I firmly believe in equality and that, statistically, you're really, really fucking stupid. The comment that brought you here was probably sarcastic.
I firmly believe in equality and that, statistically, you're really, really fucking stupid. The comment that brought you here was probably sarcastic.
I know everyone loves him, but is there a way to block a user so I don’t have to see his 60 posts a day? I don’t enjoy them at all.
I fucking hate these. If I had only one wish, I’d wish for infinite wishes. If I had infinite wishes, I’d use one to wish I could block this
4. citizens from BAD people, rather than saying that good people exist and therefore nobody needs protected. Both good AND bad exist.
4. True, a vast majority of gun owners are model citizens who don’t need laws to tell them how to be good. But let’s make laws that protect
3. “failing” to fire at the exact moment you happen to be pointing it at a “bad guy”. The lives saved FAR outweigh the lives taken.
3. the argument that it *could* fail so we shouldn’t have it to protect safety, I GUARANTEE it will save more lives than it will cost by
3. You can’t say a technology that hasn’t been fully developed yet is prone to failure any more than other safety features. If you’re making
2. Minus it needing to be easily changeable, that’s extremely plausible. Fingerprint scanners use little energy; technology needs invested.
1. If it made the gun cost 10x more money (generous), and only saved one kid’s life (generous), then that’s cost effective. Period.
Not at all. But it makes it harder to pin blame on someone who wasn’t even involved if it’s been shown to be a part of human... “culture”.
I understand your point, it’s just too attenuated and there is stronger cases to make. Religious xenophobia has been around for awhile.
... Innocent is ABSOLUTELY relative. Are you serious? Pick up a history book, psychology book, philosophy book, legal case book, ANYTHING.
Yea, I genuinely despise Trump but you really can’t associate him with this. There’s so many other stronger cases to make, that’s not fair.
I guarantee you that people rarely commit violence against those they see as “innocent”. It’s a relative term and means literally nothing.
4. If “Only the person who should legally be allowed to fire this gun is firing this gun” is situational safety, I’m 100% okay with that.
That’s a LOT of assumptions there my friend. 1. Expensive < safety; fuck your money. 2. Batteries now last decades. 3. Failure prone? False.
It’s partly false. His initials aren’t H + B, they are H + G so that part is inaccurate.
The point being that we’ve already established some safety measures are needed, even if it might have minor drawbacks. Don’t fight progress.
OR... “Look everyone, doing good shit around your community is normal! It’s not weird or nerdy to care, in fact it’s expected!”
No, because if a company was legally responsible for a mess they would have to clean it up. If they weren’t responsible, they wouldn’t care.
... What would be the point of dating someone without daddy issues? Can someone explain this meme to me? I don’t understand.
Not me, man. Give me more suffering please.
I tried! Their posts still show up, but I appreciate the advice.
Exactly. That’s why it doesn’t make sense to me why guns have a safety? What if you ABSOLUTELY need your gun, but the safety feature is on?
Nicely done! Looks great!
I always love when people want credit for being “future” things. Congrats on being accepted into college but... What does that prove?
I picked Bulbasaur every goddamn time and I would do it over and over again.
This post is so nostalgic! I remember the easy target of 2018. Those were the days!
DOUBLE DESTRUCTION!!
I logged in last week for the first time in awhile. They added a bunch! Playing as Count Dooku was awesome.