Treat myself to a private room

Jul 21, 2026 10:27 AM

memes

suspicious_fry

Passengers on busses and trains speak with one another, but on an airliner, people act like they are on the flight only to take a nap.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We are debating this for a trip to Glacier NP from the east coast

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sounds like you want to?
Flip a coin; if you’re happy about the result, do that, but if you get the urge to flip again… that’s just as telling :)

1 week ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you can, why not?

1 week ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

If the train is cheaper and you're not in a hurry, then the choice would be obvious for me. I like traveling by train, and I hate flying.
What's the difference in time, for you?

1 week ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's so fucking weird that trains are more expensive than flying in the US.

1 week ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They have to travel a lot farther to get from one end to the other than most other countries. It's about the distance. It's going to be cheaper to get a train ride from one side of PA to the other than a flight. But it's going to take more to get from PA to CA.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The answer depends on whether it's the journey or destination. The Northeast Regional from Boston to Washington is very different that the California Zephyr from Chicago to San Fran. Whatever you do make sure you get the Signature Flat Iron Steak.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wife has to do several out-of-state cons, and she loves it. As long as you've GOT the time, you can relax!

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Time off is limited. Do you really want to use more of your time off on getting to your destination?

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My wife and I did this to go from Melbourne to Brisbane, sprang for a private train room. It was nice, chill - still took a day and a half, but even a short flight eats up most of your day with BS. I recommend it anyway.

1 week ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

yeah, this is my main thing with flying - have to get to the airport 2 hours early, which for me requires leaving for the airport 3.5 hrs before flight time; wait and pay to park, wait to check in, wait to check bags, wait at the gate, wait when the flight is delayed, wait to pick up bags, and then pay more to get from the ass end of town where the airport is to wherever im actually going. i take trains whenever i can, and it's not usually much slower.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're much more likely to be in a crash on a train than in a plane.

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

You're more likely to die in a plane crash, than a train crash.

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Per basis, but over all no

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you have the time and money, do it. Life is very short. Enjoy it as much as you can.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My daughter and I took empire builder and pacific coastliner last summer for a big bike trip and I highly recommend it. The food was good too and the sleeping car is a pretty great way to travel.

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We visit grandson and family in Santa Cruz from Seattle regularly. Don't fly. Sleeper train takes 24 hours and costs 5 to 10 times the cost of flying (if you want a sleeper) depending of cabin you get.

1 week ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have taken a couple of trips in a sleeping car on Amtrak from Philly to San Antonio, Texas and one to Louisiana from Philly. I would highly recommend it if you have the money, since they are a little pricey compared to flying but worth every dime. You can really see parts of the U.S. you won't see flying or even driving for that matter. Plus you meet a lot of diverse people and have time to yourself to relax and not feel rushed like every other day. I could go on forever but just my 2 cents

1 week ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

The wife and I are strongly considering taking the Spirit of New Orleans down to visit family, but to your point it would cost more than flying (to get the sleeper car at least) and it's like a 17 hour train ride. Idk if I can handle that long on a train x.x

1 week ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think it is a nice trip and you can hang out in the one train that has glass all over to look around. Or just sit in the room and look out the window. Meal’s are included with sleeper cars and you can get off when the train stops every now and then. I’d say try it once for the experience and fly back. Let me know what you do or questions just message me. 😁

1 week ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hell yeah... trains are better than planes in SOO many ways, and they are MUCH better for the environment!

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

They start a lot more wildfires too

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And yet are still better for the environment.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Given the amount of aviation related disasters the past year, I’d just go with a train. Sounds like significantly less stress all around.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Trains are still more likely to have a crash

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Still less stress via railway than everything involved with flying.

1 week ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also I just looked that up, wtf is going on with trains to have that many disasters

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They cross roads and drivers are crazy

1 week ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1