8416 pts · December 4, 2012
Stick to German politics.
You realize they could pay for it by cutting expenditures, right? That’s the disingenuous part of this argument. The tax cuts “cost” $0.
require and increase of the debt limit, meaning we are still losing trillions of dollars a year. This shit isn’t hard to understand. (2)
Take off your partisan glasses and realize both parties are the problem. The current plan to raise expenditures and revenue would still (1)
Correct, if my budget has me losing $1tn dollars a year, and I increase revenue and expenses by $1bn, I’m- wait for it- still losing $1tn
revenue keeps us at a massive budget deficit. This place is full of economic idiots, and I have to go work.
Are you having trouble reading? You can pay for things using existing income by cutting spending. Increasing spending while increasing (1)
It’s not normal, it’s called a decrease in revenue, no business savvy person would ever call it a cost. They should, in tandem, cut expenses
Tax cuts don’t cost anything, you moron.
Legend
What’s the hate group?
I’ve seen bigger nipples on a goldfish
It’s not guaranteed. It gives the government the right to oversee, if needed.
They would at a higher cost, but they aren’t going to compete with a company performing that service at a loss— it’s not possible to compete
Who said they have to do it cheaper? That’s never said in the constitution. Again, you feel entitled to the price even though it’s at a loss
can do it for cheaper, then they should. The constitutional right is for oversight IF NEEDED.
We are the shareholders and we are piper for their loss. The constitution only allows for federal oversight of postage. If a private company
It’s not mandated- the constitution gives the federal government the right to oversee it. If a private company can do it better, they should
What is a feotus? Is it related to the GEOTUS somehow?
I’m sorry for your loss. My wife and I recently went through a miscarriage. You will be in our prayers.
It’s not guaranteed to free or even cheap. You feel entitled to it being cheap since it is now.
Because the USPS will at a LOSS, you absolute economic retard.
It’s guaranteed to be delivered / have access to. It’s not guaranteed to be cheaper than FEDEX, free to next-day. Again, you feel entitled.
These people don’t understand logic
mountain. You people have been given something at an unsustainable price and now feel entitled to it.
They wouldn’t get cut off- you would have to pay more. It’s not unreasonable to have to pay more for shipping if you live on the top of a
Stick to German politics.
You realize they could pay for it by cutting expenditures, right? That’s the disingenuous part of this argument. The tax cuts “cost” $0.
require and increase of the debt limit, meaning we are still losing trillions of dollars a year. This shit isn’t hard to understand. (2)
Take off your partisan glasses and realize both parties are the problem. The current plan to raise expenditures and revenue would still (1)
Correct, if my budget has me losing $1tn dollars a year, and I increase revenue and expenses by $1bn, I’m- wait for it- still losing $1tn
revenue keeps us at a massive budget deficit. This place is full of economic idiots, and I have to go work.
Are you having trouble reading? You can pay for things using existing income by cutting spending. Increasing spending while increasing (1)
It’s not normal, it’s called a decrease in revenue, no business savvy person would ever call it a cost. They should, in tandem, cut expenses
Tax cuts don’t cost anything, you moron.
Legend
What’s the hate group?
I’ve seen bigger nipples on a goldfish
It’s not guaranteed. It gives the government the right to oversee, if needed.
They would at a higher cost, but they aren’t going to compete with a company performing that service at a loss— it’s not possible to compete
Who said they have to do it cheaper? That’s never said in the constitution. Again, you feel entitled to the price even though it’s at a loss
can do it for cheaper, then they should. The constitutional right is for oversight IF NEEDED.
We are the shareholders and we are piper for their loss. The constitution only allows for federal oversight of postage. If a private company
It’s not mandated- the constitution gives the federal government the right to oversee it. If a private company can do it better, they should
What is a feotus? Is it related to the GEOTUS somehow?
I’m sorry for your loss. My wife and I recently went through a miscarriage. You will be in our prayers.
It’s not guaranteed to free or even cheap. You feel entitled to it being cheap since it is now.
Because the USPS will at a LOSS, you absolute economic retard.
It’s guaranteed to be delivered / have access to. It’s not guaranteed to be cheaper than FEDEX, free to next-day. Again, you feel entitled.
These people don’t understand logic
mountain. You people have been given something at an unsustainable price and now feel entitled to it.
They wouldn’t get cut off- you would have to pay more. It’s not unreasonable to have to pay more for shipping if you live on the top of a