spittleteets
104545
604
6
"Wah, wah, wah" is the only appropriate response.
Please dont yell at me for pixel poverty, I didnt steal them, it how I found em!
Source: https://youtu.be/CTsuV_176qE (AOC's YouTube)
BlairT1
She should lead our nation.
GravyEducation
theinternetkeepsmealive
"Stop playing the game by OUR rules. We don't like it "
Clockworkdancerobot
Republicans are just upset someone is fighting back stronger than a 12 year old girl against their usual republican attacker.
JackHL01
Have you seen a 12yo girl fight? I have, two of them fighting three BIGGER boys.
The boys didn't hold back...
But damn, the two furies kicked their asses, broke one nose, several lacerations and lot, LOTS of bruises.
Wasn't a fair fight. The girls were victimized by the boys for quite some time, got fed up and got some tricks off of the internet. They were suspended for 3 weeks from school. I brought them their worksheets every day and saw them heal in more than one way. It was glorious.
Orionsdick
They don't like it when you resist.
philmoregraves
If wife her sooooo hard and I dont even wanna get married
SecretAgentSuperBooger
Reminds me of one of AOCs all-time best savagings:
nevernotsure
https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPWE1NzM3M2U1cDZmaDh3aTl4OG5wb2JxNzV4dTNoNHZ5dHFoMHZjMmYxazBseXJydyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/RlO3bvMJyz3L4vGKsx/200w.webp
SgtDefaultGN
Lol that’s terrific
notsurewhattocallthis
And Democrats are putting it to their co stituents to vote on if they want it or not. Republiccans are ramming it right up their constituents asses.
worm61
Important to note that it was Democratic *voters* in Virginia who stood up and fought, not elected officials. With very few exceptions (including AOC), elected Democrats are still all to happy to roll over and present their holes for Republicans to use as they wish.
SubsyServy
Never make any deal with a republican, they never keep their word.
PorkFriedSquirrel
BuT Sh3 w@S 0n|y A BaRTeNd3r
FlippedOut
One of Australia's current best politicians was a football player.
PorkFriedSquirrel
One of Australia's best football players is an Eagle
KarenFromTheHOA
Good. That seems like a useful background. Meet lots of people. See what they're like when their tongues are loose. Learn how to manage people when their self control is weak. Learn to recognize when someone might need help in a situation that went bad.
KarenFromTheHOA
Oh shit! That's their problem with her!
mabbo
I think we need to go back and check that bar for any more brilliant political leaders.
19marcurious57
She deserves better footage! Dammit.
ugopb4me
Rapist really hate when victims fight back.
fistfulofsteel
This video is from like 4 days ago. Why does it already only have 3 pixels?
spittleteets
Ask AOC's PR team? They posted it yesterday and where I sourced it.
Purrmageddon
We will see if they keep fighting. I don't have high hopes.
DontNeedAWeatherManToKnowWhichWayTheWindBlows
She's awesome. I'm old, but I hope I get to see the day her, or someone like her, becomes POTUS.
19marcurious57
I'd vote for her, if I was you...
bripi
That's my home state, Virginia, making me proud! Hell yes we used their own rules against them, so the GOP can pound sand.
cmdshift3
Would an AOC/Buttigieg ticket move us in the right direction? I mean, it would be much better than what we have, but starving is better than eating shit, so…
worm61
She can do way better for VP than Buttigieg’s pasty milquetoast ass. That said, I don’t believe she has any intention of running for the White House in the foreseeable future. And it might be good for her to move to the Senate first anyway.
spittleteets
As much as I would vote the shit out of that ticket. A younger progressive female president and gay vice-president is not going to play nationally. If Talarico wins Texas his rise could be meteoric.
mothmam
Fuck, can she just be the president already?
Hovencl00f
Democratic politicians! STOP TAKING AIPAC money and stop funding Zionists.
mindstorm8191
"But how will we ever win any elections without funding?!?"
TeddyMoment
AOC has accepted $0 from AIPAC. In 2018 AIPAC offered her campaign $100K to "start a conversation" and she refused.
todayok
It'd be cool if Dems stopped and absolutely Israel is an asshole but the move in 2024 lead by Palestinian-Americans to boycott voting, because as they said, Kamala Harris and Trump were exactly the same, contributed directly to Trump actually getting elected. It didn't affect even 1 Republican voter and was a huge self-own.
Those same boycotting Palestinian-Americans sure are quiet these days as Trump launched his American-paid Israeli war. But sure, Harris is exactly the same as Trump.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
The day Democrats stop forcing voters to be complicit in Israeli crimes against humanity is the day Democrats always win.
shehdbeuebw738373
No one fucking cares. This isn't a moral statement, but one of truth. People who vote don't care. People who don't vote and think their potential 5% bump should dictate 100 of Dem policy care.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
You guys really always take "Democrats need to stop funding genocide" really personally... No one said anything about people who don't vote. Just that Democrats need to stop funding genocide, and doing so, will make them more popular.
shehdbeuebw738373
I agree, don't get me wrong, it's just the armchair quarterbacking and pronouncements that being ultra leftist is the secret sauce to winning in a 70/30 landslide.
It's just not true. Y'all sound the same as people who claim Democrats would win in a landslide if they "dropped" LGBT. Just baseless claims that your opinions are secretly beloved.
It sucks that genocide and healthcare as a right fall into the same shitty system as American Idol, but it does.
todayok
Dude, if you refuesed to vote when faced with:
Trump: pedophile, rapist, fraudster, antivaxxer,...
Harris: none of those things. Well, get serious, you weren't going to vote no matter what and you just need something or someone to blame for your laziness.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
Literally no one mentioned non-voters. Just that Dems should stop supporting genocidal states, and that'd probably help their chances in elections. The double standards both sides throw on non-voters is a hypocritical "Not voting is a vote for Trump!" yells the democrats, "Not voting is a vote for Harris!" yells the republicans. So, apparently non-voters vote for everyone.
todayok
Bullshit. Republicans vote. Always. Dems? Meh, sometimes.
Not voting literally was a vote for Trump. Idiot Palestinian-Americans calling for a boycott didn't dissuade even one Republican but they sure did give sort-a-lazy Dems and Dem-leaning folks a great excuse to sit on the sofa election night.
And then there's the straight up lazy Dems who want Dem things but just just couldn't mail a ballot or visit a poll station in the most accessible election in US history.
YeOlRazzleDazzle
Republicans literally say the same thing. "Not voting literally was a vote for Harris." -- This isn't proving anything other than reinforcing the double standard. Every side hates non-voters, and non-voters don't care. Because every side hates them.
spittleteets
If "didn't vote" was a candidate they would have won 2024 by a landslide, the fact is both are right as both parties leave a lot on the table by not taping into the non-voter demographic, and both understand that fear is a strong motivator. However, the GOP has more to gain by supressing voters as they have fewer registered voters and control smaller population states.
sitenickname
One of the most telling facts is that the states where "did not vote" dominated – with perhaps the exception of Arizona – were already pretty much decided because the Electoral College determines who wins the state so it is perhaps the biggest vote suppressor of all.