FunkyMonkey7503

3033 pts · April 24, 2014


If you won't extend the same treatment to Communists who killed at least 2 million land owners (by Mao's own estimate), you're a hypocrite

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Every Communist regime has advocated mass murder of classes of citizen. If I support punching Nazis, y'all can support punching Communists.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

My great grandparents suffered at the hands of the Communists in the 1949 Chinese Revolution. Can I punch Communists after I punch Nazis?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

isolated sentiment, would the CCP need to censor all of their social media and state media platforms to try and contain the information?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I linked an article on massive Chinese censorship and scrubbing campaigns, and there are many others on Google. If it really was

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Chinese might not have lynched, but Wuhan residents faced massive discrimination in private and public sector for being from Wuhan

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

that it originated in China, rather than the US or Italy or UK or wherever, as the CCP actively tries to portray the disease as being from.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

it might cause some racism, but in the grand scheme, Chinese people originally used the term themselves, and I would want people remember

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and I'm saying that it overlaps w/ China's agenda When they indirectly rule world, they'll make sure people forget where it originated from

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Many articles about CCP mass censorship campaign scrubbing similar terms from Chinese media. If you can't make the connection, that's on you

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Looks like China has already won, but that's not reason to give in to demands, which incl. banning Wuhan virus from common speech

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Read where it says China's own media called it Wuhan Virus before banning the term. And uncensored posts from then are impossible to find

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm unlikely to find original social media posts, b/c the CCP actively tried to scrub the term and similar terms from their platforms.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The mere fact that Chinese social media universally called it the Wuhan Virus b4 the CCP clamped down on the term's use is proof enough.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

to fight the CCP tooth and nail every step of the way on every issue, b/c the CCP perceives the US as its mortal enemy, and it always has.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Eh, discriminating against and being discriminated against is natural to Chinese culture. To me, it's worth the cost of reminding the world

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

If the term didn’t offend 1.4 B+ Mainlanders and overseas Chinese, are you really going to tell us what is offensive to us?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

In fact, as overseas Chinese, I want to call it that b/c the CCP tries to erase the name so they can call it Italian Virus or US Virus, etc.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Spanish Flu isn't from Spain, German Measles isn't from Germany. The names persist but no one really cares. It's the same for Wuhan Virus.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

PRC citizens called it Wuhan Virus, too, until CCP banned the term so they can officially classify it as a foreign-originated disease.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I'm Cantonese. We have called it the Wuhan Virus or Chinese Flu ever since news broke in Asia last December. It doesn't offend us one bit.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Oh yeah, no doubt about that. He's still going to be hit hard w/ illegal possession and discharge while in illegal possession.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and appreciate your tone for debate where there are at least some workable arguments supporting various outcomes.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oh yeah, I personally believe he deserves voluntary manslaughter. I'm just trying to argue it's not "obviously murder," and I understand

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that's what I'm trying to argue - there's at least meritorious argument on his side, which is way different from how he's portrayed here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's an easy one. Trick question because they don't do capital punishment in Wisconsin.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I do agree with your appraisal of that, but the way I see it, without digging further into caselaw, he at least has a workable argument.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1