What comes around, goes around.

May 12, 2022 11:29 AM

Lanhdanan

Views

175561

Likes

3531

Dislikes

72

Let’s stop throwing up straw men and non sequiturs and fight the battle where it is. No if, thens. Bodily autonomy is a right. Period.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fight for your right to safe abortions. If abortion isn't safe, neither are you.

4 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 13

Stop arguing against abortion bans as if they have any logic whatsoever. Angry Christian fuckheads want total control of everyone. The end

4 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

Yep this is "if Jimmy Nelson beats you up and takes your lunch money he should logically have to repay it and fall off his bike on purpose"

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

...no. They're doing what they want because they have the political power atm and they won't be persuaded by words.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh! Let's ban divorce next! Then we can all be miserable like our grandparents! Next up, let's get drunk at work, like all the time!

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 5

Can we skip the divorce ban and go straight to being drunk at work?

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Pregnancies resulting from rape should mean automatic vasectomy for the rapist. Or castration for repeat offenders

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Accused rapist is white: "Dismissed. He's a fine young man." Accused rapist is black: "He definitely did it and he'll never breed again."

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

I'm all for hard penalties for rape. I don't want our justice system to be able to physically alter bodies. Just keep them in jail.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s a thought exercise that they’ll punish the victim with life altering and body altering pregnancy but nothing happens to the rapist.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except maybe they go to jail in the best case scenario.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Start with hobbling the rapist and taking their arms. Let them keep their genitals.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 307 Dislikes 11

Honestly? I hear more pro-castration-as-punishment from the right than the left. They're also usually big on controlling who gets to 1/

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

procreate, though the way is more often forced sterilization than vasectomies. This tweet isn't as much of a gotcha as it seems. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Chemical castration was the go-to punishment against råpists here in the past. At least for those victimizing kids.

4 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

And they stopped because it didn't work. It's about power not sex. They still rape.

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

You're right! But this argument isn't even about rape! It's about forcing a woman to remain pregnant.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

about that...

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

We fetishize historical legal figures and a lot of the fucked up mindsets these days sure seem to reflect that.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I absolutely agree... Both parties should be able to back out 100%, at the least risk to them. That is why men to have the right to (1/2)

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

(2/2) "Paper abortion", Oh and y'all in the US... please get on board with bodily autonomy being a human right. You are an embarrassment.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I support bodily autonomy*

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Did I misspell something or did you miss the point... With so few words it is hard to tell... Not all of this fall under bodily autonomy....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't miss it, and the character limitations in general are a pain. I added the askerisk because what bodily autonomy means when it /1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it comes to the topic of abortion is being redefined to mean in all instances with no restrictions of any kind, and personally I cannot /2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Back to "Shotgun Weddings"!

4 years ago | Likes 839 Dislikes 7

And a stain on my shirt

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Abortion laws will mean the bride gets a metaphorical shotgun too?‍♂️

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ok but "guns for everybody" is the most American thing there is.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There is a clause as to who everybody is. Sadly that's not sarcasm

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Under these rules, any man who masturbates should be jailed for mass murder.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

My parents, my brother, and my cousin all had shotgun weddings….

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Are they the same person?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Those still happen, except now it's religious families forcing their underaged daughters to marry their adult rapist

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Years of misery for all involved! Fun times.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Coincidentally, shotgun is also my retirement plan

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Ugh.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look at Mr moneybags over here, able to afford a shotgun

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't say it'd be mine

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those never ended.

4 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 2

Guns got upgraded.

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Machinegun wedding

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"Automatic shotgun weddings" then. :)

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

The aa12, shotgun, drum loaded, no recoil

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kill all the groomsmen with one mag.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How to solve this: Mandate child support no matter what, even if parental rights are surrendered. They're not optional, and (this is key) -

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

make them a percentage of their personal wealth. Not just income, but literally everything. Stocks, properties, investments, crypto, etc.-

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If you're worth a billion dollars, guess what, you have to pay your baby mama 100 mil a year WITHOUT EXCEPTION. Watch how fast they decide-

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

that its ok. You HAVE to punish the rich. It's the only way to change the law.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Stop trying logic. Fight them against their hatred of women.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Uh, 1700s the punishment for rape was to marry your victim (if she was pure beforehand). "Building a home" is used to excuse rape of minors+

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in El Salvador even today, and they have the worst abortion laws. This is not a good argument, or funny. Need more, not less bodily autonomy

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Welcome to Christianity Brother

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why would she want a guy who doesn't want her? Does Dave not understand the concept of abusive relationships?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If women can't have abortions, then they should have the right to decide whether the guy who got her pregnant gets to keep his nads or not.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Abortion needs 2 b legal for a lot of reasons, but what about if the guy wants the abortion and she doesn't? Should he pay child support?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or better yet be forced to pay child support would be the argument after a split up.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, lets force women to deal with thier rapist. That seems morally right. *Sarcasm*

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know this is from 2019, but those trying to roll back the law don't actually care. And Hyper-prolifers would be just fine with this.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea lets focus on the opposite sex instead of the real issue, the fucking republicans making these dumbass rules.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Child support should begin at conception now. Only right way to take care of an "unborn human being" as Alito called it.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

are you prepared for the paternity fraud lawsuits when the wrong man ends up paying.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

the whore men shouldn't be having sex anyway UNLESS they WANTED to make a baby. The slut men can BOTH pay as their punishment for sex. /s

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

but yeah, this is part of the ChristoTaliban thinking about women. They want to punish women who have sex.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A man can pay for a prenatal paternity test if they are concerned about fraud

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I personally know 2 friends who have been in ongoing legal battles for back-due child support for 5+ years. It's fucked their whole lives

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Eeerrrr ok… but what about a child created by rape or incest….? Gotta keep that guy around? Nice idea but flawed

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Doesn't even have to be those things. If the poor pregnant woman wants out of the relationship for any reason you're gonna make it illegal?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not even a "nice" idea, it's a stupid idea. It's better to argue against terrible policies by saying they're terrible policies, rather>

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

than by coming up with other policies that are also terrible but very roughly in the opposite direction.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It has nothing to do with equality. It's all about control.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So breakups and divorce would also be illegal? Pretty stupid idea if you're making the pro-choice argument.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well the rape should hold at least the same penalty as abortion of the pregnancy it caused. And no more "He has a bright future" bullshit /1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/1 maybe add being an accomplice to abortion too, it would not happen without the guy after all. Just a suggestion.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That sounds like it would just exacerbate the problem. Also, child support is mandatory so....

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 13

Maybe states should mandate compulsory vasectomies, and only undo them when the man proves they’re capable of looking after children.

4 years ago | Likes 245 Dislikes 32

Death of parent due to complications of pregnancy/birth of unwanted preg should result in execution of the impregnator as well. Fair's fair.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Let's restart those orphanages since most abortions are performed on women who are already parents.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what you call eugenics. You know, one of the things the Nazis were known for. Genocide without the killing.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Them when does the woman prove she is capable?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We should probably keep eugenics illegal but I get the sentiment.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

In Ohio we've done eugenics backwards. If you know your not yet human is going to have downs syndromeyou can't abort it.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not for long if right wingers have anything to say about it.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Vasectomies are considered permanent changes and should be looked at as such. They are not like deciding not to wear a condom.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So save sperm for when you're ready.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be abused instantly. Who decides who is "capable?" Are the deciders politically appointed? It would be a genocide via infertility

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Right but the Supreme Court is deciding that the government owns everyone’s bodies now. Or is only women who have to put up with that shit?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Don't go giving them ideas. We have a history of sterilization and it is not a road to go down again, Carrie Buck.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We are at 95% successful reverse rate now if less than 10 years ago...maybe we should. This option is getting you deeper into murky water...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Nope, not remotely true. 75% within first 3 years, 40% after 8-10 years. Besides, telling 1 in 20 men they can‘t have childen bc „whoopsie“

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'd like you to site your research journal. Because I can site mine.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then cite away. Because you were the one to throw those numbers out there originally, and I believe you‘re full of shit

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

is pretty darn evil.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

BUT MY BODY MY CHOICES...wait (republican hypocrisy)

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

I can see where you're coming from, but all these "If abortion is illegal, then..." arguments all have severe legal, ethical and/or >

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

scientific or medical flaws. It's much better just to say "Abortion should stay legal because it's an important human right."

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This isn't designed to make a point. It's designed to make the reader uncomfortable. All we want is bodily autonomy

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well then that *is* the point, isn't it?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So instead of 'let's not take away women's rights' we're going with 'let's take away everyone's rights'

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Either it’s all ok or none of it is

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Only the second one

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good. So keep roe as it is.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In other words needing a license to breed. That'd be an interesting debate.

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

The men all qualify. The women do if they're involved... this is just fucked up

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Impossible to enforce unless you're China

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The way they enforced it was that your second kid would get absolutely no benefit from the state. Eg no school, health care etc. So, things

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you hardly have in America already, and what you have the republicunts are actively working to ruin anyways...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good point

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As i’ve pointed out before, they aren’t usually successfully reversible. Science isnt quite there yet.

4 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 10

Maybe we could finally get Vasalgel/RISUG off the ground, or Contraline's ADAM trial although that's a hard block like a trad'l vasectomy.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ectopic pregnancies aren't successful either, doesn't stop GQP from banning the termination of them

4 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 5

Im not disagreeing with that, i’m saying it’s an equally stupid idea as banning abortion

4 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 4

That's the fucking point. Pass laws to hurt women? Turnabout is fair play.

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

No. Losing human rights doesn‘t become right or even better because more people get hurt.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, it’s jut lashing out. Which while understandable, doesn’t get us anywhere.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

They're the same in overstepping autonomy, but are functionally opposites and could lead to the slow end of humanity. In other words, it »

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Actually! 95% reverse rate if less than 10 years ago...still higher than the rate of uncomplicated pregnancies by FAR. so, you a liar?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

For all intents and purposes, they are considered permanent changes. I mean, when do you even determine a start date?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If it's 18, most reasonable guys don't want children till their 30s. You just denied them that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not according to several doctors i’ve seen so idk. I was told between 5-50% in the first 5 years.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Maybe you should site a medical journal, kinda hard to take your word on what cousin Julie told you. Thought that was reserved for facebook

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Some doctors don't keep themselves up to date on procedures they're convinced isn't worthwhile or not in demand

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Lots of docs also won't provide preventative ops unless a person and their partner sign off on getting it done, like if they alrdy have kids

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

These comments about "but child support" are concerning, like there's not more to being a dad than that...

4 years ago | Likes 647 Dislikes 13

How much is child support in the US? Where I live, I think it's like half of the actual costs, like daycare, insurance, housing etc.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know about the US, but in Canada it's based on income. So even if it's nowhere near half the actual expenses, that's just too bad /1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for the custodial parent, they'll have to figure out how to fill the gap. /2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meaning, when the non-custodial parent doesn't have money, the custodian has to fill the gap, no government subsidies/aid?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's pretty hard to get aid in the US. So if one parent doesn't pay (because they don't have the money, or they just skip out), usually /1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sometimes that's the best you can hope for.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ok... we're talking about legal vs ethical. Of course you can have shitty fathers, and shitty mothers.The mother is more "stuck" with the

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

baby than the father is for obvious reasons... she bears and has the child.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's more to being a dad when you want to be, sure. But I sure women should have bodily autonomy, but that comes at the expense of men

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who don't necessarily want a child. And "just don't have sex then" is the naive, childish answer to a two party problem.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, depression has made me a terrible dad, but at least I give my family everything I got and would protect them at all cost

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

These arguments are not about folks who want to be a father. Rapists should pay up, and have no rights to fatherhood of a forced pregnancy

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

The really dark thing is that they CAN (in some places) claim parental rights.

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

The problem is, if you can't get them convicted as a rapist, they'll have the same rights as a non-rapist to their children.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No, they mean in some states convicted rapists are given parental rights by default.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

JFC. That's so messed up.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Anybody who'd need to be forced to do that shouldn't be.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

My father was present physically but not emotionally, unless you count emotional abuse which went hand in hand with the physical abuse.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wish he had just not been there and sent child support.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(1)I can say that child support should be changed. its a reason why shitty fathers dont stick around. I know its not a good excuse but

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

(2) a friend of mine got sick missed a few child support payments and he was sent to jail, lost his job, still owed more child support

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You don't get jailed over a few missed payments, people can report income changes and there are court dates before jail happens.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Most likely jail was for not showing up in court and not missed payments

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

(1)Its what we thought as well but since you are unfimiliare with how fucked the court system is i will tell you this

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

(3) and it was harder to find a job because he went to jail. Its been 8 years and he finally recovered financially from that situation.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

(4) Im not saying we get rid of it or its a good excuse to not be a dad but my friend is a good man and great father He didnt deserve that.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Your right, but targeting the wrong thing. Child support is not at fault here, the problem is living in a system where being sick is trouble

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile my abusive ex didn't pay for 5 years and nothing happened to him. The arbitrary-ness of it is infuriating.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Baby plopping out and their first words being like

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well the problem is we don't want to end up forcing women to marry the guy who got them pregnant, and we can't force a parent to spend /1

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

time with a kid they don't want to parent, because that's harmful for the kid. So the only thing that's reasonable to enforce is child /2

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

support, so at least the poor kid isn't raised in poverty. Hopefully. /3

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

There's also the part where women who can't get abortions don't want the kid either. It's all fucked up.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That too. People don't seem to understand that giving a baby up for adoption is extremely difficult to do. So some percent of women who /1

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I dk… throwing money at something usually tends to do the trick right? /a

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

/s *damn autocorrect

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dad raise kids they dont walk out. Dont gotta be bio dad to be dad

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

the people who tend to make that argument tend to be shitty fathers, so yeah they think that's all it is

4 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 4

Mine actually complained to us about how much he was FORCED to pay.

4 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

That's like my minimum wage job giving us employees a letter with our paycheck complaining about the minimum wage increase

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry your dad was *that* self-centered.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

My ex husband was pissed he had to pay child support and said he was being "taxed" for having a kid. No that's just having a kid.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Jesus, every time i dated a woman with 1 or more kids was always the best. Kids are so much fun… can’t imagine bitching bout caring for em.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

JFC...

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Jentucky Fried Chicken...

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Mine did too. He paid a whole 50 a month.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

At least he paid, mine I've never did.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It automatically deducted; he had no choice. The worst thing was he still rec'd dependant pay, so he wasn't even losing any $.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did he go to jail for it?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Nah, I'm 36 now and back then it wasn't as well enforced in the UK as it is now.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If a woman gets pregnant, then I say every suspected father is on the hook for child support until paternity is determined. As in dude pays.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And no "not my kid, so I get my money back" either. You get a 9 month financial reminder to wrap it in the future.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This is so much bs. No gay man should ever be close friends with a woman under such a law.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You realize condoms aren't 100%? No birth control is which is one of the many reasons abortion is necessary.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You realize the point of this is to be overly draconian for effect, right?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My apologies for thinking Godwin's law wasn't needed on Imgur.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also "but adoption" from people who have no idea what a full-term pregnancy does to a body.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Which is what they like, because it's punishment of women for having sex.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also is about responsibility. Not just economic support but taking care of the kid.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah but some would rather just have child support than a shitty father

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's lots more to it, but that's the argument that impacts the assholes supporting this.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Also, child support is super easy to avoid in most states. Friend’s dad has never paid to support him. He’s a cook at a casino 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And somehow this makes his wages exempt from going to child support. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Of course there is more. NOBODY denies that. But there should be an absolute minimum and that would be child support.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yeah, there should be, but these comments below I'm referring to are acting like it's REMOTELY the same thing which is ridiculous

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Also in at least some states the father can sign away all parental rights to get out of payments.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Wtf‽?!?!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wut

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Only if there is someone adopting the child will they allow that, they don't let you "sign away" child support ????

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is not true.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

He could refuse to sign the birth certificate.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That doesn't accomplish much if the woman or the state want to prove paternity.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was happy to pay my child support, even when they moved 2000 miles away for my ex's schooling. But I wanted to be a father

4 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 3

I worked for an airline and flew to visit them every month for the 2 years they were there, stayed with my ex wife and her new husband

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

That's awesome.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I admire your dedication and wish my ex would do that for our daughter. Kids need the support from their father not just financially.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Then move and follow your kids. You have to FIGHT for that shit. It's what I'd do in that situation with my 2 sons.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 54

So why do men have to "FIGHT for that shit" and women don't have to, yet they need to pay alimony?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

Must not know very many women then.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Women absolutely have to fight for that shit. And are generally far worse off financially after a divorce, because they're more likely to /1

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

have given up a career to care for the kids. If both take care of the kids equally, and advance their careers equally, they'll be making /2

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Yeah... child support exists, they already can't really back out, and they go to jail if they try to avoid it

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 39

Some people think that paying money is equivalent to being a responsible parent. SOME OTHER people think those people are scumbags YMMV

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you think providing money is all there is to bring a parent, boy do I have some news for you.

4 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 7

My dad moved out of state to avoid child support. Just saying

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

It’s often state to state and they can get out of it just by moving away

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It being illigal and consequences being handed down are two seperate things. Plenty of deadbeats dodging jail time over dodging childsupport

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Lots of deadbeat dads out there avoiding responsibility. Threat of jail means nothing to them.

4 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 6

youre not wrong but my point is is that it's already illegal, it's already on the books as a crime

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Sad that being in jail is a better option than being a parent.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Right. Also who will support the mother and child when the other parent is in prison for refusing to help?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

The whole point is you can't FORCE someone to do anything. Period. Not carry a fetus, not care for a child, anything.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

^------

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Child support isn't the same as being forced to carry a fetus to term

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 6

This.

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted May 12, 2022 1:15 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's definitely not the same either

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted May 12, 2022 1:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Chill, dude. Disagreeing with you is not calling you an enemy.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

100%! Plus not all states force fathers to work. My ex pays $15 a month in child support bc he's a SHD dad to his new kids.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Of cause not, no one says it is... The risk is different, but stile to health especially in the 3rd world where healthcare is for profit 1/3

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/3 Can't pay... Poor? Doesn't matter... Garnished wages/jail, which result in worse care aka greater risk of death... With it not being

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/4 with it not being your choice to have the kid... So not the same, but with some striking similarities...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4/4 cost of children should be paid by society, not just the parents. It is after all us all who benefit from there being a next generation

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0