Volimar
48241
20
0
When adequate shelter space exists, individuals have a choice about whether or not to sleep in public. However, when adequate shelter space does not exist, there is no meaningful distinction between the status of being homeless and the conduct of sleeping in public. Sleeping is a life-sustaining activity — i.e., it must occur at some time in some place. If a person literally has nowhere else to go, then enforcement of the anti-camping ordinance against that person criminalizes her for being homeless. - DOJ
More at http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/08/13/its-unconstitutional-to-ban-the-homeless-from-sleeping-outside-the-federal-government-says/
Or the statement of interest itself: http://www.justice.gov/opa/file/643766/download
mailinator
What kills me about the DOJ filing is that it's fucking 2015, and they JUST NOW filed a brief for a case from *2009* in Boise, ID.
cheeseburgerheaven
That's the DOJ's argument, not what SCOTUS had previously ruled. They have to overturn Clark to make it unconstitutional.
Jimbowski
When you're stepping over a homeless guy on the sidewalk...does it ever occur to you to think "Wow - maybe our system doesn't work?!" -Hicks