Senators in majority are already multi-millionaires.. ->virtue signaling<-

May 14, 2026 8:19 PM

DanForArkansas

Views

14587

Likes

303

Dislikes

9

Then it is meamingless and they are just stealing the money for not working.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is a vacation with pay assholes.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't worry, most of them will still have income rolling in from multiple sources that are not on the books. What should happen is they lose money every day the government is shut down and never get it back... it should be a large and painful sum, so that even their bribe monies are affected. This is the problem with "modern" politics... there are no personal consequences for anything these people do. Power without consequences is the reason we are experiencing this dumpster fire of a timeline.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Lets ensure only rich people can afford to hold these offices!"

2 months ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

STOP TRADING ON INSIDER INFORMATION - HOW ABOUT THAT?

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All assets of elected officials should be managed by a designated professional. They can still spend their money as they wish, but investments and business decisions are held in trust.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop complaining when they do the right thing? This is obviously not a problem they're all rich etc but if when they do the right thing you're still gonna be pissy about it why don't they just vote themselves a raise during government shutdowns?

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One more way to financially block poor people from participating in government, because a senator may have to go for months without pay. Wealthy Only Need Apply.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you look up nothing burger this is the definition

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Ah yes, let’s magnify the effect of donations (a.k.a. bribes) by not paying salaries.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

from tax payer or the assorted lobbyist ?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Big text: "we did a selfless thing!" Small text: "except actually we didn't."

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is all about attacking/manipulating the low-income senators. They want it to be a rich person's club only.

2 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

There's a list of the 20 or 30 most commonly demanded for actions from americans across the country. The govt shutdowns and politicians not getting paid was like number 3 on the list right after taxing the rich and executing trump.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate how Congress gets to decide their own payraise and rates..

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is an excellent way to attack people like AOC, who is trying to do the right thing. If you support this action, then you do not want AOC or others who are trying not to be bribed to be unable to stay in office. If you support this, then you want to be ruled by the wealthy and the corrupt. You want oligarchs to be unhindered in their desires. To support this is to deny Democracy.

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's only for the Senate

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

AOC was just an example of who could be hurt. Find your favorite Senator who actually needs his paycheck, and this will harm them. Or any future Senator who wants to run but doesn't have the wealth necessary to maintain multiple homes in some of the most expensive areas in the country.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I don't like the line of thought that basically goes "look what they get paid, when the rest of us are struggling." I get it, I really do, but there's a reason. If their pay is sufficient, there can be no excuse for corruption, ostensibly. You can treat it like a much harsher crime, which we should, and on some level, used to. That's what leads to performative bullshit like this. Don't be performative; just fix it.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure all of em can get by for a few weeks or months, however long a shutdown is. Dont government employees get backpay after a shutdown?

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Had to duck it. Federal workers do. Contractors do not get back pay.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Contractors' money is already guaranteed and not directly impacted by the shutdown. The money is "in a piggy bank", which they are given after providing the contracted good or service.
It is possible that, during the shutdown, the service may be paused (depending on the service). Others continue despite the shutdown.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah that makes sense. Thanks I didnt dive that deep

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Either way, "pay" is almost certainly separate from their expense accounts, so the whole thing doesn't mean shit.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No. You lose that pay. We get paid for work, unless it's a vacation, approved of course. Also, they should only make what the lowest wage in their state is. Incentive.

2 months ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 7

I always thought they should put their pay in escrow and provide what they need to do their job directly. House, food, transportation, clothes, etc... Then, when they leave office, a vote of their constituents is held and their approval rating amongst voters determines the percentage of their back pay they get. The rest goes to education.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I propose a bill to cap a US senators salary, based on the average income of their constituents.

See how well they listen then!

But again, they are rich and don’t give a damn about a $174,000/year salary. They make more than that in annual equity gains. Just virtue signaling.

2 months ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 2

Some of them aren't rich. Chris Murphy joined 12 years ago with like $80k of student loans from UConn law. I get he's the exception, not the norm, but I doubt he's beating his salary in equity gains.

2 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The latter just says you only want rich people to be able to afford to hold elected office.

For the former: I'd set elected officials wages as a fixed multiple of the minimum wage (different multiples for different positions). Require a supermajority to raise the multiplier, and just a majority to raise the minimum wage.

Or we could just automatically add an automatic Cost Of Living Adjustment to the minimum wage.

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You've got it backwards. If the job only pays the minimum the only people who can afford to do it are the already rich and those who are willing to pad their pockets with kickbacks.

2 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Most of them (not all) are going to do it no matter how much it pays.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They won't vote Aye to withhold their money. The Senate should not vote on how they get paid or the House. Wages earned should be left up to voters.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only ones who need the salary are the honest ones.

2 months ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 1

All three of them!

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wow we're gonna save so much money on salaries!

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

absolutely, I fucking hate that goddamn morgan freeman quote that gets posted here every few weeks... (if you, or anybody, don't know the one I'm speaking of and are curious, I can search my comment history and link it)

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm REALLY glad this is the top comment. So many people fall for this bullshit because they don't think.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0