The perfect tweet

May 25, 2022 4:42 PM

bogie41

Views

148883

Likes

2322

Dislikes

34

twitter

politics

I don't have the words for how batshit crazy this is.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The guidestones sound like something The Satanic Temple would erect, except for the one encouragement to embrace eugenics.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Satan be like "Hey, whoa, don't associate me with this lady, I've never met her. She makes me sick. Just doing my job, man."

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This dumb fuck

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As above, so below. Hail Satan. May the Morningstars light shine upon thee. Aaaand fuuuuck organized religion!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lmao this is the same woman who tweeted about getting furries out of schools. For real.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had someone like this campained in Sweden both left and right would have thought it was some wierd joke or something.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is not as bad here yet, true. But we HAVE elected chemtrail nuts and persons who think doctors drug everyone to keep them from rioting.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what is she running as? both sides being equal surely she must be independent certainly no major party would consider her.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Her party is busy with a diddling issue at the moment

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Destroying something on private property which violates no laws because of the opinions written on it. Sounds very constitutional.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Lucifer for Governor of Georgia, 2022 - Slogan: "Can't be worse than the alternatives!"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That sounds like a hodge podge of words to scare people into voting for them. I'd rather vote for ppl fixing real problems, like Gun control

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The Guidestones exist to guide a post-apocalyptic mankind towards "an age of reason". You can see why a Republican would object to that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Freedom of religion means the Luciferian Cabal has as much right as anyone. It's quite unAmerican to try and take that away.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When people "cabal" they mean "jews." They can say whatever crazy shit, as long as they tie it to the jews, it appeals to their base.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Johnny did say to the Devil to "come on back if you ever wanna try again."

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

When that Greene woman sounds like the saner choice.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those are on private property, so the "party for property rights and freedom of speech" want to destroy pvt ppty because of what it says.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Says a person who belongs to the cult that is willing to kill your children.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's gotten to the point where I feel guilty for living in a hard blue state. I have it so easy.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't the Georgia Guidestones tell us how to rebuild society after a collapse?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not really

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do you think her target audience can pronounce 'Luciferian'?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

There's a hard "r" in there so they've got that going for them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's those guys with dirty hair from Jamaica, right? /s

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Who let her out of her padded room?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Please keep Lucifer's good name outta your mouth Kandiss

4 years ago | Likes 199 Dislikes 4

Lucifer? The Light Bringer? You mean the actual good guy in the Bible!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kandiss dick fit tho? Kidding, I don't touch that kind of crazy.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

She lost the primary election fyi.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

By a lot right?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

She only got 3.4% of the votes, putting her in distant 3rd.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

She still got 3.5% of the votes, or over 41,000 (otherwise) responsible adults voted for this. #JustDamn

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I mean 41k republican voters since it was the gop primary, so I don't know about "responsible adults."

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Considering the guidestones are on private property, I am curious how she would legally demolish them.

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

They, and the plot of land, is owned by Elbert county https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She's a christo-fascist nutjob. She would 'make it legal'.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Buy the property?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Owners of the land are the same people who put it up. And courts won't like gov. using eminent domain because it disagrees with speech.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Two months ago I would have believed that.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Months? Five YEARS ago I would have blieved it. Before Trump domained a ton of land to build that dumb wall.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What did the guidestones ever do to her?

4 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 1

They advocate that mankind should act reasonably.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Oh... hahaha, good one then. That's working out great for us.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It mentions avoiding "useless officials" so clearly it's attacking her

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

That a 'legitimate' candidate is running on the platform of "Standing up to the Luciferian Cabal" tells you how far our country has fallen.

4 years ago | Likes 891 Dislikes 6

In Canada we've been wondering where the Rhinoceros Party went.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how do I vote for the Luciferian Cabal? Sounds like a cool party.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

subcivilization level

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More truer words as yours have ever been spoken.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Wow, LaRouche cultists seem so quaint now.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you think those candidates are a recent phenomenon you have a lot to learn.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It shows how far some of the country has fallen. Don't give up on the whole thing because of some loud, rotten apples.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The saying is literally "a few bad apples spoils the bunch."

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Inciting any religion past common colloquialisms, e.x. "oh my God", should be an automatic disqualification

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And how illegitimate and unfit the Republican Party & their constituents have become. End this insanity. Arrest the domestic terrorists.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Please vote. Especially in the midterms. https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this country was colonized by religious nutters who thought they were "standing up to the luciferian cabal" so...not really much of a fall

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Not sure why you're getting suppressed. We've just gotta keep fighting their religious tyranny w/ a religion that gaurantees our rights.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Example: The Satanic Temple fighting for the right to abortion as a religious necessity.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There's a lot of butthurt liberals atm running around downvoting anyone pointing out that the US is right wing and liberals aren't "left"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Democrat politicians* aren't liberal. Yes. Yes yes yes we all know it's better than the alternative, but blindly voting "D" also puts DINOs

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Also fun fact, the Satanic Temple exists largely bc the Pastafarianism movement was declared "not a real religion" by SCOTUS

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This is the same candidate that said "They're not gonna tell us 'separation of church and state.' We are the church! We run this state!"

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Ohhhh, this is THAT psycho??

4 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes, yes it is!

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Why you racist tho?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Someone's gotta fight the KKK.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She got 3% of the vote. She is not a legitimate candidate. Do not treat her like one.

4 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 4

To amplify coma's point, she got 3% of the hardcore Republican vote not the general public.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah the problem is that people like this are still on the ballot and getting airtime and someone is going to be inspired and get more votes

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Please vote. Especially in the midterms. https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3% is mind boggling to me. She shouldn't get 3% of her own family to vote for her, much less 3% of her electorate.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah we have a candidate who goes by "goodspaceguy" on the ballot and runs every election cycle. He's a nutjob. Ignore them.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok good. The idea that she even has THAT much of the vote is concerning, but the idea that she might get MORE is terrifying.

4 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

To be clear, that was 3% in a PRIMARY where a little more than 1 million people voted. So like 30,000 people.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

On the plus side, we now have unofficial stats for people with mental health issues in that state.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately, it's probably only a fraction of a fraction of a fraction

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's 30,000 too many. OBVIOUSLY unstable people shouldn't be eligible to run. At least TRY to hide the fact that you're fucking insane

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Please vote. Especially in the midterms. https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just looked and she got nearly 41k votes with 99% reporting.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

ok so 40k. Still an extreme minority of the vote, and an [insert superlative] minority of the overall electorate.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

She's also going after the furries. Which is the funniest part of this current timeline.

4 years ago | Likes 163 Dislikes 1

If she makes it past the primaries; that could sink her. There are some suspiciously wealthy furries out there.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would have been very funny once upon a time, but now those nuts actively call for violence and I don't find it very funny anymore.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

One or all of her kids is probably a furry. Kind surprised more Republican's haven't made it a talking point with Disney in their crosshairs

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Many of us furries enjoy trolling her on the subject.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Damn libs putting litterboxes in schools. :)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How can anyone see a post like this and, WITH A STRAIGHT FACE, say: "Yup! That's the one! That's the candidate for me!!"

4 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

Because they only judge things by how angry they think it will make "the libs"

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I mean this is the state that elected Marjorie Taylor Greene.

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Hey, don't you curse at me!!!!

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Okay yeah, but have you considered JESUS * GUNS * BABIES?

4 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

Every time I see that, I keep thinking it would be a terrible (amazing) paper rock scissors adaptation.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh shit, you're right! Why didn't I think of that?!?!

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Jesus is shooting babies with guns?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

why; is he running for office in mississippi?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a math problem. Jesus multiplied by guns multiplied by babies

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is what she wants to destroy:

4 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 0

Wonderful video by Tom Scott about them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNPpB_BRZJ8

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So stupid. It's a tourist attraction

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I mean... In the same vein that Confederacy Statues are "tourist attractions." -- I could certainly see a case for taking this thing down.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I've been here! It was vandalized with a bunch of NWO scribbles (new world order)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the fact that she wants to destroy them means she's already pretty deep in the welll

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

...don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of them, the condescending rich bastard that paid for it, or the eugenics they both support, but wtf...

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Mage, thief or warrior

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Always mage.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone who chose thief rules the world now

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What the inscriptions say:

4 years ago | Likes 159 Dislikes 0

other than the 500M clause the Luciferian Cabal seems to like fair practices and a lot of democratic things. I see why the nutbar hates it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

With or without this Kandis lady, humanity isn't following any of these rules...

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

wow how terrible... ?

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

neat! I'd never heard of them before

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Gotta say, #7 is really speaking to me today

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Numbers 1 and 2 are very suspicious. I mean, also, obviously KT is a dangerous extremist peddling harmful lies or insanities.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Everything except 1 and 3 I totally agree with

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not so sure about number 2…

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 3

"diversity" is a very broad term

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly number one and number two can both get pretty eugenics-y And I'm not in love with that even if the Georgia Guidestones are rad

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

I think it's there to tell people that inbreeding is bad, as sus as it's worded

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I’ve heard of sharing STD results before putting out while dating but never DNA results.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It might just be trying to say "don't imbreed" because that is literally a lack of fitness produced by a lack of diversity

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh I read that as "Provide sex education."

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Fitness is a pretty specific and eugenic-y term

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fitness means better people, not family planning. This is pretty blatantly eugenics to me

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I live pretty close to them. They are really neat to see in person. Also every time I've gone to see then I've met a new charming weirdo

4 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Apr 3, 2024 2:10 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Aren’t we all just the same charming weirdo in different disguises?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Time travelers

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hello

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm very curious on how we are going to get rid of the other 7,253,000,000 people.

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

The idea is to regulate and strictly licence pregnancies and slowly, over time, move into a more manageable population size.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It would actually solve a huge number of problems but it's almost impossible to implement.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not to mention any attempt would be a very quick route to tyranny.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think these are meant to be rules for a post-apocalyptic world iirc

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yeah if civilization collapses this is supposed to be a “Don’t do what we did” kind of warning

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Me too. Also what the fuck is that number based off of? That would mean twenty million people in the USA based off current ratios.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

US has nature for days. Do we really need to get rid of 95% of people or do we just need to curb pollution and get off fossil fuels?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

People can't help their consuming behaviour, so the easier way is to control the population size. Or nature will just do it for us.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

As far as I can tell it's on the lower end of stable carrying capacity calculations. Def conspiracy theory fodder.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Climate change is only one part of it. Bottom line is we will eventually run out of food sources as they are rapidly depleting.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not both.gif ?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0