398 pts ยท September 13, 2015
Also, I don't buy that Dems are the only smug assholes in US politics and they need to show respect to belligerent fools to win.
Nonsense. Voting for a dangerous liar because someone was patronising to you is not a thoughtful and considered choice.
1. I'm not American. 2. A comment takes effort, upvotes don't. 3. I'm not wrong. 4. That's not why Trump won. 5. 140 characters is insuffic-
The upvotes are by people who don't bother to think about it for two seconds. There may be a link there.
I imagine people are confused about why this small country exists that speaks half Dutch, half French. The reason is Catholicism.
Someone phobic worries about it 24/7. "If I fall asleep with the door unlocked, someone might bury me alive!" That type of irrational.
Correct.
loss.jpg
That's disingenuous. You are suggesting that this cop 'randomly and accidentally' shot Kinsey and is a sympathetic figure who meant no harm.
Wow, cops sure do have that happen to them a lot, don't they? people will say anything to defend these monsters.
If a cop can't think clearly bc a defenseless man induces too much adrenaline he should be fired as an incompetent and a danger to others.
You believe that assuming cops like that are racist is... what? - perpetuating cops killing unarmed black men?
You'd prefer to assume the victim is lying? You can't imagine a justification, but you're assuming the cop had one anyway?
Charles Kinsey. July 18th, three days ago. When asked why he did it, the officer replied "I don't know." I am suspicious of your intentions.
tend to become incredibly sophisticated after several cycles of patches and expansions. Hence the phenomenal success of EU4 and CK2.
I haven't played SotS but it's been called a successor or equivalent. Paradox Studios games like this start out bare-bones but (1/2)
The artist's notes via the link at the bottom talk about the accuracy. The gist is "she was actually more violent" but yeah it's ~accurate
Also, I don't buy that Dems are the only smug assholes in US politics and they need to show respect to belligerent fools to win.
Nonsense. Voting for a dangerous liar because someone was patronising to you is not a thoughtful and considered choice.
1. I'm not American. 2. A comment takes effort, upvotes don't. 3. I'm not wrong. 4. That's not why Trump won. 5. 140 characters is insuffic-
The upvotes are by people who don't bother to think about it for two seconds. There may be a link there.
I imagine people are confused about why this small country exists that speaks half Dutch, half French. The reason is Catholicism.
Someone phobic worries about it 24/7. "If I fall asleep with the door unlocked, someone might bury me alive!" That type of irrational.
Correct.
loss.jpg
That's disingenuous. You are suggesting that this cop 'randomly and accidentally' shot Kinsey and is a sympathetic figure who meant no harm.
Wow, cops sure do have that happen to them a lot, don't they? people will say anything to defend these monsters.
If a cop can't think clearly bc a defenseless man induces too much adrenaline he should be fired as an incompetent and a danger to others.
You believe that assuming cops like that are racist is... what? - perpetuating cops killing unarmed black men?
You'd prefer to assume the victim is lying? You can't imagine a justification, but you're assuming the cop had one anyway?
Charles Kinsey. July 18th, three days ago. When asked why he did it, the officer replied "I don't know." I am suspicious of your intentions.
tend to become incredibly sophisticated after several cycles of patches and expansions. Hence the phenomenal success of EU4 and CK2.
I haven't played SotS but it's been called a successor or equivalent. Paradox Studios games like this start out bare-bones but (1/2)
The artist's notes via the link at the bottom talk about the accuracy. The gist is "she was actually more violent" but yeah it's ~accurate