I want to play this DnD game.

Feb 16, 2021 9:06 PM

huntsnhava40

Views

92238

Likes

4322

Dislikes

54

Credit to Archer Kasai

Are you telling me he rolled two nat 20s

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is Jonathon just a marathon of Johns?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The kissing part caught me off guard. Probably not my first move. Maybe I'm doing it wrong?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Benny: I guide the horses to the side of the river. DM: Roll strength and perception. Benny: *rolls 20 and 1*

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 617 Dislikes 0

I love it. I need to watch this movie again.

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

didn't say where...

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I saw this when I was a child and even then I thought maybe she was going for the beej.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Y’know I saw that one scene where they guy gets the scarabs under his skin at the start (?) when I was quite young and I’m pretty sure I’m -

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

- still traumatised. Never seen any more of the movie

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You really should watch it. It's a great movie.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Plus, the CG will look much less real now, and hopefully rid you of the memory.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My DM always said just cuz you get a nat 20 doesn't mean you jump to the moon.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love The Mummy with Fraser and Weiss. Iconic pair honestly. Both films are quotable.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Always upvote The Mummy. Always upvote DnD. Not a difficult choice on what to do here.

5 years ago | Likes 898 Dislikes 3

Well if two wrongs make a right...?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know what they say, two up votes make a third, smaller, baby up vote. Timmy, one day you'll meet a nice uovote gal and then...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Since you always upvote both topics I will upvote this post as your second upvote

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Side vote?

5 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Save was a nat 20

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Nat 20's don't work on skill checks, folks. Stop pretending your nat 20 on an athletics check is the same as a nat 20 on your attack roll.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Th.... that’s absolutely fantastic and spot on and I love this.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

O'connell: I roar at the undead mummy.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

D&D and the Mummy? This is a very good post.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 285 Dislikes 0

Kevin J. O'Connor was so freaking perfect as Beni! He channeled Peter Lorre into such a delightful minor villain.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

HEY BENNNNYYYYY. IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE RIIIIVERRRRRRRR

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

Goodbye Benny

5 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 0

You don't have any kids... "Someday I might."

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

*Someday I will

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ron Howard Narrator Voice: "He wouldn't."

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Bennie: I let O’Connell know I have all the horses for gloating purposes (rolls a 1)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

These movies fully developed my childhood love for Brendan Fraser. Then he married my namesake in George of the Jungle!!!!

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He married the fat sea witch from the little mermaid? PLOT TWIST

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

George no discriminate.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#3 That's not how skill checks work. Or disadvantage works.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#3 Getting a nat 20 on disadvantage means you have to take whatever the next roll is.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

TWO NAT 20s?!?!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She's sooooooooo hot in this

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nat 20's don't work like that with disadvantage, though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is it spelled Jonathan or Jonathon?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jonothan

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Janothon

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good stuff there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

HEY O'CONNELL v

5 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Nat 20 doesn't mean automatic success. All veteran players and DMs know this. You can't get accidentally lucky into understanding egyptian

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I mean I guess you could have been very lucky and have seen that exact eqyptian phrase translated before? At a stretch.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That one didn't make sense anyway because in the movie they implied he'd had a career in archaeology but had ruined it. Presumably by /1

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

stealing artifacts. He wasn't at good at hieroglyphics as Evie but had some basic knowledge. /2

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ahh that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification =D

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, didn't Jonathan already have some knowledge? Evie makes several references to a 'dead career'.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know what movie I'm watching tonight.

5 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 0

Hobo with a shotgun?

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

What?!? Is that an actual movie title?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You have the great distinction of not seeing it yet. Off you go.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually pretty good

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

99.999% of the time nat 20s don't rewrite reality at my table, but every now and again an edge case comes along that's too awesome to say no

5 years ago | Likes 349 Dislikes 1

I feel that most Nat20 memes are made by people who've never actually played D&D

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you roll with disadvantage and get a double 20, gods above and below will move slightly to the left for this little rearrangement.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At my table you only get a roll if it's possible. If you need the impossible the cleric better roll really low on divine intervention.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The Rule of Cool

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yeah but im willing to bet you get a kick out of them horrid 1 rolls. Ya sick bastard. Double standardsA

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My friend's DnD campaign had a bard that tried to be the "sex happy" meme. Solution: Monster herpes. Giant. Visible. Monster. Herpes.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I'm a bard and the only sexytime I go for is to avoid paying for a room at the inn. Good thing he has low standards.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A friend failed a lock check and rolled to intimidate a locked door. Natural 20 door opened

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Real” DND sounds pedantically boring. If I ever join a game I hope the DM has the same level of discretion as the ones on Adventure Zone.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

DM secretly rolling a % to see if something works due to how awesome it is.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

It's like saying that 5% of the time wishes come true. GTFO.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if a nat 20 won't work or a nat 1 wont fail the players should not be rolling in most cases. for the 1 you roll if it's a party check 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for the nat 20 it could be argued to see just how fucked you are trying to seduce the dragon where a 20 means it find the attempt amusing 2/

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A Nat 20 doesn't mean success. It means "The Best Possible Result Of Your Attempt." Which might mean you fail... but survive the attempt.

5 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

"The dragon laughs at the strange music man, and decides he will be eaten last."

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah a natural 20 is like, you sling a stone and strike the giant right in the forehead at 30 meters. Very impressive, but isn't god powers.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A guy doesn't like, punch through a 2 foot thick stone door sealed by a great powerful sorcerer with his bare fist because he rolled a 20.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Unless he's a high level monk with a few bonuses

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ok yeah, maybe then. But that isn't entirely because of rolling a 20.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

WRONG!!! The nat 20 went back and changed the timeline so that PC would become a monk and choose or gain those exact bonuses

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My favorite was a giant ambushed a bard, bard rolls to secude. Nat 20. DM: you successfully seduce the giant but he still kills you with sex

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Roll for giant to be a bottom, roll for giant to have micropp, roll for giant to be into bdsm, roll for giant to be submissive, roll 4 bussy

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, in 5e a Nat20 is only a crit when fighting. The steal key disadvantage roll would only be valid with TWO 20 rolls. And even then tbc

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you have like -1 in Sleight of Hand you would have a 19. If the threshold would be 20 he would still fail.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yea exactly if a wizard with a str of 10 tried to move a boulder 10 times his weight just cause he rolled a nat 20 doesn't change anything.

5 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 3

That's actually a reasonable time for a nat 20 to be a success tho. The human bdy(and maybe some fantasy races) are insane with adrenaline.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No, stories of adrenaline fueled feats of strength are 1 in a million, not 1/20. Bring in a 20 str goliath and I'll let you roll.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup I use the arrow analogy. Shoot a bow at the moon and a natural 20 isn't going to allow you to hit it - but maybe you catch dinner.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

It could be like, ok, you shot a guy right in the eye at the very limit of a bows range. But it still have to be physically possible.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I mean... maybe he happened to cause just enough stress that it fractured and fell apart without falling on him?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The human body is capable of insane feats of strength under extreme stress

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No. You can't exert more than 100% of what the body can. Few people really risk injury, so they think 100% is lower than what it is.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What the body can is far higher than most think it is. 10x your body weight is possible https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_MQ5t3tgLvU

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bad example then. But the idea stands - if it's physically impossible (not improbably, impossible), then a Nat20 doesn't change that.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Hell yeah, ever electrocuted a corpse?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

BUT if it was in the middle of an action sequence and it would dramatically crush the Goblins chasing the party below maybe /1

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the Wizard's pushing is juuust enough to break the edge of the cliff and cause it to roll off and paint the Goblins across the cavern walls.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For rolling a natural 20 on investigation when there's nothing to find in a space doesn't make something magically appear

5 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 1

“You develop the most sophisticated mental map of the nothingness that for the rest of your life you will remember just how much nothing

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

there was in this box. Years from now you will have dreams that perfectly recount the absolute void that is this box. No other box will ever

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

be as empty to you as this box is, right here, right now. And you know it. And somehow, that knowledge itself makes you start to feel a tiny

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Our GM would do something silly for those like "for a fleeting moment you have a complete grasp of quantum field theory before realizing 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

There is nothing interesting in the room and completely forget about your revelation." 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

If I had a nickel...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"for a moment you think you see that everything is made of cardboard, and have the strangest feeling that none of this is real"

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

"I rolled a nat 20!" "... fine. A chest appears in the room." "I open it!" "Your hand goes right through it and it vanishes. The chest 1/

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

RAW nat 20 skill checks don't auto succeed

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

I hate that it upsets me when memes act like they do. Then that upsets me that I'm that kind of dork.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

RAW, no skill check should be rolled unless success is possible. Why roll a dice if the result can't change anything?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It opens up for more RP. The lich won’t nicely surrender if you roll 25 on CHA check, but he might admire your hubris and make you an offer

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. The classic "I try to seduce the Dragon" could, for example, result in the dragon laughing it's ass off at the tiny humanoid and 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

thus being distracted enough for them to open combat with advantage, sneak some of it's hoard, and/or leg it. Or maybe it's grateful for 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not getting the result you want isn't a failure

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Because players are obnoxiously dense.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Degrees of failure.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3.5e: Assuming you have no bonus to climb. The climb DC on the wall you found yourself on is 24. You roll a nat 20. You make no progress.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you rolled a 19 or less and you fall from wall.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because an attempt ending in failure makes for a more interesting story than just "No"

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, it makes a more frustrating story. The fun of rolling comes from the expectation that the results matter.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For you, maybe. People are different.

5 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Success is always possible. Just not with that character, that skill, or that circumstance. "I roll to kick the moon" -- no. "I roll to pick

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the lock" -- yes, even if a roll of 20 + modifiers will have them fail.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because what may be a success for one may not be for another, there's no way a DM can keep track of everyone's modifiers with everythingelse

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Plus even in the memes they even show the layer rolling without being asked to roll

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you aren't asked to roll, your roll isn't part of the game. That was just you fidgeting and irrelevant.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0