Turtles can’t do math, but yeah

Mar 25, 2022 2:02 AM

zenmaster11

Views

124559

Likes

1833

Dislikes

87

moscowmitch

twitter

Mitch the bitch

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I wish that ancient husk of a human shell would jusr crumble to dust already. Dude is way older than expected retirement, fucking die alrdy

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's how the get more judges in

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/5 of her qualifications is still more than most the other judges

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Refusing to vote is essentially an endorsement.

4 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 5

She's 3/9's of a completely bought and fucked court so who tf cares if it's jesus reborn because it's still not a majority

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which politicians would currently own slaves if possible and why did you choose Mitch McConnell?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 2

Yes

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

At one point i was sure we would hear 13/50 arguments or an atack helicopter joke

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was part of the generation that cheered on their kids who threw rocks when schools became unsegregated.

4 years ago | Likes 593 Dislikes 8

Black people were in literal Zoos when we was a child.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"was"?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Just wait til he hears about communists...

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Righteous burn

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Oh. That's okay, that means the spots aren't filled so Biden can appoint two judges then.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Does his refusal to vote mean that she can’t be elected to the Supreme Court?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, but every single D needs to vote for her, which is exactly half, so VP Harris can cast the deciding vote.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would Republicans EVER confirm another Democrat-nominated SCOTUS? There've been no consequences for their last 3 SCOTUS travesties.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Moscow Mitch probably says he can't be racist bc he lets the domestic help keep their own cup, plate & fork in his kitchen to eat with.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only thing I'd find surprising is if even 1 Republican voted For her.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

the Turdle

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You would think he would be in favor, if he thinks her vote is only 3/5 of one. that's 2/5 less of a vote going blue! /s

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mitch got 1.1 million from Russia to do that

4 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 3

Don't forget his wife can always lean on family money if they need a little help.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:35 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This...is just another imgur post. Not sauce.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

His party has been literally talking about making his own marriage federally illegal - just this past week.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For any other confused folk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-fifths_Compromise

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can McConnell just die. That fuck is a stain on history.

4 years ago | Likes 485 Dislikes 10

He’ll never die. Evil lives forever. Henry Kissinger turns 99 in a couple months

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*Clan McConnell...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But he wont. He will continue to influence law even if we vote against him because he will just hold his seat no matter what.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Strom Thurmond musta shared his beauty tips with McConnell.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lich McConnell died hundreds of years ago, just noone has found his phylactery yet, so he endures evil and indestructible.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's probably something like the entire state of Kentucky

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If he dies, humanity would just make another one of him; until humanity changes.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 13

Maybe but that new one won’t be a once & future majority leader in the US senate

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean...let's hope humanity has changed enough for your statement to be true.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just odd, arbitrary, bad math lol. New assholes are born either way, yes, but one kicking the bucket is still one less

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So much crab rave when he kicks it finally

4 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

2nd only to a-shit- pai.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The South didn't want 3/5s, friend. They, and the North, settled on 3/5s.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Explain please

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The South wanted 0/5ths, that's what the whole fucking war was about.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

The South wanted a whole to get more representatives in government despite not treating them as a person.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 245 Dislikes 8

Wait..if he's claiming Black judges only count 3/5, we'll have room for another one right away!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The definition of "shit-eating".

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Is this a real photo!?

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

It is.

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

I am foreign man, what is he getting? I know the flag and its history.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it's an award from the Sons of the Confederacy, which is as awful as you might expect.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can indeed imagine

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wonder how his wife feels about this.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

She is also Republican, served under the Trump administration. Work(ed) for Heritage Foundation and various other right-wing "think tanks."

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You assume that b/c she's a minority, she has principles? Is that the way you're going?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Um, what? I was condemning her, based on her continued support of the GOP/right-wing agenda. Your reply confuses me.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As a conservative who generally (not always) approves of what McConnel accomplishes in the Senate, Even I think he's a shit biscuit.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 65

Under his leadership his state has dropped to the worst or near worst state in so many metrics. Why do they keep re-electing him?

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

I can't vote for or against him so you'll have to ask people in his state that question.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

What in general do you approve of? Go on, tell us all the good he's done.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What has he accomplished that you approved of?

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

Stopping bad policy I do not want to see at the federal level & putting originalists on the bench along with some policy agreement (btw>

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 57

someone else is downvoting you but it's not me. Downvoting civil comments is a sign of a weak & uneducated mind)<

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 44

The "originalists" he puts on the bench are activist judges who abandon originalism whenever it contradicts their ideology, which is common.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh so it's "stuff I like" kind of thing and nothing of actual value. Neat

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's not an answer. What specifically has he done?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I gave specific answers.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

I've never seen him stop anything but good policy and bring forth bad tho lol. Originalists are nuts too. Anything specific?

4 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

We likely disagree on what is good/bad policy at the fed level, we absolutely disagree on originalism. He stopped the recent voting>

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 37

legislation that I disagreed with. I did agree with some parts of it & if brought up in parts I would support some but not the big bill<

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 30

The problem is that modern originalism is a rhetorical style rather than a set of principles preventing judicial activism.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0