Just kidding .....

Jun 4, 2026 1:37 PM

Xalten2

Views

26789

Likes

986

Dislikes

26

economics

funny

joke

I knew it wasn't RayGun Zapp.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

In Aug 1980, during the campaign, Reagan gave a “states rights” speech at Nashoba County Mississippi (just up the road from where the KKK murdered civil rights activists). Separately, he made up a story about a “welfare queen” from Chicago who drove a Cadillac. Reagan used race baiting to turn people against each other for a political purpose. Nixon had a Southern Strategy. Republicans do not care at all about poor white people. They just use them, over and over and over.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

3 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

still waiting for something to trickle down that doesn't smell like an ostomy bag.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3 months ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 1

I particularly like the Oops! All Reagan! image that I can't find right now, whenever a question of "when did X horrible thing in the US truly kick off?" but that Boondocks image is great.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I miss Clinton and the concept of a balanced budget

https://www.us-debt-clock.com/data/deficit-by-year

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I mean... if the country stops alternating between the brakes and the gas pedals....

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Eh, Magats don't care about Reagan. And honestly, I wish they did.

A former KGB, USSR fanboi attacking a pro-west democracy? Fighting that wasn't "in" Reagan's wheelhouse - 𝙞𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙚 𝙙𝙖𝙢𝙣 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙚𝙡. If the ideologies of Reagan were still in charge, Ukraine would be begging the US to 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙥 sending them weapons and ammo because they'd be running out of room.

3 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

The older ones fucking love Reagan.

They even voted for a guy who stole his campaign slogan.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thanks, Obama.

3 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If you think Reagan sucked, wait till you hear about his wife!

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

ba dum tss

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Reagan unleashed the corporations on us

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, hitting the rebound side of the biggest recession in 50+ years helps those numbers a lot.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm fucking sick of hearing who increased the value of the stock market. That doesn't mean shit to me.

3 months ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 4

*cry’s in Pam Bondi*

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm just gonna tell you, as a practical matter, unless you're living paycheck to paycheck, you should invest your savings in safe stocks, s&p or bank stocks or something. If you want to save money over long term, this is the best way. If you just save cash in a savings account, every year, inflation will reduce the buying power of that cash, which means your savings are constantly decreasing, even if the dollar amount stays the same.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

AI and oil related stocks are responsible. If you remove AI stocks, the market would not look so hot. Also oil stocks be abuse of Iran war.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't mean shit to 99% of them either.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a Communist, so I understand where you're coming from.

But the racist pedophile misogynistic bigots that keep voting Republican say that the main reason they support Reps is the economy.

Reps are ALWAYS worse for the economy.

If any of them ACTUALLY do care about the economy, showing them hard figures can put a crack in the brain washing.

Most don't, and it's actually because they are racist pedophile misogynistic bigots. Which we can prove by showing how they suck at the economy.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I hear you, but to me, the sense of the economy isn't the stock market that can only directly influence a small portion of the people.

To me, it's at least two factors: The number of jobs increasing, and the pay of those jobs. Not necessarily the minimum wage, but the average wage.

I am not an economist but I feel I understand that raising minimum wages will affect the prices of everything else, but I feel that people should be able to work one 40-hour job to have all finances and benefits.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Europe proved that paying a loving wage doesn't affect prices by any significant amount.

They raised prices during COVID FAR more than they said would be necessary to pay a living wage, while their expenses went down, they cut services, and pocketed record profits.

It's all bullshit, and the only answer is to kill anyone that refuses to restrain their own greed.

3 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But have you thought about the shareholders ?

3 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

nonstop, I picked up some fava beans and chianti.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have recipes, so, so, many recipes.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Especially when .most of those who control it are frauds. Musk had 17 investigations into his stock market fraud and manipulation and used DOGE to remove those people and most of the agencies like USAID. Even nasa was investigating SpaceX

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The people who are the target of this meme care, or at least they constantly talk about it as if they care.

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

They can't read

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So you read it and repeat it at thanksgiving dinner for them ;P

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Reaganomics- ended New Deal shared prosperity- 43 years flat income growth after his election in 1980 created US oligarchy, Plutocracy https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policycast/oligarchy-open-what-happens-nowutocracy">https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policycas">-us-for">utocracy">https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policycast/oligarchy-open-what-happens-now-us-forced-confront-its-plutocracy /gallery/us-has-ruling-class-americans-must-stand-up-to-bernie-sanders-guardian-X9Lmvut https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/age-kleptocracy-cooley-nexon

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Btw, happy anniversary of Reagan's death!

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reagan did decide to tax Social Security however. We have him to thank for that

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ronald(s) Wilson(6) Reagan(6)

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait till you hear how many kids Obama fucked!

3 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

release the files, everyone over 0 can grab a blue horizon rocket to mars

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

At this point I am a single issue voter and that issue is capitalism. I do not care if the president made more or less money for the stock market, I want the stock market abolished.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Cool, you can counteract some of us who are single issue voters on the opposite side (supporting free market well-regulated capitalism, which is NOT what Trump and MAGA are all about by any stretch of anyone's imagination).

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be clear, I do not want capitalism in any form to exist.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yep, thats why I said we counteract each other, because I am very pro-capitalism (as long as it's regulated and not an oligarchy).

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Regulation can not stop the inherent issues with capitalism, we have to get rid of it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Reagan was the beginning of the end. I hope he spends eternity being a bottom.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, Obama just benefited from a market that would have done that for any president who was in office at the time….

Wait, why are you googling the past 10 administrations? Stop that!

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Reagan did create thousands of jobs. Jobs that were vacant after he illegally fired striking airline workers.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hope Jimmy Carter is enjoying whatever afterlife he believed in, content knowing Reagan and his ilk are boiling in a lake of molten shit for eternity.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay guys come on, we need to stop tearing into Reagan. I mean he did some good things. Like in 2004 he died.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As a European I miss Obama. No big news and a few memes. Nice and calm.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but like, quantitive easing also happened under Obama, and that’s probably the single worse thing to ever happen to the USA, so you know, you win a little you lose a lot.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty much everything negative in america can be contributed to reagan

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good for Obama... i am very curious to know what he did to reduce the deficit that much! thats amazing!

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ronald Reagan contacted the Iranians before the 1980 election and told them not to release the hostages before the election, extending their internment by months.

This needs to be mentioned every time that traitorous piece of shit is mentioned....

Also:

3 months ago | Likes 318 Dislikes 2

And he ended the Fairness Doctrine which allowed Fox News (which isn't news) to become the evil that it is.

3 months ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

The known 6 degrees of Reagan.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm from a small farm town in the midwest. One of the staff at my elementary school had a son among the hostages. I have no idea who, I just remember the all the teachers and staff going nuts one day, then we had a big ass parade in town.

Oh shit, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis has their names and home towns, and there's a last name I recognize. Yeah, he's from my hometown. Wild. I kind of thought I imagined it. I would've been 5.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, he cheated and won? Must have been the Dem's fault for not nominating a diverse woman for president.

3 months ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I'm old enough to remember Reaganomics and all the twinkle down BS.

3 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"But if we just Reaganomics a little harder, we'll get everything back to how it was before Reaganomics!" -Republicans

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, no part of me believes that Republicans want to go back to a New Deal America where a sole provider can pay a mortgage, go on a vacation to Disney World and send a couple of kids to college... they want, well.... this.... A society where a miniscule few have all of the wealth while the bottom 95% wonders how to pay their rent and feed themselves.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're entirely correct about the Republican party. I was thinking more along the lines of republican voters. They absolutely do what those things (save the tax rates) they just have absolutely no fucking clue how we lost them.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, Republican politicians know what they want. Money and power.

Republican voters are simps who like being lied to and will change their positions to fit whatever the lie du jour of the day is... so, now they are pro-child rape (pretty obvious given who keeps getting arrested for CSAM), pro-war, pro high-gas prices, pro inflation, pro swamp, pro corruption and pro destroying the working class.

My ability to feel sympathy for the rural poor is falling off a cliff

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much. Though I think you're giving their voters more credit than they're due by implying they're even aware of half that stuff. The GOP pitch to their base is pretty much "Guns, White Jesus, and tax cuts you never actually get".

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the Challenger explosion because addled Reagan had a speech that night, and it didn't matter how cold it was.

3 months ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 4

EXPLAIN....

3 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

There is no evidence that he rushed the launch to coincide with the State of the Union speech.

3 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

"He" had dementia. He didn't "rush" it. It went off on schedule. The speech was already written.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are plenty of reasons to hate the Reagan adminstration without engaging in this conspiratorial nonsense.

3 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 45

...Which part of the /confirmed by the Iranian president, declassified CIA memos, campaign staffers for Reagan, and a dude who was on the trip to the middle east alongside the negotiator of the deal/ idea that Reagan cut a deal do you think is a conspiracy theory out of curiosity? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_October_Surprise_theory#

3 months ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

“Confirmed by the Iranian president” No, a decade later a guy in exile said he’d heard his enemies had since it. No direct evidence.

“declassified CIA memo” Also no, there’s a incredibly suspect indirect thing that says there’s a memo. No actual memo.

All the “evidence” is like this. Indirect, circumstantial, rumors. All from people who weren’t involved. All telling completely different versions of the same thing. All starting with a Daily Stormer-level untrustworthy source in 1980.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am guessing you don't believe Nixon contacted the president of South Vietnam and told him not to make peace with the North before the 1968 election, either?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/us/politics/nixon-tried-to-spoil-johnsons-vietnam-peace-talks-in-68-notes-show.html

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Conspiratorial nonsense? The man spent 8 years warping the strongest economy in the world into blatant neofudalism, enriching the elites by gutting social safety nets, public education, labor laws, the guardrails that kept capitalism in check, and so much more. That kind of thing doesn't just happen in a vacuum. That's what historians calls a "turning point." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M245PqlV328

3 months ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

That's what we call "moving the goalposts".

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Please explain how? Hmm?

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did the Iranians cut the social safety nets? Did Ronny go to Teheran, scheme with the Ayatollah on how they would demolish the guardrails that kept capitalism in check?

I can see you are a good little fanatic, but do try to keep up.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’re getting downvoted but you’re right.

Reagan should rot in Hell, but this thing is an allegation, not a fact.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 26

It is an allegation supported by the evidence way beyond a reasonable doubt. Too many Nixon personnel have testified to their role in the treason.

And the hostages spent another 80 days in captivity because of it, and the one person who absolutely did not give a shit about them was that senile racist fuck, Ronald Reagan.

He is a bottom-tier president who would have gone down as the most destructive president until his heir, trump, put a stake thru the heart of the nation.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Nevertheless, several individuals—most notably, former Iranian President Abulhassan Banisadr, former Lieutenant Governor of Texas Ben Barnes, former naval intelligence officer and U.S. National Security Council member Gary Sick, and Barbara Honegger, a former campaign staffer and White House analyst for both Reagan and his successor George H. W. Bush—have stood by the allegation."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_October_Surprise_theory

3 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yeah, so nobody breathed a word of this for decades? And you believe that Republican John Connally took his political enemy Ben Barnes on an illegal & potentially career destroying five nation tour to enact this conspiracy? And that Barnes never mentioned it, not even during Iran-Contra? And that Congress and an independent counsel investigation just missed finding any further proof?

The problem with just worrying Wikipedia summaries is that you miss all the actual info.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*reading Wikipedia summaries

Ducking auto connect

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody breathed about it for... decades? Robert Dreyfus first published the story in December of 1980 (then a followup in 1983) but he didn't name any of his sources, so it wasn't until after Reagan was out of office that those individuals started to publish their allegations themselves.

Barbara published her tell-all in 1989. Iranian President Abulhassan Banisad and Gary Sick separately published their own books in 1991.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The truth hurts just like Reagan policies of trickle into your shoes

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The truth is that none of these ppl spoke up about this for decades, through the Iran Contra investigations, an independent counsel, and every journalist who wanted to look into that rat fuck Reagan and his whole sickening career.

Then suddenly Democrat Ben Barnes says Republican John Connally decided to take him, a political rival, along on an extremely illegal and immoral errand while he talked to top officials in five separate countries. And nobody in any of them said anything about it.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(cont’d) I also don’t know why the fuck you’re talking to me like I’m some kind of Reagan fan when I literally said I thought he should rot in Hell.

Please, I’m begging you, spend some more time researching this kind of shit & less time barely looking at comments before you insult people.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reagan was a puppet, actor and spokesman. Others held the strings. Those people are still at it.

3 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Those people are all dead. Reagan's term ended almost 40 years ago.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Rupert Murdoch is still alive. He's not the only one. Turns out being megarich is great for longevity

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Rupert Murdoch is 95 and not doing much of anything anymore. He resigned as Executive Chairman of Fox News and NewsCorp 3 years ago. Lachlan Murdoch is in charge now.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm well aware, but you said none of them are still alive. Demonstrably untrue, and he has steeped his sons in his avarice and hate for so long that I see no difference between their function in the business, if anything Lachlan is worse.

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rupert Murdoch is alive, yes, but he is not pulling any strings anymore.
You can argue that the Murdoch Family is "pulling strings", but Rupert Murdoch, not so much.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2