A kid w a crayon designed it.

May 27, 2026 4:52 AM

It just kinda looks like a modern aero shitbox. That's not what people shelling out 600k+ for a 4-seater are typically looking for.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I kinda like it! Not a big fan of the color, but I bet it's fun to drive!

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not a fan of the black pillars and wheels

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Giant Cinderella dropper her ugly glass slipper

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's slower than other family evs at 2.5 seconds for 0 to 60. Depending on the trim, the Lucid Air Sapphire can do it in 1.77 seconds for only $240,000 starting price.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah that car is fucking quick.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like how everyone just keeps comparing acceleration weight blabla. We have no idea how it is on the road, the goal is not to accelerate so fast that you almost teleport, the goal is to have a great driving car.

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I actually wonder if Ferrari and Lamborghini don't make more money on maintenance than sales. Required maintenance, mind you,

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who is Lucy V?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But what are the four cheaper electric Ferraris you have to buy first before they invite you to buy this one?

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Looks like the Nissan Leaf

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Better than Elon only using 6 bricks

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Ferrari and Tesla have a grudge match going on as to who can make the ugliest vehicle and stay in business

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

This isn't an ugly car though, it's kind of generic EV design.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Man, if this is Ferrari's entry, Tesla is winning hands down

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Like a fisher price Ferrari. Why does it have to be a Space Ferrari just because it’s electric?

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

do i just have bad taste or does it actually look ...fine?? Like, not for that price, and maybe not 'Ferrari' but it's no cybertruck...

2 months ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

It looks aerodynamic. And in the industry of conspicuous consumption, efficiency is denigrated. It's a compromise on the principle of spending as much for as little as you can get.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I kinda love it, but that color blue is one of my favorite colors.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I usually don't care about cars - especially not sportscars - but this looks like shit.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's fine.
Very standard look for modern EV's.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It looks okay to me save the color. But chisel off some plastic and they could bring it closer to old school (beautiful) Ferrari design

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

your frame of reference got skewed

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it is mostly the baby blue. Wouldn't look all that bad in red. The bonnet is a bit strange, and there's quite a lot of black, but meh.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No, it does look fine. If it had a Honda or VW badge people would love it.

It doesn't look like a Ferrari though.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lots of really weird style choices. "Fine" doesn't cut it when you are talking 20 years wages for most people or the cost of 10 cybertrucks. Anything short of amazing is going to be understandably (imo) mocked as these are supposed to be status symbols and showpieces, not practical cars.

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It ain't conspicuous consumption if it just looks like a practical car that you paid a fair price for.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The people buying these probably don't care about the price, and the blue is likely to contrast with their gas ferarri

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They had to sell something to comply with emissions standards, but they didn't have to like it

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

What's that got to do with design principles

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they design it, and it's ugly fewer people will want to buy it, then they can justify not building another version because the market clearly didn't want one.
It's a way to comply while giving them an excuse to not comply in the future.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a car they don't care about and don't care if it doesn't reflect their design principles. Let the guy who made the imac make it... it's not a car that represents Ferrari

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ferrari started out making tractors.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats Lambourghini

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ferrari started out making a v12 race car

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0