Do you want chips?

Apr 28, 2021 11:12 PM

lampworld14

Views

72588

Likes

1289

Dislikes

19

chips

funny

memes

Hmm, I want something crunchy, crunch, no not popcorn, crunch, not cereal, crunch, hey! Who at all the chips in this bag in my hand???!!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think food companies wanted to include nutrition information, so they made serving sizes super tiny so the info would be useless.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Then you finish the bag and realize chips weren’t what you wanted and reach for something else

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Every bag of chips is family size if your a orphan.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*You're *an

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not me. A full size bag of chips would easily last me a week if I was single

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Depends on the packaging. The kinds I buy have recently shrunk. A bag used to last me a week, now it's 2 sittings.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No doubt. If I buy a kind my family doesn't like it lasts me quite a bit

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only 10?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A "serving size" is just a measure of food, not how much you actually eat. Also... the US has a major obesity problem.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

In this case it's like a scoop of chips for those of us that don't eat a party size bag of lays at once. I mean I want to I just don't

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah. People be like "I could eat an entire party size bag" well... that's an entire days worth of calories. It's just called restraint.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Its not what they expect people to eat its what they think they can put on the side of a bag to make it look reasonable.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Your chips make it to the pantry? Mine bearly make it home

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I multiply amount of servings per bag and calories per serving because that’s my serving size. I’m eating the whole bag.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just ate a tube of pringles. I'm disgusted and I hate myself. I want more.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean crisps?! Fucking uncultured swines!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rookies numbers

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

serving size: 1 bag

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Yes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No matter the size

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The snacketizer!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I always imagined a serving size is like ordering tons of catering and you grab 1 scoop of everything. That scoop is serving size

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its another attempt to divide cooperate produced problems up and pass them to the individual. I like crack flavoured food, that hax my brain

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not actually what "serving size" means

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Giving big info on package how much kcals is in serving and not in the whole thing does more harm than not writing it at all.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can count kcals in whole thing yourself but if instead of “in portion” they would give the kcals in while think I would think twice

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*in whole thing. My autocorrect is killing me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The number would probably scare me. 150kcal in portion sounds neat but I’ll probably eat whole package which is 800ish kcals. Not so neat.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Serving sizes aren't about what humans eat. They're about keeping a low calorie count "per serving".

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

Actually no, legally they have to be based off what people eat. They take nationwide surveys and the serving size is based on what actual /

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

people say they actually eat. So serving sizes are small because regular people lie about how much they really eat

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Low everything. It's a bitch to see all the 0 something only to see it listed as an ingredient. Under 1 gm per serving can be rounded down.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

U continue eating chips while ur really looking for something else u want lol

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who TF wats 10 chips and where do they live?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why dont you mind your own fucking business "experts".

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Experts" == people who want to make the calorie count look good.

5 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 1

Serving size = half a chip. Oh look they are only 10 calories a serving! SMH

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1 serving 130 calories. So a bowl would be 1,300 calories for a small snack. That's like at least 12 bananas worth.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

1) I mean... maybe where you live there's a mandate of 1 serving == 130 calories. That is not the case in the US. With that kind of mandate,

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

2) what would be the serving on something like a diet soda, or water, with zero calories?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3) Imagine the warning labels required on water. "Serving: ∞ Warning: One serving may kill you."

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"Experts" = people obeying the law and basing nutrition labels on what the average person eats.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh huh. There's a thread. Feel free to read it. Or not.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I saw your comments, but your assumption on how serving is size is incorrect so I commented outside of that thread

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) You're clearing up something that appears to be implicit, that's fair enough. But you've essentially already agreed with my comments.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is set by the FDA, it's not chosen by each company, so all chip bags should have a 30g serving size

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Experts: public health experts trying to bring down the number of overweight and obese people from 80% of the population.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Serving sizes are, by law, meant to be how much a person typically consumes, not a suggestion of how much one should.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which is why I always laugh when I see a block of instant ramen that says "Serving size: 1/2 package"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what’s the penalty potato chip manufacturers are facing for breaking this law? Since the consensus is apparent.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1) No clue, ask the FDA. My guess is the regulation requires something like survey data and participant responses to be used to decide what

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

2) a serving size is, self-report data is notorious for being unreliable. Kinda like witness responses.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Actually the amounts are set by the FDA, and a potato chip serving size is 30g. They can use # of chips, cups, etc. But has to = 30g

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wait, are you blokes talking about crisps?

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Potato chips or invented in New York, therefore we are more correct, though crisps make more sense.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The reason America calls fries 'fries' is because by the time America discovered chips, they were already using the term for crisps.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's an Urban Myth. They were invented in England by William Kitchiner.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Could be tortilla chips. Do British people call those tortilla crisps?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't think we have that. We just use Doritos for the same basic purpose which are indeed crisps.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you call all of them Doritos even if they aren't Doritos brand? Like in Canada and I assume the US, there's a brand called Tostitos /1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which is closer to actual tortilla chips than Doritos. And they're mostly sold plain, with just salt, not covered in cheese like Doritos. /2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You use them for making nachos, dipping in guac, etc. Do you have such a thing? What do you call them if you do? I'm just curious. :) /3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sright, mate. Yanks think chips are french, too. Madlads.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I haven't called them French fries in years, just fries. Most menus do the same thing here in the states.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thanks Osama.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't that due to the whole "freedom fries" debacle after France wouldn't support one of the recent wars?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We've called them fries in Canada for decades. I think it's just the normal way words tend to get shortened over time. There's no other /1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

item we call "fries", so putting the French in front of it is unnecessary. /2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Crisps are chips in the US and maybe Canada too, come to think of it. US folks will call you weird for calling them crisps.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Of course Brits call cookies “biscuits” so maybe you are weird.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

No, we call biscuits biscuits and cookies cookies. You're the one that calls them the wrong name. There's a difference between a cookie

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And a biscuit.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That difference being...?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where were they invented and what was the original name?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

England 1817 crisps.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hahaha I meant cookies/biscuits but thanks!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1544, when the kitchen staff of Derwyn, Earl of Biscuit-on-Groat accidentally produced a batch of small, dry cakes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Originally known as 'Cookeys', owing to the dryness and long baking time, they came to adopt a regional name, Biscuit.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Then you pour the bowl, and stand there for a bit longer to eat 10 more because the bowl doesn't fit as many as you thought it would.

5 years ago | Likes 258 Dislikes 1

And then you pour more out because you think you ate too much and it could fit a few more right?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

...NO ONE ASKED YOU DOCTOR.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fair enough.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But yes. The answer is yes. Yes I do. I'm not proud... or in danger of being at my target weight...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Na i just eat half the bag while watching tv til my stomach hurts, stop eating them, then find myself eating more while watching more tv

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Only psychopaths use a bowl

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I use a bowl when watching movies so I can hear the dialog without the crinkling

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What ever Mr. Lecter

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*need it too

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is why ~70% of Americans are overweight or obese

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You're not wrong, I need to lose about 20 lbs. But that particular habit isn't what got me there.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude, this is the 3rd point today where you had a top comment. Awesome!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Haven't I seen you somewhere before? Are you stalking me?! If so... 'ey thorn, wat that gif do?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bowl? I just eat the whole bag

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Family size? But I just ate the whole thing! What now?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's what the bag is for. Using a bowl is just eating chips with extra steps

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The two step method is preferable 1. Open bag 2. Eat chip. Unless we're bringing salsa/dip

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

if you tuck the bottom corners of the bag in you can have a makeshift bowl.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you buy chips @ costco because the unit price is amazing, that's NOT a bowl you will ever be able to finish w/o at least several friends.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0