In light of the current election I have created this petition

Oct 20, 2016 3:19 AM

ax0l0tl

Views

101

Likes

127

Dislikes

27

In light of the recent events I feel the need to repost this

The Popular vote went to Clinton but she did not win.
You don't even need to be a citizen to sign this, you just need to have an email address.

edit: this link might work better https://wh.gov/iMfRt

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/…/two-party-system-does-no…
I just made a petition to congress addressing the problem with the current voting system. I know that this might not work but if it gets enough signatures someone in the government is at least obligated to read it and will be aware that this is an issue that people care about. If you have ever been frustrated that your first choice for president did not make it to the final two or have wanted to vote 3rd party but were afraid that it would be throwing your vote away please sign!
This is the full text of my proposal. The petition website cut it off after the first paragraph due to a character limit:
There are three main issues with the current system of electing the president:
First past the post
Primaries
Electoral College
Our current first past the post voting system only allows citizens to indicate their top choice thus making a two party system a necessity. For example in an election with three candidates, a, b, and c if a citizen votes for the least popular candidate, a that is “taking away” a vote from his second choice, b thus giving an advantage to his last choice, c. However under a ranked voting system voting 3rd party does not favor the opposite extreme. Under a ranked system the hypothetical voter’s ballot would look like: a 1, b 2, c 3. Once the votes were counted the votes for the least popular candidate, rather than being discarded, would go to their second choice. This would continue until a majority winner was found.
Under this system primary elections would also not be necessary because all candidates running in an election cycle could be on one ballot. Consolidating to one election would also be more representative of citizens’ actual wishes because more voters show up to the final election than to the primary. As primary elections are run now they are also not fair because they are not standardized, with some states having primary elections and others having caucuses. The primary election also asks voters to choose between political parties. As the laws are currently, a voter may not vote in both the democratic and republican primary elections.
Finally the Electoral College needs to be done away with. We have the technology to determine a winner by actual number of votes. Currently in many states even if a candidate only wins by 51% of the popular vote that candidate gets 100% of the state’s electoral votes. Furthermore electoral votes are not perfectly representative of the population meaning that a single vote counts for more in a less populated state.
We urge congress to re-evaluate the mechanics of the voting system to better represent the people.

current_events

So what's collage like?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

From india, where multiple parties fight for power like hungry hippos, its not better.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the link isn't working try this one https://wh.gov/iMfRt

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know, you try to do it the way it's supposed to happen and thats nice. Buuut the Congress kinda want it this way, with a primary electio

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Totally want to sign, but I'm getting a 404 from the link

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The party system is fine, its the people in the party system that need to be changed

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Write in "No Confidence"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you are rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. But, good luck with that.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That is an awesome comment

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I got 404 not found

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks for letting me know. Maybe this link will work https://wh.gov/iMfRt

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also allowing independents to vote in primaries would be nice FLORIDA. I just have this werid feeling Trump will win and concede same day

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be pretty awesome if it happened.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Democracy in a nutshell.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

find the solution and people will hear you out

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree wholeheartedly with you, but this is like petitioning the foxes to design a new hen house.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Asking congress to fix the broken political system is like asking cancer to cure cancer.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

scarily accurate

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Accurate, unless we somehow found a way to reprogram cancer into killing cancer.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

...this is how a zombie apocalypse is born

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh dear Lord, I hope so!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One reason the elect college was created by the founding fathers was because they believed the people were to easily manipulated. See 2016.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No actually it's to balance the voice of people. Cities have more people than rural areas, even though they have diff views (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's sort of the same reasoning behind how many house reps each state gets

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They feared a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come to power. Hamilton wrote in the Federalist68, power balance was another reason

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Never understood this point, voting for a federal position should ignore state boundaries and give everyone an equal voice per person

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excerpt from Federal 68. http://www.historycentral.com/elections/Electoralcollgewhy.html

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think the electoral college prevents mass manipulation from affecting the elections.. His stance also completely ignores corruption

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well the original intent was for the people to vote for electors not the president directly. We've loosely changed that over time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not arguing that point, but without the two party system, would manipulation be more difficult? I kinda feel herded into one or another

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Corruption can stem from any number of parties, the issue currently is the people feel like they only have two options.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump being unacceptable, many feel there's only 1 option. HRC's fine, but the lack of credible opposition is troubling.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0