Well played Scotland, well played

May 21, 2025 8:46 PM

skapanda616

Views

16057

Likes

1331

Dislikes

54

https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/trans-women-gather-topless-scottish-31666688

https://www.reddit.com/r/chaoticgood/s/XPO4JqVGEd

protest

lgbtq

current_events

transrightsarehumanrights

As another layer to this protest: news media applied black censorship bars across the womens' nipples, which they'd not have to do if they were actually men.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've been on this earth long enough to know you never want to piss off women... especially in groups.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, sisters.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 3

I actually have a patch for my jacket that’s the Gatson snake on a rainbow pride flag I love how triggered the idiots around here get

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we flood Truth Social with Trans Titties and see what happens?

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

The sound of Nazis masturbating but still calling for all transfolk to be burned at the stake.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I was hoping for exploding heads and aneurisms over reporting male chests as women's breasts.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Wouldn't it be more impactful to go to the normal Scottish Parliament and not the Topless Scottish Parliament?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

niiiiice

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

R.E.S.P.E.C.T.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No, not well played Scotland. Fuck Scotland for making the god damn law in the first place. Well played trans-women of Scotland.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Genius! I hope you win the battle. Keep showing up until they break! Straight 79 y/o Granddad here. You all deserve respect. You are all valid. Virtual hug to each of you!

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That’s pretty fucking funny. So what happened?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Interesting fact, in Canada EVERYONE has the right to be topless. Men and women and everyone else

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That’s the kind of protest I can get behind

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I love this. What a genius way to protest! Also tits

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Does anyone know if anyone was actually arrested?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

From what I recall, I'm not sure the scottish court ruling would make it so they *couldnt* be arrested for indecent exposure. The ruling was very specifically focused on how the Equal Rights Act in Scotland is worded, for the purposes of that Act, and that Act alone.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Were they arrested?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Apparently not. Just removed from the Holyrood parliment building

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so how did it go?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

If it wasn't considered indecent then we would have a full view of their breasts

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

Yeah, that's that point mate

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I mean to say that even the article implicitly acknowledges trans as women otherwise we would be seeing the titties

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Correct

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's literally the point

1 year ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Although remember, hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug, in their belief system. They see no contradiction in charging the women with indecency while still misgendering them. The core of their beliefs are hateful lies, so anything that furthers those beliefs is acceptable, regardless of how illogical and hypocritical it is.

1 year ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

It's not hypocrisy to them. It's rules for everyone else that they don't have to follow themselves if it's inconvenient because they think they are better than everyone else.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I heard in this case none of them were arrested or anything for it, but Scotland isn't bad for this type of thing.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Maybe slip in a couple of real ones.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

Most trans girl tiddies are also “real ones.”

Sincerely, a gay trans girl that likes t girl tits

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That woman is awesome, but trans women's breasts are usually real too. Estrogen makes nipples grow into boobs whether it comes from ovaries or pills.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Most trans women get hormone treatment, which mostly or completely gives them a typical female setup of hormones. Over a few years, this will cause them to naturally develop breasts. Many trans women aren't happy with the results and get top surgery, breast augmentation surgery, but others are happy with what they get through just the hormones. So if by "real ones" you meant breasts, they're there. If you meant women, trans women are women.

1 year ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

I was more thinking of forcing the politicians to possibly have to decide which ones to arrest, knowing some were not subject to the court decision.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I mean that would prove a point.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Real titties that is, as trans women are most assuredly real women

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

So we are real women but with fake breasts? Do you not know what estrogen does to the body?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I was thinking of top surgeries, I wasn't the other person, was just trying to reiterate that trans women are real women, no offense intended.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No worries. I didn't check the username before I replied, that's on me.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 3

Keep them on you folks. They’re nabbing people in the streets. It’ll do fuck all if it’s in your bedside drawer on the worst day of your life

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Or get prepared to take and use them, so we can put an end to this. It's not going away on its own, we've got to get rid of the Nazis ourselves. There's no amount of voting or protesting that will solve this.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok i love this 😀 although I highly recommend a holster with a claw for appendix carry like that lol

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

If someone asks which you prefer please just give an arbitrary answer we're old and confused and trying very hard to be respectful we just need clear direction

1 year ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

I find just saying things like excuse me, or just a may you please move tends to work if you are unsure. They are gender neutral & polite as well :) .

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno how we got onto the subject of requesting they move. How did that enter the conversation?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just a example of what I meant. If someone is a friend then that probably isn't needed but with strangers it tends to works with.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your example doesn't fit this discussion, and your explanation is vague and does not clarify anything.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a Military Cook, most times the sneeze guard makes it so I can't see rank or names, we have a few transgender who come in, for a long time I just said, 'Good Day Sir.' or 'Good day Ma'am'. Always respectful, we had one individual walk in and I complimented their nails and hair, but I'd addressed them as Sir, and they politely mentioned that they preferred not to be called either, and smiled when I asked what should I do to avoid upsetting them and asked me to think on it. 1/?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Next day I changed how I greet EVERYONE. "Good day my Friend, what can I get for you." And that's how I address most people now unless I know them personally, everyone is a Friend until they prove themselves otherwise. And the next time the person came in and I addressed them as Friend? They almost broke down crying and gave me a hug, so I'd say he liked my answer. :) 2/2

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a good answer, and a sweet story. That said, when someone has asked what they can do to avoid upsetting you, turning that around with "why don't you figure it out?" really isn't okay.
You've expressed that you don't like this. I've asked how to accommodate your preferences, and expressed my intention to respect your wishes, it is 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘫𝘰𝘣 to communicate them! Otherwise I'm going to guess. I'm going to guess in good faith, but I'm going to be annoyed and confused and unsure about it.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I couldn't tell you his reasoning, maybe he didn't have an answer himself. What would YOU tell random people on the street to call you if you didn't feel Sir or Ma'am fit? 'Hey you?' Introduce yourself to every single person you meet so they can address you by Name? I do understand where you're coming from, if he had an answer it would only be a benefit if he simply explained it rather than being mysterious. But I'm glad I was given the chance to 'think' on a subject I never considered before.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm actually kind of surprised that it's considered indecent exposure for a woman to be topless in the UK. Even here in Texas that isn't illegal (yet). Heavily frowned upon and risking severe harassment, but not criminal.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

We're very Prime and Proper over here m8. We dont even really have topless beaches, unlike the rest of the continent where thats pretty common place. Also, alot of our laws are generally based on updated versions of older laws. Hell, you trace the linege of Habias Corpus back about 1000 years or so

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm actually kind of shocked that Texas doesn't forbid toplessness. Many or most US states do. In New York, even underboob is technically illegal (and yes, it has actually gone to court...). "NY Penal Law §245.01: A person is guilty of exposure if [...] the private or intimate parts of his body are unclothed or exposed. For purposes of this section, the private or intimate parts of a female person shall include that portion of the breast which is below the top of the areola."

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised by that, too! In TX it's specifically the anus and genitals.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(There are carve-outs for breast-feeding mothers, and for actors being topless while performing a play.)

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A state SC ruling in 1992 amended that; women are free to be topless anywhere men are. The court ruled that to set different standards would be discrimination.

I do find it odd that the law retains its original wording, in light of the ruling amending that law, but I am not a lawologist.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Um in NYC female toplessness is legal. Not sure how to square this circle.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As of this moment, the law I quoted is still on the books, according to the official New York State Senate website: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/245.01 But I don't really know -- I'm Canadian, and just remember reading up on local breast-feeding related laws from when I was spending some time in The States when my kids were little. Possibly things have been challenged or changed since then; but the anti-topless laws are still on the books, as far as I can tell. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/08/24/434315957/topless-in-new-york-the-legal-case-that-makes-going-top-free-legal-ish Apparently it's a dead letter law due to subsequent court rulings. So long as the nudity is not for commercial purposes.

I personally know topless sunbathing in sheep's meadow is common. Or used to be before everyone was carrying a camera in their pocket anyway.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hey Scots, you are supposed to be the cool part of the UK.

1 year ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 4

Basically for the same reasons as the US, England is really full of right wing fascists.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Literally not though. We have very *loud* Right wing fascists, but none of them are able to get into any position of authority because their talking points are so repugnant as to be disavowed by the majoriy, because by and large, most people in the country just dont give a shit about a person's colour, creed or place of birth.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Except BREXIT happened and the Tories still got a bunch seats even after losing the racists vote. Thatcher was just like Reagan. Also both countries have this huge state of denial about how fucked up their country is. The Tories just did all the messed up stuff Trump is doing now.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Brexit had nothing to do with racism, it was a ploy by Cameron to retain power after they won by landside thanks to the colossal economic fuck up that was 10 years of Labour under Blaire and Brown. Cameron and most conservatives never actually expected it to work. Then the EU forced a legislation change in the UK which was the triggering point for it to become public discourse, bringing up the whole point of soverignty and the EU's legal supremacy

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand the situation now, you are a Tory trying to blame the left for 4 different Tory prime ministers and the lies painted on buses. Brexit stopped the white immigrants and replaced them with non-whites so the racists were upset.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are. It’s against their will that the court made this judgement.

1 year ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 2

Sounds like America

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Its not really agaisnt anyone's will. The court was asked to clarify how the law is written. Unfortunatly, the law is written in a very specific way and the courts are bound to that. It would be dishonest of them to rule the way they believe the people *want* them to rule, and now its up to the elected to change the law. Which is not a difficult problem.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The group that took it to court is from Scotland. https://forwomen.scot/

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, the group that brought the SCUK case was a Scottish group

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Could you elaborate? Cause if its like saying "Its against the American's will that Trump is a shitbag" when a good chunk of the shithole country wanted him, then I have to disagree.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

1- as part of the UK, much of scottlands legal system is slaved to the collective legal system of the UK. while i dont know the details of

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It is a UK ruling, but it was a UK ruling on the government of Scotland, so Scottish people will feel more involved in it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_Women_Scotland_Ltd_v_The_Scottish_Ministers

Labour and Tories both support the ruling. Wiki page has no comments from Lib-dems but I'd be surprised if they differed from the prior two. UK greens opposed it. No info on SNP.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

this specific case to say, it could be this is a UK ruling, that scottland itself wouldnt have made. 2- that "good chunk" of america

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

is only 23% of its populace, and wasnt even a full 50% of its voters. that guy "won" with a popular vote of only 49.8%.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Less than a third wanted Trump. That's still far too many, but for sure is not our collective fault.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Oh you filthy, delusional amerimoron. You deserve trump, convincing yourself of this massive idiocy.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

... This regime is going to kill me and my family, and you say we deserve death even though we've opposed right-wing politicians and social pushes for years? Congratulations, how's it feel marching alongside the Nazis?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0