Male, 21, Portugal; Studying Software Engineering in College; Love to write, both in portuguese and in english; Doctor Who, GoT, AoS, Supernatural, etc.
Male, 21, Portugal; Studying Software Engineering in College; Love to write, both in portuguese and in english; Doctor Who, GoT, AoS, Supernatural, etc.
What was the probation officer's recommendation?
Now if you say "it's pretty shit that the UN didn't do anything", then I agree. But using that as argument to it being useless is invalid
Still no. It's like me saying water is useless because it doesn't cure cancer. Water is useful for many other things
"they weren't helpful in this particular situation therefore they are never helpful" is a poor argument
You are so confident on your opinion that you are too scared to even challenge it, so you play this silly game or whatever. Have a good one
Listen, if you can't be bothered to Google something in 1 minute to expand your knowledge, then this talk is useless
Is not convenient, that's why said, at the start of this discussion, that you can Google my claim of costs
You can take a minute to see if you have a point or not, and save us both some time. Like you can imagine, posting multiple sources to Imgur
Handling of the post conviction phase (people can't have counsil on appeals, things like that). Before you defend something do adamantly,
The only other country where there might be due process and cost less is Japan which has been harshly criticized by the UN and AI for their
Jesus Christ you can't even take 30 secs to Google something to see if you are right or not. There isn't a palace where it happens
In what other country is there due process and fewer costs for the death penalty than for life in prison?
That just highlights the problem with drawing lines for irreversible decisions
Why are twisting his perspective so much? Just accept that some people don't view things the same way and it's not black and white
But why do you think that it costs more? To have guarantees and due process. It doesn't cost more on places without due process
And where is the line drawn? At someone who murders? What if he murders a bad person? At someone of rapes? At someone who steals?
It literally takes 10 secs to do that but here: https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/death-penalty-cost/
If they are basic, universal rights, they are, by definition, unforfeitable and they apply to everyone, no exceptions
You don't have to, you can Google "death penalty costs" and you'll see dozens of sources on that
Costs is not be a factor in deciding if a person lives, and I don't see a reason why it should be
Besides: you want them removed from society, not deprived of basic human rights
Death penalty overwhelmingly costs more, according to basically every source
The thing is, after the trials, there is no "must kill a man", you have other options
"respectable as an execution" so not respectable at all?
?
What can a gun do against a tank?
Some of them might want to, not really "all the dudes". Most just think it should be allowed