88310 pts ยท June 7, 2016
shitposts and odd hands.
What you have written makes no sense. The correct sentence is: Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Same. But only an optional small class
I mean Standup probably Carlin. But one final go, bring me back Richard Pryor (and Gene Wilder with him) for one last movie
The cat didn't die or anything. He just left the room. A bit overdramatic of a post if you ask me
You can't play it by ear when you are talking about someone's life. That is fucked. Killing is wrong. Period. Even terrible people.
Shows intestinal fortitude since it's taco tuesday
Maybe they want a man or woman who shit's exactly once on tuesdays
Once they do they take on some level of magnetic property temporarily and are drawn to the magnet.
Of that compound. Iron is the most common example. Iron has unpaired electrons, which can be "pointed" by a magnet to face the same way. 7/
Magnets work on iron and certain other things comes down to the ability of a magnet to induce temporary order into the charge distribution6/
These fields are why two magnets may repel. (+) Wants to be near (-) so if you put two (+) ends together, you get repulsion. But why 5/
There is one side of the magnet where things around it will feel a (+) magnetic field and a side where things will feel a (-) field 4/
Think of it like alternating rows of (+) and (-) with one end having a row of (+) and the other having a row of (-). This means that 3/
Examples include bricks, water, a duck. All nonmagnetic. Magnets are special. All their charges are nicely pointed in the same direction. 2/
Magnets work on the principle that there is charge inside everything. These charges are usually randomly dispersed and quite rigidly so 1/
That we can make sure some of the real rapists die? I don't see how you can condone killing in cold blood. It baffles me
Slept with his 17 year old girlfriend in the wrong state. Or what about the people accused of rape falsely. Is it ok that they die so 2/
What I am saying is where do you draw the line on killing people? If rapists can be killed what about statutory with a 19 year old who 1/
Like lawyers, I think they are all liars and terrible people. Do they deserve to die? Does a mugger who was trying to feed their kids?
We agree: killing people is wrong right? How does it stop being wrong if you arbitrarily decide they are a bad enough person. I don't 1/
Those fries look amazing. The Mac and cheese looks old.
Forfeiting rights to be part of a functioning society and forfeiting a right to life are very different things. Solitary solves any danger
One deserves to die. In the case of capital punishment the offender is no immediate threat. The choice is simply kill or let live
Moment, if a murder is killed to prevent imminent deaths that is the right thing. If one must die let it be an awful person. But no 2/
Even a danger to society doesn't deserve to die. They deserve to be kept in solitary or similar. Sometimes that isn't possible. In the 1/
A murder is worse than the death penalty, but both are removing a life for the sake of improving one's own. Same scale. Killing is killing
I just don't see how you can ever say that someone doesn't deserve to live. By saying that you bring yourself to their level. Obviously, 1/
Nobody deserves to die man. She should rot in prison, then hell, and finally Hell 2: the hellening. But she shouldn't be killed
Somebody post the damn Uno reverse card
Nah that's a switch right there
What you have written makes no sense. The correct sentence is: Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Same. But only an optional small class
I mean Standup probably Carlin. But one final go, bring me back Richard Pryor (and Gene Wilder with him) for one last movie
The cat didn't die or anything. He just left the room. A bit overdramatic of a post if you ask me
You can't play it by ear when you are talking about someone's life. That is fucked. Killing is wrong. Period. Even terrible people.
Shows intestinal fortitude since it's taco tuesday
Maybe they want a man or woman who shit's exactly once on tuesdays
Once they do they take on some level of magnetic property temporarily and are drawn to the magnet.
Of that compound. Iron is the most common example. Iron has unpaired electrons, which can be "pointed" by a magnet to face the same way. 7/
Magnets work on iron and certain other things comes down to the ability of a magnet to induce temporary order into the charge distribution6/
These fields are why two magnets may repel. (+) Wants to be near (-) so if you put two (+) ends together, you get repulsion. But why 5/
There is one side of the magnet where things around it will feel a (+) magnetic field and a side where things will feel a (-) field 4/
Think of it like alternating rows of (+) and (-) with one end having a row of (+) and the other having a row of (-). This means that 3/
Examples include bricks, water, a duck. All nonmagnetic. Magnets are special. All their charges are nicely pointed in the same direction. 2/
Magnets work on the principle that there is charge inside everything. These charges are usually randomly dispersed and quite rigidly so 1/
That we can make sure some of the real rapists die? I don't see how you can condone killing in cold blood. It baffles me
Slept with his 17 year old girlfriend in the wrong state. Or what about the people accused of rape falsely. Is it ok that they die so 2/
What I am saying is where do you draw the line on killing people? If rapists can be killed what about statutory with a 19 year old who 1/
Like lawyers, I think they are all liars and terrible people. Do they deserve to die? Does a mugger who was trying to feed their kids?
We agree: killing people is wrong right? How does it stop being wrong if you arbitrarily decide they are a bad enough person. I don't 1/
Those fries look amazing. The Mac and cheese looks old.
Forfeiting rights to be part of a functioning society and forfeiting a right to life are very different things. Solitary solves any danger
One deserves to die. In the case of capital punishment the offender is no immediate threat. The choice is simply kill or let live
Moment, if a murder is killed to prevent imminent deaths that is the right thing. If one must die let it be an awful person. But no 2/
Even a danger to society doesn't deserve to die. They deserve to be kept in solitary or similar. Sometimes that isn't possible. In the 1/
A murder is worse than the death penalty, but both are removing a life for the sake of improving one's own. Same scale. Killing is killing
I just don't see how you can ever say that someone doesn't deserve to live. By saying that you bring yourself to their level. Obviously, 1/
Nobody deserves to die man. She should rot in prison, then hell, and finally Hell 2: the hellening. But she shouldn't be killed
Somebody post the damn Uno reverse card
Nah that's a switch right there