11508 pts ยท November 10, 2017
I love this country. Its a shame that nobody can get along. We're supposed to be the greatest country on earth, but we constantly embarass ourselves.
I find it hard to stock up on ammo because I shoot it all. Who keeps half boxes?
No. No it doesn't. And it never did. The term libertarian has NEVER changed definition.
Re-read the comment chain. It seems you can't keep more than one comment in your immediate memory
No. Your still missing the point. Somalia has ZERO regulation. We want MINIMAL regulation. ffs
Well, you can't redefine a term like that. And there's no such thing as an "anti-state socialist." Socialism is ALL state, cradle to grave.
They definently don't have government regulation, is my point.
Not including war-torn third-world countries of course...lol
Countries/cities with the least government regulation are the most prosperous places on Earth.
You say "delusional," but you're not talking about libertarians. Literally NOBODY thinks the way you are trying to define libertarians. 1/
That's all. Any other characteristics you attribute to libertarians is all in your head
"a political philosophy that advocates only minimal state intervention in the free market and the private lives of citizens"
Your vehemently avoiding the point here. You either have no idea what libertarianism is, or you just want a reason to hate people.
No. Anarcho-capitalists wan ZERO state involvement. Libertarians want protections for individual liberties. This is simple stuff guys.
Most of them are richer beyond their politicians' salaries even after leaving office. That's the aristocracy for ya.
That's conjecture. But I wouldn't be surprised. That's a common practice for politicians. That's why most of them are filthy rich. 1/
I appreciate you surrendering this information. It's good food for thought.
Even though it does employ people, the secret service likes it, and he still is voluntarily giving up his presidential salary. 3/
Seems comparable to the living and travel expenses of previous presidents. I'm not sure if it' moral for him to funnel that to his hotels 2/
Seems scummy, but the information in this article differs from that of other sources Im seeing. Seems the estimates vary wildly. 1/
Im trying to educate myself. I need a name or something. If it's that easy to find, give me somewhere to start.
Point me in the right direction. Does it have a name? Is there a company or a firm involved? Who are the major players?
Do you think I'm a Trump fan? You're dead wrong. I follow politics and current events in detail, but I haven't heard of this. 1/
A libertarian believes in "minimal" state intervention in the free market and personal matters, not 'absolute zero' state intervention.
yet I believe in reasonable economic regulation that protects consumers. Things like the FDA, for example.
You can be a libertarian AND an anarcho-capitalist. Or not. They aren't mutually exclusive. Shit, I'm pretty libertarian myself 1/
No. I need to know EXACTLY what you are talking about. A general "figure it out yourself" won't do. The burden of truth is on YOU.
That's not libertarianism. Your talking about anarcho-capitalism. HUGE difference.
You can regulate and still be a "free market"
What money did he give himself? Please provide a source for this.
I find it hard to stock up on ammo because I shoot it all. Who keeps half boxes?
No. No it doesn't. And it never did. The term libertarian has NEVER changed definition.
Re-read the comment chain. It seems you can't keep more than one comment in your immediate memory
No. Your still missing the point. Somalia has ZERO regulation. We want MINIMAL regulation. ffs
Well, you can't redefine a term like that. And there's no such thing as an "anti-state socialist." Socialism is ALL state, cradle to grave.
They definently don't have government regulation, is my point.
Not including war-torn third-world countries of course...lol
Countries/cities with the least government regulation are the most prosperous places on Earth.
You say "delusional," but you're not talking about libertarians. Literally NOBODY thinks the way you are trying to define libertarians. 1/
That's all. Any other characteristics you attribute to libertarians is all in your head
"a political philosophy that advocates only minimal state intervention in the free market and the private lives of citizens"
Your vehemently avoiding the point here. You either have no idea what libertarianism is, or you just want a reason to hate people.
No. Anarcho-capitalists wan ZERO state involvement. Libertarians want protections for individual liberties. This is simple stuff guys.
Most of them are richer beyond their politicians' salaries even after leaving office. That's the aristocracy for ya.
That's conjecture. But I wouldn't be surprised. That's a common practice for politicians. That's why most of them are filthy rich. 1/
I appreciate you surrendering this information. It's good food for thought.
Even though it does employ people, the secret service likes it, and he still is voluntarily giving up his presidential salary. 3/
Seems comparable to the living and travel expenses of previous presidents. I'm not sure if it' moral for him to funnel that to his hotels 2/
Seems scummy, but the information in this article differs from that of other sources Im seeing. Seems the estimates vary wildly. 1/
Im trying to educate myself. I need a name or something. If it's that easy to find, give me somewhere to start.
Point me in the right direction. Does it have a name? Is there a company or a firm involved? Who are the major players?
Do you think I'm a Trump fan? You're dead wrong. I follow politics and current events in detail, but I haven't heard of this. 1/
A libertarian believes in "minimal" state intervention in the free market and personal matters, not 'absolute zero' state intervention.
yet I believe in reasonable economic regulation that protects consumers. Things like the FDA, for example.
You can be a libertarian AND an anarcho-capitalist. Or not. They aren't mutually exclusive. Shit, I'm pretty libertarian myself 1/
No. I need to know EXACTLY what you are talking about. A general "figure it out yourself" won't do. The burden of truth is on YOU.
That's not libertarianism. Your talking about anarcho-capitalism. HUGE difference.
You can regulate and still be a "free market"
What money did he give himself? Please provide a source for this.