Cardenjs
193
65
24
True Liberals, this is who we chose to fight the establishment and status quo. Remembering this, we need to follow his example
We must not be lead by the example of those who we have vilified in the past who have obstructed and must look to a better future by working together, and not against each other, both for the betterment of ALL Americans.
pvtwestbrook86
ALL candidates, despite what they say, will NOT address climate change until renewable energy can sustain big industry and the war machine.
ReallyCreativeUsernameThatIsntTaken
Rah.
arcgap
HOW DARE HE SAY HE WILL WORK FOR THE COMMON GOOD!
username000176
Fight the establishment by increasing the size and scope of it
LegendOfQuailMan
Trump has been in the public eye for 30 years. Only after opposing the Democratic party was he called racist and sexist.
ImmoralWombat
Actually, there were so, so, so many allegations and reports during his run on the Apprentice.
OptimisticMisanthrope
He's been accused of racism dating back to at least the 70's but nobody really cared until he ran for president.
SamoniusNightbringer
Hell he even dated a black woman in the 80's
666centsally
pebbled
Nah, I started calling him shit when he was running the beauty pageants
[deleted]
[deleted]
kidtutty
Republicans: Border security=kick'em all out!, policing=arresting/killing non-whites, questioning EPA="what's science? Now capitalism...."
Cardenjs
Deportation Squads =/= Border Security, Stop-and-Frisk =/= Arresting Thugs, Elimination of Environmental Protections =/= Questioning EPA
666centsally
≠
kidtutty
It works both ways
FreelanceSpermDonor
It can, depending on your stance. Both sides ignore facts that don't support their viewpoint.
TheUpdootist
Okay, I'll bite. What facts does the EPA ignore that do not support it's "viewpoint"?
FreelanceSpermDonor
The discussion was Democrat vs Republican. Those are the "sides".
wingnut98
Translation: If Trump suddenly becomes a liberal progressive in his policies we'll back him.
TheUpdootist
It's called compromise. Completely changing stance isn't necessary.
wingnut98
On both sides in Washington the term compromise now means complete capitulation to the other parties platform or idea.
TheUpdootist
And if you look at how it got that way the Republicans are more to blame. The amount of obstructionism during Obama's term has been 1
TheUpdootist
Staggering. The only thing that has come out of being the party of no is that everything worked. Saying no to almost everything literally 2
TheUpdootist
Handed them the government. So obviously Democrats would follow suit. Not saying it's right, but politically it would be stupid for the 3