It’s exhausting (by @stephanie.stalvey.artist)

Sep 16, 2026 9:02 PM

Apeofdeath

Views

28736

Likes

1311

Dislikes

33

https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/s/gE68VQVeOY
https://www.instagram.com/p/DdMLtpGkdnQ

ai

exhausting

What's even crazier is that they are pushing this supposedly "for profit technology," that hasn't made any profit yet. They are just burning hundreds of billions, if not trillions, at this point and they've made nothing off of it.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"There's nothing we can do?" "No democratic brakes?" "No repercussions?" The more I read the more annoyed I got as I kept responding "Guns" "Guns!" "FUCKING GUNS!" The sooner people realize we outnumber these assholes *by a lot* and that we have *angry boom boom sticks*, the better.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Every 4 years we politely ask politicians to pass laws to prevent the planet from boiling. The politicians say no. We wait 4 years. We try again. They say no.

70 years of this cycle later the planet is now about to boil. Some politicians are now saying maybe, sure. Some are still saying no and preventing even the maybe from being done. The polite asking continues.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Long story short rich people pay stupid poor people to imprison/kill other poor people who are smart enough to know this whole system is bullshit.

2 days ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

Luigi showed us our option

1 day ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, it should be pretty obvious by now that the rich and powerful don't care about consent. They aren't scared enough to consider how we care about something, and unfortunately, the people who might be willing to change that are too few in number against the opposition to make a difference. Most of humanity would rather just sit back and let it happen. That's "easier".

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wont even deal with AI unless its open source. Worked pretty good when gov ghosts created the interwebs and it should serve well now.

1 day ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nirvana Fallacy: The idea that a problem is so big and vast and hard that if something doesn't make a visible dent in it at least, it's not worth doing. Problems are rarely solved by single big things. It's almost always a whole bunch of little things that make gradual change until one day it's like a switch flipped. The problem is, of course, a matter of time...but still! No deed is pointless, don't get into that easy mindset!

1 day ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

We have to do more than "protect our hope and humanity". We have to actually stand against them. There are so, so many more of us than them. Even with state-sanctioned forces, they wouldn't stand a chance in hell if we actually unified as a species.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ai is the largest form of theft EVER!!! so far

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm literally dying of heart failure as a direct result of Maga,Trump, and the whole administration.

2 days ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Do you watch One Piece? You should watch One Piece. Start with the Drum Island arc, Tony Tony Chopper is such a wonderful character.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean, if you're gonna go anyway and there's nothing you can do to change that.......................................................

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I have blood and clots shooting out of different parts of my body... but I have to prioritize a sleep study cause my insurance costs are now super inflated to over 10x what they were. Can't even confirm if I am dying or not cause I can't afford all the checks right now. And before anyone comes in with "Go to the ER" unless I am ACTIVELY RAPIDLY DYING they don't care and will send me home with a fat fucking bill and nothing else. Fuck I hate this goddamn country.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 2013 film Oblivion was about an AI that had wiped out most of humanity so that it could drain the Earth of all it's water.

2 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The people ruining this world have names and addresses.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hate this message. Hope that something will change before it's too late. Nah. I gave up believing that there's a loving, all powerful god a long time ago, but it's even more wild to think that a bunch of homicidal, brainwashed, half-evolved apes with nuclear weapons are going to suddenly change course and pull an ex machina before everyone's dead.

I agree with the powerlessness part, but we aren't united, not nearly enough, and we simply will not be before it's too late.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The purpose of AI is to allow the wealthy access to the fruits of talent, without letting the talented access to the benefits of wealth.

2 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Okay and now the next step is to realize this is a concentration of power rather than a completely new invention. All these things were already happening. Each and everything described is a thing capitalists were hiring people to do before they outsourced it to machines.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If we don't take action now, we'll settle for nothing later. If we settle for nothing now we'll settle for nothing later.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm going to throw out that being flippant about the end of the world, even to the point of desiring it, is a religious ideal we've dealt with for a long time now. Apparently everything is better in an afterlife that we aren't even sure exists if and only if you believe in religions that say it is because reasons.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*copyrighted

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's called "Capitalism," the entire system leads to the extinction of humanity and you get no say in it. If you don't like it, abolish capitalism and replace it with a direct democracy where everyone has an equitable say in the means of production

2 days ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 10

It’s called neo-liberalism and libertarianism as a byproduct. Capitalism isn’t what we have, hasn’t ever been. Much in the same way people claim communism hasn’t been truly tried, neither has capitalism. In actuality, a capitalist-socialist mix, leaning heavily on socialism, is likely to be the best path moving forward as it is all the freedoms and individualism of capitalism and all the protections and public good of socialism where one benefits the other by providing the needs of the other.

2 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Capitalism allows for concentrations of wealth, and concentrations of wealth can be used to buy political influence, and political influence can be used to eliminate competition and change law to allow for further concentration of wealth. Its a vicious cycle. Concentration of wealth has to be destroyed, and individual choice to amass dragon hoards suppressed. No one has a right to a billion dollars under any circumstances.

2 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

While correct, the same is said of basically every single economic theory to date. Even communism still relies on centralised control of wealth and resources for distribution even under Marx’s poorly defined explanations of what he meant- he still advocated for central authorities, especially during the transitional stages. The major factor here is state control vs individual/corporate control, and a combined socialist/capitalist idea has already seen SOME success in some nations already.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We have democracies, we could make them direct if we wanted to. You have to have a little more than that.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

yea? how do you make the US a direct democracy. outline the process. I'll wait (because I actually know how the process would have to work )

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

How would the process have to work?

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you're just trolling?

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I FEEL THIS SO MICH YOU'RE NOT ALONE.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fact that there "isn't anything we can do about it" is pretty much all the proof you need that the "it's so powerful it could destroy us all" thing is a lie. If it was, we wouldn't be debating it on the news, we'd be watching the Marines go in, the companies would be nationalized, whether or not a law authorized it. And other countries (especially China) would be moving to destroy ours.

States, especially superpowers, do not idly ignore existential threats to themselves.

2 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Don't disagree with the rest of your argument but boy are you putting a lot of faith in human rationality with that "nation states would totally do something" bit. Corporations and governments are run by the same deeply irrational, often stupid, and sometimes outright crazy hairless apes. Nuclear weapons and climate change are existential threats too, and many of the same things said about AI in the comic could be said about those. Yet governments love nukes and value GDP over the environment.

1 day ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We aren't living in an age of marines going in and companies being nationalized, we're living in the age of nations being corporatized, and the people running the corporations indirectly (... and not always even all that indirectly...) giving marching orders to the people who give orders to the marines.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Consider also the timing: OpenAI deliberately turned off every safeguard for an "experiment", waited until someone else caught on, spent a few weeks doing a big show of "oh damn they got loose". Then their CEO pens an open letter calling for various things that would make it extremely hard for new companies to compete, and within hours the CEOs of every other big US AI firm have put out statements agreeing with it. That shit was coordinated.

2 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The goals are multiple but aligned. Increased "regulation" punishes new entrants far more than any established player. So does hard-wall cutting off chip sales to China.

I think they're also going to push for a government buyout of AI firms, under the logic that it's too dangerous to remain in private hands but the people who invested in it deserve their money back. And thus the taxpayer ends up on the hook when the bubble bursts.

2 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

they do it because the only real power is force. You can either whine about things, stay quiet and enjoy what you can or you can use force.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perfectly said!

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 days ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 3

*caste

2 days ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

What the fuck does the Macklemore / Sheeran tour have to do with Ai?

Robert Kraft (the billionaire referenced in the video) is not involved in Ai at all. He is the founder of International Forest Products and the owner of the New England Patriots.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Because it's an example of what's happening with lots of billionaires. AI ones the most prominently right now but not exclusively.

1 day ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

It's the same principle, powerful unelected individuals and organizations dictating what you will be seeing and hearing or not.

1 day ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Some resistance ... https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=to+control+AI&ia=web

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not resistance, that's falling for the con. They might as well pass laws against time travel for all that it's possible.

No resistance would be passing laws punishing spreading misinformation, fake nudes, and CSAM. Or ones punishing them for the environmental damage they do.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box."

- Fredrick Douglass -

2 days ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 2

Ballot box? Tampered with. Jury box? Owned by the tamperers. Cartridge box? In the hands of those employed by the tamperers.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary - Karl Marx

1 day ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Growing up, I was always told (by my far-right wing parents) that it was: "Four boxes of democracy: Soap, Ballot, Jury, Ammo. Use in that order."

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Interests? Voted against. Juries? Paid off. Cartridge box? In the hands of those who wouldn't use it.

2 days ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

Get your own cartridge box then since you can't afford the other two.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

*in the hands of those who wish to use it against us, and nothing else.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Part of the implications, yes.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That last one is only true because you have chosen not to pick it up.

Pick it up and make up your mind to use it. Do your best to convince others to do the same, just like this post here is doing. Enough individuals with cartridge boxes can affect change when the other guardrails have collapsed.

2 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

have you picked one up? just curious. seems weird to tell other people to do things you're not doing yourself (based on your name, i'd accept picking up a sword, which gets you +1 for style but -1 for efficacy)

i'd also argue this comic is NOT encouraging violence. it explicitly says we have to preserve our humanity. this is probably more of an ethical debate than we have space for, but mass killings, regardless of reason, do not seem like a good way to protect what's best about humanity

1 day ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Yes, and have been training others for several years. It's a question of getting more support outside of the local area. I'm sorry, but any more detailed information would compromise security.

As for your second point, that is a fair ethical argument, but my counterpoint is literally all of history. If you want to throw off fascism, you'd better be prepared to fight back against it. You might not win, but you are CERTAIN to not win unless force is a weapon in your arsenal.

1 day ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

we may disagree, but you have my respect for walking the walk. that said, from an opsec standpoint, I give you the friendly suggestion of deleting this post unless you have ALWAYS connected to both your imgur account and its associated email with decent security...at the minimum, tor network or a vpn based in a non-five eyes country (i usually recommend tails for most people. feel free to dm me if you have questions). even if you do, i would say discussing it at all is an unnecessary opsec risk

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's easy to say that when you're not the one doing it. When you're not the one who WILL be caught and convicted, then sentenced to life in prison where you'll be raped and tortured repeatedly until you die.

1 day ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

...said the Vichy Frenchman to Jean Moulin.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They are very different circumstances and people.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

That's still where they are, just waiting patiently for a critical mass of Americans to pull their heads out and realize the U.S. is being stripped for parts.

2 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Only going to get one shot at rising up. Cant piss it away by being impatient.

1 day ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No need to be impatient, but if Trump actually starts the civil war he's been trying to start, he's going to get his ass handed to him.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yup. Patience is a virtue.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

A couple of guillotines can fix literally all of this. We just have to do it. My French blood SCREAMS for revolution.

2 days ago | Likes 295 Dislikes 8

Lead the way.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

As a voluntarily childless person who has lost all hope for humanity, I'm available for some stuff.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Guillotines certainly send a message but the logistics of acquiring those who would be guillotined would be an absolute nightmare.
If any book, film, game and true crime story had a point to make, it's always "short, sweet, direct and to the point."

1 day ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok, wood chippers instead.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to strap some explosives to some drones and just fly it into their next stupid Techno fascists for the extinction of humanity conference.

2 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This is what I was thinking. Basically, good people don't kill bad people and thats a problem.

2 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yup, it start by shooting the cops that prevent you from killing billionaire, cops are there to prevent you from doing what must be done, so unless we have more ar ed people than cops have its not gone happen, but show up with 300k ppl with rifle, cops cant do shit

2 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cops are gang control. Leftover Crack sang about it 25 years ago.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I loved leftover crack. I saw them play in a YMCA rec room in seattle in 2001

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yeah!

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what cruise missiles are for, stop kidding yourself if that wouldn't be an easy target. Maybe a couple thermobarics to seal the deal. The military isn't going to join the revolution.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends when you know you will kill your family if you press the button, you might think twice, the military was not create to fight its own people

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm sure Hegseth and his handpicke zoo of brass monsters have identified the diehard loyalists who would carry out their missions by now. It must be their top priority.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have the feathers if anyone else can source some tar.

2 days ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

No tar, but I'm Irish.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Steal a few DOT asphalt trucks. Good enough for a modern equivalent

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just hope that it doesn't end up like the French revolution.

2 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

It won’t. The French Revolution was a thing people actually had the balls to do.

2 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Sure, and all it did was replace the former oppressors with new ones that were even worse with summary executions for anyone who dared to object. In the end, after the reign of terror and policies that lead to widespread starvation, France became a monarchy once again.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The French Revolution helped shape the modern world by dismantling absolute monarchy and feudalism at its core and establishing universal rights and the spread of a further democratic idealism in society. It made huge changes and helped many. You are an idiot.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Go do it then. Stop talking about it online in a stupid forum like Imgur and go bag you one

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Where did you get this French blood from?

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As much as I normally hate to advocate for direct violence... we saw in the wake of the United Health CEO being assassinated that it LITERALLY saved lives. Thousands of people who would have been denied because the company doesn't care about them had their perfectly reasonable claims approved, because the wealthy were scared enough to make concessions in the name of personal safety.

Just a few heads, to demonstrate a pattern, and the rest will fall in line.

2 days ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

No functional human being wants to do violence on another. That's not the choice here. The violence is already being done and its global. What were talking about is self defence and to do anything less would be utter cowardice.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah, but sometimes you have to pull a weed out by the root to prevent it growing back.

2 days ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Regulation and law were the compromises we made for direct violence, however, the sociopaths who'd like to be called 'elites' seem to have forgotten this agreement, and have eroded the regulations and laws to their benefit, so they no longer serve there intended purpose, leaving only direct violence as a method of correcting their abhorrent behaviour.

It is an inevitable consequence of their breaking of the social construct. You can't feel bad for them when they left no other option.

1 day ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

*contract, ducking autocucumber..

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is like the Union question. Managers want to do away with unions because that lets the workers get pay raises. But the owner forgets that unions and contract negotiations are the Middle ground, where the factory owners are not dragged from their house and beaten to death in front of their family

21 hours ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, I do support Unions and recommend everyone be in one, you will only benefit from it unless you are the 1% and brother, if you're not in it already, they will not let you join their club, that's just marketing so you lick the boot that's on your neck..

21 hours ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, I don't feel bad for them. I just don't like actively ADVOCATING for violence. I'd prefer a peaceful solution where nobody has to die.

But when the alternative to trading their life for the masses is them just paying their taxes at the same rate as the rest of us, and they said no, I suddenly become far less uncomfortable with the idea.

1 day ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I think direct violence entered the Overton Window when the January 6th coup participants were given pardons.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ehhh, history says otherwise. Not only were the French revolutions utter failures, they didn’t actually do much damage to the nobles they intended to overthrow, and wound up slaughtering WAY more peasants than they ever did nobility only to then turn around and re-install the monarchy anyway. The French really aren’t the example people should be following.

What people should REALLY want is something more like the Glorious Revolution or Carnation Revolution, which actually succeeded.

2 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Shut up, doomer

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

The French Revolution helped shape the modern world by dismantling absolute monarchy and feudalism at its core and establishing universal rights and the spread of a further democratic idealism in society. It made huge changes and helped many. Yes more peasants died than nobles but thats because there are a lot more peasants. Thats just basic statistics.

1 day ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Except it didn’t. The French revolutions reinforced monarchy in Europe, doubled down on slavery, and collapsed attempts at democracy for years after. It wasn’t until Napoleon collapsed under FOREIGN intervention that France truly actually won democratic freedom from the nobles and monarchies of Europe, and even then it wasn’t even the French that did it, but Britain of all people, who maintained their monarchy until way later.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

And the French Rev lead to a Reign of Terror that lead to Napoleon. Violent “solutions” can very easily get out of hand and go astray.

2 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Violent action is the pressure that makes peaceful solutions possible and prefered

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Edmund Burke, in response to the FR, said, “When the subject of demolition is not brick & timber, but sentient beings, multitudes may be rendered miserable. Circumspection & caution are part of wisdom.” Our Rev didn’t seek mass executions, after all.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Comparing the French Rev to the American Rev with respect to what we did with the antagonists’ leaders, I am.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And after the dust settled are they better off now or before? Then there is no question what must be done.

1 day ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That they ultimately ended up better off (and I don't know that the average person did end up better off until much more recently) was by no means an inevitable consequence of the extreme levels of violence displayed in their series of revolutions.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I think sometimes things are so bad that you just need to tear it all down and let the chips land where they may.

Napoleon was on paper the antithesis of what the revolution was trying to achieve, but he actually ended up accomplishing alot of the things the revolutionary government's had failed at.

And in the aftermath his reign had shaken up the old order to such an extent that complete regression was impossible.

1 day ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1