What could possibly go wrong?

Apr 20, 2026 10:40 PM

yokwe

Views

22954

Likes

500

Dislikes

16

#ai #collapse Pretty sure they are referring to the AI bubble stock schemes, not AI as a concept.

ai

collapse

once the $ dries up and the investors disappear, it will evolve into something else, but the bubble will burst.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the Zune.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Windows phone was actually pretty good but got crushed by Apple.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't forget 3D movies, tv, and video games

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sweet summer child, ai it's just a bunch of statistics, you could run in a excel sheet with a strong enough computer, so yeah it's gonna stay for as long as we live, it's utility is because it's a tool not because you need to convince others it has values like NFT or crypto

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Here! Hold this bag! I'll be right back!

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hahahahahahahahaahahahah Burn it with fire

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

AI does for words what spreadsheets did for numbers. The world uses a lot of words to get things done. There's going to be a massive shift in how we do everything involving words.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

A.I originally started as weather models. How well do you trust your local forecast is how you should trust A.I.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Windows phone was ok, Had a Nokia Lumia with Windows 8 on it. It sucked for desktops but the tile UI was pretty good for a smartphone. And I had office on it.
Had it for 6 years, missed the whole Pokémon go craze though because there were no apps for the bloody thing.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The difference was virtually everyone knew that the other things weren't going to be around long term.

To be clear, the tools we're currently (incorrectly) calling "AI" are not going to be going away. and in some cases (such as medical imaging or accessibility tools for those who are hearing or visually impaired), they shouldn't.

5 months ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

apple 2 forever

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They are planning on reusing AI for mass surveillance data analysis. Good luck getting rid of that. They have been harvesting your data for decades and they can't afford to let the data bubble die.

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

"ecoevo.social never charged you a dime, never had a Series A, and never pivoted to enterprise. It was just scientists being nerdy on the internet, federated and free. Claude looked at it, shrugged, and said 'I don't replace friends.' It died as it lived — not dead at all, actually, still posting about nematodes."

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It has already revolutionized cancer research and deep Universe understanding. But all you toddlers do is see one tiny use of AI, LLMs and image generation, and demand that we put in laws to remove all AI, effectively killing the fantastic research revolutions we've had. That's because of you. All you.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"Copilot is for entertainment purposes only." https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse
Now start using this automated hallucination engine for all of your critical business stuff, goddammit!!

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I work for Microsoft. They are having me lie in a meeting about how much time ai saves me.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Remember when Windows phone launched, and they had a parade about it that included a float with their competitors in a hearse?

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

sometimes you are right and sometimes you are not

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

All these companies could implode right now, and open models would still be all over, GPUs would still be out there, and so a LOT of AI would remain—and literally why would people who use it now stop using it then? They actually WANT to.

The only way AI is going away is if a giant solar flare fries everything. Instead of pretending it's a self-solving problem to justify sitting and waiting, act to regulate it.

5 months ago | Likes 142 Dislikes 12

If what you said happened the component market would at least somewhat stabilize. Consumers can't dent the market like corporations.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The entire market would collapse, so I think component prices would still be screwed for some time.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm always trying to figure out things.
I don't have friends.
When I ask on-line, even in places specifically for people to get help on these subjects, either I'm trolled or ignored.
So, out of desperation, I ask an LLM, and it always gets stuff wrong.
It is so consistently wrong that it seems intentional as if its sole purpose is to waste our time.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is not The American Way. The American Way is to complain and make memes about it until someone else fixes the problem.

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'd laugh, except I'm too busy crying because this is exactly accurate.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't think anyone's like, "No, EVERY Clanker MUST be wiped from existence!" We just don't want all our money and water going to this shit

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Like, I don't care if Mrs. Williker is having cyber with Microsoft Sam. I just don't want my taxes funding it while I die of thirst.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Good idea giant solar flare, let's do that

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Just like "Fuzzy Logic" which was also going to be in everything and revolutionise the world. Remember fuzzy logic?

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know what, I'm gonna go with the solar flare

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Solar Flare 2028.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

His running mate, Giant Meteor, has kind of an extreme healthcare plan. But you can't argue with results!

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i mean yeah regulate it or whatever but its absolutely propped up. people only want to use it because the cost per token to them is basically 100% subsidized. even with your own a100 gpu all the goodies that make it good are only there because of investor money thats running out. we'll see if they can goad the military into propping them up after it runs out

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody realistically expects AI to be wiped from existence, the bubble bursting and the implosion of the companies proliferating it will likely be sufficient.

5 months ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 3

No. That will only do what the .com era bust did, which is break up the existing players and pave the way for others to fill gaps. What is different about AI from the other fads mentioned in the post that already died is that they didn't do work for companies. And while many companies lack the talent and resources to implement AI successfully, many are AND that barrier to entry will continually decrease as time goes on.

LLMs aren't vanishing unfortunately. Like the internet, society must adapt.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Which historically just trims the fat and consolidates the ecosystem, at the cost of the public footing the bill economically.

5 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yeah, that really did a number on the internet too, didn't it? After the .com bubble, never heard about it again.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Sufficient for what? You think the people who've developed dependance on GPT will suddenly undevelop that dependance?

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

They would have to if OpenAI implodes. And they aren’t doing so well…

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Sadly, that's not the case. The behavioral pattern has been learned, and the paradigm shifted. You have CEOs asking Chat GPT how they can get out of fulfilling payouts from contracts because their in-house council told them there wasn't a way. You have AIs managing warehouse inventories hallucinating deliveries that never occurred, only to be discovered when the item(s) aren't actually in the warehouse.

Getting away from AI is going to be a long and painful process.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This just in: people who used to be stupid before AI, are still stupid after AI.

5 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

… no, they literally wouldn't. A smaller company without the lofty promises or ambitions would come up to fill the void. There are so many open models out there to choose from.

5 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

I tried to explain this to somebody on bluesky that it wasn't as simple as the companies failing or stopping data centers because of how its very possible to run things locally. That the giant power draw is because of how many people its serving at once and it being optimized for response time rather than power saving. Maaaaan that did not go over well I almost felt like starting a new account just to distance myself from the hate and drama I got for it.

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

the massive cost is partially because of precompute and pattern matching searches, like you said to optimize for speed. even when everybody can get a100's from failing datacenters, having to wait minutes for the model to start spitting out tokens isnt going to be most people's wheelhouse.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think a lot of people would get used to it rather quickly once they realize they no longer have to pay anyone for the service

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if most people dont even want to put in the effort to install their own gpu or switch to linux, the hump of having to fuck with custom drivers, gpus with no video out, agi temperatures, etc, is going to be nearly insurmountable. the amount of help (read: money) to make the process smooth for people right now really cant be overstated

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ai is 100% here to stay. Ive built software for 20 years. We are fucking cooked and we need to regulate this shit fucking yesterday. I can make video of anyone doing and saying anything and its insanely difficult to detect. We are toast.

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Anyone else remember Juicero? L M A O 😂

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I asked for instructions on how to download a specific report from Salesforce today- my colleague said “I dunno, ask Copilot”

I was stunned.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait so what's the argument here? AI, as a concept, will become obsolete? Is anybody actually that detached from how the world works in 2026?

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I think they are referring to the extreme and stupid pump and dump AI companies.

4 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't you blaspheme Windows Phone. Still a better base OS than a certain iProduct I could name. If only other companies had been bribed to make apps for it...

5 months ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 10

My Lumia 920 was by far my favorite phone I've ever owned

5 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I still miss the Microsoft band. Best smart watch ever. Not only did it have heartbeat and UV index. It also actually allowed you to text back on your wrist something no other watch has done to this day

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Excellent phone in its early iterations

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I came here to say the same thing. Even though I'm using an iPhone haha. It was a great platform.

5 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I used Windows Mobile for ages before the smartphone revolution. Sure it was stylus focused because the screens then generally weren't capacitive. But it was more accurate. I liked that just like my computer, I could download and install software as I pleased. The essentials were generally free, and you could largely do whatever you wanted. We then got app stores, with adverts and everything costing and limitations on what you could do.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

With Windows Phone 7, the paid apps were outrageously expensive, Microsoft took ages to implement features it lacked vs Android&iOS, actual OS updates were few and far between. Microsoft constantly does this: launch something with ambitious chest thumping but little actually following through on improving it. The Metro UI was really the only thing it really had going for it. WP8 was a bit better but the reputation damage was already done.

5 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I still miss my little HTC Win8 phone 🙁 It was never a distraction *precisely* because no one wrote apps for it

5 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

HTC had the best Win Phones

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Microsoft was arrogant about how well Windows Phone was going to do, but I genuinely enjoyed their marketing campaign surrounded the design philosophy of "you pick up your phone, do what you need, then put it back down".
On the other hand though, using a web browser on Android you're inundated with popups to "please use our app instead", while using a web browser on Windows Phone they would be like "oh, I guess this is your only option". That was a nice bonus to its lack of popularity. :)

5 months ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

I was a softie at the time, and I don't remember any arrogance, more like desperation? I wasn't on the WP team, but we worked with it a bunch on my team, so I'm not an expert by any stretch.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe this was the idea of someone in marketing rather than the product team, but the funeral for the iPhone seemed a bit arrogant.
https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-iphone-funeral-2010-9

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, I think all of them know it's a pump and dump scheme like every other flash in the pan tech development the last 5 years. A bunch of bros making a quick buck by convincing their dad's friends and frat brothers with whom they share secrets of mutual destruction to fund their vanity projects.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Honestly I dunno. I feel like it depends on which type of AI were talking about. Asking it for answers to questions is always dicey but people are addicted to it. It might die off because its unreliable. Art generation? Honestly not sure. The quality keeps going up and its getting harder to tell it from human art with every week. 2D image to 3D model translation? Surprisingly good at it as it turns out, another year and it might be invaluable to some industries.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is one of the most devastatingly depressing things I've ever heard. Being excited we will be able to replace actual artists with AI is one of the most dystopian concepts on the planet. It boggles my mind anyone would be excited by it. It's not invaluable to the industry, it's cheap for the people who are already rich. Don't get it twisted.

5 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think you underestimate just how desired 2D to 3D translation is even from artists. It cuts down a ton on busy work giving more time for actually fun stuff. AI Re-topology is something I've seen a lot of 3D artists want too.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, the artists who don't understand that they are essentially training their own obsolescence. They don't want to do the actual work of their job so they are willing to train AI to do it for them, thus completely replacing them and eliminating the need for their job entirely. If you don't actually want to do the WORK of being a painter or a writer, you just want to produce a sellable product, choose a different fucking job.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dude you really need to step back and think about the stuff your saying. Art involves a lot of different steps and people have a lot of different processes. If someone wants to skip having to model out a dumb one off prop for a scene or spend hours looking at modeling sites to finally find it and find out it costs 10 goddamn dollars... who can actually blame them. There is a lot of tedious busywork that modelers just do. not. want. to. spend. time. on.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also an aside while I was in no way talking about replacing artists entirely it should be noted that one of the most iconic utopias in fiction literally did just that. Replicators got rid of cooking except for fun. The Holodeck eliminated art except as a hobby.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0