1116 pts ยท February 21, 2018
This makes me want to throw up
I don't think a woman would go asymptomatic for 9 months though.
Pb blast
I've been in management for over 10 years, welcome to the most underappreciated job in the world. Wait till you average out your hourly pay.
people have a higher standard of living vs what they would in the current state of Africa /2
How is this getting upvoted? The end does not justify the means, it's the same as saying slavery in America was ok because now black /1
Our current slavery problem?
Dont say that, then people would have to start taking personal accountability for themselves.
No it's not. You can't pick your flavor of slavery you want to oppose.
Quotes = sarcasm, of course slavery is not ok, I was pointing out the hypocrisy
a condition compared to that of a slave in respect of exhausting labor or restricted freedom."female domestic slavery"Webster
A good argument for "slavery is ok"
"Biden dies from sickle cell anemia"
Biden needs to fake his own death so Bernie can take the seat.
Would you ask for the manager to correct your order? Just curious.
Maybe we actually did die in 2012 and this is our hell.
Lol, alright man, g'night
Explain
Matter the type, gold standard was dropped in part due to a liquidity issues which digital assets solve
If you could reduce trade to only essential resources GDP would go through the roof, and our currency value is based on demand, it doesn't
national value if trade is required
suction of 90% would allow that without sacrificing economy. Trade is still agreed upon, and a decentralized currency would still hold inter
And that would lead to a complete collapse? We have everything nessacry, and I would pick equity over having a few chemicals and again, a re
Iron aside, what else would we need that we couldn't get that would cause a disastrous collapse?
While restoring a middle class
Even if you reduced globalization by 90%, that would be enough without the risk of hyperinflation, especially with a finite supply of curren
The only resources we do not have domestically are non essential, like chromium, magnesium, arsenic etc.
Globalization and innovation do not have to be synonymous. It would not set us back 100 years.
This makes me want to throw up
I don't think a woman would go asymptomatic for 9 months though.
Pb blast
I've been in management for over 10 years, welcome to the most underappreciated job in the world. Wait till you average out your hourly pay.
people have a higher standard of living vs what they would in the current state of Africa /2
How is this getting upvoted? The end does not justify the means, it's the same as saying slavery in America was ok because now black /1
Our current slavery problem?
Dont say that, then people would have to start taking personal accountability for themselves.
No it's not. You can't pick your flavor of slavery you want to oppose.
Quotes = sarcasm, of course slavery is not ok, I was pointing out the hypocrisy
a condition compared to that of a slave in respect of exhausting labor or restricted freedom.
"female domestic slavery"
Webster
A good argument for "slavery is ok"
"Biden dies from sickle cell anemia"
Biden needs to fake his own death so Bernie can take the seat.
Would you ask for the manager to correct your order? Just curious.
Maybe we actually did die in 2012 and this is our hell.
Lol, alright man, g'night
Explain
Matter the type, gold standard was dropped in part due to a liquidity issues which digital assets solve
If you could reduce trade to only essential resources GDP would go through the roof, and our currency value is based on demand, it doesn't
national value if trade is required
suction of 90% would allow that without sacrificing economy. Trade is still agreed upon, and a decentralized currency would still hold inter
And that would lead to a complete collapse? We have everything nessacry, and I would pick equity over having a few chemicals and again, a re
Iron aside, what else would we need that we couldn't get that would cause a disastrous collapse?
While restoring a middle class
Even if you reduced globalization by 90%, that would be enough without the risk of hyperinflation, especially with a finite supply of curren
Even if you reduced globalization by 90%, that would be enough without the risk of hyperinflation, especially with a finite supply of curren
The only resources we do not have domestically are non essential, like chromium, magnesium, arsenic etc.
Globalization and innovation do not have to be synonymous. It would not set us back 100 years.