3704 pts · May 12, 2019
Sure dude. No professional photographers use adobe photoshop or lightroom… if you say so. Absolute bull. Tells me you really have no idea about photography. That also means every photo you see from Hubble are all fake.
Your definition of fake is any layered photo? any photographer would disagree with you. Just enjoy the art instead of being critical of something you can’t do
Still disproves your north south argument
So by your definition, 2 real photos makes one fake photo. A lot of “real photos” you’ve seen actually involve dozens of layered photos. There is much skill involved with this. Sounds like you have no photography experience other than on your phone. I see numerous photos online of different people with unique photographs of the moon through the arch
https://www.thewave.info/Arches/Arches%20NP/Windows%20Area/index.htmlThese are legit. The moon can pass through but the telescopic effect would be difficult to align so layering is used. Still real photos… a layered photo is still photography. It’s even done in the darkroom with old school film
12 is really the ONLY except in this compilation. But it’s still art and advanced photography techniques. All photos took the photographers much time and skill. Claiming they are fake without any context is just a diss to the photographer.
Just a quick look on google, the arch is aligned north south, but the opening faces east west at a slight angle. Just google it. Many people have captured sun/moon rise set through it https://bpsop.com/watching-the-moon-through-the-window/
Thank you OP! This is a great compilation of photos demonstrating perspective compression with a telescopic lens. Many people on here claim they are all fake, which is a bummer because these photos take much skill, time, and knowledge in photography. Acknowledging these techniques would be very informative. Not everything that seems unreal to most should be auto labeled as fake AI
Yeah, the moon always fucks up exposure. Have to layer photos or if you use small aperture and provide additional artificial lighting on the foreground objects, it will help balance the exposure. All around it takes a lot of time and skill
Proof? I find more proof of them being real. Just perspective through a lens. Look up perspective compression effect through a telescopic lens
This is spot on. It’s sad most of the people on here automatically think fake, when it is actually true skill.
/gallery/zeNiPnB/comment/2426929199
Perspective compression with telescopic lens… as demonstrated in basically all of these real photographs
Sad actually.. photographers work very hard for photos like these
It is possible
These types of comments piss off actual photographers
Perspective compression with telephoto lens. Not rocket surgery
Don’t know what to tell you. It’s real
You are not real
Perspective compression* what most of these photographs are demonstrating
Telescopic compression effect with telescopic lens
You watch shitty porno then
people seeing these shots just auto assume fake photoshop! Where they actually take incredible skill and planning and knowledge of light through a lens. Sad
It’s still photography and take a lot of skill and planning
Have you ever looked at the moon with binoculars? Imagine it was behind an object on earth as you viewed it. The moon would look massive. The large moon shots are 100% possible.
Photoshop is still photography
It is 100% possible. Perspective compression effect with telescopic lens. Only possible if you take the photo from far away and zoom in
Perspective compression effect with a telescopic lens
Nope. Look up perspective compression effect with a telescopic lens
Thank you
Sure dude. No professional photographers use adobe photoshop or lightroom… if you say so. Absolute bull. Tells me you really have no idea about photography. That also means every photo you see from Hubble are all fake.
Your definition of fake is any layered photo? any photographer would disagree with you. Just enjoy the art instead of being critical of something you can’t do
Still disproves your north south argument
So by your definition, 2 real photos makes one fake photo. A lot of “real photos” you’ve seen actually involve dozens of layered photos. There is much skill involved with this. Sounds like you have no photography experience other than on your phone. I see numerous photos online of different people with unique photographs of the moon through the arch
https://www.thewave.info/Arches/Arches%20NP/Windows%20Area/index.html
These are legit. The moon can pass through but the telescopic effect would be difficult to align so layering is used. Still real photos… a layered photo is still photography. It’s even done in the darkroom with old school film
12 is really the ONLY except in this compilation. But it’s still art and advanced photography techniques. All photos took the photographers much time and skill. Claiming they are fake without any context is just a diss to the photographer.
Just a quick look on google, the arch is aligned north south, but the opening faces east west at a slight angle. Just google it. Many people have captured sun/moon rise set through it
https://bpsop.com/watching-the-moon-through-the-window/
Thank you OP! This is a great compilation of photos demonstrating perspective compression with a telescopic lens. Many people on here claim they are all fake, which is a bummer because these photos take much skill, time, and knowledge in photography. Acknowledging these techniques would be very informative. Not everything that seems unreal to most should be auto labeled as fake AI
Yeah, the moon always fucks up exposure. Have to layer photos or if you use small aperture and provide additional artificial lighting on the foreground objects, it will help balance the exposure. All around it takes a lot of time and skill
Proof? I find more proof of them being real. Just perspective through a lens. Look up perspective compression effect through a telescopic lens
This is spot on. It’s sad most of the people on here automatically think fake, when it is actually true skill.
/gallery/zeNiPnB/comment/2426929199
Perspective compression with telescopic lens… as demonstrated in basically all of these real photographs
Sad actually.. photographers work very hard for photos like these
It is possible
These types of comments piss off actual photographers
Perspective compression with telephoto lens. Not rocket surgery
Don’t know what to tell you. It’s real
You are not real
Perspective compression* what most of these photographs are demonstrating
Telescopic compression effect with telescopic lens
You watch shitty porno then
people seeing these shots just auto assume fake photoshop! Where they actually take incredible skill and planning and knowledge of light through a lens. Sad
It’s still photography and take a lot of skill and planning
Have you ever looked at the moon with binoculars? Imagine it was behind an object on earth as you viewed it. The moon would look massive. The large moon shots are 100% possible.
Photoshop is still photography
It is 100% possible. Perspective compression effect with telescopic lens. Only possible if you take the photo from far away and zoom in
Perspective compression effect with a telescopic lens
Nope. Look up perspective compression effect with a telescopic lens
Thank you