing or corruption.
Yes terf and awful person. Yes should pay taxes. But earning $2 per book sold doesn't sound evil to me.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Respectfully disagree. Your example is very reductive. I still don't think she contributed $1B worth of value to the full process of connecting her books to 600M people (printing, advertising, shipping, sales, etc). There are too many people in the middle (between her and the purchasers) who are underpaid, made to work overtime without overtime pay, or working multiple part-time jobs because none of their employers are willing to pay for health insurance and wage theft is still theft.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And they just stood there and took it. Maybe they still had something left to lose. Maybe we just have to wait for more people with nothing left to lose to stand up and join the Mushroom Kingdom.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They used to sell entire flat pack houses. Nice ones too.

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I live in one. It's nice. Small, but nice.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have a Searstown on the west side of Cleveland. It surrounded our local Sears.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wow an evil greedy motherfucker doing evil greedy motherfucker things...color me shocked.

3 months ago | Likes 266 Dislikes 7

In the current time frame, he must know there is a Luigi waiting him.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0



I think the point is more in how he did it, and how he hid it.

3 months ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

3 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Gonna steal the meme but give nothing back. This is how you become a meme-billionaire.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I can see the headline: Memeionaire "did it for the lulz" but bankrupts the whole whole internet from goodwill alone

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Isn't that the dad of that guy from dropout? I hear they're from cambridge

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Reacher Gilt. Look it up.

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

GNU Terry Pratchett

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

bloody parasites, man. world would be better off without 'em. shame that'll never happen...

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not with that attitude it won't

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This type of corporatist bullshit has been taught as gospel truth to MBAs & business students for the last 5 decades. It's a cancer.

3 months ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

It's inherent in the system. So no, it's not a cancer, it's working as intended.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

No it isn't. We used to understand that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RHzn3lnFXE

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, if that is the understanding of the system you have, then good luck.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

It was that system which transformed the US from a 3rd rate backwater to become the world's most powerful economy & wealthiest nation by the middle of the 20th century. America's decline began when we abandoned those ideas in favor of supply-side bullshit.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, it was war profiteering that made you rich. Something that you have failed to repeat since the success of the first two world wars.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Don't forget the mandatory 10% culling of workforce every year to "streamline", "cut waste", "improve efficiency", and "force the remaining workforce to be more 'productive' out of fear that they will be next" while doubling to tripling the average workload.

3 months ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

"Rightsizing".

3 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

What I dont understand is that there isnt a single person named Luigi in those 175.000 people who lost their jobs, their income. And thats just the people who worked at Sears. I bet suppliers lost jobs, city lost jobs, cleaners lost jobs. This wasnt just 175.000 people at Sears but also everything around it. How can you screw HUNDREDS of thousands of people.... and not one is named Luigi ?

3 months ago | Likes 183 Dislikes 7

Why didn't you do it? If you're frothing at the mouth for vigilante homicide go do it yourself instead of wondering why a group of people with everything to lose didn't do it for you.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Oh I have a good life and I'm close to a comfy retirement :) And I dont want people to do it, I'm just wondering why it doesnt happen. 175.000 people and not one of them is angry or poor enough to do something? I'm curious about the psychology behind it. I'm wondering what it would take for ONE person to do something. How many people can you shaft before you get murked? A million? 100 million?

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Getting "what's a banana cost, $10?" vibes from you. You're just as out of touch as the CEO you hate if you genuinely can't understand why people don't immediately commit a homicide the second they catch a pink slip.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

So let me ask you: what would it take for you to do something like Luigi? Is there any situation you can imagine yourself in where you say: "ok, this is enough I'm gonna do it." Or is there never such a moment?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you think losing your low wage retail job should equate to such a moment for a person? Are you so out of touch that you think killing a person should become an imperative when you lose your $8hr part time job?

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That’s why evil keeps going on, nothing to stop it

3 months ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 1

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Be the change you want to see in the world

3 months ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 1

Because of what you're seeing right here in this post.
Nobody knew who was responsible. There was no demon to fight, no dragon to slay. Anyone effected by this probably thought exactly what this post is trying to to refute: that another company outcompete it or that it couldn't keep up with the times.

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

And in America of all places. This applies here:

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Be the Luigi you want to see in others.

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Because people have not understood what was happening, they still do not. And this is why it is happening again and again.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Back then, losing a job wasn't a death sentence like it is today. You'd avoid burning bridges, and proceed to work for someone else like Amazon and Walmart. Job hoping and career advancements were real possibilities.

3 months ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

99% of them likely don't even know his NAME, 95% of them likely never even had 1/100th of the information here, no idea what he did to them or how. Just straight up, 'Sorry, things fell through, we're bankrupt, get a new job or starve.' No one, NO ONE told them ANY of this.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean he's just the one who made out with the cash. There were thousands of brick and mortar companies that failed to adapt to the rise of amazon/ecommerce, sears wasn't special in that regard.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

According to Wikipedia, he did get kidnapped in 2003 but was released two days later because they used his credit card to order pizza. Here's the reference but it's paywalled. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2004-11-21/the-next-warren-buffett

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Well, why aren't *you* doing a Luigi?

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Oh I have a good life and I'm close to a comfy retirement :)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What does that have to do with doing a Luigi?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have no reason to Luigi. But I can imagine out of the 175.000 people who got hit by that billionaire, at least one will lose his house or can not afford his diabetes medication anymore and probably die. As far as I know people in USA have almost no safetynet. So I can imagine at least ONE of those 175k will be in a position where he's super angry or simply has nothing to lose. But I guess people always still have something to lose so billionaires can keep doing this.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're so close to figuring it out

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because most of the people who work for multibillion dollar mega corporations have no idea who's running them. America's "keep em poor" strategy keeps them worried about rent and feeding their family. How many Walmart workers do you think actively keep tabs on the CEO's shenanigans? Ain't nobody got time (or money) for that.

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I admire the “just pay me enough to live on” guy!

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Image just 100 of those in the country. There would be a lot of pressure on politicians to do something. Raise minimum wage for the first time in 20 years for example.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We’re all heavily sedated with entertainment and high grade brainwash to make us all masochistic bootlickers.

3 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but they keep making entertainment more and more expensive.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

don't forget isolated and alone

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Malls lost foot traffic, small businesses and other corporations lost customers indirectly.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This is kind of an important point. One could argue... not me... that this asshole was just ahead of the curve on the death of the shopping mall. Sears going down preceded Federated, and all of the huge regional independent anchors, either closing or consolidating into Macy's.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because, believe it or not, most people who aren't on Imgur still feel vigilante murder is wrong. If you're surprised that people aren't just going around shooting other people in revenge, that's your own moral failing.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And yet many states love that death penalty so someone who commits a violent act in a moment is suffocated in the name of bebe jebus while turds like this who ruined so many livelihoods sip drinks on the beachfront. The Wobblies had it right, they just didn't go far enough.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes and no? Society feels vigilante murder is wrong, because that is a direct action. But soeciety doesnt care much about CEO's killing thousands of people every single year because it's indirectly. If I'm morally failing because I dont disaprove of Luigi, what does it say about society no protesting 24/7 against CEO's and companies who kill thousands, tenths of thousands.. millions worldwide. Isn't society morally corrupt when it judges Luigi harsher than it does a billionaire?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because peace and rule of law are fetishized as the foundations of a better society when in reality, they are the rewards for having fought for, and upkeeping, a better society. The horse got put before the cart. Among many other things.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Many of the claims here are misleading or outright false. Its rage bait. Sears was a dead man walking for years, and everyone there knew it. Lampert’s dumb ideas certainly didn’t help much, but his cash might have actually delayed the end. He lost billions on Sears. Check his net worth today vs what it was 20 or 30 years ago. Still a billionaire asshole, but significantly less than it used to be.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

3.8 billion in 2006
3 billion in 2013
became CEO
2 Billion in 2016
2.2 billion in 2026 Not sure he lost that much on Sears, but it is all pretend money at those volumes.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

financial crisis, 2008 financial crisis.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can commit any evil so long as you wear a suit while doing it.

3 months ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 3

Yes but not one of those 175.000 has nothing to lose? None of those have an uncurable disease? None of them are so incredibly pissed and angry they dont care anymore? Not a single person does anything?

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Fwiw the Sears nearest to Dearborn MI, was left up half torn down on purpose, just before Oct 7. And they intended to leave it like that through the winter, I'm pretty sure. A Ford bldg in Dearborn too, To trigger the large middle eastern population here.

8 complained on FB about it and the city forced it to come down after that.

It's also one of the few bldgs I had memories with my grandmother in so of course it had to go

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everyone keeps waiting for someone to save them. If you won't act, why would you expect anyone else to? People hope to make it through whatever is happening by keeping their heads down, ignoring the fact that there's no bottom to this abyss.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

almost. you also need to make sure that the act and the result are separated by enough time no one will catch on till it's too late

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Anchors leaving ruined malls

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that what you get when you teach people from child that the money and corporation is the most important thing in your country

3 months ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Also you teach them 'violence is not the answer' even though that billionaire just destroyed the future of a few hundred thousand people, causeing extreme pain and suffering to probably thousands of them.

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

As an avid wild west and westerns fan I can clearly see how 'violence is not the answer' was made up to "please do not try to kill cattle barons and land owners and railroad moguls cos that would totally work."

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Another example is: I got bullied in school. Nothing worked. School counseling, parents talking. One day I brought a hammer to school and hit my bully on his leg, just once. Problem was solved, never bullied again. Seems to me violence worked pretty well.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Ah, but he only hurt and killed people with a pen, not directly, so it's ok!" - Way too many assholes :/

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Exactly.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why are you surprised? Millions of Americans loathe Trump and nobody has become Luigi despite that

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

At this point he'll just become a martyr for the 20% of Americans for whom "owning the libs" is their highest calling. The man is nearing the final stages of dementia, and his base is fracturing. Giving him a martyr's death now would be worse for the left than the boost he got from his first assassination attempt.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well... 2 tried I think? And thats the 2 we know of. Trump might be super hard to get, but a guy like Lampart? He doesnt have Secret Service around him.

3 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Super hard to get? Some dunce actually managed to take shots at him from a roof not even 200 yards away from where he was standing. If that guy had ever taken a few practice shots in his life before this stunt, he would not have missed those shots. 200 yards for a non-moving target is really easy, even with iron sights. I've been teaching 16 year olds shooting 300m (which is over 300 yards) with iron sights, and many of those would not have missed on their first shot ever.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Kidnapped once. At least 4 homes and Yacht.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where were you when we really needed you. Sigh…

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who is "we"? The society has already collapsed a long time ago. All the property is concentrated in the hands of a few, and everyone else forever has to rent from them. People who have almost nothing prefer to worry about people who have even less than to demand their fair share from the profits their labor generates.
It is over for the west, and Trump is just a symptom of the downfall.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ill look like someone with a tinfoil hat for this, but I always tought that, that guy was on trump paycheck. like, he was 20, yes, but he was from one of the families that teach how to use a rifle before teaching how to drive. He managed to get himself and take aim without anyone stopping him? He used an AR15 but managed only 3 shoot before being killed? He missed all three shot? And this is only on the guy side. From trump side, well, a coward like him that go out of the meat shield protection>

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to raise an arm, in an almost nazi salute, in "defiance aganist the sniper"? a shot from an AR15 that dont leave a trace on the ear? an ear that heal, perfectly, without any "new skin" color showing, no deformities and no visible signs? in two months? I got a scar on my right arm, two on my left and one on my belly. Each of em started as a small angry red line and became bigger and bigger until they became a fat 5mm large, 2mm high pouche of a totally different color skin. Each of em leaved by>

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, so if it;s rather easy to almost kirk the prez, then how hard can it be to kirk a guy like Lampart. Why are those people still walking around freely without getting .... every day?

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because there are very few Luigis around.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because, just for the attempt, you probably pay with your life. Either death or prison. "The Great American Hero who Offed Lampert" doesn't feed you family or console them for your death.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0